[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 116343751_p0.jpg (3.28 MB, 1241x1829)
3.28 MB
3.28 MB JPG
WARDEN is a setting-neutral RPG based on Pathfinder 2e. I have been following its playtesting for a while. A few days ago, it was fully released.

https://ghost-spark.itch.io/warden

So naturally, I decided to run a few test fights. All of these combats had only a single PC, but that is fine, because WARDEN explicitly has an encounter type tailored to only one or two PCs. The three fights were:

• Flintlock musket vs. special forces. This resulted in the PC one-shotting both special forces enemies in quick succession despite the Reload 3 of a flintlock musket. Very impressive, considering that this was a 0th-level PC.

• Assault rifle vs. five non-natty halberdiers. The outcome here was the PC getting dropped by the mooks, while having taken down none of them. Scale armor is just too much for an assault rifle to overcome, even with the Sunder action, it seems.

• Holy sniper rifle vs. six non-natty halberdiers, in the same enclosed space as the previous battle. This was, very specifically, a showcase of just how important it is for an optimized combatant to add a Special Damage Types (e.g. Aether, Dark, Holy, Psychic) to their Strikes, because according to the author, doing so causes said Strikes to completely bypass Armor. Quite unlike the previous fight, the PC here trivially crushed the opponents, decisively proving that Special Damage Types make a humongous difference against Armor (and that, somehow, a sniper rifle is better than an assault rifle even in a tight space).

Goofy results, I know. You can read about the precise details of these fights here, in the following document:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pxTxGFn1DaKARndEq3v4WKvcgBSO3qlJJhWBIn-Uqw8/edit
>>
Buy an ad, faggot
>>
>>97851143
Laugh, laugh at the newfag.
>>
>>97851143

I am neither the author of the game, nor someone being paid or instructed to advertise it. I just find the system interesting (if very goofy) and wanted to talk about it. That is all.
>>
>based on a shit system
>is shit
Waow
>>
>>97851173
Forgive him anon, we have a few autists here that can't conceive genuinely liking and playing games.
>>
>>97851173
>I just find the system interesting (if very goofy) and wanted to talk about it.
You didn't say anything interesting (or goofy) about it though. This barely qualifies as talking.
>>
>>97852514
Fuck off, anon provided content, you're just bitching. Get a real hobby.
>>
>>97851069
>based on Pathfinder 2e

Stopped reading here. This absolutely killed any interest I might have in this game.
>>
>>97851069
>non-natty
What does this mean?
>>
>>97852831

It means they are using the Alchemy setting alteration. For 2 Adversary Points, they purchase the Alchemical Body (Power Potion) ability and the Improved Body feat. This gives them a constant +3 Status Bonus to Melee Strikes and Force checks, which, yes, is as boring and as super-effective as it sounds.

If the Alchemy setting alteration is in play, then PCs can take the Alchemical Body ability and the Improved Body feat, too.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.