[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Screenshot 2026-05-28.png (445 KB, 625x351)
445 KB PNG
is she right? are modern actors too good looking?
>>
File: at 1.48.01 AM.png (1.58 MB, 1600x900)
1.58 MB PNG
>video essay
>>
>>220801507
Those people all look dysgenic though
>>
lol no
>>
They're uglier if anything. There's no actor or actress today that can compete with the best looking actor/actress of the 90s
>>
They're the ugliest that actors and actresses have ever been and they're still trying to make them uglier. Jesus christ. By the time I'm dead film will exclusively cast absolute freaks of nature.
>>
People had thinner brows, lips, and noses back then. Everyone looks like mystery meat abominations now.
>>
>>220801507
they have literally never been uglier you dumb bitch
>>
>>220801507
>pretty white people offend me
libtard
>>
>>220801715
They already are
>>
>>220801715
They will do this because of nepotism and claim it's somehow moral
>>
>>220801507
In an age where Cynthia Erivo can show up looking like a fucking zombie, no, they aren't.
The problem is that you don't have a lot of actors with interesting faces. Eva Green's beautiful, and has an interesting face. Clint Howard's ugly as fuck, but has an interesting face.
The two people on her thumbnail are both pretty, but the real problem is their faces aren't that unique. Same goes for these two >>220801698 they're just kinda ugly in a normal way
>>
File: WBwpj7Q.jpg (488 KB, 614x900)
488 KB JPG
>>220801507
God I miss classic beauties
>>
>>220801507
>video essay
>made by a woman
>an ugly looking woman
where do you all find this bottom of the barrel type of contents
>>
File: 1779964425840885.jpg (199 KB, 482x551)
199 KB JPG
>>220801507
It's not about beautiful or ugly, but about being too young, too homogenized and lacking charisma. Whether it's a pretty twink, a nepo baby or an ugly DEI mutt, most casting choices these days only reflect the sterile, bland, sanitized sensibility of what you may call the netflix demographic (female, young, urban, casual viewer, superficial).

They don't have interesting faces, they don't have idiosyncratic personalities, they don't have non-conformist worldviews, they never experienced struggle and hard life.

You go back a few decades and read the life trajectory of a famous actor and it was like "family of 12 kids, grew up during famine, Korea war veteran, boxer, coal miner before he ended up being a cook on a set and the director noticed him, did ten years doing weird bit roles before gaining bigger roles", now it's "former child actor and model, famous for a CW teen show, from Manhattan family of shrinks and producers, only other sibling is a sister who's also a singer in some "underground" Brooklyn band somehow produced by big-shot labels".
>>
>>220802059
>You go back a few decades and read the life trajectory of a famous actor and it was like "family of 12 kids, grew up during famine, Korea war veteran, boxer, coal miner before he ended up being a cook on a set and the director noticed him, did ten years doing weird bit roles before gaining bigger roles"
Wanna buy a bridge?
>>
>>220801507
Most asian women are hideous
>>
>>220801507
>are modern actors too good looking?
Fuck no they're hideous and plastic, not at all beautiful let alone *too* beautiful. Look at any mid 20th century film and it'll have actual natural beauty in it.
>>
>>220801507
Those three are supposed to be beautiful? jfc
>>
>>220801507
Objectively speaking, yes. Back in the day, people in general, not just actors, were less beautiful and aged horribly. Now, people are more beautiful and age much better, Scarlett Johansson is in her 40s and she still looks hotter than any 40-year old actress looked in the 1990s or before that. Nicole Kidman is like 60, does she look 60? No, she looks 40-45 max, still hot. Charlize Theron, same. Same applies to men as well
>>
>>220801724
>Everyone looks like mystery meat abominations now.
In America.
>>
>>220802113
In your Europoor shit hole as well faggot
>>
>>220802283
All white here, friend :)
>>
File: 1776832180950470.jpg (39 KB, 680x593)
39 KB JPG
Yes, please show me ugly people. That's what I want
>>
>>220802080
T R V K E
R
V
K
E
>>
File: america spic nation.jpg (120 KB, 771x1024)
120 KB JPG
>>220802283
Whiter than you, Hernandez.
>>
>>220801507
She's prettier than Robbie and she's not that attractive.
>>
>>220801698
rachel is cute
>>
>>220801507
I don’t pay mind to what a gen z foid has to say
>>
File: IMG_0721.jpg (111 KB, 473x921)
111 KB JPG
>>220801715
>>
>>220801507
>disgustingly ugly Asian American with a Woody Allen shy coward ego is whining into a video essay about something

