https://www.hasbropulse.com/product/G35465L00Looks like they finally made it to 10% of the way there. This is still sad watching the merch crash and burn with the Ares movie. And it could have been saved if only if it were more reasonably-priced.
>>11603246> if only if it were more reasonably-priced.It's likely priced this high to account for lower anticipated sales volume and maybe higher licensing fees. Most (All?) other Haslabs were for IPs they already had the license and were making product for.
Yeah, this ain't happening. Not after Ares crashed harder than the Hindenburg.
>>11603271It would have sold well in spite of that if it weren't for the price. Ares flopped because it didn't give fans what we wanted, which was a continuation of the Sam and Quorra story. It didn't flop because there are no fans. On the bright side you can dumpster-dive behind movie theaters for rare Tron popcorn buckets no one bought.
>>11603246Still didn't see ares, should I?
>>11603279Why not? It'll be your last chance to see anything Tron on the big screen again.
>>11603279its not great, it's not horrible. It just is. Nice visuals and soundtrack make for a fun time if you just go turn your brain off and have a snack.
>>11603279The YouTube reviews about it are more entertaining. And also free.
>>11603316>soundtrackHaven't seen it but I did skip through the soundtrack and it seemed very mediocre almost like someone playing with synthesizers for the first time. It was also very same-y, Legacy had more variety in it's sound
At least the 6" Legacy figures are still coming.
>>11603246How many backers has this thing been averaging per day?
>>11603379It got several hundred on the first two days, then it slowed down to maybe a dozen backers per day.
>>11603359I hope they make the 80s Tron in 6” too. The Legacy figures look a bit underwhelming. I guess the light up suits are hard to pull off with mere paint but with the old white/light gray suits instead of black, it might look a tad better since there's less contrast. But anyway this is gonna be another Adventure Series probably will hit Ollies eventually
>>11603279It was absolutely terrible (not in a fun way.) I don’t know who it was made for. It’s fitting because whoever thought this Haslab was a good idea at Hasbro is equally out of touch and should be fired. How can focus groups and market research still be a thing and mega corporations still be so clueless? It seems like everything is done in spite of the consumer and public consensus now.
>>11603486>How can focus groups and market research still be a thing and mega corporations still be so clueless? It seems like everything is done in spite of the consumer and public consensus now.When they're pushing an agenda, they tend to ignore shit and create their own studies that speaks positively about their agenda.It's like when cigaratte companies funded studies on the benefits of smoking or how circumcizing dicks is the greatest thing since indoor plumbing. So they use those super biased documents to convince accountants and higher ups of all the great shit that comes from making a super biased product, while doing their best to ignore all established knowledge or more researched studies.Here's a minicomic made by one of the creators of the Green Lantern cartoon about his experience with testing the cartoon with kids. Pretty funny shit, especially given how the GL:TAS and Bruce Timm's career ended up.
>>11603486Look closely at the figures. They're 3.75" figures with the same level of sculpt quality and detail as 6" figures. Hasbro has apparently reformatted the way it does 3.75" figures now, and they noticably upped the level of quality to them. I think they look awesome. The only catch is that price that makes them to be unobtanium. And if this is the level of detail and quality that Hasbro plans on or 3/75" scales, then I am all for it IF they can do something about that price.
>>11603681Those aren't just renders, either. Hasbro showed the actual fgures at NYCC. They're great figures with great details. The price just sucks.
>>11603681>They're 3.75" figures with the same level of sculpt quality and detail as 6" figuresHasbro's 3.75" figures have had the same level of quality and detail since the late 00s. Only the paint apps were lacking, especially when they started doing the printed paint apps.BTW, you're looking at professionally painted figures. So of course it looks much more detailed and won't have the plastictically look that production figures will have.Even Mattel's prototypes can look great when they'er hand painted.
>>11603708Look at the face sculpts on the Tron figures. They're definitely better than they were in that size in the past. They're even better than many figures in the 6" size. Also look at the proportions. Gone are the disproportionally short legs and overall off proportions.
>>11603486Hasbro knew exactly what it was doing. It knew it was in the riskiest market for toys ever and it wants the fans to bear the cost of any risk for it. It knew Ares would do poorly and provide no boost to this haslab. It knew Disney demanded a Tron tie in offering like the Reva lightsaber before it. It knew the only people who would buy this are adult collectors. This haslab was never intended to succeed. It was sent out to die to fill a licensing quota.
>>11603692Too bad this is DOA. I want that sexy weird looking girl.
