>>220815942Buy an ad.
>reviews of reviews
Remember kids: If the thread features a youtube or twitter screenshot in the OP, it's shit and the person who made it is an NPC.
>>220815942Let me guess: Another butt-blasted Prequeltranny who blames claims RLM "raped his childhood" or something?
>internet cel thread
>>220815942>manages to get 300k views though sheer spam
>Dunning-Kruger Instantly dismissed as a moron.
>>220816119>Let me guess:Super gay way to start any post. Protip, girlbrain: Men aren't afraid to make statements without framing them as questions. You act like you were raised by a single mother.
>>220816155Nta but you're a faggot and a prequeltranny obviously. >>220816146The only Kruger I care about is the sexy aryan goddess from National Treasure
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2mArj6WvqzE&t=126s&pp=ygULcmljayB3b3JsZXk%3D
>>220815942How badly RLM raped prequeltards? Yeah, agreed.
>>220816155>being this obsessive over basic and common phrasingHoly shit, autismo, you need to calm down.
>Why the ___ __ ____ __ _____>First we need to go way back.. back to 18th century Close video
>>220816213He actually defends the Special Editions. Mega kek. So he's just a YouTube shitposter basically. Let's stick him behind some rocks he couldn't possibly get behind.
>>220816155spotted the prequel-tranny
>>220816213Isn't this the clown who is like a neomarxist or some such faggoty crap? I haven't gotten laid in like 7 years now and even I can tell this guy's a fucking super virgin
I'm so sick of seeing these ugly retards on thumbnails.
>>220816269>three hours defneding the special editionsI cannot think how anybody will waste that much time over the definition of pointless at be changes and changes that just ruin a scene, such as making Vader say nnnnnnnnnoooooooooooo when he redeems himself by killing the emepror
>>220816269>The Special Editions are the Movies, Get Over ItWow, what a buttblasted megaloser
>>220816155Let me guess: from this autistic spergout the video is about how Plinkett raped muh childhood
>>220816155>allow me to explain why your post is womanly and immature by seething about your phrasing instead of the content of your postYeah man, real masculine behavior
Now THIS is podracing
>>220815968Youtube drama pays in some corners of the tubes
>>220816007People who use the NPC meme are as generic and boring as the people theyre trying to mock
>>220815942The really sad part is that he felt the need to create a 1 hour excerpt from a 2 hour review as its own video. His original video is titled>Why The Prequels Are Better Movies Than You DeserveI don't even know how to respond to this level of stupid.
>>220815942On the web it is controversial to state that filmmaking pioneer George Lucas probably knows what he's doing better than his most talented critic, Mike Stoklasa; director of Space Cop, who has great insights like "why is The Trade Federation mad about taxation of their trade routes," "why are characters not talking like they're in a modern tongue-in cheek popcorn flick" and "this movie isn't following a conventional 80's blockbuster formula"I just don't know what Occam's Razor is in this situation
>>220815968zoomers are incredibly effeminate and love gossip like this
>>220815942lmao look at all the seething RLM fans losing their mind in the thread
>>220816747You're talking about the director of Return of the Jedi, stop pretending he's a genius, prequeltranny. The reason Plinkett reviews were so popular was because it was like shooting fish in a barrel, with a serial killer added in for humorous effect.
>>220816783Seethe eternally prequeltranny. Rise of fucking Skywalker was better than the slop Lucas barfed up from his directors chair later in his fat ass fucking life.
>>220816747Issues should not be needlessly complicated, my son. They're *both* shite.
>>220816269You just know this tranny felt a surge of adrenaline when hitting post especially after typing out that title
>>220816783You mean just the one that's been samefagging this whole time?
>>220816155Based
>>220816747Fucking brutal rape of a truthnuke, well done
>>220816119>>220816334This is insanely funny because most people who defend the plinkett reviews nowadays are the people who watched them when they were like 10 years old and they thought it was the deepest and coolest thing ever that absolutely blew their prepubescent minds.
I'll try spinning, that's a good trick.
