[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: osr thread bitches.png (7.1 MB, 1665x2048)
7.1 MB
7.1 MB PNG
Welcome to the Old School Renaissance General, the thread dedicated to TSR D&D, derived systems, and all content compatible with them.

>Troves, Resources, Blogs, etc:
http://pastebin.com/9fzM6128

>Need a starter dungeon? Here's a curated collection:
https://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/94994969/#95006768

>Previous thread: >>96799302

Thread question: What is your fav monster?
>>
New to OSR systems
what is some old-school system (i.e. which book do I get) and modules if I want to run a short 1-3 session adventure to get some OSR interest among my town's ttrpg scene?
>>
>>96815697
I'm sorry?
>>
>>96815710
Just download
"Moldvay/Cook BX D&D"
and
"B2 Keep on the Borderlands"
>>
>>96815731
>"B2 Keep on the Borderlands"
I considered that one but it seems to be to large to keep it 3 session or less
>>
>>96815729
the previous thread was autosageed by post limit at that point so I made I a new one
Is there some sort of monopoly or something?
>>
>>96815748
so what?
OSR isnt completing some pre-set story, its about adventuring: killing things underground for treasure and glory.
also, play BX completely RAW and BTB
>>
>>96815761
Your attempt to play dumb fools nobody, however, we can simplify this down to: yes, for your personal purposes there exists a monopoly which excludes you. Also, new threads should not be made until the old one is on page 10.
>>
>>96815813
>OSR isnt completing some pre-set story
ok but some sort of closure would be appreciated especially since I want to make a good impression so players are willing to start a lengthier campaign
>>
>>96815748
Hop over to the other thread and repost your question. I'll help as best as I can with advice over there.

This one was, unfortunately, made by one of our shit stirrers in residence so it's not going to get any half-decent answers.
>>
>>96815822
>for your personal purposes there exists a monopoly which excludes you
last time I checked neither 4ch nor /tg/ was your personal website so how about you fuck off with your bullshit
>until the old one is on page 10
bullshit
it's perfectly fine to make one if a thread hits the bump limit which it did
>>
>>96815842
are you for real?
what difference does it make?
also I like the art in this one better
>>
>>96815842
Bruh, you're replying to the troll. It ought to be obvious from the fact that the two "sides" of the "conversation" and his open shitposting e.g. >>96815857 all read exactly the same and have the same typing tics. He's too dumb to samefag effectively.

>>96815857
>bullshit
>it's perfectly fine to make one if a thread hits the bump limit which it did
Incorrect. You are wrong, also retarded, also walk into traffic.
>>
>>96815868
>are you for real?
It's a long and sordid story.
>what difference does it make?
Most regular posters are over there while this thread is likely to be a ghost town apart from one guy trying to keep it alive with pure force of autism.
>also I like the art in this one better
It is a banging dragon.

>>96815881
>You're replying to a troll
I choose to believe the best in people and that the occasional newbie does show up.
Put it on Blackstone, if he is a trolling shitbag then better he get a sincere answer now and then than a newbie be coated in bile for asking an honest question.
>>
File: bf1-cover-small.png (13 KB, 100x134)
13 KB
13 KB PNG
>>96815813
also how does BF1 Morgansfort: The Western Lands Campaign compare to B2
>>
>>96814299
What does "FOE GYG" mean?
>>
File: 393473.jpg (396 KB, 900x1277)
396 KB
396 KB JPG
Why is everyone here so autistically aggressive / aggressively autistic?
>>
how come the b/x omnibus hasn't been updated to remove the errors?

