[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1665315656706.jpg (17 KB, 480x360)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>Dark elves exist to be evil elves
>There's occasionally orcs that are noble savages rather than pillagers
>Even dwarves have some evil equivalents like chaos dwarfs in warhammer and whatnot
What would a "Dark" equivalent to gnomes be like? How do you corrupt a little jolly bearded man from the woods into something evil?
>>
>>97353846
kobolds have filled this role in dee and dee for a long time
>>
>>97353846
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redcap
>>
>>97353858
Nah, dark elves in D&D are D&D elves but evil. So dark gnomes in D&D will be D&D gnomes but evil. Saying kobolds are evil gnomes is like saying goblins/orcs are evil elves. inb4 Tolkien
>>
>>97353846
Dark Elves exist to be Dalit elves
Gnomes are evil by nature
>>
>>97353846
Gnomes don't need an evil counterpart, since gnomes are all secretly evil and always have been.
Seriously, look at some of the "pranks" that the "Neutral Good" god of the gnomes, Garl glittergold has done, and how they always seem to entail massive body counts.
>>
>>97353874
autism speaks
>>
>>97353846

You are trying to reinvent the wheel. Gnomes are the ORIGINAL dwarves. In the original elemental spirit tradition (particularly from Paracelsus in the 16th century), gnomes were earth elementals - mysterious, possibly mischievous beings of stone and soil, not jolly inventors.


More alien and otherworldly, like other fey
Connected to earth, stone, underground places
Potentially capricious or unsettling rather than cheerful
Skilled at earth magic, illusion, blending into their environment
Living in hidden places - beneath hills, in ancient barrows, at the roots of old trees

There wasn't really a coherent "dwarf race" with a unified culture, religion, and society the way Tolkien created. That's almost entirely his synthesis, drawing from Norse mythology but building something new.


Smaller faerie folk that actually existed in folklore:

Brownies - household spirits, helpful but easily offended, human-ish but small
Hobs/Hobgoblins (the helpful kind, not the D&D monster) - again, household helpers
Pucks or similar rural spirits
Kobolds - Earth spirits, mine guardians, can help or fuck with miners by making them mine worthless cobalt.
Various "little people" from Celtic and English folklore
>>
>>97353846

Goblins.
>>
> A race of technologically inclined nomads who also focus into various dark magics
> In varying sizes of population, they can be found throughout the lands of the world in their insular merchant caravans though none trust them enough to keep them settled for multiple winters.
> The Dark Gnomes create products of greater or equal quality at lower cost than the Elves while often being more accessible due to their nomadic caravans.
> Their speciality is in illicit & exotic goods
>>
>>97353846
gnomes are the evil counterpart to halflings
>>
>>97353846

Gnomes as tinkerers suck major balls. It's an extremely narrow and ill-defined niche. The only reason they did it is because in folklore a lot of gnomes lived underground (like dwarves). If anything, they should be more Fey-like.
>>
>>97353926
>you are trying to reinvent the wheel
>here's how tolkien reinvented the wheel and made something fascinating and far more enduring than its inspiration ever was
Wow, you're doing a really great job of dissuading the OP!
>>
>>97353997

The Hobbit was published in 1937. Gnomes are folklore inventions from centuries ago. I think gnomes have endured for far longer. Regardless, the point is that trying to use gnomes to make them fit into Tolkien-inspired races is getting them backwards. They should be the original ones, older and more magical, no the other way around.
>>
>>97353858
>>97353874
Rather then evil Gnomes, what would 'Good' Kobolds look like?
>>
pretty sure Deep Gnomes are a thing in a few settings, and generally they're schizophrenic and disturbed by things that lurk in the deepest parts
>>
>>97353846
Gnomes are evil gnomes
>>
>>97354009
The Gnomes was published in 1977
Paracelsus's gnomes have as much to do with modern fantasy gnomes as the dwarfs of the sagas have to do with Tolkien's dwarves
"Gnome" has just become the standard English translation for a dozen different little guys from different European folklore
>>
>>97353846
Skaven.
>>
>>97353846
Or just look at what some of the worse fey were historically portrayed like and apply to the modern gnome shape.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.