Spite is a dangerous sword.Post your Pepe.Post your setsPost your MocsPost your weird partsDon’t post your leaksDon’t post YoutubersDon’t spam the board with splinter threads.He was about to make a new one anyway.FAG:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YVt-4sibEMFOU8H484MpB-K6rNla5SIYdHZG8lyCHLQ/edit?usp=sharinghttps://www.brickeconomy.com/https://www.bricklink.com/https://brickset.com/https://rebrickable.com/>/lg/ Flickr Group:https://www.nigger.com/groups/legogeneral/>LEGO General Archive:https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/subject/Lego%20General/>Third Party Information:https://pastebin.com/YHYxy2Ze>Retiring Setz Data:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rlYfEXtNKxUOZt2Mfv0H17DvK7bj6Pe0CuYwq6ay8WA/>General Resources:https://lgfag.neocities.orgPreviously: >>11700924
>>11707540I like that frog
Shogun was a kino theme
>>11707554It’s 1000 bucks on brickowl, but 11 bucks sealed on bricklink https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?S=7606-1#T=S&O=%7B%22iconly%22:0%7D
>>11707560Imagine if we got a whole Clavell’s Asian saga theme.It’s on streaming shit why not?!
Can someone explain the meaning of the frog posting? I'm new to /lg/
>>11707579France, and frog fetish on one of the designers, and also partially due to there still being no blue frog or re-release of the red one after all these years
>>11707540>Don’t post your leaks>Don’t post YoutubersYou realize this isn't enforceable, if you decide to make a general you have to be open to all subjects relating to that topic. You are not a moderator.>>11707579Some schizos are angry about another schizo so are doing the exact same thing he does. He's allegedly french so they spam frogs.
>>11707582>Some schizos are angry about another schizo so are doing the exact same thing he does. He's allegedly french so they spam frogs.kek. What about snails?
>>11707584Don't think the angry schizos are clever enough for that, they seem like the brainless reddit types
>>11707582You are salty due to nobody organic using your shitty threads, and now are gonna spam 50 low quality threads onto the ‘log? Typical. Nobody likes those two topics, mainly because of you and your kin so don’t try and act like a higher up either froggy.
>>11707586>the creature that spends all day reposting reddit and instagram screenshots calling somebody else from redditlol, lmao.
>>11707589See you think everyone who disagrees with your shitting up of the thread to be the shillposter,but no there are many of us who think you are a retarded faggot and are making the threads worse than shill spam ever did.
>>11707597you just simply are white knighting for the “man” who flooded the board with 50 threads, the same one who spammed interracial porn, and the same one who’s utterly insane, funny
New pics of the new gwp, $100 threshold
>>11707589Dude, because of you, every third post in these threads is like, “fuck off” or “nobody likes you” or “go away frog,” etc. It’s fucking exhausting and it’s genuinely more grating than whatever the supposed frog (if he even exists) is doing.
>>11707608>The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist
>when in Rome
Dude i literally just remembed my love for lego and wanted to see some community and discuss mocs and shit and i come to /toy/ and THIS is what i see. IT'S THREADS ABOUT PLASTIC TOYS NIGGERS. Can we get some civilised conversation and share our hobby?
>>11707563In what way are upcoming Lego sets off-topic in the Lego thread?
>>11707617There’s less esl spam than /dbg/ and /shf/, but thats about the only positive here, and yet here is a better lego discussion area than anywhere else on the internet. Sad.
>>11707623There’s that feigned ignorance again.>>11707566
>>11707617Whatchu into?
>>11707627I’m asking genuinely, and I’m not the supposed frog you fucking schizo. Intuitively, it seems to me that “news” about upcoming Lego sets is practically by definition on-topic vis a vis a Lego thread. How is it not?
>>11707636Rules exist for a reason, thats why we use the toilet around here, cleaning up the septic of all the posts with only “New #### When?” as a usual crossline in between them and seeing all the posts that disappear in an actual wipe, and how the one “providing” them does it to mainly stir up shit. Simply put, nobody’s playing your game anymore.