>>220816928Wait, why didn't Darth Vader try spinning when the Millennium Falcon showed up and BTFO his "best starpilot in the universe" little podracing bitch ass? It WAS a good trick.
>>220815968>My review of their review is, in many ways, a review of the review they reviewed. When I reviewed their review, I found that their review reviewed the subject in a way that invited further review, which is why my review reviews their review rather than merely reviewing the subject itself. The review they wrote was a review, and my review of their review reviews how effectively that review functioned as a review. Therefore, this review of their review is primarily a review of the review within their review, making my review of their review a review that reviews a review through the act of reviewing that review.
>>220815968>comment of a comment>reply of a reply>criticism of a criticismYeah, it's called conversation. Discussion, communication, you don't get to just say your opinion on something and then close the book, people will continue talking after you're dead, cunt.
>>220816119
>>220816949Up next on Re:View: we review a review of our review. *cue funky Re:View music*
>>220815942Those videos are really good. Also watch all references in star wars.
RLM fans why does Best of the Worst never get me to watch after they select the movie? I can sit through their other stuff, but BOTW I always dip out 30 minutes in
>>220816984Heh keep seething prequeltranny
>>220817116The complete opposite for me. BOTW is the only series of theirs I can actually watch and rewatch in full.
>>220817116There's a bizarre kind of continuity to BOTW. I recommend starting with episode 1, especially since it's only about 30 minutes to begin with. There are a few BOTW that I skip as I rewatch the series on repeat to fall asleep to, and they're mostly a few newer episodes where Rich Evans is being a little cunt. But yeah, if you start at the beginning you'll be able to build up to the longer episodes.
>>220816878>it’s another autismo thinks his experience is something the entire world shared
>>220817018None of this is remotely surprising. He's literally a prequeltranny kek
>>220817018>prequeltranny>faggotFucking RLMchuddies
>>220817181I mean, that is a pretty common experience for the people defending the plinkett reviews still.
>>220817215Seethe more prequeltranny
>>220815942Is this the guy that thinks the prequels making references to westerns means they're pure kino?
>>220817018HAHAHAHA This is the same homosexual that made a nearly 6-hour long video trying to explain why The X-Files' mythology makes perfect sense. The X-Files is my most favorite tv show ever, but not even Chris Carter and Frank Spotnitz would dare make the claim that the shit they wrote towards the end makes any sense. Why are fans of the Prequels like this?
>>220817277>This is the same homosexual that made a nearly 6-hour long video trying to explain why The X-Files' mythology makes perfect sense.Nigga, who in the fuck will watch a 6 hour video from a nobody? The absolute onlypeople I can see are faggots who are desperate to find small channels with no subs so theu simply can post in the comments on every video>I was here when they had only 20 subs!!!
>>220817277I forgot about that video, wow, it all falls into place. It's like poetry, it rhymes. I'm a huge fan of X-Files too and yeah he's clearly completely insane and huffing his own farts.
>>220816984No it is arbitrary letter posting in an error of mass communication. If you respond to me I'm right, that's what makes this a conversation. If you don't I'm also right because it shows you just blog posted on a forum where people exchange ideas they don't actually everyone here is shitposting.
>>220817309>ErrorSaar do not redeem the error
>>220817059By responding to someone else, while also responding to your blogspot, im doing both and neither at the same time, thus I win.
>>220815942No one above midwit is seriously dissecting star wars movies or in fact watching them, to be fair.
>>220817398Exactly, I agree. But imagine being a writer for, "Reviews of Reviews Monthly." At LEAST when you discuss the original work, you're putting your opinion on the line, even if it is a midwit opinion. If you're criticizing criticism, you're just a fucking bootlicker as far as I'm concerned.
>>220816747/thread
RLM was right on their prequel criticism on every single issue that matters.
>>220816747The prequels are terrible slop movies with poor direction and poor writing and no clue how to pace and tone them as space adventures. That's all you really need to know. So much time wasted by millennial babies who can't differentiate between "good movie" and "movie i liked when i was a baby now i'm mad you're bullying it"
>>220817499Ok samefag
>>220816155Based. You upset the low test "males" in the replies.
