[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Go back and read some old books
>Gamma world encourages 4d6 drop the lowest
>ADnD recommends making a new character if your character sucks
>Many other games says that your character is supposed to be elite
>The only game that makes you take a shit character is...2nd edition dnd
>>
me, the one hit point mage
>>
you forgot B/X retard
>>
>>96849015
OP's a shitposter. Probably thinks each Basic iteration is a new edition.
>>
>>96848953
>Retarded complaint thread.
Didn't read. Have you tried not playing D&D?
>>
>>96848953
>Different games have different styles of play
This is shocking news to /tg/...
>>
File: late80sAsFuck.jpg (254 KB, 1300x861)
254 KB
254 KB JPG
>>96848953
>The only game that makes you take a shit character is...2nd edition dnd
From the AD&D 2nd edition Dungeon Master's Guide, Chapter 1: Character Ability Scores:
>Method I Disadvantages: First, some players may consider their characters to be hopelessly average. Second, the players don't get many choices. Using method I, only luck enables a player to get a character of a particular type, since he has no control over the dice. Most characters have little choice over which class they become: Only one or two options will be open to them. You might let players discard a character who is totally unsuitable and start over.
Method I is 3d6 down the line, by the way.
>Hopeless Characters
>At the other extreme from the super character is the character who appears hopeless. The player is convinced his new character has a fatal flaw that guarantees a quick and ugly death under the claws of some imaginary foe. Discouraged, he asks to scrap the character and create another.
Note how scrapping the character at creation is a choice made by the player. Inb4 "You might let" and "he asks" become semantic sticking points
Then there's this further down:
>Dealing with Dissatisfied Players
>All of the above notwithstanding, you don't want to force a player to accept a character he doesn't really like. All you will do is lose a player. If someone really is dissatisfied, either make some adjustments to the character or let him roll up a new one.
If this isn't one of the core books encouraging number fixing for player satisfaction at character creation, I don't know what is.
We knew already, but OP is massive, raging homosexualist.
>>
>>96850879
which muppet is that behind the hot lady?
Is that Gumbly Graggle?
>>
>>96850879
I remember Gygax writing several times that forcing someone to have a shit character is just bad game design because all it leads to is "I kill myself, and depending on method possibly some other characters too, can I reroll now?"



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.