NO stretch goalsNO hints at continuing the line furtherNO Red Light CycleNO RamNO Guard army builder NO way to buy more of Program the army builderMUST buy the display stand whether you want it or not, will NOT fit inside a Detolf$260 BASE price, but $323 after surcharges, tax & shippingAny 80s Tron fan will always note the missing Red Lightcycle, this was never a "complete" collection like they want to claim it is. It has so much against it as it does for it, and the cherry on top is that shitty pricetag.
>>11603714>Gone are the disproportionally short legs and overall off proportions.oh, you're literally talking about 3.75", meaning o-ring turds?Because actual 1:18 got great when HAsbro started making them 4" (6 feet person = 4" in 1:18) back in the late 00s.And you literally can't make them anymore detailed than they were since probably the 90s, because molding technology hasn't improved since the 70s or 80s and top tier sculptors have been taking advantage of that molding tech since the late 90s.Still, those Tron figures are hand painted prototypes and we've seen how top tier sculpts can be completely ruined with shitty paint jobs.
Whats a worse flop, this, or McFarlene's Joker fiasco.
>>11603727Or they expect fans to shoulder the cost of the Ares stuff that was NOT produced to hedge against what they spent on aquiring the license. >>11603740>NO stretch goalsThis gets me. Unlockables are motivators. Having RAM and a "warrior" as unlockables would have easily helped boost the number of backers because that's more you'd get for the money.
Where’s Daft Punk when you really need them?
Let's break the price down. Five figures at retail for $25 each would come to $125. That retail price is assumed from the price Reaction+ and others sell figures in that size for now. So that leaves two lightcycles and a light-up "grid" base for $130. Since the lightcycles aren't exactly big and ellaborate, I could see them retailing for $30 each. So that's $100 for a small light-up display base. Lose the base to bring the prices down. >>11603777>holy 7's confirms truth
>>11603783Derp I did the math wrong. After two lightcycles, the base is $70.
>>11603785The base clearly doesn't cost even close to $70 to produce. It's just there to pad the total number even more and give you the illusion that you're getting your money's worth. It doesn't even have a battery course in it. It's a cheap USB plug powered baseReally not sure what made them think this price with these offerings was a great idea. Maybe there's some kind of licensing restriction and they had to get it above a certain amount like McFarlane claimed theirs needed to be? DST was making classic Tron figures a few years ago but I'd assume their license was expired by now.
I really want the Diamond Select figures so much, but they got the scale wrong. They made them to be 7" instead of 6". That screws up the ability for them to go with anything. That's probably why their values are so low for convention exclusives. >>11603795Yeah I know it doesn't cost that much. Someone on Etsy could probably make one for half that price. It's all padding to kick up the price. I think you might be right with Hasbro having requirements placed on them by Disney because these days Disney is good at losing a lot of money, and they're probably putting a tight squeeze on licensors to get as much back as possible.
>>11603783>>11603795Haslab prices are what they are literally just for their profit margins. It's probably like a low risk high reward thing for them. If they meet/exceed the profits, they are happy they got away with fleecing suckers. If it doesn't reach minimum backer count, they are not gonna bother going into production at a lower price to make less or lose money and will just move on and try something else later
>>11603821If it doesn't get backed, then they already lost money in the license as well as the development costs for the production samples.
>>11603828Development costs for the samples and prototypes is a drop in the bucket. Just a couple thousand dollars in the artists' time and putting together the prototypes. Since they're producing the 6" figures apparently no matter what, they're already paying licensing fees to whoever is the Rights holder for Tron. These 3.75" figs would just be extra money going that way if they funded.
>>11603812>THEY GOT THE SCALE WRONG ITS WRONG ITS WRONG ITS WRONGwhat a little incel
I'm a pretty casual Tron fan, I'd buy some glow in the dark, translucent, led lights, black light paint or whatever gimmick to mimic the aesthetic in a cool way. It seems they aren't doing that.
>>11603883He's saying there's a smaller set of collectors who prefer 7" over 6" which is true. But the main issue with those was that it was DST making them. Almost all their figures are poorly articulated pieces of shit with outdated sculpting, joints and paint.
>>11603895Are you seriously trying to argue that people shouldn't care about scale? Obviously people who enjoy collecting accurate representations of characters from films or shows they love, they want them to be in scale.
>>11603883Fuck off, Michael. >>11603884Diamond Select did do that with their 7" figures in a special blacklight arcade-style box, which was actually pretty cool if you don't mind the size. >>11603895Do you come ehre just to nit-pick any excuse you can so you can argue with people?
