[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


I just can't
>>
>>220741541
care to elaborate?
>>
the director used a hag body double instead of legitimately filming 12yo jennifer conelly's naked butt, bringing a curse upon the entire film
>>
>>220741560
I don't even know where to start, I just have very mixed feelings about it.
>>
>>220741615
>I just have very mixed feelings about it.
I think most people feel that way about it
>>
>>220741580
Tell me you made this up
>>
It's one of those watch once then never again type of films.
>>
>>220741580
It's illegal in america or something like that. I bet Jennifer would have no problems doing it. She also refused a body double for the ass to ass scene. True story.
>>
>>220741713
I watched it 5 times. Still great.
>>
>>220741697
nope, her body double is listed in the credits. "margherita pace"

>>220741733
>It's illegal in america
no it isn't. see: pretty baby
>>
the whole 'whites being tough New Yawwwk gangsters' shit is over
they tried to resurrect it with those Boston movies from a few years back but they didn't work either

the only whites in NY by now are hipsters and Bateman-type psychos no-one can identify with
>>
A rare one where the leads are genuine pieces of shit. Obviously we get to see them as kids who get lured into it by the environment they grew up in but as adults they’re genuine cunts.
Beautiful music
>>
>>220741900
>whites
>movie is about Jewish people
?
>>
>>220741926
>Finally gets a date with his childhood sweetheart
>Rapes her
Deniro was fucking detestable.
>>
>>220741823
I didn't watch it, but from i remember it was pretty controversial, the movie was banned in some countries and culture changed in years after that. Maybe Hollywood changed it guidelines.
>>
>>220741976
At least she was white.
>>
>>220742060
She was jewish
>>
File: hqdefault.jpg (14 KB, 480x360)
14 KB JPG
>>220742090
That's not a jewish face
>>
>>220742126
Jokes on you I think they are the same race
>>
>>220741985
there was still underage nudity in plenty of 90s films, so no, it would not have been illegal in the 80s. artistic child nudity is still not illegal now.
>>
>>220742191
Which movies? Even Kids doesn't have it and that was controversial as fuck. Maybe not illegal, but producers would rather avoid it to not have a bad press.
>>
>>220741541
It's a great film, the fuck are you banging on about?
>>
>>220741541
Best gangster film ever made.
>>
>>220741976
Realises he can’t possess her and can’t handle it. It’s pretty grim
>>
Took years to come back out on physical media and they put the disc break between part one and two when he shoots that guy in the room full of feathers. So awkwardly handled
>>
>>220741615
It's a great fucking movie. Masterpiece. Hope you watched the lengthiest version.
>>
>>220742252
off the top of my head: milla jovovich in chaplin, kiera knightly in the hole, thora birch in american beauty, i think drew barrymore in something. mostly 15-16yos. there's much more if you include foreign films released in the us. baader meinhof complex for example is a german movie from 2008 that opens on full frontal naked little girls at a nudist beach.
>>
>>220742471
Long movies should have a planned intermission in the middle like Lawrence of Arabia.
>>
>>220742488
I guess if you count 16 and 17 as underage. The Hole is european. In European cinema it's hard to find movies that don't have underage nudity.
>>
>>220742610
>I guess if you count 16 and 17 as underage
why wouldn't you? they are.
>>
Jencon's little butt.
>>
>>220742533
It’s far more sensible than letting people just cut randomly in the middle of a scene
>>
>>220742902
...is not in the movie.
>>
>>220742878
For me underage just mean under age of consent. But it's strange. You can have sex with a 17 year, but you can't take naked pictures of her.
>>
>>220742991
the age of consent in california and therefore hollywood has been 18 for over 100 years.
>>
NOODLES!

NOODLES!
>>
>>220741541
Jews are evil?
>>
>>220743071
No one cares about California. Movies are made all over the world. Once upon a time in america was made in Rome, for example.
>>
>>220743071
That still didn't stop Chaplin from legally fucking a 16 year old. As long as they were married it was fine.
>>
It's an all time classic movie made in the 80s, what's not to like. It's imperfect but so what? I'll take this over Godfather or Scorsese any day
>>
>>220741541
It 2as all a dream lmao
>>
>>220743229
Contrarian.
>>
The director’s cut is superior to the theatrical version. It makes the phone ring at the beginning a full hour instead of just 15 minutes.
>>
>>220743355
It's just a better movie. I like the music more, I like the way it looks, I like its theatricality, I like how ambitious and foreign it is. It's good stuff
>>
>>220743361
kek
>>
>>220741541
Why is this thread half filled with pedophiles discussing how they want to rape children?
>>
>>220741541
>four hour movie about the beta jewish mafia

Horrible movie. Something only the jews of jewlywood would ever make.
>>
>>220742533
Have you ever been to a movie with intermission? I've been to the Kill Bill anniversary recently and honestly it's great, every movie longer than 90 minutes should have it
>>
>>220743418
Godfather's main theme mogs once upon time in america
>>
File: 5pences.jpg (247 KB, 1920x1080)
247 KB JPG
>>220741541
The only thing wrong with this movie is the dogshit "restored" version where they add unedited scenes with garbage quality. But the director's cut version is one of the greatest movie of all time and I keep watching scenes again and again.
>>
>>220744607
Yes. Lawrence of Arabia and LOTR 3. Even though that was a theatre decision, not a studio. They were afraid people will piss their pants because they wouldn't want to miss any scenes by going to the toilet.
>>
>>220744682
Both are good. I don't see the point of comparing them just because both movies are about gangsters.
>>
File: slipped.jpg (344 KB, 1920x1080)
344 KB JPG
Look how beautiful this movie is
>>
File: whatchalookin.jpg (295 KB, 1920x1080)
295 KB JPG
>tfw have never been in a child gang
>>
File: max.jpg (258 KB, 1920x1077)
258 KB JPG
Look at this charismatic fucker
>>
File: jewed.jpg (282 KB, 1920x1080)
282 KB JPG
More kino photography
>>
File: notrouble.jpg (224 KB, 1920x1080)
224 KB JPG
And for almost 4 hours it's like this
>>
File: wtf.jpg (271 KB, 1920x1080)
271 KB JPG
And then..."oh yeah let's add pure shit to that 10/10 kinos this is so worth it".
Makes me mad every time.
>>
>>220741541
>What the fuck was up with this movie?
First, make sure you watch the correct version (and not the butchered american cut)
Second, i always liked the opium-dream theory
Third, it's a masterpiece like the other italian directors with international cast of that period.

The scene when old noodles peep into the hole and he starts reminiscing always gives me the heaviest feels.

It's about growing up but never achieve happiness, always looking back to when you had it better, had fun and was actually happy. Or it is about guilt, or it is about time travel via heavy drugs (but that theory is retarded)
>>
>>220745169
Nah, it's about nostalgia. Being old and remembering the good old days when you fucking underage whores and got viciously beaten up by mobsters, before everything turned to shit.
>>
>>220745043
They should have AI to re-render these scenes so they match the others.
>>
>>220745251
That's a shitty retard idea, but it's still better than what was done.
>>
>>220745043
It looks like one of those Dogme 95 movies shot on early digital cameras.
>>
I watched it for the first time like a week ago over the course of a few days, it was pretty cool and I appreciate the artistic use of rape (not once but twice). I had to look up a summary of the movie because by the end I didn't remember the scene of Max "dying"
>>
Just can't what?
>>
>>220744904
So glad that little skipping faggot got shot.
>>
did that tall guy jump into the back of the garbage truck at the end?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.