The Charge of the Very Light Brigade Edition>Resources:WFB: https://pastebin.com/qVGrgwwhWM: https://pastebin.com/EsDAgebaWFRP: https://pastebin.com/inbyBsR6Novels: https://pastebin.com/PFqPDr0H>TOW:https://gofile.io/d/fxFgXShttps://www.warhammer-community.com/downloads/warhammer-the-old-world/>Warhammer Chronicles:https://files (dot) catbox (dot) moe/0xt777 (dot) zip>Time of Legends:https://files (dot) catbox (dot) moe/q46ut6 (dot) zip>The End Times:https://files (dot) catbox (dot) moe/j7d0t5 (dot) zip>Battle March General's Compendiumhttps://mega.nz/file/tP5STCAS#4yDuu8WLk-Mn4Ut2pe7x7AWwxJmEjXW5cvV0xtwMWD4>Alternative Models:https://pastebin.com/xPeM9szL>Previous Thread:>>98811478>Thread Question:What do you think of the new skeletons? Which core do you want to see most updated next and why?
>>98821232Mr. Manlet, if you're going to shitpost, you should do it in a way that makes some kind of logical sense so that you have plausible deniability. Throwing out statements without any care for their believability isn't even shitposting it's just taking up space.
>>98821641/aosg/ got it>>98819668>It's the colour scheme, look>the old models were way whiter, allowing for greater contrast between shadows and highlights of the bones, and used very bright red and very bright turquoise as spot colors, while the gold was darker and a unifying element>the new models are using warmer almost yellow bones, with bright yellow gold, and red that's practically brown, with little to no turquoise, it makes the whole thing a homogenised mess
>>98821641The rules for them are still bad so I dont care. If the old ones didnt have mold line issues I would say I prefer the old ones.
>>98821641>>Thread Question:>What do you think of the new skeletons? serviceable >Which core do you want to see most updated next and why?fix high elf spearmen, archers and silver helms and their range is practically completely up to datebut I think addressing the empire is more important, they should be the most important player of this period and instead gw has been wasting time redoing chaos three times across aos and tow
>>98821684I agree and disagree. Agree that High Elves need it most now (I think they needed it more than Tomb Kings), but I disagree about the Empire. I think everything other than Knights for Empire is fine for many years.
>>98821641>TQ> What do you think of the new skeletons?Not a fan.>Which core do you want to see most updated next and why?None of them. Just keep reissuing old sculpts. So I guess Dark Elf spearmen and crossbowmen next, but not the shitty 8th ones.
>>98821641Bros they are charging Wood Elves
Just pulled my VC army out. Going to get some movement tray converters for Old World. What am I in for other than people complaining that VC are too good? I sort of noticed online that all the video creators are kind of faggots about VCs and their ability to... bring back skeletons and zombies. Like the army's core ability that has always been really good to make up for skeletons and zombies being dogshit. Am I going to have to deal with niggas groaning when I plop my army down? I don't really make WAACfag lists just take my skeledudes.
>>98821652I think they look much better in the more old school white bone
The exciting thing is, Tomb Kings cav coming now confirms perfectly what the rumor monger who said Bretonnia is next in line for the refresh. Pegs and KOTR iirc?
>>98821641For better or worse they are still just the almost 30 years old skeletons with some egyptian bits stuck on them.Shame the skeletons of that 1998 kit were worse than those from 1986 that they replaced.
>>98821751The empire knights are fine despite being over 30 It's the state troopers that need emergency jaw surgery and a pair of shoes.
>>98821641I hope they redo Empire Knights soon, End Times DLC made me respect Middenheim and the White Wolves are pretty cool
>>98821684>muh empireThey are the cuck factions and will be serviced last, if anything.
>>98821856Wonder how they would look with more bronze or copper metallics rather than gold
Tomb Kings shouldn't have cavalry as a bronze age faction.Neither should the lizardmen being based on indigenous populations that lacked cavalry. Thank you for reading my genuine dogshit opinions.
enough talk about skeletons, so how about them beastmen folks?
>>98821751the empire's basic infantry units are humiliated by their plastic predecessors, that's not good for a range, they may be 7th ed plastics but they are ugly, with not enough sashes and poofsor at the very least bring back the 6th ed ones as well to keep in production alongside the other ones
>>98821960I can agree with the first point but the later point is genuine retardation.