>>11603910What the fuck is wrong with you? No one's jacking off to these, nor being perverted in any way. You pulled that retarded crap out of absolutely nothing because of my complaint about the different scale. You're good at fabricating any scenario that helps you believe that you're always right. You're totally mental because of it.
>>11603246Does this mean they’re not doing the legacy toys? Because I really want rinzler good legacy merch is surprisingly rare all I have is the Lego set
>>11604002They're still a "go" as far as I know. I hope they're not cancelled.
>>11604002no, those 6" ones were never shown off as a Haslab or dependent on the campaign. Those should still be coming though I doubt we'll get more than a wave or two since there's no shot they sell well. It'll probably be even shorter lived than the Indiana Jones line
>>11604009Well there's zero chance of getting Zuse and Gem unless they sell well.
>>11604007Geez I hope not>>11604009Really Other than the girl & the troopers what more do you need? I guess a white outfit for The Dude would be cool too
>>11604066What the fuck. What are those leg proportions. Why are their knees all so damn low?
>>11604066Damn they were NOT that fat in the movie lmao
>>11603774Stretch goals would increase the price people are already mad about since they are factored in the base price
>>11604066These are so lame bruh. They needed to be light up or glow in the dark or something. Also their complexions should be paler
>>11604014Need Gem's fat ass
>>11604151Light up? Come on, be real. You can't have super articualted figures and have room for all those spots to light up. Best they could do it GITD paint on the stripes
This new pic just made me realize all the blue parts of these are just printed on! The torsos are totally smooth and this is just going to be printing like they've been doing faces on the larger figures. That's lame! The should have all had raised sculpted detail for the cost they're charging.
>>11603681> They're 3.75" figures with the same level of sculpt quality and detail as 6" figures. Looking at the post right above, I think they duped us all with those digital renders that made these look nicer. Now that we know all the blue and red line work is just printed on and none of it is sculpted, there's a LOT more parts sharing here going on than I first thought. Several male torsos and legs are the same flat sculpts with just new printing on top. This feels even more a rip off now
>>11603246>only 9 new backers in the past 28 hours Wow, cringe. This is absolutely not getting funded.
>>11604190Then just don't bother making them desu because they look very unimpressive. It's just a generic black figure buck with some white lines on it. At least blue lines would've looked better even if less accurate
>>11604230There is such a thing as "day-glow" florescent paint. They just don't use it on Tron or any figures now.
>>11604230Did you seriously think it was possible to have electronics and lights in all the figure so that everything lights up on all their limbs and torso? Seriously? With all that articulation?
>>11604250I know it's not possible. My point is the paint does not imitate the lights well at all and therefore the figures look lame
>>11604066See, they needed to lead with this.Not the shitty 3.75 figures
>>11604327These are coming regardless. The 3.75 are the crowdfund. How does releasing the 6" figs for a totally different film and scale help the 3.75 ones get made?
>>11604329Cause you start with what people remember well (Legacy is more recent than OG, popular among 20-30s ppl that have money and love 6in). Let that be the lead, cause OG tron just isn't in anymore.
>>11603246That Steve dude comes off as a weird corporate useful idiot, he's a kiwi so they are normally breed to be inoffensive yes men so it makes sense.I assume his choices as well as the people above his are to blame and totally tone deaf. They just keep things in a certain way to ensure they all get their bonuses.Back in the day I think they would hire more passionate people.
>>11604403Also og tron has readily available diamond select figures on Amazon eBay Walmart.com and every other comicbook shop I’ve ever been to
>>11603486>>11603614Look into the making of Ares. Jared Leto was one of the lead producer that got the movie funded and made in nine years (He started work on this in 2016) Leto strongly influenced every choice and the reason it took so long was the suits desperately wanted to make the Legacy sequel that follow what happen to Tron and him finding the main charterers from the second movie while the programs started to leak out into the world and assimilate everything grey goo style. Leto was having none of it and was beating the ears around everything that wasn't about his OC. In order to get his way the comprise made was making sure this movie had sequel bait that tied to Legacy, and that Disney control composer for the movie. It's why the merc was so late t even happen, Disney was not interested in trying a another time to making Tron merc, Leto was. This is the exact opposite of a corporate made movie, this was one lone man's desperation for his big budget black tank top vanity project to happen.
