[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tg/ - Traditional Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.
  • Roll dice with "dice+numberdfaces" in the options field (without quotes).

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1777297087315126.png (72 KB, 822x770)
72 KB PNG
>Outfoxxing scummy metagamers
>"I heard there are lots of ircs in this adventure. Ill set them as a favored enemy"
>Change them to bugbears
>>
>>98023987
IRCs?
>>
>>98024002
Yeah, like mIRC, mibbit, Nettalk, ircII. They're common opponents in 5th ed modules.
>>
>>98024002
orcs, op is a fag
>>
>>98024015
You've got your editions confused, friend. They were super popular enemies in 3 and 3.5 but eventually started getting replaced by vents, teamspeaks, and eventually discords shortly thereafter. You only see ircs in grog-led hardcore campaigns now.
>>
>>98023987
who are you quoting?
>>
>>98024015
I remember trolling in mibbit. Fuck I'm old.
>>
>>98024106
if you aren't 55+ your still warm
>>
>>98024015
Bro I haven't seen anyone fight anything but a discord in years.
>>
>>98024060
That's simply because IRC requires higher expression of player skill, something 5etards are totally uninterested in.
>>
>>98024153
Ircs do require a little more player skill to deal with than discords, but even room-temperature IQ players in 3.5 could deal with them. I think discords are a downgrade from ircs too, but mostly I think you're just upset that the game in general and its playerbase has changed.
>>
>>98023987
Pff amateur
I tell them there's going to be lots of orcs then I change them to something completely different
>>
>>98024207
IRCs felt less tropey. Yes you were dealing with a smaller, pre-Critical Role playerbase in 3.x but you still got plenty of fucked-up shit without every IRC needing to have a resident catboy, puppygirl etc. like discord. Half the time two completely different discord adventures feel exactly the same in play.
>>
The real question is how a bugbear replaces a fucking chatroom.
>>
>>98024228
By trolling, of course
>>
>>98024207
>>98024220
>irc renaissance grogs think they're hardcore
the true test of turn-based combat mettle is email
those encounters have the highest skill ceiling and offer deep strategic gameplay
you simply cannot beat the experience offered by the Generic Universal Messaging System
>>
>>98024153
I hear that 5e is more lethal if you don't make good characters though, like it's some version of rocket tag
>>
>>98024365
Yeah yeah you can use GUMS for everything you can even use it to play Civilization and Diplomacy we’ve heard it all before.
>>
>>98023987
Choosing a favored enemy that's actually relevant to the campaign may be metagaming, but it's not particularly scummy. A GM - who holds all the cards and has no need to outfox anyone - intentionally making sure that a player's chosen class features won't see use during the campaign is genuinely pretty scummy, though.
>>
>>98024757
Specialization may be cool, but it also risks limiting options. You have a fighter specializing in one weapon, he's stuck with that weapon for all time. The ranger wants a favored enemy, so what is the GM to do? Put that enemy everywhere? Depending on the type, the favored enemy may not appear. Is it a dick move? You play Only War and have a campaign against Orks, players build their chars and take weapons to kill Orks better. The campaign is over, people still want to play. Are you forced to put them against Orks again and again? What if they have to deal with Eldar?
I see no easy way out of this.
>>
>>98024894
Imo, if the whole party is on an even paying field then it's fine, it's only an issue if one player is being fucked over. Sure, the Only War party might be less effective against Eldar but they're all equally less effective so you can just balance the encounters to compensate for that.
>>
>>98024015
Did Khaled Mardam-Bey get BTFO'd for trying to revoke the lifetime software licenses he sold?
>>
>>98023987
I planned to do this once in WFRP 2e, in Norsca. Local NPCs complaining about 'draugr,' makes Skyrimbrained players assume "oh, it's just wights or zombies." Nah, vampires.

Mostly just because I noticed the mythical traits of them overlap heavily with vampires. And because I liked the idea of vampires going on blood orgies during the winter twilight months, then sleeping it off in profaned tombs the rest of the time.
>>
>>98024151
>Doesn't paytowin campaigns non bluesky
Not going to make it in the new corporate feudalism
>>
>>98024365
>GUMS
No thank you, I'd like to be able to take less than an hour to have a single combatsation
>>
File: levels.png (44 KB, 683x172)
44 KB PNG
>>98023987



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.