>>11707634Technic and creator animals, but i havent bought a set in over 3 years. Only today i dug up my old collection from the basement and built some random stuff. I'm not very good at mocs though
>>11707582>not enforceableYes it is. The OP determines what on topic is. Posting off topic is against the rules. This is very obvious.
Imagine what could have been
>>11707608This tbqh. We want to discuss upcoming kits in peace.
>>11707656>the lost themes >medievalWhy does everyone seem to love castle/medieval lego themes? Isn't there enough of it already?
>>11707642Ok, so that doesn’t answer my question. I’ll assume you concede that Lego “leaks” are in fact relevant to the discussion of Lego (again this seems practically tautological).So my next question is, with respect to the rulefriending, why ought there be a prohibition on posting leaks? Is there any actual utility to the rule, or is it just one sperg enforcing this as a matter of personal preference?
>>11707663Because in the days of classic LEGO castle themes and sets, LEGO was actually putting out original intellectual property and not just creating building sets from movies and popular culture. They were actually original and fun.
>>11707664It’s off topic, advertising AND spam technically.
>>11707664>completely ignores the point and insists on being obstinate and obtuseSigh. >>11707650If you don’t have the 31120 get it. Great 3-1 castle set. I’ve been less and less impressed by 3-1 lately though.
>>11707668you can’t seem to describe how it’s off-topic, so until I’m corrected, I’m going to go with my intuition that discussion of Lego is in fact on topic in a Lego thread. I don’t see how it’s advertising either. Is posting a newly released set also advertising? Is posting lego bricks advertising? Is the very existence of a thread (or board, for that matter) dedicated to consumer products advertising?And how is it spam?
>>11707664Its simply put spam, he COULD do a concession and just upload them all into one site link and just post that once or twice per thread, but NO, he MUST flood the thread with shit nobody replies to like he was promised this general 3000 year ago. This is simply the end result of people being tired of his shit and his leak spam. Now go away.>>11707659And here’s the pedo still seething. Yawn
>>11707669Nigga, I literally can’t grasp how discussion of Lego products is off topic in a Lego thread. If it’s so obvious, please, with your galaxy brain, just help me across the finish line. I’m just too stupid to get it.
>>11707675Flooding with mono-word posts and images nobody replies to, and fake hype shit. Simply a course correction against everything thats been happening here for the past few years.
>>11707675>I’m just too stupid to get itClearly. It’s been addressed. Learn to read.
>>11707664>I assume you concedeNo. Not when the OP clearly dictates what is on topic in the OP. Literally no one cares about an upcoming movie license no one is going to watch. No one cares about a license for a musician no one has heard of. You pretend you don’t know what we are talking about. You pretend not to notice leaks of set numbers and prices but nothing else.>Guys serial number 19476-829$3)-37839292! Is going to be $4999 who else is HYPE!????!!???!This shit is empty posting. It’s advertising. It’s spam. It’s off topic. No one wants to read this. No one wants this.
>>11707678I’ll concede the obvious samefriending with low-effort posts (“very cool” or “exciting!” or whatever else) to bump his threads is annoying and bordering on spam. My question is about the posting of leaks themselves.
>>11707681It hasn’t been addressed whatsoever.
man he is furious right now when does the melty start
>>11707683I don’t mind it :^)
>>11707684He uses them as the trojan horse of his spam and as >>11707683 says tries to make everybody give a shit about them, funny enough now we do, but not in the way tlg wants us to. If he just as stated many times before put it all in an image folder and posted that? Nobody would fuss up but he continues threadshitting the same way every time. Simply put, its spam, and off topic as dictated.
>___friendingI am noticing.
>>11707687But it has and you know it has. What’re you building today? Wait let me guess you don’t own any? >>11707224
>>11707694And you don’t know what on topic is. Coincidence?
