Previous: >>98235578Planeswalker Edition>Newshttps://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-banned-and-restricted-february-9-2026https://magic.wizards.com/en/news/announcements/commander-brackets-beta-update-february-9-2026>Current Banlisthttps://magic.wizards.com/en/banned-restricted-list#commander-banned>Bracket Informationhttps://files.catbox.moe/4tbvzw.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/r62yfy.png>Former Commander Website: Learn the basics, and read the format philosophy laid down by the rules committeehttps://mtgcommander.net>Card Searchhttps://scryfall.com>Card Statistics: See what everyone else puts in their Commander decks based on what is posted to the Internethttps://www.edhrec.com>Deck List Sites: You can search for decks that other people have made. Authors often have comments that explain their deck strategy and card choiceshttps://www.archidekt.comhttps://www.moxfield.com>Gay Bolashttps://files.catbox.moe/823tpq.png>Manabase Information: Find out what lands you can add to your deck, sorted by category, based on a chosen color identityhttps://managathering.com>Proxy Guidehttps://pastebin.com/9Xj1xLdM>Preconshttps://magicprecons.comTQ: What are your thoughts on planeswalkers in EDH? Do you think any problems would emerge if they were allowed to be your commander in a manner similar to Brawl or Oathbreaker?
>>98242217>Gay bolas
Planeswalkers should be de facto allowed as commanders. There are some that are very problematic, but it'd be better to make a banlist than lazily autoban them all.
>>98242217It's impossible for a planeswalker to be a problem.
>indestructible aura>doesn't give indestructible>isn't an aura>>98242217planeswalkers should be removed from the game entirely and the lore should be deretconned where planeswalkers are eldritch horrors without this tranny spark nonsense
>>98241065Bringing this forward:Have we seen any non-WotC Planeswalkers (not just reskins?)If they do Q as anything other than a Planeswalker, I'll be proper pissed.Still if you're going to do Marvel, you have to be careful insofar as you care about accurate whole-picture design translation, because there's a pretty clear hierarchy of who should be a Planeswalker without any unrelated power-ups and its not just based on powers but rather how explicitly and frequently their power allows them to hop and how well known that facet of their powers is.Making Thanos a Planeswalker but Dr. Strange a legendary hero would be silly.On that note, it's pretty clear from the lack of Stephen Strange that we'll be getting a Midnight Suns release too.
>>98242239I agree the person sitting across from me is closer to an eldritch horror than Jace.
>>98242239>le planeswalkers were GodsTook several old walkers to even contain the Eldrazi
>>98242248Wotc has aleady said that only their own IPs will have walkers
>>98242239>t. esl
>>98242217>TQ: What are your thoughts on planeswalkers in EDH?They are one of the weakest card times and rarely worth running. Virtually none are worth running just because they are genericly good. If people want to play a bad commander then let them.
Post decks
>>98242248Marvel has entities more powerful than Q and we didn't get any walkers there.Where was my One Above All walker?
>>98242254Took one lesbian channel Fireball to kill them.
>>98242248I have no clue what a midnight suns is.
>>98242254there were no 'old walkers' when there were Eldrazi, Eldrazi were invented in 2010, Planeswalkers (and all of Magic) were retconned in like 97
I still want to figure out a way to make this guy not suck dick in commander
>>98242268I kid you not maro thought the lesbos needed feats and that's why they decided to have them off kozi and ula
>>98242217>>98242263>planeswalkers>badIt's like you don't run my boy Ugin in your Eldrazi decks.
>>98242271It's a heroes/antiheroes team like the Avengers but its also shorthand for anything Marvel thinks is too thoroughly related to magic or religion to comfortably fold into its mainstream envelope.
>>98242275He's a 4 mana fog that can turn into a beater if ignored, that's itThe card's too awful to use counter doublers on it
>>98242281Why an Eldrazi deck? Why aren't you running it in all decks like I'd run the enchantment Rhystic study in all blue decks?Oh...because it's good for a specific deck type and not generically good.
>Dozens of cards named after her>finally release her as a planeswalker>she's not like totally dogshit, sure but boy is she underwhelming for being kind of the big cheese on the angel side of things
>>98242286Oh so just another shitty not-suicide squad thing. I'll skip the set. Second you say anti-hero I check the fuck out. I don't agree with the literary concept.
