Magic the Gathering thread without posting or discussing Universes Beyond>how do I search for non-UB cards?On Scryfall "-is:ub"On EDHREC selecting "Universes Beyond" under Card Filters hides them.>Can I play UB cards even if I hate them?You can do whatever you want, but you shouldn't contribute to the enshittification of this game. More people taking a stance against UB means WotC have to acknowledge itProxy them if you must, or wait for them to get in-universe reprints as a few already have>TQWhat's the most memorable moment you have from playing this nightmare of a game, anon?
would a Duskmourn x Innistrad set work? Gothic Horror versus Analog Horror, Valgavoth taking on Emrakul(?)
I am gonam buy the marvel value pack
>>98437310If they cut the 80s shit out of Duskmourn sure. I fucking love the lore of Marina Vendrell and Valgavoth and it was the one thing that made an entire plane being 1 haunted house actually work for me. I want to see more of them, I want more Rooms and enchantment support. But I want less cheerleaders and Sony Walkmans
>>98437313>UBtard can't spellTo no one's surprise
>>98437321Agreed. Duskmourn would have been a good set if they didn't put the anachronistic modern day bullshit in it.
>>98437292My turn 5 win with my voltron tin street krenko deck turning into a game loss in one fell swoop from a rakdos charm
>>98437491100%, yeah. I still enjoyed prerelease by completely ignoring all the moderb crap, but every time I pulled one, it was accompanied by a heavy sign or a laugh of disbelief. Fucking chainsaw.
>>98437310>Valgavoth invades Innistrad>locals shrug, say "another one of those days I guess" and go about their businessIf anything it'd be a net positive for them since they'd get access to more advanced technology.
>>98437292>What's the most memorable moment you have from playing this nightmare of a game, anon?Probably the time I played a game of Pauper where the back and forth was so intense I ended up winning the turn before I decked myself. It was such a good moment I ended up taking a picture to memorialize it.
>>98439062>no UB threadwhoops, my bad folks. Thought this was the regular MTG general. Ignore the loriens I guess.
>>98438514Fuck my life into pieces
These Mystery Booster Commander cards look so dumb. The "rulebreaker" text doesn't actually break any rules it's just templating for things that already exist.Like the otter lets you add instants and sorceries of 1 other color to your deck. but that's literally just Partner without having a 2nd commander to castAnd the angel lets you play angels of any color even though it's monowhite, but they could do the exact same thing if they put WUBRG in the text box
>>98441519
>>98444878I guess it's a way to make the card playable in the 99/59, cause if they all had wubrg, they'd only be playable in wubrg decks.
>>98444941Yeah they could have changed the rules for the draft but whatever.I'm more annoyed that there's 2 cards that are in the set that are exactly what I want. One is fine, no real complaints. The other though is exactly what I want and they went and made it fucking monored. I already have a monored deck and monored is really bad colors for what this new card is doing so I'm genuinely torn about whether to build it.In any case, the fact that these are all gonna be like $10 and unobtainable for a while due to limited supply pisses me off
>>98445108It's pretty upsetting that the seemingly "gift to fans" set is a limited event exclusive set, definitely. Like they couldn't convince Hasbro that existing fans actually wanted a new Commander Legends set filled with tribal dudes that don't have any commanders and referenced characters without cards. A love letter to lore fans abd smoothbrained tribalshitters alike.And yeah, I saw that girl too and was saddened that shit didn't have other colors or some rulebreaker thing going on.
>>98445201>I saw that girl too and was saddened that shit didn't have other colors or some rulebreaker thing going on.You have no idea man. I have wanted a well themed puppet commander for fucking ever. The options are surprisingly limited. I need it to be themed around puppets and be about controlling other players or permanents. No option has ever had both.Then the monkey's paw curls and I get this shit. She's clearly part of the fucking rakdos cult too, and her flavor text references a rakdos enchantment. The more I think about it the madder I get
>>98445307It's much more of a blue+red thing since red threatens and blue steals. Not much with regards to puppet members, though, but you can always proxy for theme.
>>98445548Black has a few cards that change control of thing, like Blim. There's also that Jasper guy from OTJ that makes creatures you control but don't own into mercenaries. I don't think there's a single good reason she couldn't be rakdos.The sad thing is she probably just goes in the 99 of better commanders. I'm toying with a decklist now and there's just nothing coherent I can make happen with it. Not knowing what triggered abilities you will even have to copy as you play her (if any at all) really sucks. And red isn't good at giving all your creatures triggered abilities like some other colors can. The best I can come up with is that you just play every variation of Fling, steal your opponents creatures with "until end of turn" red theft spells, and then sac them for value instead of giving them back. But even then, that would fit rakdos so much better than monored.>you can always proxy for theme.I don't proxy, and even if I did what would be the point? There's a different feel to an official WotC card. Anyone at any time could proxy their own spin on Secret Lair, but they don't, they pay out the ass for WotC to do an OFFICIAL proxy.
>>98445577Anyone at any time could proxy their own spin on Secret Lair, but they don'tI do.
>>98445647Year of autism diagnosis?
>>98445649Borderline, but no.
>>98445658I hereby diagnose you
>>98445577>There's a different feel to an official WotC card.I am sure you are genuinely gay enough to truly believe this over 10 years into literally no new cards feeling like real Magic cards.
>>98445723>over 10 years into literally no new cards feeling like real Magic cards.Save the histrionics for women, anon
>>98445758To be fair, somewhere around the starter commander precons, half the magic cards they make since feel wierdly course.
Platinum Angel got an upgrade
>>98447020Nah it's as overrated as platinum angel though. I have never seen a real (non youtube game) where someone being unable to win or lose made a difference. And for 9 mana that shit is going to feel reeeeeal bad when it gets StP'd or bounced to hand
>>98444878propably prepping us up for the hybrid change>>98445201oh yeah this not retail. thankfully like 90% of this is tribal shit but yeah some of this shit is gonna be expensive thanks to wotc's infinite greed to print unique cards in limited releases
>>98437292>What's the most memorable moment you have from playing this nightmare of a game, anon?When a guy at my LGS was opening his prize packs and throwing out the trash, he threw away a Shaman of the Great Hunt (intentionally; he commented on how shit it was). I had been wanting one for my shitty Mardu tokens deck (I was a kid at the time my deckbuilding was ass) so I took it out of the cardboard bin. Guy walks up behind me, takes it off the table, goes 'Hey I didn't say you could have MY card!' and tears it in half in front of me. I start crying like an autstic little bitch, he gets like a 6 month ban from the LGS.And before you ask yes, he did play Esper control in RtR followed by some other control shit in Khans block forget what the best variant was in Khans. Quintissential That Guy.