>>11604403Yes Anon... That's why the OG toys are 3.75 and crowdfunded for the people that still remember that film and are more attached to that scale. Your argument doesn't make sense here.
>>11604789I agree with you. There's probably very little overlap with people who want the 3.75" OG figures and the ones who want the 6" sequel figures. I don't see how one helps the other that much.
>>11603246This is looking like it might be the biggest haslab failure yet.
>>11604988Can't be worse than Reva's lightsaber
>>11604990that needed 5000 and got 1400no way this hits 2800
>>11604988>>11604990You mother fuckers just gonna forget about me? I failed so badly they don't even have me archived on Pulse's website!>624 out of 3000 backers needed
>>11605007He deserved it.
>>11603740No MCP is the biggest WTF for me. If this is intended to be an all encompassing Tron 82 set, how the fuck do you not include the MCP with some sort of spinning gimmick?
>>11603740>>11605060I'm fairly certain the goal of this was to gauge interest and have some tooling paid for that they don't need to take the full risk on. If this were to be a gangbusters project, pretty sure in a couple of years they'd be doing another wave leveraging the existing tooling (probably reissuing Flynn and another figure in blacklight reactive deco) a couple of new figures, and an MCP playset.
>>11604997>needed 5000>>11605007>3000 backers neededThe Haslab minimums have really crept up over the years. For Ghostbusters it went from 7k needed for the first one to be backed, to 10k for the second, to 12k for the most recent. Haslabs started as super low run things, which helped justify the higher prices, yet as they increase the minimums needed their pricing doesn't becomes any less absurd. If this Tron set only needed 3k backers I'd understand the $260 price. Super niche thing, high price to justify the extremely low number sold. But at 10k there's no reason this should be so damn expensive for 3.75" scale stuff.
hasbro is spamming emails now, the desperation is setting in
>>11605243I can't believe Hasbro honestly thought this had even a snowball's chance in hell at that price. If so their hubris is insane.
>>11605111Corporate greed is a helluva thing.
>>11605007sad thing is I think had they actually advertised this correctly that one easily could have funded, there’s definitely a big muppet fan base hasbro just had no idea what they were doing with these haslabs at first
>>11605332People want the figures. They just can't afford or rationalize the price.
>>11605516Hence why I said "at that price". The Rancor couldn't get 9k backers for the same reason, it was stupidly overpriced for what it was, and yet they thought a significantly less popular IP could pull 10k for this? How is this billion dollar company so far removed from reality? Their website is literally called "Pulse", yet they employ people who couldn't have their finger further from the pulse of what the consumers want if they tried.
>>11605579This was never intended to fund. Disney wanted them to do Tron and they need to remain in Disney's good graces to keep Marvel, so instead of putting out an Indiana Jones line that goes straight to Ollies they make the customer bear the risk with a haslab
>>11605007They overhauled the site recently so they removed a whole ton of previous HasLabs, successful or not.That said, Cookie Monster got memory holed the second he was DOA
>>11605421can’t you come up with an original shitpost chungusthena? Are you lazy?
>>11603486>How can focus groups and market research still be a thing and mega corporations still be so clueless? It seems like everything is done in spite of the consumer and public consensus now.They probably farm reddit and other social media for ideas. Maybe look at fan custom figures and look at how many likes the photos get on social.Normally you could blame really poorly made market research surveys and test groups at malls and shit. But there would be no point in doing that for products aimed at fans and not the mass market
>>11603614Come on anon, no one paid for a study in regards to these crowd funded tron figs
>>11605243Just got back from a trip, checked my email, saw DESPERATION emails for this (two in a row!) as well as several from Super7. Sad.
>it's losing backersKWAB
>>11607001You're right. It was at 1,064 last night. Now it's at 1,060.
I loved Legacy's toyline. Great 3.75" line with light up features and details.
>>11605579>PulseThey stole that name from me. I was selected for a huge Star Wars Black Series survey when the line was new. I gave them a ton of free ideas (including more play features, blast effects and dioramas..and raising the prices) and I told them to hire me because “I have my finger on the pulse of the community”. Of course they didnt hire me they just took and used every idea I gave them.
>>11607119How did you think they were going to hire you from a survey?
>>11607119The purpose of a survey is to gather free information companies can use when their own employees are uncreative dip-shits not giving the bosses any data they can use.
>>11603246This doesn't come off as a haslab. A haslab Tron set would have a huge MCP and area, huge and small Sark, Tron. They definitely read the file wrong on this
>>11607119Hire you to do what? Play wordle?