>>98821641>that hornblower
>>98821960lizardmen don't have cavalry because they don't have horses, silly
>>98821652Age of Smegmar players when Tomb King Skeletons are revealed: "oh the bone is just too yellow, it makes the models very ugly".Age of Smegmar players when GW sells dwarfs with leaf blowers "OH MY GOODNESS WHY ARE YOU NITPICKING, YOU'RE JUST AN AOS HATER"
>>98821992Not very fair to compare a 4chan reaction to a TGA reaction.
>>98821992You keep picking your battles m8
I don't get the overdetailed angle some dipshits are pushing on these guys. They have *more* detail than the pushing-40 old ones, but since those had absolutely fucking none at all adding the odd strip of cloth or bronze torc or actual fucking riding tack for the horses hardly qualifies as excessive or egregious.
>>98822006No, the AoS thread was also filled with defenders. It was a sight to behold.>>98822008I will ALWAYS dunk on those shitty new dwarfs. They indefensibly bad and always worth laughing at.
>>98821652Newsflash: You can paint models however you like.If you are an osteoautist you can even paint archeologically accurate skellingtons.
>>98822012You’d figure that out if you actually had a painted army that required effort.
>>98822012"overdetailed" is a buzzword that sounds like an actual criticism without going into actual arguments that someone could counter.
>>98821641>TQOrc Boyz. I like the current sculpts and want to see if they do them justice.
>>98822012>excessive or egregious.All nuGW sculpts are excessively and egregiously overdetailed. It's about adding details where none need to be. Specifically for the horses, the saddles are pretty overdone and look bad. Don't be a faggot like >>98822036 and reduce a shorthand criticism to disingenuousness. Critiques aren't required to come with a full-on education every time they're made. Fact of the matter is nuGW's computer sculpted miniatures have too many details implemented poorly for the sake of adding detail, and lack an intrinsic artistic touch that even the old "bad" 90s sculpts had and are beloved for.
>>98822061Not him but this is one of the reasons I did not buy the new marauders. Way too many details on each mini. I don't mind it on say a character but baseline units? Bit much. Though I am considering the new warriors
People bitch about too much detail.I'm bitching about how these will be awful to assemble and yet be monopose like every damn new release.
>>98822095They have weapon options (at least the warriors and horsemen ) but yeah the arms are gonna snap.
>>98821818Being able to raise the dead is not at all the problem with VC. Look at what screams can do.
>>98822061This is what I am talking about, you're bitching about the saddles but even GW just painted them one color. Literally one color bro, how is that overly detailed.
>>98822136I've heard about screams. The simple fix is to just say after engaged in combat they can only target in base-to-base. But I read something called "Renegades v2" that nerf rezzing into the ground. Half of the community just seems to hate undead shenanigans.
>>98822165Yeah thisAt this point it's just a knee jerk reaction that people haveThey have tassels, straps and a simple saddle and therefore they must be ridiculously overdetailedThese people have just been told that this is the correct opinion to have and can't stop repeating it like a parrot
>>98821641I want the new AJ so bad. Keep that Tomb Kings content coming.
>>98821973these would look perfectly fine with one coat of contrast as opposed to the pajamas the current ones are wearing...
>>98821641Are they meant to be camels? They look like they have a hump
>>98822257Heh... My misspent semester of animal osteology will finally pay off.
>>98822257Camels have longer necks and smaller heads, don't they?
>unit sucks so nobody new plays it>every oldfag playing it for theme already owns 30 of them minimumWhy uh why did they resculpt these again
>>98822353They have to turn everything to shit. People will buy the models because they're in the GW bubble mental space. It's kind of insane what that does to a man.>I'll build it later, just another thing for my pile of shame!>Oh shit, I better not miss out on the initial release! But it's not like I'll get to it before the restock lol.>Cool bitz! These can definitely go into my bitz pile even though I don't kitbash anything at all.>Oh man, let's split the box bro!>I need another army, these new models are cool!>I'll just scalp them because they'll sell out immediately.etc.