>>220816007Based
>>220816119Judging from how butthurt the responses are to you. Yep.
>>220816155He's right though.You ARE a buttblasted prequel trannie.You ARE an enraged cuckold screaming that "RLM raped my childhood!"And now you're trying to escape that with super witty rhetoric? VERY female coded.You lost, prequeltranny. Your movies suck, and you never grew up.
this guy is OBSESSED with trannies
>>220817233>i watched the Plinkett review when I was 10So you’d say that RLM raped your childhood?
>>220816119lmfaoSTOP MENTIONING THE POD RACING
>>220817183>>220817018He's a cool guy. he calls out SJW faggots who try to cancel great French directors over racism and shit.He's a good guy.
>>220815942Just one more video essay. Just one more hour long refutation. This'll be the one. Just one more to finally show everyone.
Imagine how gay you have to be that the fat guy from RLM dunks on you
>>220815942Mike has apologized. Leave him alone.
>>220818880i'm pleased that versions of this meme still make me laugh
Rlm was kind of new and fresh like 10 years ago but there hasn't been anything funny or insightful about it in years. I watch like the first 10 minutes of every video they release thinking maybe it will be good but I click off it quickly because it really isn't funny or insightful
>>220817018
they're STILL seething about plinkett lmaoit's literally nearly 15 years old now
>>220816155You are 100% correct. It is girlbrain and a useful tell irl. These dipshits getting flustered can’t introspect.
I think younger generations are really conditioned to never say that something sucks ass, and think that trashing something is like, offensive in some way. There was a lot more media like Plinkett in the old days that really made a meal out of shit-talking something. They are so coddled by gentle, mealy-mouthed, qualified, "this is just my opinion" media that they can't fathom saying that something sucks major donkey dick. They're faggots, in other words. Pretty sure the only reason Marvel was popular for so long is because if you called it a heap of shit you'd get dogpiled by fanboys and banned
>>220816269i mean he's not wrong, but he is a massive faggot about it. except it's whatever the newest cut of the film is, which is like 3 versions past the special editions.
>>220815942Can someone explain why prequel defenders constantly act like the Plinkett Reviews are this boogeyman that are the only reason people hate the prequels? I've never seen this behavior with any other fandom. It's not like people are claiming the only reason people hate LJN Nintendo games is because of the AVGN. You don't see people claiming the only reason people don't like Batman and Robin is because of the Nostalgia Critic. Or that the only reason people don't like Rob Leifeild's comics are because of AT4W. It comes off as the most insecure people in the world getting butthurt that a singular review came out and just laid out common criticisms for the Prequels. Is it just because it is an easy way to deflect criticism? As if saying you like a review means that your opinion is somehow invalidated?
>>220816155the amount of seething proves you completely right. also nice dubs.
>>220819427so the thing is the plinkett reviews were a mockery of actual retards running around claiming george lucas destroyed their childhoods. mind you these were gen xers who were in their 20s now and had to come to terms with being manchildren. the rlm crew is also in this category but turned it to comedy. idiots online watched the reviews and decided the points made were spot-on criticism for the films and ran with it, parroting the videos on pretty much every social media website and internet forum available where star wars was talked about. the main reason prequel lads act like they're vampires and the reviews are crucifixes is because when the movies initially released, the discussion surrounding the prequels were much more level-headed; i.e. jar jar was annoying but maul and podracing was cool so overall the film was alright, not JAR-JAR IS A FUCKING NIGGER AND IF YOU LIKED HIM YOU'RE A NIGGER LOVER GEORGE WHY DID YOU RAPE MEbasically it was just the internet doing what it does best, destroying things people hold sacred.
>>220816984No it's not you retard
>>220819427I think it's really just like one troll who keeps bringing it up because he know it upsets people
>>220815942>are...What? Are what?
>>220819427It's just cope. An excuse to deal with the overwhelmingly negative reception of the films.