>>11606245Two in a row because they managed to send an email without bothering to link any of the buttons to the actual site. Utter morons.
>>11607119Lmao
I don't recall these red suits in the movie, were they cut?
>>11607502
>>11607119>and raising the prices)Look at all the retards not realizing you're trolling.
People don't seem to realize this Haslab is a range without anything to compare it to so they naturally price it higher. Existing ranges they are behind on the price increases they want to make because they have to gradually turn up the heat rather than suddenly jumping the price by like 7 bucks a figure. MLs and Black Series are in their first phase of price increases now (+$3). This Haslab is where they want to end up as far as value per dollar.
>>11607529well its not working out for them is it
>>11607539Nope. Hopefully they realize this insane pricing will not be tolerated, but I'm pretty sure they'll just write it off as Tron being a worthless IP. The sad part is the Marvel Legends fans probably would pay $33 a figure
>>11607566Hasbro used to care about price, and used to make stuff in all price ranges so even the poorest kids could afford a little something. Now its "DON'T LIKE OUR PRICES? STOP BEING POOR!"
>>11604190>You can't have super articulated light up figuresYou literally can Anon. Leds are fucking tiny these days.
>>11607793I'd settle for flourecent day-glow paint or plastic. I'd also settle for glow-in-the-dark paint and plastic. Both are possible, but toy-makers openly reject using it.
>>11604327say that shit to my face, not online and see what happens, 6ingger.
>>11607502>>11607503Generic background characters like so many others.
>>11607529>so they naturally price it higher.Seems to be working out pretty GREAT for them so far, huh?
>>11609375They desired money but didn't understand how voluntary transactions worked. They thought they put up the haslab and you had to fund it by their divine right of kings
>>11607502>>11607503They were on screen for about 5 mins during the break in/hacking scene. Same scene where that red head actor from Shameless got his helmet taken off, had literally one line and then was never seen again. This movie was probably chopped to hell in the editing room
>>11607793>You can have the stripes down all the articulated limbs of the figure with working LEDsCan you though? What figure has that at this scale? Wires and what not would have to pass through every single joint in the shoulders and elbows plus hips and knees. How is THAT possible?
I've seen brand manager Steve Evans asked on fb & instagram why they didn't size the display to fit in a Detolf (Steve has a TON of Detolfs housing his personal collection in every video he makes at home), and Steve NEVER responds, but will thank everyone who comments that they backed the HasLab. Guess we can't question the corporate overlords?
>>11603246>$260>for 5 basic bitch robot chicken ass action figs, two bikes, and an LED display>$260>oh, and it isn't even a limited run, it's literally just a shitty kickstarter clone, meaning you might not even fucking get it>$260what the fuck happened to hasbro? I've been mainly paying attention to my main game LEGO but I've never even considered the other non-brick based bands and what they're doing. Hasbro IIRC used to be the dominant power of toy brands back not even like 10-15 years ago, with shit like Bayformers, Prime, MLP, even fucking lincoln logs. Now I go to the store and they're functionally nonexistent except for Marvel legends, and apparently people don't like those.
4 days later and it's still stuck at 1000 backers. That can't be right.
>>11610522>people aren't backing retardedly overpriced thing from niche franchise >That can't be right.
The woman was approaching actually being attractive and can't have that on screen. Seriously how do you go from Legacy having the hottest PG rated women in the history of cinema to the absolute potato cast of Ares.
>>11610785Beauty is considered an attack on less-attractive women and young girls, and gives them self-esteem issues. Sone even argue that too much beauty around kills girls who feel ugly by compelling them into suicide. Making the world of movies, TV, and gaming ugly "saves lives" as the woke like to argue.That's the argument. Whether ir not you agree with it is moot because that's what Hollywood and gaming go with now. Personally a lot of the ugliness in everything comes from MEN who are mad at attractive women who refused to acknowledge their existence so they want the world to be as ugly as possible as revenge.
>>11610519CEO died and some retard from (((microsoft))) took over
>>11610776>mfw the 1/12 figure aren't based on Uprising designs of charactersIt would be far more striking and unique. Instead it's just Hasbro's lazy plastic skin tones and uncanny face prints.
It's completely stalling out. This shit won't even hit 2k
>>11611546It's so close to doing it too. It was a waste of time. It'll probably another half-year before we see the next HASLAB.