>>98822088I like the new marauders but I do agree there’s too much on em. I cut some greebles off as I assembled em if I’m gonna be honest
>>98821910You can already have Knights of the White Wolf with the current knight box, it is an excellent box for its age. State troops need a simpler refresh in terms fo models, right now they got too much useless details and lack unity in equipment.I'd like to have them like the Greatswords/Archers/milita kits, but they'll surely do CAD which will just make dynamic looking rank and file units which sounds an oxymoron
Imperial Chapter and Grand masters not being able to take griffons is a bizarre choice, and frankly a personal insult.
>>98822279Yea but that's the thing. If you look at where the riders are seated, it looks like it doesn't go down and it just keeps goin up. >>98822322And many other differences, they are not related animals
>>98823045>it keeps goingThat's called a saddle. We clearly see the thoracic vertebrae decreasing in length by the time we reach the rider.
>>98823028They're knightly leaders, Griffons are for the Elector-Counts, that's why they can go demigryph at best, the Orders don't have money to spend on a griffon for a sole Chapter Master, an Elector-Count does have the forture for it
Is there a Skaven clan specializing in jezzails/marksmanship? Like how Vrrtkn have the globadier gimmick and Ektrik like warp-lightning cannons?
>>98822029>>98822061Oh, so you're just a lazy retard with shit taste. Gotcha. The new skellybobs look great, like they stepped right out of the classic TK artwork, and if you think they'd be a challenge to paint you should legitimately just go back to mashing together Army Men and making pewpew noises because you clearly have the mind and attention span of a toddler.
>>98823113I'm of the opinion that the head honcho of the griffon lovers should be able to finagle an actual griffon out of an elector count in exchange for military assistance.Also I want to be able to take one with my knightly order army.
>>98823456The thing is not everyone can ride a cgriffon, you must raise him from a chick to adulthood so it will recognise you as their master, else they'll just rip you to sherds without hesitation, you can't simply loan a Griffon like it's a horse.Just take a sole General in your knightly army then
>>98822951>it is an excellent box for its ageNo, the horses look like ponies compared to all other warhammer horsesYou can say "muh historical horses weren't that big" and yet I will put the knights next to Cathay of TK or other new cav kits (even pistoliers) and it will look old AF simply by its size
>>98821972fuck off furfag scum
>>98823974It's not about the scale of the horse, it's about how they'll all become monopose CAD, with each model carrying their of drawer full of random crap on them.
>>98823805'fraid you can't take empire generals in the list.
>>98824019imo despite Beastmen being clad with fur they do not incite the red flags of furries. If they truly were a furry faction then we would see more heckin’ wholesome chungus paintjobs and conversions. Instead they are brutal carnivores who worship dark gods and practice foul magic.
>>98823974For me it's the lack of stirrups on those knights.
An exciting development has graced my hobby as of late.I need to decide tho whether to use the existing bases or base for old world specifically
>>98824768===Dorfs [582 pts]Warhammer: The Old World, Dwarfen Mountain Holds, Battle March===++ Characters [139 pts] ++Thane [66 pts] - Hand weapon- Great weapon- Full plate armour- Shield- General- On footDragon Slayer [73 pts] - Hand weapon- Additional hand weapon++ Core Units [226 pts] ++12 Dwarf Warriors [111 pts] - Hand weapons- Heavy armour- Veteran (champion)- Standard bearer- Musician10 Thunderers [115 pts] - Hand weapons- Handguns- Heavy armour- Veteran (champion) [Handgun]- Standard bearer- Musician++ Special Units [217 pts] ++8 Miners [122 pts] - Hand weapons- Great weapons- Heavy armour- Blasting Charges- Prospector (champion)- Standard bearer- MusicianCannon [95 pts] - Cannon- Hand weapons- Light armour---Created with "Old World Builder"[https://old-world-builder.com]What runes should I add (to bring it up to 700pts total?)
>>98824768Always base for WFB and buy conversion movement trays. You can always add base but can’t take base away if you ever want to play superior 6th or 7th.
>>98822353>Why uh why did they resculpt these againBecause the current models are trash.
>>98824930What do you do for lords and heroes tho?
>>98821641>What do you think of the new skeletons? Which core do you want to see most updated next and why?Love them and wish TKs had a battle march for a reasonable side project. Some dude on the Internet said Empire would be next but I believe it when I see it.