and why the fuck is the art so low res
>>
>>96815731
>"Moldvay/Cook BX D&D"
is that the one?
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/110274/d-d-basic-set-rulebook-b-x-ed-basic
https://www.drivethrurpg.com/en/product/110792/d-d-expert-set-rulebook-b-x-ed-basic
>>
>>96815905
It doesn't mean anything.
>>
>>96815900
>I choose to believe the best in people and that the occasional newbie does show up.
Buddy. Don't be retarded. A newbie isn't going to show up within the first minutes of a troll thread being posted, asking a stereotypical question in the exact same cadence as the troll. Not to mention he tried the exact same ploy the last time he posted a troll OP. Get a grip.
>>
>>96815917
It's because this is a troll thread, so nothing good can possibly come of it.
>>
>>96815581
You grab Moldvay B/X and run Castle Amber.
>>
>>96815958
I don't get it why are you so salty and what is exactly the offense you have with this thread
You are more than welcome to participate in the thread
it's a public anonymous board after all
>>
>>96815970
>Castle Amber.
anons please help me understand if this is trolling or genuine advice?
I'm skipping through the wiki article and it doesn't seem like it was exactly highly rated
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Amber_(module)
>The worst module in the X series.
>did not recommend this adventure for purchase
but then again the article mentions it is part of the top 30 modules I've heard being mentioned before
>>
>>96815748
Big is good. You're not trying to 100% everything, you play for the time you got.
>>
There must be a lot of w*men here because I see a lot of missed periods.
>>
>>96816026
It's funky and weird, but it's also really good. If you read some of the Chronicles of Amber before playing it, it makes a lot more sense.
>>
>>96816042
appreciate your reply
I would like to run it as second pick after I recruit some players
But as I already mentioned before for the first adventure I want to make an impression [to actually recruit players] so some sort of closure would be anticipated
>>
>>96816059
what, you don't like women? a bit gay for the cock I suppose?
>>
>>96815761
>the previous thread was autosageed by post limit at that point so I made I a new one
>with my truncated bullshit OP
This moves you from tourist to troll.
>>
>>96815935
https://i.4pcdn.Morg/tg/1431738654868.Mpdf

Just remove the capital M's.
>>
>>96816122
I was searching for answers in archives and at the point I was getting desperate I saw the current thread was at post limit and I found this really cool art I liked and I wanted to participate
I just took the description from the thread in the archives, the OP from the previous live thread reads like it was written by someone having a stroke, this one is clean and simple

I don't see the problem
>>
>>96816177
That means (you)'re the problem. Funny that.
>>
>>96816108
I may be a homosexual, but y'all are faggots.
>>
File: rude.gif (641 KB, 400x200)
641 KB
641 KB GIF
>>96816200
rude
>>
>>96816026
You can find any adventure in the world just by searching its name and .pdf.
Read through some of it, maybe even play through it, and if you like it, then you can do the whole buyfag thing after you're sure its worth the money.

