>I'm not running DND.

>>97675009
Arguing which D&D setting is the most prestigious is like arguing how to season a basic bitch McD burger to make it haute cuisine.

>/tg/ approved?
crippling amounts of cognitive autism

File: 295754534.jpg (1.17 MB, 1000x1250)

1.17 MB JPG

>why yes, im running Exandria. What gave it away?

>>97675009
>/tg/ approved
Historically accurate setting where all adventurers are white men.
>/tg/ disapproved
Eberron has Tieflings, Dragonborn, and Changelings.

>>97675113
Every official DnD setting in its new/ most current iteration has Tieflings, Dragonborn and Changelings.

>>97675148
>/tg/ disapproves
Playing games

Anyone remember the website where some dude wrote about his setting where adventures needed permits from their local lord to raid dungeons and where the party's elves were hanged because they stole shit or something? I think it could have the name "scrolls" in it

File: 1752655004434845.jpg (523 KB, 987x741)

523 KB JPG

>>97675009
>Which of these answers is the most based and /tg/ approved?
The ones I run.
>Which is the most cringe and /tg/ disapproved?
The ones you run.

>>97675159

Coins & Scrolls.

>>97675113
>Historically accurate setting where all adventurers are white men.

But that’s not historically accurate…

>>97675009
The most /tg/-approved settings consist of
>three hours of scripted prelude before player characters are even introduced
>"you start in a tavern" with hours of autists making voices at each other trying to find which badly done cliché they want to fail at emulating
>any sort of travel or stocking up on items is glossed over, because "that's bookkeepy video games"
>the party is never split, even when it results in characters being in shops or facilities they don't need to be in, with players making more autistic voices with the DM to try to "haggle"
>more scripts as characters visit key points of the city and look for people to help
>bonus points if a pointless base-building sub-plot is included, with several more hours being used to explain its premise
>add in a smattering of nu-Marvel Disney "humor" here and there, can't let things be too serious too long
>any combat or exploration is also glossed over, because despite the scripted railroad that the party can't split from and has no agency over, we wouldn't want the session to be too much like video games
>divide minutes of combat between hours of scripted exposition and autistic voices; present enemies as being unique in description, but in combat they're just the same stat blocks with no variation beyond getting either a unique item or a legendary action
>make sure to cuck the DEX fighter with abilities like "ignore the first instance of damage this round" even though his bow only hits half the time anyway, but then have enemies conveniently group up for the Moonbeam of the DM's wife's character
>extra bonus points if you tell the players how cool and involved your game is going to be, wouldn't want to have a shred of honesty
>but lying is fine if it's for the story, make sure to have as little gameplay as possible

>>97675009
>most based
Running any setting you and your players like without caring about what dtrangers on the Internet might think about it.

>most cringe
Carung about whether your setting is /tg/ approved.

>>97675303
Ty nigga

>>97675009
Homebrew setting that changes over time in accordance with the players' actions.

>>97675049
fpbp

File: 1758737294316342.gif (973 KB, 400x225)

973 KB GIF

>>97675009
I would answer explaining my choices extensively but you wrote "DND" like a troglodyte imstead of "D&D".

>>97675009
>The only options are dndogshit
grim