About to start a daggerheart one-shot that could potentially lead into a stable groupWhat am I in for? I thought there'd be more fanfare for this
>>97332330>What am I in for?Rank mediocrity.
whatever the standard quality of your group usually produces. if they are not actively disinterested, at least.
>>97332330>What am I in for?Something even the creators of the game wanted to avoid, lmao.
>>973323305e but "better" (latin for worse). At best you're going to get the average 5e experience you would with those people, at worse you're going to get bored.
>>97332330An okay-ish system that is way more fully of arbitrary game logic about what a character can and can't do based on randomly earned metacurrencies and video game-y attempts at "balance" through likewise arbitrary restrictions on what characters can or can't do.Some people like it, others don't even care it exists. CR/Darrington got their fans to buy it, and then made a bunch of retarded excuses for why they won't be using it for their main campaign after they already sold it to their fans.