>>220816269This is a mental disorder.
>>220815942>6 years old video>less than 300 views>half of them because people only watched the miniature and thought it's a RLM videolmao
>>220815942Prequels are flawed, yet incredibly ambitious films, that fail on many levels, while completly succeeding on others, that deserve the respect at least for trying to create real modern epic and for ironically being the biggest independent films in history.Plinkett reviews miss some of that, because Mike is a guy really keen on structure of the story, but they are good 101 guide on how to understand some things about basic screenwriting and they're fine exploration of why prequels fail to achive all of their goals, while also being really funny and encouraging whole generation of people to share their opinions on the internet forum.Rick Worley films are a bit meandring, but have some really interesting insights. My favorite parts are listing of all visual references to other movies in Star Wars and that segment about the history how artist often continue changing their already existing works for their whole lives.I like them all.
>>220816146unhinged
>Mike Stoklasa is dumb therefore the prequels were le goodno
>>220815942>subhuman zoomoid still clinging to prequelslop immeasurably pathetic. >>220816119This and /thread
>OT fansNormal, well adjusted chads>PT fansPeople who can't get over some videos a fat failed filmmaker made in 5 minutes 15+ years ago>ST fansempty_room.jpg
We understand if you watched the prequels when you were 8 on DVD while eating McDonalds and your parents were out for the night. I'm sure it was a very special memory
>>220819427The guy goes into it in the video, but most anti-prequel videos just parrot the plinkett review. Even bad arguements like "Quai gon jin sucks because my friends can't describe his character in a sentence" get repeated with 0 introspection. Most people are NPCs so they don't even like or dislike anything on it's own merits and flaws but judging by what they've watched online. I think the Chris Stuckman one he rags on in the video is the worst since he has multiple arguments lifted from the Plinkett one that weren't good to begin with that he repeats verbatim.RLM guys say it's ridiculous to say that Disney got JJ Abrams to make SW because of them, but in a sort of domino falling / avalanche fashion they did give the argument that George Lucas shouldn't be the one to make future Star Wars movies a lot of ammo.
>>220816390So does selling your ass on the corner
I don't fucking care what people say, Mike uploading those idiotic videos are the reason we ended up with a shitty sequel trilogy, woke shit like Andor and The Mandalorian and Star Wars being utterly DESTROYED nowadays and probably had wider effects throughout cinemaLucas should be able to sue RLM for potential profit loss and emotional damage
>>220816296No, he's gay and made a video about coming out.
>>220816146>dunning-krugering yourselfgrim
>>220815942redlettermedia is my go to contrarian critic source. when they recogment something i stay away form it and when they hate something it usually means i will like itbest case scenario. they loved force awkaens for its girlboss protagonist and race mixing message yet hated mandalorian for having zero girlbosses and a competent male action lead
>>220815968extremely high brow content, actually
>>220817277Up until the revival the mytharc did mostly make sense even if it was sloppy and quite shit after the movie. Worley is a clown, though.
>>220820399>Lucas should be able to sue RLM for potential profit lossFor the franchise he hasn't owned for over a decade?
>>220815942His videos do a really good job of exposing the likes of RLM and Stuckman, who are manbaby retards making videos for even bigger manbaby retards. Just look at the seething replies ITT for proof. Not one of them can prove RW wrong so they resort to cope and insults. Probably why they think a fat alcoholic talking in a stupid voice making jokes about poop is some high level intellectual novie critique. RLM became successful because they pandered to ignorant morons just like them.
>>220820570Did he dun, or is he full blown kruger?
>>220821543Go back to your shit cartoons, Rick.
>>220816155I kneel...
>>220817134>>220819524nta RLM samefag stay seething. Go dilate your axe wound, faggot.