>>98439068since you did something kino I think it can slide.
>>98448199I'm sorry that happened to you anon, I hope you got your Shaman of the Great huntThat reminds me of a more positive story I had last year though>LGS gives you a "free" pack with table rent>guy cracks Aetherdrift>pretty common practice if you don't want anything you let the rest of the pod take a look>I pick it up>Bleachbone Verge>uh hey you probably don't want to get rid of this>"nah they're not worth that much right?">uh depends what you mean by "much"...about €8?>he looks it up>"huh yeah I'll keep it"Felt like my good dead of the day. I did want a copy, I wouldn't have lied about it but there's still that part of my brain that just goes "you had it, it was in your hands, it was free"But it matters to me more to be honest I guess
>MBC looks like the most anticipated cards of the year>it's all in-universe>Hasbro will still absolutely lie to the shareholders just like they did about people trying to vote with their wallets by buying more in-universe sets
>>98453238They don't have to lie because stock is so incredibly limited. They can also blame it on being commander-centric rather than it being in-universe.Shit sucks.
Imma build this guy, wish me luck
>>98457782you have some gimmick or are you just running generic exile effects?
>>98458760I don't like theft, but this could be fun for theft with a bit of chaos.Maybe run some Shifting Grift, Share the Spoils, maybe even Blim, just make everyone swap cards as much as I can.Afaik the previous theft options in grixis were pseudo-tribal. The pirate guy or the vampire woman
>>98457782Sadly there aren't too many cards that exile without already stealing themselves.
>>98437292lol I just proxy all my UB cards and slap whatever fantasy art I think Is cool onto them problem solved.
>>98459347You shoukd do some research and make them proper in-universe cards :^)
>>98457782so "clown" is its own species/race? like goblin, zombie or angel.Wouldn't it make more sense if it were like a class? Similar to warrior, soldier, rogue or cleric?
>>98459330No so.I can also think of off the top of my head Necromentia and Dispossess. There's an equivalent to them which does creatures, but literally 3 mana search your opponents libraries lol>>98459395Who fucking knows. Advisor and Ally weren't a problem for you?
>>98459880eh... I've been out of the games for decades. I played from 8th edition to 10th edition included. I just like to browse these threads and look at cards from time to time. But if I remember correctly ally and advisors were "class" and the creature were always human or something else
>>98460015In ye olden days their species wasn't a type
>>98460064yes, but they soon adapted it and changed it, the card you posted is now technically Creature – Human Rebel as per the rules.in a 2026 card, having "clown" as its own specie is a deliberate choice
>>98458912>make everyone swap cards as much as I canI built the new gonti just for that. I still haven't mastered to win with a strat like that yet altho I enjoy them trying to keep track of multiple piles of cards just to tax them mentally
>>98460335>I still haven't mastered to win with a strat like that yetI'm gonna dig for my opponents wincons with Jester
>>98460344godspeed
>>98460064Human as a creature type was one of the big mistakes of the game tbqh
>>98459395>>98460087It doesn't look quite human. You're right they should have picked a better species to represent it than using clown which would commonly be viewed as a class.
>>98445647I do this but UBs of UBs
>>98463546Wrong thread, m80
>>98445647I always admired your posts in the edh thread.
>>98466989Thank you, brother
>>98467004Give props where props are due, I do find the Cayth hate funny though. Everyone prefers their broad commander to be pretty.
>>98467013If she was a visually interesting old lady I probably wouldn't bother, but she's fat, oldish, ugly, and boring, so just nothing appealing at all. Also Tawnos is a cool dude.
>>98447020Goes great in my angels deck!Platinum angel is one of my all time favorite cards, just because it's so cool, and darksteel is one of my favorite concepts, so I'm happy to see them combined.
Fucking sluts
>>98473122Who, me?
I was sketching more custom tokens for brenard food golems. is snake milk too raunchy?
>>98476234Work on your art
>Reality Fracture>next set>43 cards previewd>Star Slop >set after that>129 cards previewedIt's all so tiresome
>>98476234Looks good, man. No clue what a naga has to do with Brenard, though.Also yes, that would be too much. Would turn a nice soulful custom art into coomerart/porn.
>>98476234Kill yourself, dogfucker. Furfaggotry goes on >>>/trash/
>>98476430Woof woof
>>98476400milker food? STE is a snake with 4 arms.
>>98481073Oh, you're/he's making tokens for every single creature in hia dexk? Nevermind then, no notes. Gib milkies. Funny as a one-off joke if steve happens to show up.
>>98476234I’m trans and I hate UB but LOVE this bestiality porn thank you please keep posting.
>>98460087Exactly, Human was added in the great creature type update of 2002/2003?. I know Mirrodin was the first set with race class model printed on the card and all previous card were errata'd
>>98482273>I’m transTrue, you are> and I hate UBFalse, you worship it and are quite possibly paid to shill it with your fellow UBrown transes
>>98481196yea, I just didn't want to make everything gingerbread
just a couple left. what would be a good portal manipulator token? all I can think of is pic rel
>>98483153I don't get it.
>>98483153
>>98483934this was another but it's not a creature>>98483930idk he is manipulating his portal food comes out of. it's a stretch and that's why I want to replace it
>>98483934A, the block itself doesn't have momentum
>>98484100It could be a creature.
Why does nobody play this card? It's like 20 cents but it would be a good finisher in dozens of decks, especially token decks like Adrix and Nev
>>98487284It's green and blue.Also all of my decks are just engine builders, so having all of my creature be the same creature would not be good, outside of a couple of them like Blood Avatar, but that's not in-color
>>98487555I mean, there's a reason most copy spells either make you choose a non-legendary or simply do not say the copy is non-legendary so you have to make it non-legendary some other way.Sure a big part of copy spells can be the ETB, but there's tons of legendaries that become busted when there's more than one of them on the fieldSimic in particular fucking loves copies. But you could be running it in 4 and 5 color decks anyway
>>98487617I imagine part of the reason is also that it's the back of the card, and people don'tget that far.For me I have no deck, non, that would both benefit from it and has both colors for it, and I have a LOT of decks.There are definitely decks that could benefit from it, though, yeah.
>>98487284what the other anon said. I have exactly one deck that has blue and green (with black) and it doesn't really want everything being the same creature altho the effect is nice. I feel there needs to be a more specific reason to run this over say, a single non-legend clone that is more versatile since it stays aroundI'd even go as far as to say this side of the spell is a "win more" because it does nothing for a good while after a boardwipe
Guys I really miss set blocks. They didn't all have to be 3 blocks. Two was fine, and you can always throw in a spicy one block set now and then, but overall I miss them.