What do people do for Wyvern kitbashes/proxies? I was thinking of picrel with the wings repositioned and arms clipped (stormcast dragon + kruleboyz sludgeraker head)
>>98825011
>>98822353Maybe them resculpting one of the least popular units for one of the least popular factions is a statement that they will redo the entire range for the entire game. Or maybe that GW is incompetent.
>>98822353because those statements aren't as extreme as you make them out to be
>>98825037My question about this and other archon studios dragons is how do you make the saddle for the rider?
>>98825131With some Green Stuff
>>98824989Well for dwarfs, your heroes are almost always just in your infantry units, so they just go in the spacer trays too.
>>98824838For a Thane, the +1 wound one is top tier. Slayer get the AP one.
>>98824838Definitely a rune or two to the cannon, I always take at least one rune of forging. Though I don’t recommend having over 100 pts of runes at that point level though, you might end up with diminishing returns. I’d maybe shoot for a 600 pt game. Knock off a single warrior so your hero fits in it squarely maybe to free up some points. I’d also turn your dragon slayer into a doomseeker, which is a more efficient solo hero. But if you have to, I usually enjoy turning my thane into an absolute best stick.
I'm trying to find a piece of art of a female dwarf. Pretty sure it's digital, pretty modern style. She's in full plate with a winged helmet. I thought it was in one of the WFRP books but I've looked through pretty much every dwarf related one and can't seem to find it and now it's bothering me. Anyone have any ideas?
>>98825282This one?I think it's from a WFRP3e book about Black Fire Pass, but I couldn't give you a specific one
>>98825308That's the one! Turns out it was in the 3e Book of Grudges. I overlooked it because I confused it with Grudgelore.Thanks.
>>98822353Retard.
WFRP worth a crack or is it a meme system?How's it compare to Dark Heresy since I've played that one.
>>98825709Very similar to DH, the career system is better and more evocative. Makes you feel more like your character. Not as deadly though and a lot more light hearted.
>>98821818Rezzing was fine in editions where it was tied to casting spells, and so was inherently bound by how many power dice the controlling player had to play with, not to mention that opponents had counterplay options by utilising dispelling. In tOW rezzing is tied to whether the controlling player can pass a leadership 8/9 test, usually with a reroll, with no real upper bound on that other than how many rezzers you can cram into your list. It becomes especially egregious when you look at all the bullshit VC can stack onto Grave Guard, which they can very easily get in core. VC are fine as long as you avoid very obvious cheese (scream spam, rezz spam, I think the big ghost chariot thing is bullshit too) I'm sure there's Swedish Comp style list out there somewhere that gives a good list of VC bullshit to avoid. Or do what you want who cares.
>>98825709Decent system with the exception of 3rd edition, which is just a meme
>>98821972It would be really nice to have a plastic chariot, dual banner/lord kit like chaos warriors got, and centigors.
>>98825868Im just happy for plastic chariots and Centigors with razorgors being a nice bonus.If they get some new plastics it would also be neat with a tuskgor herd, like an in between of warhounds and razorgors in terms of unit role/function.
>>98825880if they don't include one razorgor in evey plastic beastman chariot I will think they're doing it on purpose to trigger me
>>98825868>>98825880>>98825893Plastic Jabberslythe for me, those wings snap off with a stiff breeze. Razorgors are also desperately needed though. I love the resin one but you really need at least 3 to make that unit work.
>>98825905>I love the resin oneIt’s fully metal m8, if you put one in a sock you could clobber someone with it
>>98825908Oh shit I never realized. I fucking love metal models, but not interested in three clones on the tabletop. I wish running a single one was viable.
>>98825916Running one is quite viable. Having one flank a unit or lone hero can make or break a combat. Since they have M7 and S+T 5 with swiftstride they are quite nasty pork missiles. And at only 52p a piece they are quite cheap to just throw in there.
>Read Warriors of Chaos lore>functionally immortal>Don't need to eat, drink, or sleep>Empowered by the gods with great strength and stature
>>98825947I guess thats not a bad idea. Might be my next beastmen purchase, I do have an affinity for that goofy model.