>>220821543The Plinkett reviews make very good points. I notice people that shit on them only ever mention the few "flawed" arguments that come more subjective areas or a confusion on some plot elements that frankly are bad even if you do understand them (i.e. the blockade). Qui-gon still makes retarded decisions throughout the film particularly on Tatoonie. The battles lack emotional weight. The ending has too many plot elements that could have been reduced or cut down significantly. Most of the characters are defined by their roles rather than their individual personalities, even people claiming they can give descriptions of the prequel characters still lean into their actions rather than their traits. Sorry but even if the RLM reviews do have flaws the number of legitimate arguments outweigh the bad ones. Hell their are prequel apologists that even have to admit that RLM had good points even if they personally hated those reviews like Sheev Talks.
>>220815942This video ended them, thank God. RIP RL-Lame.
>>220820361>RLM guys say it's ridiculous to say that Disney got JJ Abrams to make SW because of themBecause it is, yes. Do you fuckers really not remember the 2000s and 2010s? Abrams was fucking everywhere, and the prevailing sentiment in the wake of his Star Trek--including among those that liked it--was that he was too captured by Spielberg and seemed like he'd rather be making Star Wars. He was an obvious choice to direct, even if you dislike his directing (so was Johnson, really, though less so). Even in retrospect he was the most obvious choice.>they did give the argument that George Lucas shouldn't be the one to make future Star Wars moviesLucas didn't want to make future Star Wars movies anyway.
I wonder how many thousands of hours this prequel schizo has wasted seething the same shit over and over again about rlm.
>>220821690This.Prequelfags sound like fucking tin foil hat retards with all the conspiracies they push that all can be easily disprovened with just a small amount of thought.
>>220821543this. no one else in this read has watched them though
>>220821690>Lucas didn't want to make future Star Wars movies anyway.he did, he had his own sequel trilogy laid out
>>220821644>plot elements that frankly are bad even if you do understand them (i.e. the blockade)Why is this a bad plot element?
>>220819427Because the first 10 years of the World Wide Web is semi-lost media at this point. Things like the 1999 Ain't It Cool News talkbacks (where 'George Lucas raped my childhood' originated) can't easily be linked to and cited on Wikipedia, so they may as well not exist. The modern internet's memory only goes back to 2008 or so, and even that period is starting to fade out.
>>220821644A character making stupid decisions is not bad writing. Are you saying characters must always be intelligent? What a retarded perspective. This is not a good criticism. The conflicts are laid out and work pretty well, especially considering it's a family movie. The Naboo-Gungan rivalry is interesting, fleshes outnthe world and its resolution contains a nice message. The 'ending has too many plot points' is another retarded, dishonest criticism. Plinkett used DVD bonus footage of a test screening of a rough cut and parroted what George Lucas himself identified as problems. No one saw that rough cut, and extrapolating normal post production to justify your hate for a movie is another example or dishonest, retarded criticism. The final movie had a single conflict going on at once, showing different perspectives since they related to each other (especially the space battle disabling the droids affecting the land battle below), and not once was it difficult to follow. The lightsabre fight is very well done. You can claim Alec Guinness vs David Prowse is better if you want, but that comes down to personal taste at best.The prequel characters can be described, and that's a simple fact. You trying to defend one of the worst parts of the Plinkett review doesn't change that.
>>220821843He had some loose ideas, but you're failing to contextualize the chronology. It's not an accident that Lucas greenlit more Star Wars movies at the same time he was deciding to sell the company. He never wanted to make them himself; he wanted to retire. He just understood that Lucasfilm was not thriving and needed an injection.He (supposedly) considered making Episode VII himself before selling to try to pump up Lucasfilm's value and get things on track, but that's about it. He didn't care about sequels.
>>220821849It doesn't help that Google became so shit, and it's only going to get worse with AI.
>>220816878Bro that's not even remotely true. Are you seriously trying to push this as a new narrative?
>>220816747The Prequels still suck the root regardless of however much a "pioneer" of film George Lucas is or whatever the talent level is of the person stating that the Prequels suck. It's fact that's independent of external factors.
I watched the first two in the cinema. People were cracking up. The most laughter was in episode 2 when Amidala came out in that tight leather suit. It was just weird bro, lol
>>220816269>Special editions bad because some forum poster said so 20 years agoIt's time for people to get over this shit.