Castle Amber is okay but maybe not a starter adventure. Keep on the Borderlands is more traditional.
In Search of the Unknown is a very basic adventure designed for beginners.
>>
>>96816098
>some sort of closure would be anticipated
Maybe they'll all die.
>>
>>96816216
>Search of the Unknown
thanks anon
seems like exactly what I was looking for
>>
File: be-fucked.gif (773 KB, 498x254)
773 KB
773 KB GIF
>>96816210
>make troll thread to be a shitfuck
>calls others rude
nou
>>
>>96816177
>I just happened to find an ancient /osrg/ OP image
lmao, pathetic
>>
>>96815731
>B2 Keep on the Borderlands"
That's the one that Gygax replaced as an intro module only because he himself wrote it and wanted all the royalties for himself.
>>
>>96816026
You won't get actual advice in this thread.
>>
>>96816358
why is that?
apart from one or two bad apples
who keep calling me names for taking an old thread OP and never explaining why it even matters
everyone else seems helpful and I actually did have a recommendation which on further reading seems to be just what I needed see >>96816216
>>
>>96816424
Because you're a fuckhead.
>>
TROLL THREAD. REPORT AND DON'T ENGAGE.
>>
>>96816424
It's retards being buttblasted that the OP does not exclude 2e.
>>
File: 17171.jpg (70 KB, 605x814)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
What is the best class in every system? I know in 1st edition its probably ranger/cleric early on and wizards at high level. And 2e is probably the same. but what about in OD&D for example?
>>
>>96816582
wdym by best class?
this isn't a solo game unless you were asking specifically for a solo game
a party needs a bit of everything
>>
>>96816582
Fighting man in everything.
>>
>>96816582
At high levels, magic-users are incredibly OP if they have the right spells. But, Fighting-men are still the best combat class, though that also doesn't mean as much in OD&D.
>>
File: marilith.gif (60 KB, 300x360)
60 KB
60 KB GIF
>>96815556
>What is your fav monster?
>>
File: tanatmar.gif (59 KB, 300x360)
59 KB
59 KB GIF
>>96817006
This art is much better though.
>>
>>96815917
The foundational components of OSR kind of go hand-in-hand with autism. Lots of numbers and rules and little things to argue about. It's also why something like pigeon racing or competitive sudoku is 80% people on the spectrum. It's the reason why the OSR community had trouble forming and remains split into various subgroups/subgenres, rather than ever really being a cohesive whole.
>>
>>96815935
lmao fucking retard
>>96816582
dogshit book
>>
>>96816657
There can still be a best class. Simply meaning the one that contributes the most to the party. Clerics seem to contribute the most early on because they are decent martials and can also contribute some spells.
>>
>>96817329
How can we cure this?
>>
>>96815905
It's the sound someone makes when they've got a corpse dick lodged in their throat.
>>
File: BVMHgS5.jpg (92 KB, 1751x725)
92 KB
92 KB JPG
>>96815581
If you really just want to generate interest, grab the Tomb of Horrors. For some unknowable reason, that's the OSR adventure that keeps surfacing in the public zeitgeist.
I'd wager it's mostly a mix of reputation (as being extremely challenging), it being written by Gary Gygax, and just the evocative name, because the adventure itself is not really fun to play through and it's filled with less "challenges" and more just "dick moves". But, even though it's not fun to play, it's definitely an experience and what anyone interested at all in any edition of D&D should try out just to see what all the hub-bub is about.
>>
>>96817631
thats a horrible fucking idea for a DM and Players new to OSR you absolute chucklefuck
>>
>>96817639
It's giving people what they want and are interested in doing (playing the big famous adventure in its original form), along with the caveat that even if they don't enjoy it, most other adventures are much more fun. Also, ToH is really quick because it's a tournament mod that people played for speed, so they can go through it, suffer and die or maybe succeed, and then go play a fun adventure.
>>
>>96817329
shut up ACKSshill
you really think "rulling over rules" means you need more rules? You don't know shit about anything, that's why you've never convinced anyone to play your crappy game.
>>
File: standards.png (24 KB, 500x283)
24 KB
24 KB PNG
>>96817673
I'm not talking about the rules of just one system.
Even just trying to get into OSR has people comparing OD&D and AD&D, and 1e and 2e, and OD&D and Basic, and Holmes and Moldvay and BECMI, and so on and so on. The joke is that they made Basic to try and make D&D simple, and decades later it's mostly just helped to make everything more complex.

>>96817543
If someone here had the cure for autism they wouldn't be playing games, they'd be banging all the gold-diggers chasing all the money they got from selling that secret.
>>
>>96817670
confirmed, youre a genuine moron, and a nogames to boot.
>>96817673
what the fuck are you talking about, you actual delusional schizo?
>>
>>96817631
This is dumb.

Especially if you're trying to drag in 5e players using Tomb of Horrors. They'll just go play the 5e version instead.

All versions of Tomb are shit.
>>
>>96817748
>>96817808
Ask ten people who've never played an OSR game whether they want to play Tomb of Horrors or [Any other Adventure], and at least five of them will say Tomb of Horrors.
>>
>>96818089
sure, and it will be a terrible experience since:
A. the DM is completely new
B. the players are all completely new
C. ToH is not representative of 'normal' OSR gameplay
D. ToH is a semi-competitive point-scoring tournament module
now fuck off, you retarded tourist
>>
is this the knave thread?
>>
>>96818147
Starting at the bottom means there's only one direction you can go.
>>
dogshit b8, nogames troll
>>
>>96817043
>snakebutt
>>
File: RustMonster.jpg (269 KB, 683x955)
269 KB
269 KB JPG
>>96815556
Favorite is rust monster because fuck your armor. But I always thought it was lame that they can't even attack other than by destroying metal stuff. Makes it pretty obvious that their only purpose is to deprive the players of weapons and armor.