>>98242288Most Planeswalkers are specifically tailored to do one thing and work for a specific deck EXCEPT FUCKING TEFERI FUCK YOU DUDE. Hilariously Ugin's best use is being an Eldrazi cheerleader.
>>98242267It's not really a power thing, its just his entire schtick to randomly teleport people or planeswalk them to to other realities/dimensions. >>98242258lame i wonder if the copyright is vulnerable or somethingit made sense when they were still doing the disingenuous "there will always be a UW printing" shit but why pretend anymore
>>98242294>I don't agree with the literary conceptElaborate
>>98242265
>>98242294i mean im using antihero pretty loosely just to describe like less-than-exemplary heroesits more "wolverine on a bad day" than "the joker's girlfriend is such a quirky chungus"but also i dont know much about them so its very possible they team up with actual villains
>>98242301>It's not really a power thing, its just his entire schtick to randomly teleport peopleHe's going to have either blink or bounce effects. Maybe tuck effects (like how the Angels from Who got tuck effects to represent sending a creature back in time)
>>98242265Nah you'd just cry that 90% of them are UB
>>98242288Yeah, you're right, no planeswalkers are generically good, definitely not Ugin.
>>98242308NTA but the antiheroes of the 90s were honest and believed in somethingToday's antiheroes don't believe in anything - not even themselves - and are just commies and hedonists
>>98242320I appreciate you not posting your slop, fren.
>>98242320Post your decks and tell the haters to go to their dead containment thread
>>98242313Yeah, he'd make sense as a phasing legendary with a win con printed on the card, I suppose. It would also be acceptable if he responded to zone changes by self-exiling and gaining suspend 1 instead. Maybe give him "Aye Mon Capitane - Q cannot be your commander" and preclude him from being a commander himself.But they would never have the SOVL for such a thing
>>98242265Don't have a pic, but I've currently got:>Light Paws (Aura Voltron)>Lightning, Army of One (Equip Voltron)>First Sliver (Tribal)>Zhulodok (Tribal)>Y'Shtola (Control/Combo)>Tannuk, Steadfast (WARP BABY)
>>98242248No, and it's unlikely we will for quite some time. Right now UB sets are designed differently from UW sets, where a major priority is ensuring a degree of simplicity for new incoming players. Planeswalkers tend to have an intrinsic complexity to them even if it's not much higher than usual. This is compounded by how the AFC and CLB walkers were received extremely poorly, and the last time walkers as a whole got a spotlight (WAR) the set was also considered exceptionally bad despite selling well.Basically, right now every card in a set is aimed at one of three formats:>Draft>Standard>EDHUB sets have a very large EDH bias in this triangle because they know the majority of people buying these sets just want to make a deck themed around their favorite glup shitto. However the threshold to make a planeswalker EDH playable is very high especially relative to 1v1 formats. The walkers we do get for EDH are generally extremely weak because WAR and Oathbreaker demonstrated that they promote a playstyle that most players don't particularly enjoy, which is why the walkers aimed at EDH generally suck on purpose and are just there to appease the "I want planeswalkers" crowd (ironically meaning WotC treats their own fans wanting planeswalkers the same way they treat UB players wanting a glup shitto commander).A bit of a rambling explanation but the short is it's extremely unlikely.
>>98242265I have too many so I'll just post the most recent builds.
Honestly hoping Star Trek brings back the planeswalk cards like Doctor Who did. Then you can explore all the various worlds while also giving cards abilities to influence the exploration of the galaxy with planeswalk effects that will not impact balance outside of that format.
Just realized I posted in the wrong thread, woopsMe and a friend are doing a thing where we each opened a pack and we make a deck using one of the legendaries in that pack.Only rule is we can't buy any cards specifically for it. Has to all be made of stuff we own.I can't decide between Beast and Winter Soldier.
>playing izzet mostly strix precon>added jeska’s will I pulled>turn 2 sol ring, jeska’s will>inprov capstone>table crashes out and cry hards>pulls out 4s
>>98242389>me adding jeska's will had nothing to do with this escalation i swearHow hard is it not to use GCs, really?