Here are your Tron Ares figures /toy/
ALMOST 1100 BACKERS!!!!NGMI
Haslabs don't work unless there's already an existing line
>it's losing backers againlmao
>>11612507They're trying to sell it for twice what it is worth. It suffers from the issue that most haslabs have where there are just a bunch of gimmick features to bloat the price. They could have released the figures at $20 each (and that would have already been a pretty high price, but that's just their going rate for all 3.75" now) and sold the bikes for like $20 or $30 each. And that's being generous, since those bikes look cheap as hell.Does anyone really care about the light up base, or whatever? Seems like they're attributing at minimum 40% of the perceived price to that. This shit should not have been a Haslab.
>>11612584I saw that too. Every time it creeps up on 1,100, a couple of backers bail.
>>11605111If Hasbro needs all 10,000 to fund at 260 dollars each, that's 2.6 million. Let's say Hasbro lowers the threshold numbers to 2,500. If it still needs 2.6 mil to fund, that means Hasbro charges 1,040 per backer. For five figures, two bikes, and a base that lights up. There is no way they're going to get that many backers at that rate for the little amount they're offering.
>>11603783How much for the Tariff surcharge or whatever we call it. If this was released a year or two ago, would it have shaved off fifty bucks or so?I think for $200 bucks it might have sold me. I should be cutting back right now, so that price hike is too much for me.
>>11603812I got Tron on sale somewhere. Maybe Gamestop.>>11603883I gotta agree with him. 7 inch not fitting with other 6 inch figures bugs me. McFarlane is noteworthy for this. Can't fit them with any older DC figures.Also it is a sperg thing, not an incel thing. Though many spergs might be incels.
Did anyone see the movie Tron?
>>11612661They don't need 2.6 mill to make a fucking steel mold to produce a 3.5 Inch action figure. 90% at LEAST will be profit and royalties. I highly doubt materials and assembly costs them 5 usd a set, especially with how dogshit hasbro's haslab qc has been.
>>11612702If the full 20% on Vietnamese products is applied the set was about $167 if my math is right. That said large companies are able to offset tariff costs by bulk shipments so hasbro is full of shit.
>>11612724The tariffs aren't per shipment, they are per item, though.
It took two weeks to get from 1,090 to 1,100. It's doomed.
>>11612715>90% at LEAST will be profit and royalties.You should learn the difference between speculating and simply reaching as far up your own ass as you can to pull out nothing but pure stupid bullshit. You're not even worth chatting with, you're just a histrionic retard screeching for attention.
>>11612715>I have no idea what the fuck I'm talking about, how toy production is actually done, and what those costs are but here is a completely baseless statement that is DEFINITELY true.
20 days left.We can do it... !
>>11615115The next HASLAB is being held up for this shit. It's a shame and it's contrary to previous flops. Reva's lightsaber and the rancor flopped ebcause no one wanted them. This is something people do actually want, but can't rationalize the price.
>>11603486it wasn't terrible, hell that'd have been better. it was as exactly a 5/10 movie as ive ever seen.
>>11615136Rancor got far closer than this and would've funded if they extended the haslab a day
>>11603771>that dash at the end This was written by AI lol
>>11615508>Only AIs use dashes nowIs this a new meme? I use them all the time.
>>11615136>The next HASLAB is being held up for this shit.>MOMMY I NEEEDS ANOTHER HASLAB NAOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!There will be more, be patient child.
>>11615691It was a waste of time and you know it
>>11615136>This is something people do actually want, but can't rationalize the price.Why can't boomers accept that TRON is just not actually that cool or popular
The number is skyrocketingWe can do it!
>>11604066Flynn looks like my old comic shop guy.
>>11620485jeff bridges looks like every old nerd and burnout in existence.
10 days left.
1 week...
>>11627732Hasbro really came up with a winner with this Haslab eh?
>>11627774It didn't even reach 20%. It was a waste of time. Hasbro probably won't offer another HASLAB until summer, and then it'll most likely be GI Joe since that seems to be the line with the highest success rates for HASLABs. It's a shame because people do want it, but just can't rationalize the price.
>>11628546there's a new TF one coming at the beginning of next year
>>11628546Ghostbusters has a 100% success rate so I could see them doing another.
>>11628684For what? After Ecto-1 and a proton backpack, there really isn't anything left that they can do.
>>11628684>>11628615The real question is: are those fandoms ready for the new higher prices Hasbro will require for their Haslabs?
>>11629302There's tons more equipment they could do, and it would all fund easily. Stuff for the figure line is a harder sell, but the firehouse would be the logical choice if they wanted to try something else for it.