>>98488422>>98488623I'd put it in this for a start. >all my creatures are now a copy of the best legendary on the board>this side of the spell is a "win more" because it does nothing for a good while after a boardwipeI could accept not seeing its strength but this is a dumb statement. Thousands of cards do nothing after a board wipe. And you're in some of the best colors for casting creatures and making tokens, so it's not like it would take much to rebuild a board
>>98489759You wouod indeed put the clone effect in a clone deck, yes.You are right, it is a game ender and I suppose is underplayed (I don't have the stats) for the decks it does go in, but it really doesn't go in most decks that have UG. Would be huge in WU.
>>98437345>using UB memes
>>98490168>You wouod indeed put the clone effect in a clone deck, yes.You would also put in token decks which was also what I said
>>98489759that's the sultai deck I have too and the reason I don't have the spell in my deck is because I have noticed I almost never have more than 3 other creatures on board before getting got after protection, recursion and what not. this is because I don't create tokens but rather play creatures with effects I want to clone and that is slow. so as my commander already does the clone effect I don't REALLY need another card like that, let alone a version that clones legends to make a board "full" of volraths if that's the best legend. it would be what, like 4 or so -1/-1 counters and then I have to have more mana to make them something useful to make someone dead on that turn.all this to say you should run the spell if you are churning out a lot of tokens, yeah
>>98490703Are you running quasiduplicate and cackling counterpart? You should be
>>98490703>let alone a version that clones legends to make a board "full" of volraths if that's the best legend. it would be what, like 4 or so -1/-1 counters and then I have to have more mana to make them something usefulDidn't even catch this retardationBuddy you use 1 Volrath to copy something else, and then because that's a creature you control all your creatures become a copy of that, instead of making multiple Volraths and then having each of them use their ability??? Tf you even talking about
>>98490736not cackling anymore because the flashback is simply too expensive these days but used to have both>>98490748you see, these are the kinds of hoops my deck is not equipped to jump through, on top of the one extra mana and many more creatures instead of just one or two, the og volrath now needs to put the counter on something. this means going to combat so you can only cast the clone spell on second main or next turn, both too late. and if you are putting counters on useful stuff without him that's another card to this already 3+ card combo which is too fragile I feel. especially without a lot of tokenswhat I do run is naga flescrafter tho
>>98490847>he og volrath now needs to put the counter on something.Not if it's already there, and fortunately earlier in the year you got a set with an entire subtheme about -1/-1 counters and a -1/-1 counter preconLook man you're obviously the kind of guy who just enjoys inventing hurdles to allow you to keep on living exactly as you already are- it's fine, but just don't bother replying
>>98490897idk about the hostility but I feel you didn't read the reply fully as you ignored the need of even more cards to make the clone spell worth it. what comes to your new precon argument you enjoy inventing, there were like 2 new cards that do the whole counter placing thing and arguably only the reanimator is potentially a spell that could bring back creatures worth cloning. also it doesn't make the amount of cards any fewer to execute all this.if you feel like running away from reasons people are not playing the spell, it's fine too.
>>98490689If your token deck ran enough big boys to justify it, sure.
>you don't need an unlimited hand size, just keep the best 7 and discard the rest!I hate this advice so much and it always comes from oldheadsIt's retarded. That's not how cards work. There is no objectively "best 7" cards in a hand, it's a collection of various cards for various situations. Even something as simple as how many lands is a good idea to keep can change from moment to moment. And then there's situations where you keep the "best 7" for the time, and then the game changes and you wish you'd kept something else.I WILL be playing Reliquary Tower and Thought Vessel in every deck
>>98493019>I WILL be playing Reliquary Tower and Thought Vessel in every deckIf you aren't fairly consistantly needing it, there's not much of an argument for having it. If you don't ever need it in a game Reliquary Tower is a Wastes and Thought Vessel is the worst 2-drop mana rock that comes into play untapped. If your deck can handle that, that's fine, but +3-color decks really, really shouldn't. Even 2-color decks, honestly.Having them in your deck without a moderately consistant way to use them is like putting an enchantment boardwipe in your deck, it's just too specific to be useful 99% of the time.
>>98482273I’m so thankful for the trans people in this community, I didn’t think any other enlightened girlies hated universes beyond and loved furries as much as I do. I love you.
>>98493060I don't need a reason other than the fact I want an unlimited hand size.Maybe I get lucky and draw a lot, maybe someone plays group hug and I draw a lot, maybe they're trying to mill me out by draw. In any case versatility is valuable in this game and having more cards in hand makes me more versatile>+3-color decks really, really shouldn't. Even 2-color decks, honestly.If a couple colorless sources in your deck make it unplayable that's not the fault of those sources, you aren't running enough ramp and fixing
>>98493158>maybe maybe maybeOr maybe none of those and they do nothing, as is very often the case.>if it makes your deck unplayableNo one is saying this, but a colorless source with zero utility will make your deck worse. Not unplayable, but worse, certainly.You do you, man. Run your Temple of the False God too. None of them will ruin your decks, they will just make them worse.
>>98437321>>98437491>>98438514This is a good idea for a CUBE. Demonic/Horror cube
>>98493302>Or maybe none of those and they do nothing, as is very often the case.Need it and not have it etc etc etc>a colorless source with zero utility will make your deck worseLike Sol Ring??? >Run your Temple of the False God too.No see the difference there is TotFG taps for NOTHING if you don't have 5 lands
>>98493369>like sol ringThat'a hevay mana acceleration, but actually yes, don't run sol rong, not because it's weak but because it's strong.
How would you guys feel about a cube league?Are there any sims that would be good for this? How is untap.in?Post what kinds of cards/packages you think would be cool.
>>98496146I love draft even though I'm relatively shit at it, so a cube league sounds great.I'd love to see blocks, like a few sets from the same plane, or from the same storyline.My only experiance beyond fiddling around with shit by myself is in TTS, so I couldn't speak on anything else.
>>98496146Maybe following specific events or groups, like the Keldon.Or something like an anon previously mentioned, removing the trash from a setting like on Duskmorne.
>>98496146Limit it to <M15.
>>98496146Is there a site that resolves shit for you like Arena? I'd play but not if I have to get on mic and read cards aloud and rely on manual input to resolve correctly
>>98497826Do you exclusively play Arena? Cause that's exactly how in person mtg is played.My only issue with it being in a program is if the UI fights you to do things.
