Absolute Unit edition>Resources:WFB: https://pastebin.com/qVGrgwwhWM: https://pastebin.com/EsDAgebaWFRP: https://pastebin.com/inbyBsR6Novels: https://pastebin.com/PFqPDr0H>TOW:https://gofile.io/d/fxFgXShttps://www.warhammer-community.com/downloads/warhammer-the-old-world/>Warhammer Chronicles:https://files (dot) catbox (dot) moe/0xt777 (dot) zip>Time of Legends:https://files (dot) catbox (dot) moe/q46ut6 (dot) zip>The End Times:https://files (dot) catbox (dot) moe/j7d0t5 (dot) zip>Alternative Models:https://pastebin.com/xPeM9szL>Previous Thread: >>97811159>Thread Question:Which older sculpt currently used in your army is most in need of a refresh?
>TQKnights of the realm on foot.Also these thread questions fucking suck, just ask me for my credit card info at this point.
>>97826633I was trying to tie it to the other TQ, so we have finality.
Back drops, yes or no?
>>97826625>TQUnironically >>97826633, I had to third party kitbash the most important unit in my fucking army because of retard millennial WoWshit design. If we're talking pre-TOW, then Grail Knights and Pegasus Knights. The Fay Enchantress and Green Knight could do with a touch-up too, but I don't know if I trust modern GW to do those properly, or even GKs, for that matter. I also don't like our mudcore manlet peasant infantry but I seem to be in the minority on that.
>>97826633>>97826758I think it's easier to just ignore the foot knights/not use them. Pegasus Knights imo for me. The Grails look very plain but not bad. Pegasus Knights meanwhile really could use a glow up.
>>97826625>TQI can't wait until plague monks are remade. I own them, I've built them, I fucking hate them. Night runners refresh was pretty good.
>>97826779When the long-awaited, first big release is a steaming turd, it doesn't do much to inspire confidence. I genuinely would appreciate them being redone in the near future or even the next edition, like what happened to High Elf spearmen getting touched up every edition for a while. Fucking fix them James, until then I'll be using third party models.
>>97826846To be fair, the Foot Knights were a unique stinker. They are terrible and so is the named Empire character, both awful and probably made by the same guy. The other TOW sculpts have been good to great so far.
>>97826853True. The new Damsels are absolutely superb.
>>97826853Hey, I'm glad you're enjoying the chinks and furries. I'll stick to the classics or third parties, personally.
>>97826853I haven’t really liked much of the tow exclusive models that are in plastic, but at least they’re still doing mtos of the stuff I actually like.
>>97826758No I agree, I feel like if the lord provides the men at arms’ armor it wouldn’t look like shit
>>97826870If your MTOs aren't priced identically to ebay secondhand rates, that is.
>>97826873Exactly. Men at arms represent their lord, why would a knight anywhere outside of Mousillon allow his retainers to be shit-smeared inbreds in filthy rags? The 6e mudcore shit is fantastic Mordheim/Mousillon fodder but that's about it.
>>97826853What’s wrong with the foot knights? I haven’t really looked at them
>>97826901Look at them and get back to us.
>>97826905Why do they look like this
>>97826918>I'm a Nottingham millennial cunt with pink hair and a septum piercing who knows nothing about historical armor.>Armor is, like, thick and heavy, right? Better give them Starting Strength tree trunk legs.>I just learned what gorgets and mantles are five minutes ago. Neck protection is important I guess? Hmm, better make it the size of a poncho.>Chaos Warriors have thick metal shields. Let's give our knights those, too!Easy to see how you end up with a Playmobil knight playset by the end of this.
>>97826965I’d rather take the playmobil ones man holy shit. Also is the flag bearer a chick? Is she supposed to be an armored damsel?