>>98825964yep, it's time to turn off your brain and pose for a death metal album cover
>>98825981I know, right? You also hang around in a cool fortress in the interstices between the Chaos Wastes and the Realm of ChaosWhat are the downsides?
>>98822353The thing is, cool models will pull people in before they get bogged down in 'is this unit META' like your typical 40kek cuck. If you are even looking at tOW, you aren't about that life
>>98825987Pretty sure if you don’t become a daemon prince your soul gets raped by daemons when you die
>>98825997Thankfully I WILL become a demon prince because I'm built different
>>98825980It’s a great mini, the studio paintjob also makes it look extra goofy so you can tone that up or down with your own color scheme, but I agree with not wanting to run copies of them same pig. So I have settled to just owning one so far.
>>98826036I can recommend having some greenstuff on hand though to fill any eventual gaps.
>>98825987I dunno man I quite enjoy drinking, eating and sleeping.
Got a doubles event this Saturday and we got a bunch of sweat FAGGOTS playing.But I'll just get drunk with my bro teammate.
>>98826473>I'll just get drunk with my bro teammate.Just don't get drunk enough to start car park fights
>>98826495Fuck you I'll fight you on the parking lot as well
>>98825964they may not need it but they still can drink, eat and fuck, right ?
so aos soulblight models won't be portable to tow for the barrow kingdom army in the end ?
>>98826750You asking about the models themselves or the rules for stuff?
>>98821641Pic shows kangs fighting welves, I'm still calling new versus box set with them both in and a new battle march box each shortly after
This is a very well painted mini.
>>98826810the deathrattle models
>>98826750why would you expect that you fucking hopeless retard.
>>98826750>Barrow kingdom Qrd?
>>98824989They make single model upsizers, too.>>98825041God, I hope they don’t redo everything, TOW exists to sell us perpetual 6th-8th edition models. Age of Smegmar exists for faggots who want overdetailed nuGW slop.
>>98827200>God, I hope they don’t redo everything,With how people are frothing for the new Chaos and TK sculpts, expect to be disappointed and buy what you can before it is gone.
>>98827121new army of infamy in the next arcane journal
>>98827116beastmen have a model and scenery originally designed for aoswhy shouldn't it be possible for other armies ?
>>98827266I take your moms asshole doesnt mean im gonna take my semen infused shit with it.
>>98827266I mean there’s nothing stopping you from just using the skeleton AoS models regardless
>>98827220No one is “frothing” for anything. It’s just typical GW marketing astroturfing. The reception for all new models has been pretty mixed.
>>98826750People (tastelets, poors) already use them to make VC armies.
>>98827358I have seen next to zero negative sentiments anywhere outside you and your buddy in this thread.
>>98827368Meh, considering how expensive these are, I don't mind proxying the AoS ghosts for ToW. It would be stupid not to.
>>98827411I’ve seen people criticize em for being overly detailed, and the wooden shields. Other than that I think they’ve been overall accepted well enough. Not gonna say frothing for though
I get the sentiment that TOW will lose its identity if a lot of the kits get replaced but TK skellies and horsemen really aren't ones I'll miss. Not all kits are equal.
>>98827307consider suicide and spare our species the problem that the continued existence of a genetic dead end like yourself poses
>>98827411>>98827469Every major venue I’ve seen them discussed there is criticism alongside the astroturfed GW shit-eating. There’s a segment of GW buyers (different from wargames or WFB enjoyers) who like everything GW puts out, as well as GW employees whose job it is to promote anything and everything. But there’s also a not-insignificant portion of customers, who are longtime WFB fans and drivers of TOW’s success, who don’t particularly like any of the new sculpts.This dude like “only in this thread” because he’s terminally on 4chan alone.
>>98827514Just for that I’m gonna donate more sperm at the bank and ensure that I leave several women as single mothers the next burning man.
>>98827543>burners play wfb Get the fuck out of our wholesome Tolkienesque hobby, degen.
>>98827521Post warhammer models
>>98827521Don’t get me wrong I could still see myself using them, and I do actually like the knights. I just think frothing is a bit of an exaggeration considering what I said and what you’ve added
>>98827585
>>98827469>I’ve seen people criticize em for being overly detailedAs we've seen in this thread, that's a buzz word. Retard called the saddle overly detailed (it has literally no detail and is painted one color)
Does anyone know if demons are actually playable with the renegade packs or are they hated here too. >>98827684They don’t look fun to paint is all I’ll say in regards to the new chaos range. They remind me too much like the new terminators in the Hh range.