>>98242396Jeska's will is literally a precon card
>>98242410>added jeska's will i pulledIt doesnt matter if it came from a welcome deck, you knew what you were doing
>>98242389Bracket fags are babies. News at 11
>>98242328I wouldn't say that's totally true, Punisher still has morals (depending on writer) and Gambit can kind of bounce between hero and anti hero while still being arguably one of the biggest idealists in Marvel save for Cap. Sure there's some that are like you said, but I'm still willing to give it to a few
Muscle mommy
>Playing esper mostly ff precon>Added dark ritual and ad nauseaum I pulled>Turn 2 dark ritual, ad nauseam>draw whole deck>table crashes out and cry hards>pulls out 4s
>>98242460Turn 2 dark rit is just 4 mana dingus
>>98242265I love Abdel so much bros
>>98242217What is the point of making a Planeswalker Commander if you're not even gonna have it do anything interesting?This is just 4 mana to tutor a dragon
>>98242217>I le defaced le OP with advertisements for my furry porn commissions again OwOFake thread, not /tg/, shan't use.
>>9824226514th Doctor/Clara: 5C(technically) Historic deckSecond Doctor/Vislor Turlough: Esper draw/hand size punishment/group hugGreensleeves: Mono green landfallDr. Eggman: Grixis Artifacts with a discard side themePeter Parker/Spider-Man: Bant Big Mana legendary shitThe Celestial Toymaker: Esper factorfiction.dekThe Beast, Deathless Prince: Rakdos theftLeo the Balance/Michelangelo the Heart: 5C +1 counters (precon upgraded with only turtle set cards)Okaun/Zndrsplt: Izzet Coin flip voltronJAWS, Relentless Predator: Mono red artifact sacrifice burn shitZul Ashur, Lich Lord: Mono black zombie reanimator.Nekusar: Grixis You know what Nekusar doesAnd I'm working on like five different builds with the new shit. I only plan to keep one however.
>>98242265My casual deck
>>98242410>>98242396>>98242418>>98242410They were playing 3sI ended up playing umbris vs his ureni and exiling all of his good dragons because he ran so many mdfcs
>>98242505>they were playing 3sAh, good job then i guess
>>98242472He goes well with >>98242447
Thirty (30) starting life is objectively superior to fourty (40)
>>98242504Looks fun. Nice choice of basics.
>>98242389>turn 2 sol ringthis is clearly the problem, but casuals will defend this
>>98242613It was the uber casual sheldon who allowed sol ring in the first place, and so his legacy will live on forever
I already saw this episode of /edhg/, put a new one on, or put the one about hybrid mana on.
I wanted to run one of the Saheeli planeswalkers in my mono red deck and that's when I learned that you can't have hybrid mana cards in a deck with only one of the colorsI said aloud to myself, "fair enough but that's gay"
>>98242217>What are your thoughts on planeswalkers in EDH? Do you think any problems would emerge if they were allowed to be your commander in a manner similar to Brawl or Oathbreaker?Should not be made commanders. We already have enough I already dislike the rule changes that have been made to commander over the years. It was peak right after WotC released those commander precons in 2011 and people started to show up early at game stores and play some EDH before standard started.Also, why didn't any of you faggots tell me about this card? Absolutely smoked me for 30 damage, when I had an almost unstoppable board and was going to win. Is this the best direct burn spell in the format? I'm guessing it might be above a certain mana value. I've been using Banefire or Aurelia's Fury.
Best card in marvel?
>>98242776Roaming Throne
>>98242776Probably the reprint of Simulacrum Synthesizer
>>98242772>Also, why didn't any of you faggots tell me about this card?It's a pretty famous and well-known red card. This one's on you for not knowing it desu senpai
What is the one site that stiches pictures together like this?>>98242265>>98242265>>98242265
>>98242772The fact you didn't know about Fireball circa 2021 indicates to me that you aren't allowed to have opinions on the rules because you're too stupid to make an informed opinion.
>>98242799microsoft paint
>>98242265Going for the 32 deck challenge, bros.
>>98242799I thought they had it linked, but maybe that's the custom card general I'm thinking of.https://old.photojoiner.com/
>>98242906The 4 color options are just so sad, same with colorless, so I skipped those. Otherwise mine's complete as of earlier this year with BreSee >>98242310Good luck, brother.
>>98242915Thank you anon, I finally found it in my bookmarks. Definitely should be part of the OP list.