>>98498516>Do you exclusively play Arena? I don't even play Arena>Cause that's exactly how in person mtg is played.Yeah no fucking shit, if I'm playing online I want to take advantage of the technology and not have it played exactly like in person but now with the added disadvantage of having to wrangle something like TTS's jank-ass controlsI played Yugioh and Keyforge on unofficial clients and even they could automate card effects, it's not much to ask for
>>98498683I think the closest that we have outside of Arena and maybe MTGO (not sure, never used it) is FORGE, which is actually part automated player and part whole singleplayer videogame. I think it does work, but I haven't touched it in a long while. I think you can evem run drafts with it, but I'm not sure as I've never tried.>>98496146Maybe look into FORGE.
When do Reality Fracture previews start, anyway?
>>98506777like 24 or so days before prerelease, which is on the 25th next month. so not in a while unless wotc feels they need some extended hype with "leaks"
>>98506777>>98506825They hold off on in-universe previews to try and fuck them so UB looks better by comparison. ~40 previews are currently out for RF which is the next set, and yet 120 are out for Star Trek which is the set after. It's utterly shameless
>>98508331There was a star trek convension that wotc appeared at recently, so they did rhe set previews there. That's really all that was.As much as I hate UB, that's completely understandable that they would want to do that.
I've asked this also in the other thread: what could be the colors of neets?I've received two votes for black and one for black-green
>>98508637>That's really all that was.>As much as I hate UB, that's completely understandable that they would want to do that.It's cute you can cope like this anon but we had the fucking Marvel Heroes previews before Lorwyn too. This is a pattern of behavior
>>98508690colorpie ideologically that makes sense, however I'd argue red has the most unemployed creatures on cards. that or green hippies.
>>98508847if the fracture spoiler season is cut short thanks to early previews meaning there is not enough cards to fill the time, I'll be nooticing
>>98508847That's fair enough I suppose.
>>98508331>~40 previews are currently out for RF which is the next set, and yet 120 are out for Star Trek which is the set after.I hadn't checked this in a while and it's actually worse than I thought.There's currently 135 previews from the Standard legal Star Trek set and 41 from the commander product. So Star Trek previews currently outnumber Reality Fracture previews more than 4:1
>>98447020Finally good game design!Unfortunately its been powercrept. There's already a 5/5 for 9 mana.>>98445723>>98445758Hang on, he's right. Modern cards have a totally different feel.I've grown past thinking that means they're worse, but there's a reason retro formats are so popular. People want to go back and play a version of the game they isn't the same as today's formats. I won't bother to get mad, since you can and should play and enjoy both, but I agree there's a difference.
>>98511635It's just nostalgia sloppaOld frames look like dogshit my man. They're just bricky 90s design software garbage. But you associate that with being how Magic "should" look
>>98513569I think he's talking about actual physical, tactile sensations. Which, yes, older cards have a different feel. Could be changes to the printing process or it could be a function of how the material ages, but you can pretty reliably tell without looking which of two cards is newer.
>>98513668Did anyone else by any of the starter commander precons? Holy fuck those cards felt like ass, like rough untreated cardboard.I had another set during a prerelease feel close to that as well, but I don't remember which one.
>>98513873nta but first time I remember thinking the box was fake was during WAR. the jap printer cards were like sandpaper and the foiling way darker thanks to the nonglossy surface. if anything they didn't curl as much
*digs in your path*
>>98516327Shut up and show me your trade binder before I give you a huge wedgie.
>>98516327>Digging is how you bypass mountains in canonWhat did Richard Garfield mean by this?
>>98516327I miss old cards. So simple and charmy. No blacks, trannies or IP.
>>98513569>Old frames look like dogshit my manlolzoomoids truly have no aesthetic sense whatsoever>>98516327I want a creature card of this guy
>>98519513>zoomoids truly have no aesthetic sense whatsoeverI am literally a digital designer and artist, I've designed logos and brand templates for dozens of companies.Consider the idea that actually you have no aesthetic sense and just like something that reminds you of your childhood. Go back to shitting in diapers while you're at it
>>98520500>I've designed logos and brand templates for dozens of companies.Torture couldn't drag that out of me trying to sell my good taste. Is the problem that it's not in Corporate Memphis?
>>98520598>durrrrrr u design things? then u must think bad design gud!!!!!!!!Wow you play Magic? You must love Universes Beyond then, right?
>>98520649NTA but that's completely apples to oranges.You being a graphic designer really doesn't hold much weight for things being beautiful. Graphic design is about as soulless as it gets. It's more psychology than anything, things looking "clean" and drawing the eye where you want.That said, while the old frames (mostly) look nice, the modern (not current) frames look the best of the three by far. A great mix of the soul of old frames with a design that conveys the information much, much more clearly.The current frame took that and said "but we need an area we can put all the credits on the card where it can be seen more clearly", and then just said fuck it by taking the modern design and adding a shotty-looking black area at the bottom, rounding out the beatiful top corners, and giving the box more of a drop shadow. Gross.
>>98520500The old frame compliments the art, settling quietly around it. The new frame clashes with the art, like looking at something through a thick plastic window frame.
>>98521174>the modern (not current) frames look the best of the three by far.The Planar Chaos frames are actually the best ones of all.
>>98521313Thus why I said of the three.
Mirri getting punched in the mouth
So you're telling me they make a commander slop set with deep cut legends and we somehow don't get a card for Asha? Where is my bant representation? Who was in charge here? Where do I file my complaint?
>>98521556god damn manacosts like this are sexy
His ult ability does NOT feel blue....>>98521556Sent it to MARO
>>98525392Every color gets +1/+1 counters. A quick Scryfall shows that blue more typically gets “where X is equal to the number of instant and sorcery cards in your graveyard” for that, but cards in hand is a pretty blue metric.
>>98525392wasn't gavin making this?
>>98525392>goatse jace
>>98525620>o:"+1/+1 counter" c=u date<=WAR>52 cards where the text includes “+1/+1 counter” and the colors is U and the date is less than or equal to the release date of “WAR”Exactly one one them cares about instants and sorceries and it's from Conspiracy. Zero care about number of cards in hand.Blue gets 52 cards that mention counters when they still had the color pie and used Magic players for designers. Red got 77, white 113, black 125, and green 282. Tell me again about how blue gets counters and relates them to these bullshit game properties they never once found interesting in the first 25 years of Magic.
>>98520500Yeah sorry mate the other guy's got your number. There hasn't been a good logo redesign in the last decade, and I assume your work, if it exists, would be among those corposlop de-soulings. The fact that you, of all people, hate the classic border is actually one of the strongest arguments in favor of it.Feel free to reply with some Pepsi tier design pdf explaining the theory though, it'll make for a good thread theme.