>>11707697I don’t like to say -fag because I’m Politically Correct and I also think the -friend suffix is funnier.
>>11707702lmao he got deleted
>>11707707Nope :^)
>>11707699It hasn’t at all. All you retards have said is, effectively, “it’s off topic because the OP says it’s off-topic.” I’ll give you credit inasmuch as this isn’t literally a circular argument, but I’m asking for more of an explanation. If a non-frogposter posted a leaked set (the otter or whatever), that would be considered off-topic? How?And I’m currently waiting on pieces to finish these up. They should arrive in the next couple hours :^)
>>11707709Hey don’t copy my face, you’re going to give the schizos another “tell” to look for
>>11707713People are able to tell off of filenames, cropping, and such, after a while it gets ingrained on what to look out for and what is obvious, then again it requires a basic pattern recognition sector be functioning, and your people aren’t too good with that.
>>11707715Sorry, you’re accusing me of being the frogposter or a Lego marketer or something? And you can tell “because of the pixels”?I hate to disappoint, but I’m just the guy who posted the little Majora’s Mask moc a thread or two ago — see? :^)
>>11707722No, I’m accusing you of being a liberal, as you stated before. Thats why you aren’t too good at noticing patterns kek, also yeah the one guy is trying to steal your face as he typically does, sucks
>>11707722Glad you’re not him. We’re on hiatus from new sets for a while until froge leaves or dies. That’s all. Like you I am also excited for Zelda and it sucks we can’t goon over it together.
Recently finished watching ninjago dragons rising and it's a really solid cartoon. Not sure if the best out of all the seasons, the animation is definitely way better compared to before.
>>11707663Its due to the loch ness dragon, and some of the prototype roofing pieces, or stuff like this
>>11707713>you retards keep saying> it’s off topic because the OP says it’s off-topicThat’s how a thread works. The OP is literally the topic. Deviation from the OP is off topic.
>>11707736The Loch Ness monster is awesome. I really wish a third party manufacturer or stl site would recreate it as it exists in that image
>>11707724I don’t understand. I said, “how is X off-topic?” and your reply was “liberals can’t do pattern recognition.” How is that responsive to my post?Also you retards need to do either more or less Noticing, because you’re getting an awful lot of false positives with your current frog identification process.
>>11707737So, again, if an image of a hot new set leaked (say the Ganon final battle or whatever), and I posted the image, that would be considered off-topic?
>>11707747In this thread, yes.
>>11707743I see the only part of it thats shared with the regular one is the crocodile tail, but the upper jaw is a new mold, more sinister looking eyes with the ear fins you would expect, and body goes sideways, also nevermind about the eyes but it seems to have 6 studs on its back >>11707744You said you were politically correct earlier, so line of reasoning. The spammer should get his posts deleted by the end of the month if the usual site timer is on track anyways>>11707747You just posting it directly off reddit and saying “omg guys product details” would entitle it as such, learn how this place works
>>11707749That’s retarded lol
>>11707743Lego did a plesiosaur. A few times actually.
>>11707752Nigga, do you think people earnestly describe themselves as “politically correct”? The last time the term wasn’t used derogatorily was the early 90s.And I still fail to see the throughline. How do you get from “define off-topic” to “we can tell the frogposter because of the pixels.” Thats some ungodly lateral thinking, big fella :^(
>>11707756lol, it looks so silly
>>11707765Years of having to deal with fuckers like Athena changes a man, at a certain point, you just know. It sounds insane but thats how this site works.
>>11707777Oh shit
>>11707777Lolwut
>>11707777I love when people reply to themselves in the same post.
>>11707778Second time I’ve managed to selfcheck like this here, first time was with sexts here
>>11707792I disagree.