That also brings up a question. How good would full plate still be if the character lost just the chest plate and only their torso was exposed?
>>
>>96818186
No, this is the troll / hijack thread. Knave is a good fit for the NSR thread, though.
>>
>>96818377
When I was really young I actually had one of those plastic toys it was based off of. Wish I still had it, it might be worth something now.
>>
>>96818471
It's not.
>>
How can osrfags claim ‘rulings over rules’ while also holding the position that osr is vasily different from narrative-centric systems. It's contradictory.
>>
>>96818638
People sort of lost the meaning of what "narrative-centric" system actually means, thanks in part to a lot of trolling and shitposting.

An actual narrative game is something like Fate, where players don't just have control over the actions of their character, but can directly help change the world, insert story elements, and are even expected to call up situations that are detrimental to their character, like if their character has a trait where they're being chased by the Yakuza, when they enter a tea shop they might suggest to the GM that the tea shop has ties with the Yakuza.

To a troll though, a narrative game is any game that has more story than "There is a dungeon, you have to go in it."
>>
>>96818638
"osrfags" have lots of different opinions. Of course they're going to contradict each other.
>>
>>96815901
I'm the guy that posts updates about my BFRPG campaign every week. I like the game a lot have ran my current campaign for 52 sessions...
The campaign I've ran used BF1 Morgansfort as it's base that I built on, and honestly I wouldn't use it again. Basically it does everything B2 does, but worse. Highly recommend just using modules from other stuff or just writing your own settlement with a large dungeon nearby.
>>
>>96818828
>The campaign I've ran used BF1 Morgansfort as it's base that I built on,
:D
>and honestly I wouldn't use it again. Basically it does everything B2 does, but worse.
D:
>>
File: images.jpg (48 KB, 377x530)
48 KB
48 KB JPG
I've only been a player and I've only played 5e. I want to run a game and am interested in OSR. How is OSE? I want physical books, so I'm not interested in systems that are PDF only.
>>
>>96819342
If you want real answers this is not the thread for you, as it's a troll thread made by a retarded sperg. Try >>96815749.
>>
>>96819395
Is there an O.S.R. version of the World of Darkness?
>>
>>96819342
It's solid. Slimmed down and neat, but I'm going to have to say just playing 5e doesn't make you some sort of abject retard who needs to be babied. Not saying OSE is babied, but the best question really is what are you looking for in an OSR game?

If you just want something to play, OSE will work. Might want to try Dungeon Crawl Classics, it's in the same vein.

But you can also go for something like AD&D, which has a little more to build from.
>>
File: Succubus-1e.png (97 KB, 360x457)
97 KB
97 KB PNG
>>96815556
>Thread question: What is your fav monster?
The best.
>>
>>96819342
I like it.
It's an easy rec to people even with zero RPG experience. Clear language, clear rules.
The books also don't look like shit, so that's a plus.
>>
>>96819407
If you just want VAMPIRES, the best I can say is maybe grabbing some Ravenloft and Draccing things up.
If you want modern day emo kids wandering the streets battling against despair and hunger, why not just stick with WoD?
>>
>>96819342
BX vs OSE comes down to flavor vs intelligibility. OSE is much, MUCH easier to actually use but a lot of the old-school charm and/or jank (YMMV) is removed as well.

Given that you're new to OSR I'd say that OSE is the safest bet but go download both and see which you like and then buy a physical version. Or just blind buy both, if you're willing to shell out a bit more. OSE is $70 new IIRC and you can usually find copies of the Basic and Expert rules on ebay for $15-20 each.
>>
File: Spoiler Image (115 KB, 498x261)
115 KB
115 KB PNG
>>96819407
None I know, but there is an OSR WoD at least.
>>
>>96819445
AD&D doesn't really add anything over Old School Essentials Advanced Fantasy.
OSE Classic Fantasy = Cleaned up B/X
OSE Advanced Fantasy = Cleaned up AD&D.
>>
File: kSHx9Cs.png (438 KB, 666x300)
438 KB
438 KB PNG
>>96819342
>I want physical books
I wish the 1e rulebooks weren't so pricey. They look awesome. How many people here actually own them?
>>
File: ADDpix.jpg (227 KB, 970x545)
227 KB
227 KB JPG
>>96819894
Only physical RPG books I still have were gifted to me a decade ago, these WoTC 2e rereleases.
Not my favorite RPG, but probably my favorite looking RPG books. Real nice packages, everything premium.
>>
>>96817748
Its just boogyshill. Ignore them, they're a troll and made this thread to fuck with people.
>>
>>96819993
Those ARE kinda sexy.
>>
File: AppendixN.png (1.72 MB, 692x1590)
1.72 MB
1.72 MB PNG
>>96816070
>If you read some of the Chronicles of Amber before playing it, it makes a lot more sense.
People should read those regardless.