>>98528793>and I assume
>>98528785Would have made more sense for the ult to give creatures "Prowess X".
>>98531559It might turn out that blue has a +1/+1 subtheme in the set because colorshift
>>98534979is it gonna have colorshifting? last time I heard about this arc was that some cards might do some light colorpie bending. a whole subtheme seems like something they don't want to do as they said in the premiere that this won't be another planar chaos altho I'd very much like it to be
>>98536765From what we've seen so far, famous cards are getting redone in new colors like Ancestral Recall into Ancestral Thirst. So no, not really shifting effects into the wrong colors, I'm just saying we can't completely rule it out.I don't think pic related is an especially red effect, but whatever we can see what they were trying to do. Side rant here, but it's objectively worse than Craterhoof but will still probably be a $15-$20 card purely on the basis that it's trying to be Craterhoof
>>98536781yeah I hear you. tho I feel this colossus will only be expensive during the first month or so and then drop significantly to a fiver and below simply because counting artifacts instead of just creatures is a very big change as a buildaround. doubt the reference alone will manage to carry the price for longalso unrelated but damn, just checked emeritus of ideation and it's down to 5
>>98536828>just checked emeritus of ideation and it's down to 5Good, scalpers and any piggies getting into Magic because they heard there is profit can get price gouged and lose money
Bumping from page 10, won't do it again
>>98541951Bump my dilation stick into my boyhole dada, I fucking hate UB
let's say you have only one spell in your deck that is 1 cmc and it's not sol ring. you cast something that discovers 1 at sorcery speed. what would be something you want the sure hit to be most of the time in sultai? pongify? other removal?
>>98545113Why are you discovering for 1 consistantly enough to warrent exclusion?Removal would be the generalist choice, but it really depends on what the deck wants to do.Really the best choice is a zero cost suspend spell, though those are obviously not cmc 1.
>>98545429But for a fun answer.
I was thinking about proxying a vintage cube since I want to return back to MTG without giving money to WOTC. Do y'all have any recommendations? I was thinking about using the MTGO Holiday cube from 2019 since that was around the last time I was heavily into Magic and I heard it was a good year/fun to draft but I'm open to any suggestions.
>>98545429oh yeah I totally forgot those. inevitable betrayal is most likely the best choise here because a creature etb could be anything, it could even be removal. thanks
>>98541951>TitanbonesPart of me wants to stick around with standard because it seems like the non-UB sets are starting to have a lot of Magic fanservice to compensate for UB taking away the focus on Magic story, but at the same time, it seems like the cards I'd like to see just aren't really on WotC's radar.
>>98548260No reason to stick with standard, no. It's mostly UB. Even if you can somehow manage to avoid it in your own deck, you will be facing it constantly.Better off with limited, be it prerelease, draft, or cube. That way all the cards are controlled.
>>98549753Have you tried not being a repulsive cock sucking faggot?
Hating UB is going mainstreamhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq8x763DxjM
>>98551144I'm not sure what part you're offended by here.
>>98551441>Random normie with 30k subsLmaoPeople talk about hating it lots. Andrea Menguchi has said he doesn't like it openly, but he still plays with it because he's a pro player so he has to.
>>98549753I just want more Grist lore. Now that Blex is gone, she's probably the only new character I like.>>98553246No clue what bro is yapping about.
>>98553724I 100% understand wanting more lore especially for vharacters you like. Standard is in no way involved with that though. Just played limited.I am very excited to see where things go with the magic story in general, even if they have let us down a lot recently (looking at you valgavoth).
>>98553254>>Random normie with 30k subsMagic is far more niche than you think. About 2 channels in the sektur regularly see over 100k views
>>98555825Lots of channels with a million plus subs barely see 100k views. That's really not relevant.
>>98437292does faerun and the D&D card count as universes beyond?
>>98555836Genuinely what point do you think you're making?>hey this vid is pretty popular, people are turned on UB>"erm I've never heard of that channel and it's only 30k views">Magic is more niche than you think, only a couple Magic channels see over 100k views a vid so 30k is actually pretty good>"there are channels with 1M subs that don't get 100k views"Okay??? Complete non-sequitur
>>98555881I didn't say 30k views, I said 30k subs.Views fluctuate wildly so they aren't a good measure of a channel's mainstream appeal.That is all to say, a video having 40k views from a channel with 30k subs talking about wotc being shit is not "hitting the mainstream" by any metric. Call me when the elder tranny lover fag does another 180 on UB and actually stays that way.
>>98555919>I didn't say 30k views, I said 30k subs.>Views fluctuate wildly so they aren't a good measure of a channel's mainstream appeal.Oh you're a diagnosed retard, I see.The channel could have 1 sub, if it had 40k views and thousands of comments that's all that matters to approval of the sentiment of the video
>>98555952I just don't understand how you cab correlate 40k views with "hitting the mainstream" when there are tons of anti-UB videos with tons more views than that. What about this makes it mainstream?
>>98555878>does faerun and the D&D card count as universes beyond?It's not filtered by using "-is:ub" on scryfall, but its not part of the MTG canon (at least from what I remember).Does it fit in this thread though?
>>98545113>>98545429got to pull this off with contest of claws when dealing 1 extra dmg and discover betrayal. I feel like the bite card is very good if you double dip like this
>>98559650I think this thread is more about the mtg canon world, personally, not business-lines.
>>98559650>>98561236There is nothing wrong with a WotC IP going on WotC cards. D&D had a Magic module, there's no reason at all that the reverse can't happen.When you try to break Magic down too granularly people will always be able to find exceptions. Old cards had guns and robots, newer cards have cars and Sony Walkmans. So opposing UB because anything looks out of place is a dead argument, and what's worse is it's completely subjective and how you end up with retarded "approved UB" memes about LotR being okay because it "feels" rightThe only distinction that will stand the test of time is whether the set is a 3rd party IP licensed to WotC. Not only is this a completely indisputable categorization, it also highlights that part of the problem with UB is a cynical cashgrab where card-space is literally being sold to other companies to advertize their shit. The Marvel sets are trying to drum up hype for their movies, the Avatar set was scheduled in literally last minute to come out just before Avatar's 20th anniversary. Other IPs are always selling something and brand awareness is inherently valuable, it's why Coca-Cola is constantly running new ads despite already being the most popular soft drink in the world and everyone knowing about it- there is value to just maintaining presence in the public consciousness. So even if you don't know what the product is, ad space is giving those IPs value.>b-b-but Hasbro owns WotC and some of the IPs that have had crossovers so that's okay!!!No. Companies have legal personality, 2 companies separately own the rights to things even if one company owns the other. WotC does not own the IPs Hasbro owns, and if Hasbro were to sell WotC the likelihood is they'd have to sell the IPs WotC owns along with it, or buy them from WotC's new owners before the sale.>b-b-but muh Arabian Nights!!Retarded bullshit. The direction designers thought the game might go 30 years ago is not relevant to what is happening to the game right now
This SLD looks like total AIDShttps://scryfall.com/sets/slz
>>98562877Or we can catigorie it as wotc IP that is set within the Magic the Gathering universe, which would exclude D&D.I honestly don't know why you'd want it included and your arguments for it are jist strange. Could EotC not quite easily make a game about their own funko pop knock offs, have the IP, then make a crossover with magic then? And that would be UW? That's incredibly dumb.