Skeleton box is going up for preview this weekend right?
>>98826047Maybe you still can, but dont need to
>>98827765maybe
Is chaos armour fused to the wearer's body?If so, how do the warriors of slaanesh fuck?
>>98827782they are not called warriors of chaos for their homogeneity
>>98827653Alright, that's a cool dude
>>98827653>no timestamp
>>98827684>As we've seen in this thread, that's a buzz word.It isn't a buzzword. In fact, your usage of "muh buzz words" to shut down any criticism is factually a buzzword.>Retard called the saddle overly detailed (it has literally no detail and is painted one color)The addition of the saddle is a plain and obvious example of overdetailed additions to classic WFB designs, and in line with nuGW's inability to maintain the character and feeling of WFB's design language. See picrel. The previous skeletons literally didn't even have a saddle at all, neither on the models nor the art. The saddle is a superfluous addition that adds NOTHING positive to the miniature, and in fact makes it look more busy and cluttered. The saddle is added for the sake of adding something, which is what "new models have too many details" means, not whatever bullshit deflection you're asserting.Just sit down and shut up. You can like the new models, but you're using multiple fallacies to shoot down real reasons why people do not like nuGW's OVERDETAILED computer designed miniatures.
>>98827822>the model is overdetailed slop>because it has a saddleLmao
>>98827684It’s not a buzz phrase just because you disagree. I don’t care about saddles or shit but there’s too much shit on the new warriors for my liking. Ergo, too much detail
Now that there is also a maliketh in elder ring, GW has to let malekith have his name back right?
>>98821818>What am I in for other than people complaining that VC are too good?VC are a legacy army with ogors, chaos dawi and those other faggot armies no one cares about but since their rules never get updated whatever they started with is what they currently have and thus will never get nerfs to their OP resurrection bullshit skeletons.
>>98827860GW doesn't even seem to know themselves anymore. Whether or not it's a conscious loosening of policy or just communication errors who knows.
>>98821791there are wood elves in the southlands, in Oreon's Camp.
>>98823974>cathay horsesDragons had sex with them so they're bigger>tk horsesAncient men were just bigger, so were their horses
>>98827822>The previous skeletons literally didn't even have a saddle at allthat's because it was one sprue for all skeleton horses that gw would use for either cavalry, characters or chariots, across two factions.
>>98821960>Tomb Kings shouldn't have cavalry as a bronze age faction.This is true though because it makes them stand out more if they only have antiquated chariots especially vs. VC that have undead knights.
>>98825868so did he fuck the cow or does his wife just only give birth to mutants?Is he secretly a mutie?
>>98827860>>98827868GW goes through phases of being a hobbyist company and being a corposlop company. They're still in the middle of a corposlop phase. Like, I personally know one of the lead 40k designers and he's dogshit at playing and painting and hobby and doesn't give a shit about the fluff but got hired because he worked in various corpo management roles for a decade.Hopefully we'll get back to a hobbyist-focused management agenda soon. There are some signs but the vestiges of corposlop ideation make it hard to tell.
>>98827860dyslexic malekith doesn't challenge marvel's ip
>>98827895it does in fact challenge their IP, you can't just make Bickey Mouse and not have disney sue you.
>>98827894>'t give a shit about the fluff but got hired because he worked in various corpo management roles for a decade.and this is why no one else can get hired, because HR whores recycle losers with ~experience~.
I just love how no one points out that tomb king riders were actually from araby and aren’t actually native niggherians. But then I guess that conflicts with all the Egyptian decorations they have despite Arabians being quite distinct.
>>98827924Yeah. Gone are the days of Andy Chambers, Alessio Cavatore, or even ugh Mat Ward and Gav Thorpe. Now it's just fake nerd weirdos who play the cocksucking office politics game.
>>98827894>I personally know one of the lead 40k designers and he's dogshit at playing and painting and hobby and doesn't give a shit about the fluff but got hired because he worked in various corpo management roles for a decade.Why would you offer a head designer role a creative role to someone who was a project manager, which is a managerial role?