I like Lego
>>11707787Bejitabros…
Time to walk out and buy some toothpicks and small equipment bits at walmart
>>11707562Not like I have a choice as bricklink blocked my country for no fucking reasonI still don't get it. We have official lego stores here and we're the biggest country in the continent and there's always never any legos on shelves cuz people buy them all the time I don't fucking get ittttt
Cybear ready to hack your NFT picnic baskets or whatever the fuck cyberpunk bullshit I dont even know
>>11707783Ice Planet 204444444 looks fucking awesome
>>11707775Once I pretended to be Athena and instantly got banned for 30 days. A few days passed and I told the mods I wasn't Athena and just pretending and actually got my ban appealed. The MODS actually DID SOMETHING. That's how fucking real he is. And knew enough about his IP and shit to know I was just pretending to be retarded. There are just certain ways people are and you may think that it not be like it is but it do
>>11707736>>11707656Lego Prototype stuff is so interesting. It's so strange to me that Lego went balls in 80s and 90s nostalgia with licensed properties or have done some licensed properties for so long like Harry Potter and SW that they wrapped around and became nostalgia properties. They do their own nostalgia with remakes of 80s and 90s sets and minifigs but they will probably NEVER make any thing actually look and feel like classic Lego playsets (I.e. toys) ever again. Not even out of nostalgia. No one even does it I LEGO ideas either they're always gigantic MOC type things.I remember in the early 2000s they rereleased some black falcon sets and I got a black falcon inn and thought it was the coolest shit ever. They even accidentally gave everyone one of those cool indian western horses and sent a free regular horse with it.
>>11707961And I fucking loved it. Despite having Bionicles and the newer castle stuff at the same time. I wish they kept it up. Imagine I'd they recreated prototype stuff. I guess times are just different and I still like some of the crestor 3 in 1 castle and house stuff they put out.
Is this thread now just 2 retards "trolling" each other? I honestly can't tell anymore.
So what are you building, anon?
I’m kind of torn on the existence of lego movie 2. On one hand the movie was bad. On the other hand the sets were 10/10
>>11707961Mostly agreed. They are remaking Playsets now. They are just GWPs. Which is annoying in and of itself. These should be on store shelves for 20-30 dollars. But you have to spend 150 dollars or buy from a reseller.>Forestmen Hideout>magisto’s house >that black knight or dragon knight boat people are excited about
>>11708009Spray painting, picked up some toothpicks for support on that and am both melting and freezing at the same time, guess I’m finally ready
>>11708023Surely you can just get the parts and build them though, right? None of these look super complex or specialized
>>11707540HAS THE BOUNTY HUNTER PURSUIT BEEN LEAKED YET?
>>11708030It's probably not even coming out this year so no.
Got a reasonable facsimile of the MM mirror shield for Young Link, and added a rare gear piece to the clock tower. Still waiting on the gilded sword, I’m afraid, as well as the roof of the mini OoT Temple of Time
Offtopic only refers to the board topic you silly cunts.
>>11708075Beyond that, I also struggle to imagine how news about upcoming Lego sets is off-topic in a Lego thread.
>>11708075Try spamming the DC general with Lego Friends then, see how that goes for you.
>>11708094But would the DC people sperg the fuck out of if I posted a leaked figure mould or something?
>>11708073Buddy of mine was a tiny god in gw2. He passed away in 2017. Rest easy Sir Ulrich The Wise. Anyway, nice job!
>>11708100They have their own lolcow to deal with (Jarett) so you would be basically the same thing>>11708077>>11708075Ruins the flow of everything.
I went through my minifig box and found some shit
>>11708132>the incredible bulk (2012)
>>11708131Redpill me on Jarrett? I knew a guy… and he was super into DC.
>>11708138Powergirl obsession, powergirl obsession, and thats about it, but he doesn’t get banned
>>11708131I’m not the frog, I’m just not sure I understand the endless sperging out
>>11708141It’s odd how every toy theme seems to have one or two absolute spergs who ruin it for everyone… I suspect even the same spergs across many threads and themes. And somehow bans never stick.
>>11708148Uhhh dude, theres something in the reflection
Old spray paint stand rebuilt
