Would you rather adventure and quest in the lands of a weak king or a strong king? What are the pros and cons of both? Think about it for a second.
I want to adventure and quest in the lands of a cute and bratty queen or empress.
>>97951220Fair enough haha
>>97951207I'll adventure wherever theres money to be made. Weak king got more money in his lands cause hes failing his people ergo more problems. Hell give me a good price and I'll help with whatever plans there are to remove him.Strong king has the benefit of contracts so a steady supply of those plus any odd jobs and I'm set quite nicely.
Why do you keep doing this shit puckee
>>97951207>Weak kingPros: More nasty bandits & monsters to killCould start the game as hired caravan guardsAlways a quest ready wherever you goCourt intrigue as people try to take control with force or charismaCons: Bad if the group doesn't want a high combat campaignProbably a stronger kingdom will attack and that's a LOT of things to track in initiative"Bandits again?">Strong KingPros: safer roads so less random encountersLess rival adventuring groups taking questsAssassination plots and secret rebel groups to take down or joinFighting & evading guardsCons: Fighting & evading guardsLess random quests & side plots due to crackdownsProbably bad for a group who like fighting dudes without political consequencesPolitical"Soldiers again?"Both can be very compelling if your DM is good. Both can be very shit if your DM is bad. I prefer weak king because in a past D&D game we were hired to be bodyguards for a very stabbable king and we managed to keep him alive and were honored with cash we then blew on food and pets
>>97951207Sometimes I think about having you executed, just to see the expression on your face.
>>97951241I feel like it also depends on how Chaotic/Rebellious your party is.
After long and very careful deliberation, I, the Queen of England, have decided to extend the ransom money on......a big party. Just impossible to decide between my two faves, so I’ve decided to keep the cash, have a whizzy-jolly time and try to forget both of you. Hope you’re not too miffed. Byeeeeee!
>>97951241Another pro of a weak king is in theory you can insert into his court much easier by helping him out so much, he'd be indebted to you as he is potentially able to be built up and grows stronger.
>>97951272I figure overall a a kingdom with a weak king is much more serviceable to adventurers, maybe not so much the common folk though.
>>97951207>puckee spamming his commission againhttps://www.reddit.com/r/DnD/comments/1ipl8a9/artcomm_king_edward_vi_of_eredan_by_tomasz_ryger/https://desuarchive.org/_/search/image/HYBKW4xLP1-cLSr0iyVT4Q/>21 times since February 2025
>>97951207Traditional games?
Fuck off.
>>97951207>questThose were banned from /tg/ in 2018.
>>97951761It's what the PCs do in Tabletop games.
>>97951207I would rather you kill yourself.
>>97952046No, they do everything but quest, because quests aren't /tg/.
>>97952203Do you not go on quests in TTRPGs you play. Like a quest to save the princess etc?
>>97951207Wait, is OP pic meant to represent a strong king or a weak king?
I will have the strongest army through my wit alone
>>97952423kek
>>97951207Which king shares my opinions? That is the one I shall serve alongside.
>>97952624Who would be easier to deal with? A weak king would be more amenable to suggestions imo.
>puckee thread
>>97952337No, because quests aren't /tg/. We exiled those obnoxious fuckers for a reason.
>>97951272Yes
>>97951207Kill yourself redditor
>>97951207This looks like shit.
Who ever pays more
A strong king would get in my business too much. Plus, there would be less monsters to steal back stolen stuff from. Weak king all the way.
>>97955726>>97951272It seems weak kings are better for adventurers
