DBZ LEAKS EDITIONPost everything related to LEGO! News, MOCs, Leaks, whatever. Have fun. Play well.FAQ:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YVt-4sibEMFOU8H484MpB-K6rNla5SIYdHZG8lyCHLQ/edit?usp=sharinghttps://www.brickeconomy.com/https://www.bricklink.com/https://brickset.com/https://rebrickable.com/>/lg/ Flickr Group:https://www.flickr.com/groups/legogeneral/>LEGO General Archive:https://archive.palanq.win/toy/search/subject/Lego%20General/>Third Party Information:https://pastebin.com/YHYxy2Ze (embed)>Retiring Sets Data:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rlYfEXtNKxUOZt2Mfv0H17DvK7bj6Pe0CuYwq6ay8WA/>General Resources:https://lg.neocities.orgprevious thread: >>11867408
Sanriobros... we won!
>>11874291another original theme down the drain
spongebob set has a disgusting amount of stickers
>I want a Jp3 set with Spino and characters from the movie!What a monkeys paw. I am genuinely disappointed. How can Lego put something out this shit?
>>11874339what's so wrong with it? just the fact that the spino aint molded?
>>11874342Mixing brick build dinos in with molded dinos is a genuinely terrible idea. They don't go together. At minimum they need molded heads, but it just looks terrible and doesn't go with the rest of the line. On top of that it's an awful build, probably the single worst looking brickbuilt dinosaur they've released. The rest of the set, such as it is, is also garbage. Speaking of garbage jp3 is a terrible movie, but it least has a few locations that would make for very compelling sets. The overgrown hatchery lab with all the cloning equipment tanks and egg incubators with raptors would look awesome, as would an aviary set with some tall rock structure builds and a couple catwalks bridges and cages connecting them with a couple baby pteranodons and a big one with walkable jointed wings and billy with a glider would be absolutely kino. But instead we got this.
>>11874339I'm out of touch didn't even know those vegetation pieces were a thing
>>11874296The amount of idiotic cat-themed molds this theme created is rage inducing considering how mold stingy Lego usually is
>>11874281>Kame House(18+)Poetry
You know what? The Pokemon polybags aren't half bad. I can see the bottom half of the smaller balls being used for a missile pod, or searchlight, he middle piece I can't see being much besides a robot's cycloptic head (see zaku), and I am enjoying all the new curved parts. As far as the new grass tufts go they don't feel like lego, but I can see a lot of uses for hair.
>>11874465
Holy mother of kinohttps://youtu.be/o116pfHoo_Q?si=NWZSErkrU5DZAueS/ourgirl/
>>11874281>more display slop
>>11874475I think you posted the wrong video.
>Lego has their own futuristic version of JTTW>They cancel it for Dragon Ball ZHmm...>>11874506 #I'm not. I like Sonic and I'm upset we never get more minifigures. Lego are ditching the furries for the weebs.
Here are your toys and franchises for kids, lil bro.
>>11874560>we will never get another Crossworlds set with Blaze and Rouge minifigsFeels pretty bad, man.
>>11874573It bothers me they never made an official Omega build (there's a dozen fanmade ones but I can't be bothered to bricklink the parts) to complete Team Dark and Blaze to go with Silver.>RougeIt's strange that Rouge was the only minifigure to never get a rerelease. I'm not saying it's because of the porn, but it's because of the porn. Same reason why Lego never made an Ankha figure despite how popular she is online.
>>11874555Oh. Epic failhttps://youtu.be/rie-x_5EBQU?si=XK9TowI5XFthMrVP
>>11874612>whore tits out in the thumbnailAnyone else uniornically hates women or is it just me?
>>11874617>Hair covering her tits up>Not even wearing a low-cut shirt or showing off cleavage.I think you might just be a woman-hating incel.
>>11874617calm down faggot
>>11874617I think you've spent too much time on /pol/
>>11874560monkie kid was failing hard and all the sets were reduced to vehicle or mech slop
>>11874281just to be clear, the dragon set pic is fake
>>11874281>kids lineAre little zoomies into dragon ball?
>>11874636zoomers loved super, I don't think they are kids anymore tho.
>>11874636>Are little zoomies into dragon ball?Anon, the youngest zoomies are 17.
>>11874612So shes making MOCs now? Based. >>11874678Nta but anyone younger than me is a zoomer, anyone my or older is a boomer.
I have a dilemma. Bought some big Lego sets like 10 years ago to resell em, but never got around to it. I realized shipping big sets is kind a pain in the ass so now I'm wondering if I should just open them up. The chima mammoth and some city arctic research base.
>>11874684all things have valuesell thing, get money.will the new thing you get, with that money, be more valuable than the thing you sold?if you want the Lego set back at some point, how much of a hassle would it be? could you even do that? (probably?)
>>11874731I dunno, just thinking how the Chima mammoth is probably all brittle brown puts me off. The Arctic base mite b cool to build.
>>11874281Lego lost their mindEnough of display slop!!!!!!!!!!!
>>11874291hello kitty? more like hello shitty
Sonic line is over?
>>11874281i got interested then instantly uninterested, because they'll make everyone, but make it bitch to get it all
>>11874788Just like be rich
>>11874788>instantly uninterested, because they'll make everyone, but make it bitch to get it allthey did that exact thing to One Piece:Luffy WEARING the hat, locked into $140+ set. they finally make a set with Luffy hat/hair in a $60 set (the lowest entry point for hat/hair) but in that set Luffy has situational facial expressions. you still need to get ANOTHER Luffy set to get a kinda-neutral Luffy minifig.they did the same thing with Chopper. sure he's in a $30 set, but his expressions are not neutral, forcing you to get the $100 set to get the better Chopper.it's almost unbelievable how insanely frustrating Lego's choices are with the One Piece sets. I want to Chopper-cry.>>11874799>Just like be richyep. I wish there was some kind of metric I could supply to Lego about WHY I'm NOT spending my money on their sets.
>>11874560>Lego are ditching the furries for the weebsGood
>>11874296>original Gabby's dollhouse was a dreamworks IP you moron
>>11874339they couldn't even put a jurassic park III logo on the plate? Seriously? Not only does the set look awful but that's just pathetic
I'm starting to HATE lego
New cringe dropped
>>11875187Is ANYONE buying this shit?
