False dichotomy, i can just "roll sword magic" every turn instead, making them functionally identical concepts unless distinguished in-system. Which system are we talking about again, by the way?

>>97840183
>i can just "roll sword magic" every turn instead
how many systems have you played where magic is always just a single roll with the same function each time it's used?

>succesful strength draining strike
Yes, I guess being stabbed through the heart tends to leave you weakened after

How this bot is not yet permabanned is beyond me

>>97840201
Exactly as many as this thread is about

>>97840336
Delete the post with your mod powers if you dont like it.

>>97840158
>Fake binary choice thread
Kill yourself, faggot

>>97840353
And now what?

>>97840910
Keep seething, nogames.

>>97840158
Have you tried not playing Dndogshit?

>>97840996
Cope

>>97840158
>basically
This is a word that's been driven into meaningless babble by retards who think being reductive is a substitute for an actual argument.
For example, if someone describes a function in a game as "basically magic" but that function doesn't behave like magic does in that game, that someone is a reductive retard.

>>97840158
>it is at least a lot more fun from a gameplay perspective than just going "I make an attack roll" every round.
This is the core failure of game design, explanation of rules and gm incapability to explain to retarded players.
Combat should never have been condensed into bit sized single roll is a single attack segments. The attack roll should always be a series of manoeuvres, strikes and melee. The mechanical effects have to mesh with player and gm description that incorporates contextual factors like terrain, approach, equipment, health, opponents, etc.
If your combat is boring its because you're boring and play shit games.

>>97840999
Have you tried playing tabletop game and not spamming the same nogames retardation?