>>98563780To add to that, you can abolutely also have in-universe sets that you don't think feel right or fit, but are still in-universe. That doesn't run counter to being anti-UB, you can both dislike UB's existance as a whole and dislike certain UW sets.
>>98563780>Or we can catigorie it as wotc IP that is set within the Magic the Gathering universe, which would exclude D&D.And if WotC says that canonically all D&D universes are part of the multiverse??? What then?>Could EotC not quite easily make a game about their own funko pop knock offs, have the IP, then make a crossover with magic then? And that would be UW?You got to lay off the crack anon, you're fucking incoherent
>>98563698it's kinda concerning how everyone in our 2 separate groups is just nodding along and saying every secret lair looks so cool.
>>98563809>what then?Then they would be retarded, but nothing would really change, the definision would just include them as well. That said, they already have printed gods as planeswalkers, which makes no sense to MtG's universe, so it's not really compatible.>You're incoherantI'm saying that if Wotc made a new non-fantasy IP and did a crossover then it would be UW, which is more or less against the spirit of what anti-UB crowd stands for.
>>98563839>but nothing would really changeExcept the foundation of your definition, dumbass.>I'm saying that if Wotc made a new non-fantasy IP and did a crossover They won't, and they won't
>>98563780How would WotC spontaneously coming up with a non-fantasy IP and crossing it over into Magic be any different to what we got in Duskmourn, New Capenna, or Neon Genesis Kamigawa?
Why are rakdos commanders so fucking boring?We got 3 themes for ya kid>aristocrats>burn>aristocrats and burnOn paper it should be this crazy color combo that gives you a feeling on anarchy and maybe breaks some rules, but it simply isn't.
>>98564793bro your storm/combo? clones? aggro? theft? forced combat/sex? the singular alt wincon with treasures? there are propably others I missed too
>>98564993Point to the fucking commanders for that lmao. No partners allowedhttps://edhrec.com/commanders/rakdos
>>98565024>npcrecid=rakdos f:c is:commander -(otag:burn-player OR otag:life-loss-matters OR otag:synergy-sacrifice OR otag:sacrifice-outlet OR otag:morbid) -atag:external-ip -is:digitalif you can't pick from those idk what to tell you
>>98565446That's okay, I can tell you what to tell me>I'm sorry I thought there were more interesting options in rakdos than there really were. Looking at the list I just provided you, a lot of these are either overcosted or really better in the 99 of something else than in the command zone themselvesGo ahead
>>98565593>noo not like that
>>98565856>the pool of rakdos commanders is quite bad>"oh yeah? what about these, huh?">all of those have the problems I referred to>"y-you're moving the goalposts!"
>>98564793Build my nigga Laughing Jasper FlintPut a cowboy hat on your enemies' Craterhoofs
>>98565935Theft is troon strats unfortunately, and I'm working on a chaos-theft thing with Madcap Jester and Blim. The idea is to have everyone playing each other's shit
>>98564002>except the foundation of your definitionNo, it wouldn't change at all. If they become part of the mtg universe, my rule wouldn't change, they would just be included now because they are part on the mtg universe.>wotc will never make a new IP!I think it's dramatically more likely that they would make a new IP and make mtg cards for it, than they are to canonize their existing IP into mtg.
>>98564391Because those are new canon mtg planes. They're shit, but they aren't UB, they are part of the mtg universe.
>>98565952>"theft is for trannies">"anyways, here's my theft deck"Based tranny confirmed?
>>98565896NTA but you did more the goalposts. You functionally said there are no commanders in rakdos that aren't aristocrats or burn. It doesn't matter if they're "overcosted" or "better in the 99", they are there. They do exist, so you are wrong.
https://www.tumblr.com/markrosewater/825938397394796544/maros-reality-fracture-teaserwhat's the token gonna be?
>>98565971Nah notably I have to completely change what theft is to make it fun to play.I fucking hate people who sit there and hold their grubby little mitts out to play with cardboard I spent my hard-earned money on. There's really obnoxious cards that will just let them search your whole deck for any card they want too. All round it feels fucking awful at the table.The idea with the Madcap Jester is that it's chaos but the chaos is everyone is playing everyone else's shit.What's that one card? Share the Spoils? That's an important part of it, and also using shit like Blim, Harmless Offering, Shifting Grift, Role Reversal, and Visions of Duplicity to get everyone playing someone else's shit.By EDHREC's extremely limited theme vocabulary (I learned yesterday they don't even have "Arcane" as a theme even though there are multiple commanders that care about you casting Arcane spells) you would have to call it "Theft" but I think it's so completely unlike theft in its purpose that it is something else
>>98566151do you have Scrambleverse and Confusion In The Ranks? Play that shit with Norrin the Wary
>>98566173I don't play old cards if I can help it
This lil nigga is available at my LGS for $1, do I buy it? I've heard Henzie decks can be unintentionally strong
>>98565979How old were you when you were diagnosed with autism?If someone says rakdos commanders are just aristocrats and burn, referring to commanders that do something else but are functionally unplayable does not refute that point.It would be like if someone said the US election is a 2 party system, and then you go>nah uh, there's like 3 independents who each get ~1% of the vote!!!!!That is not a meaningful alternative>>98566107Post screenshots if you want anyone to reply to nosewater's ramblings
>>98566336I mean it's a 40 creature special so it can be a bit samey after a while. in my exp playing against it he is one of those KOS commanders that really need to be sent to the moon. so yea he can pop off hard super easy$1 is not that big of an investment if you run full of goodstuff you already have just to try it out
>>98566355I am borderline, not over.>If I say only A and B are the only options, and you say C exists too, you're wrong!No, I'm right. You thinking they are "unplayable" in a casual format is an issue in itself.>convoluted political comparisonYou aren't voting, you're building a fun deck for a game.
