[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1765205723533371.jpg (927 KB, 1600x900)
927 KB
927 KB JPG
Is Age of Sigmar good yet?
>>
>>97253903
Post your models and I'll tell you.
>>
Nah
>>
>>97253903
No, but it has some nice model kits. they dont really work too well as game pieces.
>>
>>97253922
Models of what?
>>
>>97253937
Whatever miniatures really.
>>
File: 1746186835689984.jpg (585 KB, 1848x2598)
585 KB
585 KB JPG
>>97253952
Heres some of my quite dusty Reiksguard
>>
It was for a brief period a few years ago. Now it's the same lukewarm dogshit as 40k.
>>
>>97253903
No.
>>
>>97253903
Who cares? The Olde World is coming along nicely, and soon we'll be back to proper WHFB.
>>
>>97253996
>soon we'll be back to proper WHFB.
how so
>>
>>97253959
>>97253952
I showed you my models, now answer me
>>
>>97253996
>soon we'll be back
The game has been out for a year? Two years? And it's still not proper wfb? Sounds like a massive failure.
>>
>>97253903
It's very close. They just need to give points to endless spells and faction terrain because otherwise, it's objectively like $200 bucks more expensive ot play than 40k.

I like that it really pisses off boomers.
>>
>>97254047
Liking something out of spite is always a good endorsement of its quality
>>
>>97253959
nah it sucks, stay your dusty ass in the old world boomer.
>>97253996
>TOW gets 1(ONE) new faction
>only new boxes for 3 of the factions
>everything else is either not sold or 3 decades old
yeah I'm sure it'll be great when it's finally got all the factions supported in 2055
>>
>>97254130
thought you guys were meant to be nice
>>
>>97253903
Hard to swallow pill: it has always been good
>>
>>97253959
>>97254004
Nta, these are some ancient looking reiksguard anon.
In any case, it's very different from whfb. If you're diehard into fantasy chances are you won't enjoy aos. It's very different, and just not the replacement that gw wants (or wanted) it to be.
As for the actual game, it's alright. 2nd edition was widely considered the peak. Current edition (4th) has solid core rules, but they sucked all the flavour out of warscrolls and armies. If gw manages to turn that around and stop having every fucking ability deal d3 damage on a 3+ the game will be sovl again.
>>
>>97253903
No, you honestly missed the good period. Late 2nd edition was great, 3rd was okay, and 4th is fucking awful.
>>97253996
TOW desperately needs to get some actually interesting factions added. I like the game, but it needs the proper Warhammer flavor.
>>
File: IMG_2287.jpg (733 KB, 1650x1024)
733 KB
733 KB JPG
>>97253903
It’s got a lot of neat ideas, the game itself is fun. Not something I can see myself playing every other week but it’s nice to play spearhead at the LGS. Every so often.
Usually I just stole what I like from the setting for my own projects.
>>
>>97253903
>does this pile of shit smell any better now that it's sat in the sun for a few hours?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.