Bravo GW edition>Previously, in the Mortal Realms>>98660726>Official AoS website:https://www.ageofsigmar.com>Downloads, Rules Errata, and FAQs:https://www.warhammer-community.com/warhammer-age-of-sigmar-downloads/>Toolshttps://runebrush.pa-sy.com/warscroll/https://lordbaconbane.github.io/aoswarscrollcreator/>4e Booksgofile.io/d/JXpc9g>Anvil of Apotheosis hero creator (old):https://aosg.github.io/https://sigdex.io/>Thread Question:no question, talk leaks
>>98670975
>>98670976
>>98670979The goy... golems I mean look pretty nice, but the regular dwarfs look generic in a bad way. Would much rather use Fireforge or oathmark dwarfs.
>TQI've been hearing runnning water from my neighbour's yard for 3 days. I hope a pipe didn't break while they're absent, csuse it might damage the wall.
>>98670979Problem solved.
>>98671001these fit so much better with the golems, i wouldnt be surprised if this becomes the standard
>>98671001
>>98670979Hopefully they line up nice when I try stick into ToWAlso FOUR dwarf factions in AoS, ain't that more than there are elf factions (wood elves, elves and fish elves?)
>>98670979I like that the beards look more realistic, but the armor is just boring
>>98671028Naked dwarfs are going to be rolled into vanilla dwarfs, so I heard
>>98670979These are Duardin Steelhelms
>>98671028you forgot the DoK
>>98671037I thought there was something I was forgetting>>98671034That's gonna be weird if you can run golems AND fire lizards. But Slayers were always supposed to be a part of a whole and not a whole themselves. But also I wish they'd stop forcing slayers like they did in Leagues of Votann
>>98671028>Also FOUR dwarf factions in AoS, ain't that more than there are elf factions (wood elves, elves and fish elves?)forgetting someone
>>98671035those would look like this
>>98671055i dont see a difference between this an what we got
>make the new basic infantry mixed gender, ruining poses, beards and armor design for that>also make a female-only unit as well, fucking up the gender ratio back the opposite way
>>98671059What we got has ugly pauldrons, ugly gutplates and a lack of textures.
>>98671060Sure thing Boole, considering he made no mention of this at all until it was leaked publicly
>>98671055
>>98671060i have no problem with having women in the ranks, but you have to give them long braids like the flameseekers or the new character. the infantry with no braids or beards just look like little ogres, just like the helsmiths ones. no beards but also no hair to compensate.at least the fyreslayers and kharadron ones got that right
>>98671086yeah pretty much the same thing, with a different shieldzzzzzzzzz. wheres the filigree? the capes? the horns? you've got what, 2 runes on the whole model? no gems, no ale mugs? small heads on the axes and hammers? boring.
>zero armour or weapon decoration>brutish mass produced plates like football armour >pyjama pants These guys fucking suck. Imagine being mogged by gholemkind
>>98671082He's talking about things that haven't been revealed yet though.
>>98671092You could shield swap them and count them as tbhon
>>98670979my khazalid hail from Chamon
>>98671089I like the magmadroth puppy
I AM A DWARF AND IM DIGGING A HOLEDIGGY DIGGY HOLEDIGGY DIGGY HOLE
>>98670979what the fuck is wrong with gw? why can't they make armour designs anymore? is some sculptor crying for help?
>>98671112dwarves truly are the reddit race
>>98671086Cruel.Dire even.
>>98671044LOV have their own too?>>98671102Lol
>>98670979They're alright. I wonder if they are going to give them any form of firearms or keep it exclusive to KO. Also I hope they keep the magmadroth is some way
>>98671129Bald head looking mfs
>>98671125grrrrrr, downvoted.
