I think this is the first time I've ever physically cringed from reading OOTS
>>96904333That's not something you should be bragging about.
>>96904333What's cringey about this? You did see the official D&D art that this is a riff on?
>>96904333In the next panel he proceeds to explain what celibate is to a clueless beholder, and beholders were always known for weird and messy ways of breeding. There is nothing woke about this. Dumb ragebait thread.
>>96904578The one where the evil beholder turns everyone gay?
The OOTS thread is still on page 1, OP.If I were exactly a year younger, I would have assumed you had made this new thread in error.>>96884914
>>96904578>thinks Rich would dare to make fun of that piece
>>96904658Beholders are Asexual Retard, they reproduce without a partner. If you had read the rest of the comic, you'd realize that's what it was saying.Gayness lies in the eye of the reader.
>>96904748what happened exactly one year ago in your life?
>>96905319He was molested by a gay beholder.
>>96904333Anon, go read up on Beholder biology and reproduction and you'll realize that is LITERALLY THE JOKE.
>>96907692It's honestly not that funny of a joke
>>96907729The joke is at the expense of Wizards for having conflated the two things.
>>96907746Then why is nobody laughing?
>>96907785Who is "nobody?" You aren't everybody, so I don't really see how you'd feel reasonable saying that.
>>96907803I'm not Everybody, anon, I'm Polyphemus. Nobody's the guy crashing at my pad, and he told me how unfunny this comic is.
>>96907853You know what? Respect. Actually a pretty funny response. I love the Odyssey, and I'm gonna have to steal that.
>>96904333Ace-sexual supremacy!!!
>>96907853If nobody thought it was unfunny, why was he laughing?
Based RichBro's been writing this comic since like 2004.No way he's on board with all this homo shit being shilled.Real 3aboo fags remember when WotC didn't do this cringy pandering.
>>96908617WotC had lesbian succubi in 3e, anon.
>>96908642lesbian succubi are hot
>>96908617Rich intentionally doesn't reveal V's gender, or their spouse's gender, even after all this time. It's evolved from a joke about elven androgyny into being representation.But you know, anybody who actually understands that human sexuality is different than a creature's reproductive capabilities knows that WotC was being obtuse by putting a beholder in as though it were asexual representation. Which is what Rich is pointing out. He gets it.
>>96904333Your cringe threshold is incredible low. Never interact with the public again, for your own sake.
>>96904333beholders can't have sex, they reproduce by basically budding little beholders out of their dreams into reality like weird psychedelic spores
>>96908642>WotC had lesbian succubi in 3e, anon.succubi are shapeshifters who'll fuck anything, wotc has had jokes about Sabine using her shapeshifting in the bedroom with Nale for like 15+ years
>>96904333why?Is the beholder gay?that's cannon now in D&D aparently
>>96908642That's fine if it's a rare thing and they're actually attractive.>>96908658>Rich intentionally doesn't reveal V's gender, or their spouse's gender, even after all this time. It's evolved from a joke about elven androgyny into being representation.It's funny though. It's not representation, if it "evolved" like that then it's his gay SJW fans projecting their mental illness onto his comic. It was just an innocent joke that got dragged out. Might even have some relevance at the very end. Or maybe it will never be revealed.Either way, it's like Eowyn "I am not man" it's only SJW shit if you view it in bad faith. Whereas even if you view the modern WotC shilling of alphabet freakshit in good faith, it's still annoying, and it's pathetic corporate pandering at worst.
>>96905319A year ago I realized this is a dead board filled with societal backwash that only remains because it can't make it anywhere else.
>>96910099I am fine with it as long as it keeps you, personally, agitated enough to complain.
>>96910264okay.enjoy your retarded future that you didn't give a fuck to stop because it made other people mad.
>>96904333This was so stupidly cringe and the joke was so stupid I laughed.
