>watching old horror movie>here’s a naked woman that serves no purpose to the story
Faggot
>>220721732>>here’s a naked woman that serves no purpose to the storyum based?
>>220721732uncs were creeps fr fr on god
>watch old horror movie>the black guy dies first
>>220721732Okay. What's the problem?
>>220721773>becomes a trope despite never actually being a trope
>>220721781Objectifying women is morally wrong.
>cheap garbage 70s/80s horror movie thats modern equivalent would be some straight to tubi movie>seems good because it was filmed with actual film and not some cheap digital camera
Im so glad woke won and that shit is never coming back because MAGAtards think naked people is outrageous
>>220721794How is being naked objectification?
>>220721732This is a blue board, the gay boards have a different background color.
>>220721794Why?
>>220721794You can't objectify objects.
>zoomer watches horror movie about ghosts, monsters, psychopaths, literal hell, existential dread>scariest thing in the movie for them is a naked woman
it's important to show tits in the movie so people will want to see the movie. i've sat through a full length feature film for 5 seconds of tit footage
>>220721794Moral philosopher here. What does that even mean?Having naked women is definitely not morally wrong.
>>220722049based evil toons enjoyer
>>220721732It serves a purpose to the viewer. Movies aren't just story. They're a collection of deliberate choices that all serve a certain purpose. Only idiots and children think movies are just the story and everything in them needs to pertain to it.
For me? It's Lifeforce.
>>220722126kino. By far Cannon's best.