Forcing dorf fans to buy chorfs to salvage this shit with kitbashes is as evil as GW gets
>>98671133Apparently they're getting a big cannon and a unit of rifles.
what does the N stand for
>>98671133
>>98671001>>98670979I am shockedThe Dwarf Queen actually looks like a Dwarf queen instead of a lesbian sidecut with a male chestpiece. You could use this for Norse Dwarfs in the old world
leave Chaos to me umgi
>>98671129okay no matter how bad the GW ones are, they arent mantic bad i'll grant them that.god the mantic designs look awful
>>98671118GW armour design used to be based on primary or secondary sources like groping actual 15th century cavalry plate armour, or reading tolkein's descriptions of dwarf armour. All declines in the fantasy spectrum come from a generation of writers and designers whose primary inspiration comes from FFXIV and WoW.
>>98671142Norfhashutites are Souf
>>98671153hashutites are blackpool spiceheads
>>98671141>big cannonThats nice, but if they were truly based they would put the cannons on top of the Magmadroth
>>98671157fyre dorfs, sky dorfs, and normie dorfs stay separate even if you put them in the same book
>>98671125I like them but honestly… yeah>>98671149Dangerously spot on
>>98671159Gotrek exists so no
>>98671089Basically, female Dwarfs shouldn't have helmets.
>>98671009>different weapons >different shields>different beards >different helmets>flat joint shoulders
>>98671098How come he didn't mention "new dwarf range" at all though
>>98670979The exaggerated dynamism really doesn't suit battleline dwarfs
>>98671133>Also I hope they keep the magmadroth is some wayAll the current droths are staying, AND a new Droth character is being added. All the rumor mongers are also currently implying that there will be more Fyreslayer stuff down the line. The only notable Fyreslayer thing that's going to be going is the Vulkites. And honestly you can just proxy shield Vulkites as these new clanguys anyway, if you wanted to.
>>98671132Berserks. They're dumb as hell and honestly a detriment to the factions thematic
>>98671177>>different weapons>>different shields>>different beards>>different helmets
>>98671171gotrek isn't carrying a runic cannon or wearing a flying ball, he's a fyre dorf now, he may be in denial about it, depending on whether the author of the latest book bothers to check the character development of the previous books, but he is a fyre dorf
>>98671187KO aren't part of the book Fyreslayers and Dispossessed have been souped and Gotrek represents a bridge
>>98671149aos dwarfs look nothing like wow armor. if you think this, you dont play wow. the wow designs look much more creative
>>98671179He did, we were expecting this one for quite a while, before the latest flurry of TLW rumors he even confirmed that lizardmen would come last, not dwarfs.
>>98671149they also REALLY look nothing like ff14s dwarfs
>>98671190Gotrek is not a bridge, no, there's no bridge, they're sharing a book because gw isn't bothering with another book for this edition and whether they stay together, split, or kharadrons are folded in, within the next edition or 3 editions from now, will be a completely arbitrary ordeal because there won't be any bridge between them just like there isn't any between ironjaws and kruleboys.
>>98671197Poor reading comprehension.He is suggesting GW's inspirations lie not in primary sources but secondary. Fantasy armour imagined without reference or distorted. Final Fantasy has nonsensical armour that doesn't reference historical examples
>>98671200They aren't split like Warclans nigger just wait and see retard Fyreslayers have two unit kits ffs
>>98671204he specifically called out ff14 and wow as potential inspirations, knowing nothing about what those sources actually look like. stop trying to cover for his shit argument
>>98671209ESL or retarded?
>>98671204also the only dwarfs even in contemporary sources i've seen that look that fucking dull and uninspired are GWs. every other modern source puts waaaaaay more effort into their designs because they want them to actually look good. hell even raid shadow legends puts more effort into their dwarves and thats literal shovelware cashgrab mobile shit
>>98671207>They aren't split like WarclansYes, they are>nigger just wait and see retardStop projecting and listen to yourself >Fyreslayers have two unit kits ffsAnd that's why they haven't received a separate book THIS TIME
>>98671223the battletome hasn't leaked, how do you know this?