>>98242920Yeah. Probably going to be my last ones I make. Colorless I might just go complete BS Eldrazi just for the hell of it. 4 color I've only got one picked out, Omnath Locust of Mana. It's going to be the jankiest deck I've ever built. Nothing but french vanilla creatures in it. We will see how that works out
>>98242265I posted one of my decks already but these are my commanders that are currently built, I have 5 that I'm currently building not on this
>>98242383Just realized she was talking to a giant ant. Doctor Who is probably the only UB where I'm absolutely certain everyone involved actually knew the source material. WH40K doesn't count since GW has a monopoly on autistic lawyers.
Noob here. Don’t know what EDH stands for, but the other thread doesn’t like UB so I’ll ask here:How do transforming commanders work in terms of what’s allowed in a commander deck? Am I allowed to have red, green, and blue? I’ll pretty much have to pay the usual cost to transform him every time I bring him out right? I don’t get to just bring him out transformed without paying that cost I mean.
>>98242955It has the most soul put into it.
>>98242948Is Fire Lord Azula a massive flavor fail or is there something I'm forgetting? I don't remember her multi-track bending at any point.
>>98242957-an MDFC (Modal Double-Faced Card) as your commander has the color identity of both it's faces as well as the usual identity of colored pips in it's rules text. in this example, Bruce has Red + Green + Blue, so you can use those 3 colors in your deck.-MDFC cards can be played/cast on either side, provided you can pay the mana cost of the side you are casting.-the ability to transform using the ability is entirely optional, although in this case it's often recommended to play Bruce before transforming into Hulk if your commander tax gets to high.
>>98242957this hulk has red, green, and blue color identity (temur) and you can just cast the backside immediately without having to go through the frontside first
>>98242957>Don’t know what EDH stands forElder Dragon Highlander, basically you the origin of the format is people running theme decks of old shitty cards called Elder Dragons. The highlander part is because of the single card rule>>98242957>Am I allowed to have red, green, and blue?Yes if a commander has two faces then you take into account the mana pips present on both playable sides of the card. In this case, yes Bruce Banner/Hulk is a red blue green (RGU/Temur) commander>I’ll pretty much have to pay the usual cost to transform him every time I bring him out right? If you want to transform Bruce banner into the hulk yes you need to pay the mana cost on the bottom. However, double faced cards with mana values on the back, like the hulk, CAN be cast on that side. If you see a double faced card without a mana value on the back side there's usually some specially condition you need to fulfill to transform it.
>>98242957>>98242972I played against this today, and it's really strong.
>>98242979i feel like this couldn't have been tested outside of limitedi mean its in the braids space where it doesn't break any formats but holy shit is it extremely fucking annoying
>>98242265Comfy deck
>>98242988Yeah you couldn't even attack him unless you are doing lethal. He would constantly ping him for damage so it gets bigger and then does spot removal on targets. Throw in the strongest red cards and fast mana... yeah. Better have removal and board wipes are the right time. Pretty typical for a fast mono-red deck.
I love free creatures
>>98242993That's an interesting commander. HOw does that work? You just have card advantage so you can make people sac a threat or what?
>>98242979I exile Pyrohemia from your deck
Can someone link me to the cheapest pubstomp deck that I can say is bracket 4, but it's really cEDH?
>>98243005i cant because there isnt a difference between 4 and cedh
>>98243014cEDH was born with brackets?
>>98243005all bracket 4 decks have access to all the cards in cedh and have no casual sentiments like no MLDthe only practical difference between it and cedh is a gentleman's agreement not to pop off until turn 5
>>98243005No we can't. You are going to get you balls stomped on and then cry that we didn't give you a real deck.You're not devious or clever lying about what you're putting on the table and you'll be twice the retard when you lose on top of it.>>98243034Practically speaking the difference between cEDH and b4 is if you're going to mull yourself down to a retarded level to run out the most psychotic line you have and/or run a full set of true duals (and similar full retard optimizations).
>>98243034I know that. So what is the deck I can pop off turn 4 the most reliably for the least amount of $?
Anyone here know any good competitive bracket 3 decks?
>>98243047look no further than belzenlok, godo's ugly cousin
>>98243051think archetypes, not commanders
>>98243047Vivi
>>98243051Bust out the printer
>>98242258They also said UB would never be Standard Legal. They lie all the time and constantly.
>>98242906Whats the 32 deck challenge
>>98243090Deck for each color/color combination
>>98242963Yeah and its really not even close, every art is peak and every character is represented in their most iconic moment, or at least one of them. The only downside is that its Doctor Who and therefore extremely cringe regardless of quality.