>>98827928ARABY BROSWE HAVE BEEN MENTIONED HERE
>>98827894>shitposters dad works at NintendoLmao
>>98827928That's been retconned, now horse riders are Nehekharan's who were trained by Cathay (not a joke)
>>98828113Holy fuck every time I think there isn't much more to hate about TOW there is something new. At least the main actual gameplay issue are the ugly new huge base defaults.
>>98828113that's not the fluff, no
>>98827822>See picrel. The previous skeletons literally didn't even have a saddle at allYes, and they look like ass. Skeletons sitting awkwardly on exposed horse-spine. >the artThe art based on the models? >the saddle adds nothingIt adds the skeletons not floating midair because theyre using a horse model clearly not designed for riding. It adds a sense that these are proud nehekharan warriors and not a cheap conversion 10yo me made because he had some mounts and some infantry models left over.
>>98827266>originally designed for AoSActually in the journal they tell you to convert/scratchbuild your own. Herdstones had been that way long before AoS made a model of one.
>>98828647the beastlord was released for AoSand while they encourage you to scratchbuild your own herdstone, the one originally made for AoS definitively is part of TOW now
>>98828803>definitively is part of TOW nowWhere can I buy it
>>98828379It is sadly
>>98826473>event this Saturday and we got a bunch of sweat FAGGOTS playingAverage nuhammer experience
>>98826473It's really interesting to me the way in which people are sweating in TOW. Like. Sweat lists in 40k are still fun and have variables. Tryharding in TOW amounts to taking units bigger than 25 and avoiding fighting at all so you get marginally more victory points. It's just boring. The TOW community overall is still more fun and cheerful than any 40k player but rank-and-flank is extremely boring when it's death star units protecting heroes.
>>98828808on ebay for a massive markup
>>98828933So tomb king cavalry has been bad this whole time because cathay wasn't very good at training khemrian soldiers?
>>98827792And yet all of their plastic renditions have been homogeneous as fuck.GW really fucked up going from the 1st-4th edition designs to the 5th ed onwards one. Chaos as a faceless horde of Darth Vaders doesn't really capture de individualistic and unique nature that every warrior should have.
Progress on my Empire village table. Most recent addition is the smoke from the chimney
>>98825980Avatars of war makes some nice ones, bought them on etsy myself
>>98829122So how do you fit a movement tray down those streets?
>>98829387He doesn't, it may be better if you ask the ol' boomer on a Facebook historical group he stole the picture from.>Filename is screenshot Bait has really gone down in quality.
>>98829387Movement trays aren't real.
got some DIABOLICAL ideas for the new releases for spooky month, but now I need to figure out how to source them.
I really like the more 17th century plate on Karl Franz's model.The empire mixing aesthetics from different time periods is really neat and I hope it's leaned into more in the future.
>>98829692it's the whole reason d'être of the Empire Aesthetic.
>>98829692>>98829788I was thinking about this earlier tonight but these posts reminded me. I kind of find the Empire just unreasonably, unbearably boring. Even has a someone who enjoys the historical HRE aesthetic and plays 40k's most boring faction the Imperial Guard. The Empire just has nothing going for it other than to job against Chaos, VCs, and Orcs. Very gulp shitto.
>>98829788BVSED VVHITE ARYAN Chad crushing those brownoid beastmales
>>98829824>I kind of find the Empire just [bad opinion], Even has a someone who [bad opinion] and plays [bad opinion]We get it, you have shit taste.
>>98829832nah he's right empire is sovlless
>>98829850..."he"?
>>98829824I suppose you're not the Human Fighter type then in fantasy game then? The whole fun of Empire/Imperial Guard is being a bunch of regular joes standing, dying and sticking it to whatever horrible things come their way. I also play the RPG so I might be more lived in.The current art is rather shit I'll admit, and the current fluff is also horrible and unutilised since every is just looking at each other and doing nothing. Should have much more inter province conflict, and less of that 3-4 miniEmpires-within-the-Empire with shit names which means nothing to no one.
>>98828933have you even read that? in the same breath it mentions cathay it also mentions the chaos marauders.there's no "trained by cathayans".
Some fluff for my Orcs