The Appendix N is a solid set of books, and one of the easiest ways to improve your games is to go through and read as much of them as you can. Though, not necessarily in alphabetical order like they're listed. Reading Zelazny should actually probably be a priority over most of the other authors.
>>
>>96817329
>rather than ever really being a cohesive whole.
It's better off that way.
>>
>>96819993
These aren't OSR rulebooks, however. This isn't an old-school edition.
>>
>>96820259
...I have to agree. Everyone being able to do their own thing and not fight about it is much better than anyone trying to get everyone to conform to one standard.
>>
>>96820094
>faux leather
>half-naked, glistening people
>exposed thighs

Putting the Dungeon back into D&D.
>>
>>96820285
What are you even on about?
>>
>>96820555
Don't engage with that troll please. Just ignore him,
>>
>>96818828
thanks for your reply anon
do you have a say on any other BF adventures? are some worthwhile? I like the concept of a fundamentally free game based on an old beloved game, so I want to try it out in some regard
PS
I've read your reports, they are a fun read
that's what got me thinking about BF in the first place
unfortunately the previous osrg threads had a sperg who was insisting BF is offtopic
>>
>>96819342
OSE by this time should be considered the industry standard in terms of print quality, art, layout etc.
it is both B/X and AD&D compatible (classic fantasy vs advanced fantasy)
it's hard to go wrong
the only thing is that it has a lot of books by this point so you would make yourself a favor in watching some buying guide if you want to get all the right stuff in just one go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Crzlhy-0yRI

also OSE basic rulebook is a free download
you can check it out and see if you like it
>>
>>96819993
these do look rad
probably pricey though
>>
>>96820675
>OSE by this time should be considered the industry standard in terms of print quality, art, layout etc.
if we lived in a better world
OSE is well above the standard and there was much more time and dedication put in making it look good than most games.
>>
>>96820555
that anon is on his personal crusade against 2e and Hickman-style adventures
probably a no-games faggot who watches too much retarded gatekeeping content on the internet and builds his identity around being a gatekeeper to what people can and cannot enjoy

ignore him
he will never go away despite claiming this isn't the one trve osrg because the OP doesn't exclude 2e specifically that's what the OP always was before this retard and his fuck buddy hijacked the general
but if you feed him it will lead to walls of text with him sperging out
>>
>>96820725
>personal crusade against 2e and Hickman-style adventures
it's one of the basic things about OSR
OSR is a response to hickman style adventures
it's not one anon, is whoever is willing to tell you again that you're being retarded
>>
>>96820765
>OSR is a response to hickman style adventures
you are literally retarded, but humor me this
hickman style adventures are 80s
OSR started in the middle 2000s
how. the. fuck.
is it supposed to be a response to hickman style adventures

PS
naturally we shouldn't feed the trolls
replying only to make sure newbs see this as a blatant lie
>>
>>96820567
>>96820725
Ok i'll ignore him, thanks.
>>
>>96820725
>>96820776
You dummy. Just ignore him.
>>
>>96820776
When Hickman did it it was new and interesting, then everything TSR and then WotC printed followed the same railroad format. Yes, it lasted more than 20 years, how is that confusing when OSR also lasted 20 years?
>>
>>96820798
It's not confusing him, he's being deliberately obtuse.
>>
>>96820285
>aren't OSR
>old-school edition
strictly speaking all old-school editions are not OSR
They are just that, old-school editions



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.