>>98567696>>convoluted political comparisonJust take the L autist
>>98566107battle would be funny but not really possible with their current implementation (you cant cast it from exile) ig. it will be a planeswalker (or saga) token>“where X is the number of cards that were put into target player’s graveyard from their library this turn.”(anti?) dredge shit incomming
>>98570118oh yeah it's propably a saga
>>98566107>prepared spell that’s a red version of a popular blue instant (the color it should have been in)Oh hey, Force of Will. Well that shits going to pre-sale sky high until people eventually realize that the cost of casting the creature and preparing it if it doesn’t enter prepared balances out the value of casting the spell.Same thing happened to that Ancestral Recall one, and the precon one that had Channel on it
>>98570118>>98570147Sagas are enchantments, and we’ve already seen enchantment tokens. Almost certainly planeswalker.
>>98570738Planeswalker would make sense because the whole idea was that Jace colorshifted a bunch of named characters and planeswalkers and that would be half the set if they did all of them
>>98570738capenna ob nix can make a copy of himself so maybe not
>>98570866Nah you're overthinking it. It's already possible to make token copies of any permanent. There are spells that will copy any permanent and when you copy a permanent spell the copy enters as a token.Clearly The Vile Enemy means a TYPE of token, like Treasure, Clues, Food, etc.
>>98570890Treasure, Clue, and Food are all subtypes.
>>98571153Got sick of scrolling for the fucking link, so here, screenshot.It says "token type" as in a type of token. We have no fucking clue what that means. Is MaRo using technical language here? You have no idea, and given the absolute shit show of Day 0 erratas on recent cards, I doubt anyone on the design team thinks in those terms.Someone said it was almost certainly planeswalkers.Someone else said it might not be that because there is a planeswalker that can copy itself.I said that he's taking it too literally since you can already make a token copy of any permanent so clearly a planeswalker being able to copy itself has fucking nothing to do with it. Then I gave the example of Treasures, Clues, and Food, which- yes, are "subtypes" if you want to be a turbosperg and treat the Comprehensive Rules as your own personal bible- but would probably more commonly be referred to as "a type of token" by most people, albeit they are all artifacts.One way or another it doesn't fucking matter because it will be planeswalkers and I don't give a shit what you reply to this post with. I'm too fucking old for these retarded semantic sperg-fights and I'll see you next month when it's planeswalker tokens
>it turns out it’s a new card type entirely
>>98571329God I hope not. War of the Spark was so bad. I'm imagining all the fucking cards that will be templated to include [new permanent type] and inadvertently completely fucking bricking the card in whole or in part because the new permanent is just garbage and no one plays it
>>98571329>it has no type at all
>>98571825>Name:Token>Type:Token Token>This token is a token.
>>98569493Even if it was apples to apples, I vote 3rd party.
>>98572022Just don't vote then?
>>98572026An example of why it isn't apples to apples. I enjoy building decks and playing games with them.I guess I enjoy seeing that I'm one of the votes for the 3rd party, but again, the comparison doesn't work.
>>98571430Battles weren’t War of the Spark.
>>98570738there's already a Jace that makes a token copy of itselfit's the one that scries 2 for +1 and draws for 0 (but he hits himself with the card)
>>98574632I think in this context copies don't count. They are copies of a permanent, not specifically a planeswalker. As anotger anon pointed out, you can make copies of every permanent.
>>98574308think he meant the rule change from target player to any target to include walkers
>>98574308>>98575072No yeah I was just like>the fuck set was battles in? it had something to do with war right? War of the Spark?Was it actually Battle for Zendikar or some shit?
>>98575655march of the machine
>>98575662Riiiight
>set name MOM>hot milfs on the cardWhat did WotC mean by this?
Just discovered pic related. Very neat blink/theft tech
Is this even the same Ajani? Except for the mane of fire, they look nothing alike.
>>98447351>hasnt fuckblasted his own life total with ancient tomb to oblivion and won at -4 with herald of the eternal dawnKill everyone, including yourself.
>>98581182 Damnation with mono-black mana? It's time.
>>98581182>Kill everyone, including yourself.Could be a shitpost
What did they mean by this?
>>98581566>bracketFAGDH general is this way>>>/reddit/
>>98581566I did this before with Jon Irenicus giving away the demon that makes it so that you cant win and opponents cant lose. Made 3 copies of it and waited until all of us were at negative life, then boardwiped.
>>98439062>slauper
>>98581399Just play avacyn, ez pz>>98581566Na I'm just a crusy old timer. https://moxfield.com/decks/1m8TB_bmkUuwtQrGn3Np_g
>>98497821I have an EDH old border cube that has one of each card printed in old border. I actually thought about extending to exactly what you posted. That was the last good period I think. Also I hate post M15 borders with the stamps.
>>98438487I always thought this guy's axe/cleaver thing looked really weird along with his getup. I also didn't understand this card as a 9th grader when it came out but I'm guessing it >hoses GY snapcaster and reanimator>destroy artifact is never bad>beats tokens, infinite creature combos, and helps you win races against other creature decks when you run out of steam late game??
>>98581935>>98439062I stopped playing the game a long time ago and when I tried to get back in I decided commander would be fine since I played it with my friends back when I was in school in the mid 2010's.I hated it and it seems a lot of people who play MTg also don't like it. Yet I keep hearing so many good things about pauper. Doesn't it fall into the same trap of just some commons dominating the entire format? Is there enough diversity and viable strategies that you don't just end up running the same 10 cards in every fucking deck like other formats?
It's my conclusion that premodern is shit. Why? Two decks in top 8 that are just gay as shit solitaire decks>enchantress>replenishThey run the same combo. They win the same way. The only difference is how they spam the board with enchantments for Opalescence. They only ever interact if forced to. Just solitaire until they win. But then again, every MTG deck is a solitaire deck if your opponent doesn't force you to interact. Bad design generally for a two player game.And then there's the aggro. The two decks. Either lackey for easy combo into a turn 3-4 win or one of the most efficient burn decks in the format. The other end is just the slowest most boring control decks to play against. And then there's seeing JotC's mistakes when designing black. Just the ability to get an opponent to ditch their hand in the first few turns before they could do anything. I see the truth now. MTG is shit. Absolute garbage. It always was. Premodern Brozilians like to pretend that old MTG was somehow better. It was just a broken mess in a different way. I'm going to look for another game to play.>>98582143Pauper just has less combo than the rest of MTG. It's especially annoying to the 15 common black cards that read something like "as an additional cost sacrifice an artifact" then "draw 2 cards." The top tier decks are pretty much just affinity or "affinity" for graveyard or some extremely power crept shit that popped up in Modern Horizons. MTG is just a bad game regardless of format. Commander is even worse though because it's not even a game. Not two players going at it trying to win and having hopefully what resembles a "fair" game rather than who draws their combo first. It's some gay fucking social event like D&D but without the world building.