Seen this movie too many times, Robert. Let me leave the theater please
>>
>>220801507
Shut the fuck up uggo.
>>
>>220803152
Do you think Israel realized the last thing they’ll see before America cuts their aid is a dysgenic abomination calling them colonizers? They had a good thing going with Boomers, why couldn’t they maintain that.
>>
>>220801507
No? This is the third video I've seen claiming that and they always put sheboons like Zendaya or Ervo. Or worse, ugly jews like Hunter Schafer or Timothy Chalamet.
I know beauty standards change through the years, but this push to make ugliness acceptable feels artificial.
>>
File: Irulan.png (503 KB, 882x500)
503 KB PNG
>>220801507
>is she right? are modern actors too good looking?
No, they look too fake and unconvincing.
They are actually too ugly and often dysgenic looking
>>
>>220802080
Most people don't belong to the screen period.
>>
File: Disdain for Plebs.jpg (48 KB, 400x462)
48 KB JPG
>>220802108
>Objectively speaking, yes. Back in the day, people in general, not just actors, were less beautiful and aged horribly. Now, people are more beautiful and age much better,
>>
>>220803256
>Now, people are more beautiful
Aren't you forgetting about the dysgenic freaks in America? There are way more people in the world now, and way more abominations.
On average, I'd wager we're doing a lot worse today.
>>
>>220801507
Modern actors and actresses have been too ugly if anything. And I’m not sure they’re even more talented either despite selecting for the uglier.
>>
>>220801507
Nobody wants to work in Hollywood anymore. Whether it’s due to the rampant sexual assaults, the inherent Jewishness of the industry, the ability to self-manage through OnlyFans or micro-studios, or some combination of the three, people don’t want to work in Hollywood. Though I should say the worst-hit sectors are “legacy” studios, the big names we all know.

This downward trend started well before Weinstein. In fact, the #MeToo movement was an attempt by Hollywood to clean their reputation. It was them calling out the most open secrets of Hollywood to show potential fresh meat that, “look, we’re clean now! We’re fresh! Please, join us!” It’s no small wonder every director called out was done so by a big name actress for utterly conventional sexual misconduct. None of the child rape was called out, none of the sex rings. Isn’t that strange? It makes sense when you realize it was a PR stunt to get people back into Old Hollywood.

It didn’t work. God bless zoomers, because they didn’t bite. As another anon said, Hollywood is now forced to rely on the suckers and dregs that joined the industry. It’s become a tiny pool of incestuous, generational actors and actresses. It’s why everyone looks so dysgenic, because you’re looking at like 1,000 people’s kids after 4-5 generations of breeding among each other.
>>
>>220803351
You have to be over 18 to post here.
>>
>>220801507
No, but they are very forgetable
>>
>>220803387
they dont put people in tiers anymore. Like they hire a bunch of pretty people but they shove them infront of you expecting you to care about them when you don't know them from anything.

They used to put promising new actors in side roles first especially on tv before making them leads but nowadays they make some faggot zoomer or feminist whore the lead and you've never seen them before in your life. They just... become leads. There's no build up. So when you see steeljawed manfag as the lead in some fantasy you don't care because you only see his face (he has no personality).