>>98671209his argument is solid, your strawman is ass
>>98671224it's obvious. they won't be souped like skaven but like orruk warclans
>>98671149WHFB's Dwarfs were made by someone who went on to work on WoW lmao
>>98671193PAULDRONS>>98671197STRANGE MAGIC IMP CREATURES
>>98671224The same leakers that's been warning us about incoming releases and rules and fluff development have told us.Meanwhile you have absolutely no source other than your gaping ass for your delusional idea about fyreslayers not being a warclans situation, or gotrek being a bridge of any kind.
>>98671238Mark Gibbons?He didn't have that much influence on WFB dwarfs
>>98671209>this guy likes WoW
>>98671243You're joking, right?
>>98671233its really not, because there arent a bunch of secondary modern sources that look like those dwarfs. nobody else (except mantic) are making ultra boring no aesthetic dwarfs, and especially not the examples he listedalso your arguments are crap, you're saying the GW ones look like modern sources and they really fucking dont and you havent posted any examples of when they do other than GWs own internal designs
>>98671246
>>98671246This doesn't look like wow, doesn't look like the new dwarfs, is not the only concept work warhammer dwarfs ever received, nor is he the only concept artist in wow.
>>98671246Mark only worked on Dwarfs in their 6th edition redesigns all the older stuff is by different writers and artists.He also didn't spend that much time on Blizzard; he did WotLK designs and then moved on to Riot.im not sure what he's even doing these days
>>98671251the copium
>>98670979RETVRN
>>98671254>Mark only worked on Dwarfs in their 6th editionsooo.....everything except the ancient metals dwarfs look nothing like anymore in any IP? 6th edition started in 2000, its practically oldhammer by now. i dont know why you would try to suggest the 80s and 90s blisters are relevant to this conversation much at all, GWs dwarfs havent looking like that since half the player base was born.
>>98671248>its really not, because there arent a bunch of secondary modern sources that look like those dwarfsexcept for the one posted, that highlights the trend to deviate from historical plates for nonsensical pauldrons and geometries >and you havent posted any examples of when they do other than GWs own internal designsexcept for the one posted, that highlights the trend to deviate from historical plates for nonsensical pauldrons and geometries
>>98671254No? He's most known for the early plastic dwarfs and metals
>>98671264>he has to go back to 2004 screenshotsi accept your surrender
>>98671265it doesn't matter if he worked on them he wasn't the only concept artist at gw so the argument is sound
>>98671173Seems like there’s a lot of things they shouldn’t have at this point…
>>98671173No, the hair just needs to come out from the helmet
>>98671278this, its not like its exactly a new idea to warhammer
>>98671266>he has to scurry away and drag the goalpostunsurprising
>>98671278>>98671282discord told me TWW dwarf women had beards?!
>>98671284no Warhammer isn't Tokein or DiscworldDwarf Women were always beardless and have large braids instead
>>98671284discord has been telling you a lot of gay shit as of late, maybe you should leave it
I am no longer asking for Wanderers or Kurnothi. GW can leave it alone if this is how they ruined dispossessed
Back to painting after a 2 week break, blocked some basecoats on the Terradon now that the Skink is done.You guys working on anything?
>>98670979is this cities of sigmar or entire separate faction?
>>98671307Khazalite Holds will launch as a wholly new faction.
>>98671283>G-g-g-goalposts! strawman! whataboutism!ahhh the sound of a defeated nerd with no point. music to my ears
>>98671284they can shave it you know? ask your mom why she shaves her legs
>>98671316Meant for >>98671266
>>98671187>The tankards are all copypasta>on LE miniaturesSad
>Here at Warhammer Community, we’ve got a big week of delicious Space Marine content ahead of us, with rules previews, detachment reveals, and loads more from the new Codex. It’s so much to get through that we don’t even have a miniature to show off tomorrow, but don’t worry – we’re announcing something even cooler instead!will they walk back on this and show one of the new dwarfs up close?
>>98671339Maybe the only time GW respond and confirms leaks is when it's stuff like boxes or books leaking, since that's what happened with the Ork Big Boss model and that big Kill Team leak last year and this AoS one does probably count as big as those
