>see interesting toy video>try watching it>the guy smacks his lips every single time he draws breath to speak
>>11652536For me it's when they try (and fail) to be funny instead of just reviewing the toy
>>11652577>evil twin appears in the review
>>11652536There is a way to remove it in audacity, but most youtubers dont do that, like me.Im actually lip-smacker supreme, but i just edit it out in my voiceovers
>going over articulation>calls every hinge joint a ball joint
>>11652609kino
>breaks toy during the review>still gives it a high score because he got it for free
>black handsunironically makes me close off the video
>Hispanic toy reviewer>starts using Spanish words out of nowhere (look at Marvel Legend Rogue’s nalgas! ¡No names guey!)
>Now for some size comparisons>Proceeds to only show the figure next to some random ass unobtainable toys that like six people have and means absolutely nothing to the audience at large
>>11652822Not surprising that a 4chan anon gets mad about comparing sizes
>>11652536>review of a battery operated toy>dipshit doesn't have any batteries or assumes the contacts are corroded and doesn't exhibit any of the electronic features
>>11652664>goes over articulation>wildly rotates figure the whole time like they're solving a rubix cube
I always found most toy reviewers a bit obnoxious and tried making a quick review myself years ago just using my phone as a test. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHCIh91zDDgIf I stepped up production quality with a proper camera and backdrops is this style of review something that would appeal to toy? Im almost entirely a vintage collector so the reviews would be of the Beastwars / Transmetal / Transmetal 2 line + Transart releases and a variety of other 90's toylines like MightyMax, Street Sharks etc. I try to support revive projects for cancelled releases and get prototypes and other artefacts whenever possible that might be fun to include as well. It might be good to do a bit of trivia/history voiceover maybe but otherwise I want the reviews to be POV and entirely focused on giving an impression of what its like to own the toy.
>>11652536>see interesting toy video>try watching it>the guy spends more time showing himself than the toy that's the subject of the video.>see interesting toy video>try watching it>it's a "hands video" where you spend more time seeing the guy's hands than the subject because his hands keep blocking clear views of the subject.
>>11652912I will never understand the first one, I want to see the damn toy not some fat neckbeard next to it ffs.
>watch any kind of model/toy video with close up shot of the guys hands>he has type d brachydactylyI don't know why it triggers my disgust sensitivity. I fucking hate stubby fingers. Get those things out of my sight.
>>11652769>>11652912>>11652953got to appreciate the chinese/japanese reviewers who wear latex gloves in their reviews