Personalities used to be developed over multiple shows or movies. Now it's forced.
>>
File: IMG_2419.jpg (81 KB, 707x1000)
81 KB JPG
Who would they get today to headline this movie tells me everything I need to know.
>>
File: Gene t.jpg (60 KB, 780x1171)
60 KB JPG
>>220801507
Oh, no.
>>
>>220803450
already did it. nobody watched it
>>
>>220803469
that soft focus
the cheats have changed but the game hasn't
>>
>>220802333
Nope.
Slaves are not white.
>>
>>220803507
No slaves here, friend :)
>>
>>220803385
The only thing zoomers have done that’s based is utterly reject the Israeli agenda. They know the Jew and Gen Alpha will name the Jew.
>>
>>220803507
>american education and perception of the world
>>
>>220801507
The only one that doesn't repulse me is whatever's on the right, and that's not even great looking because it's a bad angle. The left and middle are grotesque modern mutt blobs. Middle has crazy eyes and the shit bangs just make her flat moon face even more potato like, and her freckles look like gross moles.
90% of hollyjew just looks like some homogenized brown mix that appeals to no one except marxists, and the proof is that like 9/10 of the biggest blockbuster actors are still white like Pitt and Cruise.
>>
>>220803651
It’s going to be funny when the last of the purebreds leave Hollywood.
>>
File: 173459330860770249.jpg (164 KB, 1459x1208)
164 KB JPG
>>
>>220803199
it's fat acceptance but for uglies
>>
>>220803925
As a fat ugly person I hate this and just want to be left alone. Whoever is out there rocking the boat on our behalf needs to stop.
>>
>>220801507
Cinema is now appealing to women. All men are hot. All women are girl-pretty instead of boy-pretty which just looks disgusting for men.
>>
Ugliness should be acceptable, but we don't have to pretend that it's appealing.
What I'll never understand is the modern trend of casting ugly people who can't act.
>>
>>220803152
This is why they keep casting Brits because the Americans now are very disturbing to look at
>>
>>220803500
portrait lenses were intentionally made to be less sharp than other ones, and sometimes the photographer would also smear vaseline on a filter to take away even more detail (now pro mist filters do the same in a subtler way)
>>
>>220803850
killshot
>>
>>220803152
Mestizos are beautiful.
>>
File: hq720[1].jpg (84 KB, 686x386)
84 KB JPG
>>220801507

This format is so overplayed even normgroids are making fun of it now.

There's even an exact variation with "mousy brown mystery meat zoomer who visibily has some sort of anxiety disorder" like the OP I've seen floating around.
>>
>>220804350
you're confusing acceptable with tolerable. i will tolerate a fat person. in no way would i accept that their lifestyle and eating habits are ok
>>
>>220801507
No most of them are ugly as fuck
>>
>>220801507
What the fuck do you mean "too beautiful" it's the absolute opposite.
Every new movie especially big budget one there's always some goblina, a sheboon auntie or some Jewish nepo baby .
I miss Weinstein like you wouldn't believe.
>>
>>220803479
It's hilarious how fast it was memoryholed kek
Not even farmed for anti woke content just straight into the trash
>>
>>220801507
>are modern actors too good looking?

Not at all. But they're not ugly either. Zoomers are just weird looking, like they're not real. They have almost an uncanny valley or Innsmouth look to them that just makes me uneasy.
>>
>>220801724
>>220802113
I have strong eyebrows, kinda fat nose and medium full lips, and i'm 100% european genetically, literally from a small country where there wasn't any race mixing with non-euros kek
>>
>>220805188
None of those features are inherently bad. I'm sure you don't look like an American mutt.
>>
File: Tess.jpg (111 KB, 1150x835)
111 KB JPG
>>220801507
Actors used to have distinct, instantly recognizable looks (think Burt Lancaster, Peter Lorre, Robert Mitchum) and actresses had natural, classical beauty. The problem is that a lot of actors now have a very cookie cutter magazine ad model look. The "beautiful" ones all look exactly the same because they've been botoxed to hell and have the same type of facial structure and the ugly ones just look unremarkable. The "objective beauty" looksmaxxing spergs who draw lines on faces and spew a bunch of autistic jargon are partially to blame for this, because when you reduce beauty to a mathematical formula it results in a homogenized, generic ideal. To me a natural face that has striking features and a tiny flaw or two is far more attractive than one that has all the mathematically perfect ratios or whatever.
>>
>>220801507
Ling ling, both of the people in that photo are bogged. There's probably never been fewer naturally beautiful people in Hollywood than now. DEI hires and women feeling insecure about themselves will do that.
>>
>>220803152
Dios miooo
>>
>>220803850
>attractive



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.