>>98584004I knew super old and new magic was shit but I wouldn't count out the whole game like mid lifetime modern (doesn't exist anymore) because it was slower. both old and new magic are too powerful to be good by definition so only the middle remains.
>>98584208Modern wins, as always. (See: >>98521174)
>>98584208The middle? You mean like Scars of Mirrodin to RTR? Where you had perfectly balanced decks like Affinity? A standard that was just the fastest available aggro v. the most consistent control as in the Zendikar and Scars standard blocks were? Scars of course being the block which introduced cards like gitaxian probe. Zendikar is also notable as the design philosophy after Mirrodin's mess went away changed to one which culminated in the mess today. Even the original Ravnica was off the rails with 3/3 creatures for only 2 mana and NO drawbacks.
>>98521174>Ignoring the intermediates between Alpha and 8th editionBy 4th edition much of the formatting had been cleaned up and text and parts of the cards were already far more readable. Certainly I would agree that a text bubble for the card type and card name are good additions. But cards looked more like magic cards still in 7th edition and prior. After they started to resemble more and more something like Pokemon cards.
>>98584268Did they, though?
>>98584229>>98584397Looks the same to me.
>>98445649Officially the coolest commander from this set I’ve seen so far.
>>98585474Playtesting is less fun than I expected. You will be shocked how few 1 mana jeskai instants and sorceries are worth running. It's most removal because the rest are all combat tricks and therefore don't go in the deck because combat damage has to already have been dealt to cast the exiled spell
wasn't there supposed to be a coomander announcement this summer? there's only 2 days left
Why does Jace have eyeliner and tits now?
>>98586443As the playerbase becomes more trans, so does Jace. Makes sense to me.
>>98437310Put maybe Ulgothra/Homelands into the mix? It has similiar feel to later revisits of Innistrad but with the dying plane, humanity grasping the remains of hope they still had and vampire overlord slowly but surely conquering everyone and everything. And I guess minotaurs, nature, dwarves and bandits doing their shit, too.
>>98581900That Teferi was a shit student till he was kind of forced to grow the fuck up and figure out how to unfuck everyone stuck in a time bubble.Honestly, an alt version of Teferi that decided to just fuck off, never figured out time magic and still is just a retarded menace would be kinda kino for Reality Fracture. Make him an illusionist or some shit.
>>98586235Nope.https://youtube.com/shorts/iwsL2rYGrlM?si=UvLWXP2mJWXEbDG5
>>98586443>child Jace>Ixalan Jace>Innistrad Jace>Phyrexia JaceI'm forced to admit that it would be kino if this set involved all the different Jaces that have erased themselves over the years resurfacing to argue over their current actions
>>98587095Goatse Jace
>>98587016god damn lazy bum. the gc list cannot be large enough
>>98587016>?si=UvLWXP2mJWXEbDG5All of this is a tracking URL used to monitor who you share videos with
>>98588514Oh, I knew some of the where connected to playlists, I didn't know others were trackers. Thanks for letting me know, sorry about that.
>>98588724I think playlists on YT is "&list" or something similar. "?si=" is signature, I think it appears the same on other sites like InstagramAmazon uses "ref=" but I think most people are more wary about Amazon in the first place because for some godforsaken reason Amazon will put your fucking search terms into a URL if you opened a listing from a search, which makes the URL insanely long and noticeable when you copy and paste it
>>98586443>>98587458Council of Jace agrguing with each other.
>>98437292>What's the most memorable moment you have from playing this nightmare of a game, anon?winning monoblack devotion with my shitty UG flash deck during RtR/Theros standard.
>>98584244>3/3 creatures for only 2 mana and NO drawbackshell yeah brother. that's real magic right there
some quality rage baithttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig5-jelxf7s
Do I spend $70 on cards straight off the back of payday?
>>98593730Yeah, it is rage bait that someone would be treating a game like an investment vehicle.
>>98594962you should spend more than $70
>>98595082Findom me daddy
>>98595008Have you ever seen that PayMoneyWubby guy or whatever his name is? Total faggotAll "mtg finance" fags need to self-delete
>>98595157unfortunately wotc keeps printing fomo shit with mechanically unique cards in super limited product so they are not going anywhere
I fucking hate that EDHREC uses the latest print of whatever card instead of its most ubiquitous printing. Like look at this shit. What the fuck is this?
>>98597680yeah I go by art when playing too and whenever someone has some fucked art on the table I have to do a double take what it is. this game has quickly become a race to be as annoying as possible with readability
>>98598004It's your opponent's job to provide a written translation for cards that can not be read.
>lets sit here doing nothing for an hour
>>98595008I didn't watch the video but he and the other GGG guys have been playing since Beta or thereabouts and their collectors autism is driven by genuine passion rather than profit.t. Kiwi>>98599038That's the point of the card and of the deck. It's a hard prison deck with minimal wincons that you have to go under.>>98597680I'm not an EDHoid but you can use is:firstprinting on Scryfall or Moxfield so it doesn't try and forcefeed you the latest version. Maybe if EDHrec has accounts there's a similar operator.
>>98599570>on ScryfallScryfall already ignores special printings. It will still give you UBsloppa prints, but it ignores Secret Lairs and Special Guests etc
>>98590182Perfect
>almost exactly a month until Reality Fracture>1 (O N E) new preview >it's a boring 1 drop combat trick>135 (ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FIVE) cards have been previewed for Star TrekThey're trying to sabotage another in-universe set, gang.
>>98603620there are TWO whole spoilers, anon. this one cares about legend bloat
>>98603620There was a star trek convension so they previewed a ton of cards there.But yes.
>>98603730One came out monday, yours came out today>>98603958Didnt have to preview 1 3 5 cards. Star Troons would have shit piss and cum for just the captains and you know it
>>98602100>perfected>4/5Can't even balance offense and defense and you call that perfected huh
But that's just a theory... A MUTLIVERSE THEORY!
SHOCKDirect burn never goes out of fashion.
>>98602100>>98603620>>98605578I don't make the cards, man. I just report them.
Are there any websites where i can just give them a deck list and like 50 dollars and have them mail me a proxy deck? I want to start getting into higher power magic but I don't have the money to shell out for a 900 dollar deck or the faculties to make high quality proxies myself.
>>98607826mpcfill? use the editor with a list to export the xml file and run their non-dolphinporn executable to automatically go through their process if you don't want to do it manually. idk if they approve real magic card back since their library doesn't have one but you can upload a custom pic. I haven't needed to do so tho