>>220819427Why do you even need to ask?It's because the made-up narrative that "RLM is the only reason anyone hates the Prequels and nobody hated them before that" is a comparatively comforting lie when pitted against the actual truth that the Prequels sucked bafflingly hard and were widely rejected by people over the age of 10 when they came out.They literally CANNOT accept that these movies aren't very good OR very popular. So they instead opt for a false but apparently more palatable narrative based on patent lies and reality-demial. Boogeyman narratives are easier to swallow than complex and nuanced truths.
>>220819427There was legitimately a space of about five to ten years, where if anyone tried to say anything remotely positive about the prequels, people would laugh and tell them to watch the Plinkett reviews. That's why.There's even old Razorfist and Moviebob videos you can find where they're like "I don't give a fuck. Stop telling me to watch the Plinkett reviews".
>>220822012>Special editions bad because some forum poster said so 20 years agoWhy the fuck did you think this was the case, retard? The fuck are you on about?The Special Editions have ALWAYS been hated, and they're hated because they're literal bastardizations of art made decades ago by a retard using bafflingly tonally inappropriate additions and shit-tier CGI.The fuck are you on about it being because of "some guy on a forum".
>>220822090They've always been hated for flaky reasons, because the people who hated them back then were immature. Are we done?
>>220816155Got all the RLM redditors angry kek
>>220822101>flaky reasonslol
>>220822101Is this what you tell yourself? Seriously?Are the Star Wars Special Editions really, REALLY the hill you're willing to die on, friend? ...Like, legitimately?
>>220822131>film makers should be forbidden from revisiting their movies, because I don't like what they did to the Greedo scene, or Max Reebo(since these things make it more obvious the movies are for kids, and that makes me feel childish). No, I have never heard of Blade Runner. What about it?And every time, people ignore the the half dozen good changes that the SE's make, because it's inconveniant.And then there's the people who just hate CGI on principle, and those people need to fucking get over it, and accept that they lost the argument.
>>220821976You missed the unbelievable cringe and shocked silence of the final film's NOOOOOOOOOO. People couldn't fucking believe it. Everyone who was there had the delusion that the first two were bad but would somehow be redeemed in the end.
>>220815942>this much energy arguing over movies for childrenwestern men are fucked
>>220822161Are you having a panic attack?
>>220822161As if I'm "dying on a hill", by voicing an opinion on 4chan. I say far more outrageous things every day.
>>220822065>Razorfist and Moviebob videosSo the intellectual powerhouses who champion the prequels are actually somehow more retarded than elderly midwest drunks?
>>220821887>Are you saying characters must always be intelligent?When a character keeps making stupid fucking decisons after stupid fucking decision that actively goes against their main goals that isn't realistic. It's infuriating that not only does Qui-gon keep making stupid decisions but they somehow all work out for him.>Naboo-Gungan rivalry is interestingIt's honestly pointless and resolved with like absolutely no work>The 'ending has too many plot points' is another retarded, dishonest criticism. The ending could have easily been compacted to have the gungan ground battle take place just outside the city. You could cut out the space battle or the palace chase as both essentially complete the same goal. Those two extremely minor changes at least condense the ending to be a far less jumbled mess. It's still tonal whiplash to go from Jar Jar hollering like an idiot on the battleground sucking all tension from that battle to Qui-gon dying.>The prequel characters can be described, and that's a simple fact. By describing their actions, not their actual individual traits. That's the problem. The characters are integrally defined by their positions in the narrative rather than who they are as people. People can say Padme is caring because she wants to save her people but that caring attitude only exists to placate a plot point.
>>220822166lol, I never actually saw the third one. But I have seen that infamous scene online
>>220822178Point out where I praised them as intellectual powerhouses.The point is even back then, other people were saying "just shut the fuck up about these videos, and let us express differing opinions on these movies".
>>220821848>Why is this a bad plot element?The Trade Federation's blockade of Naboo is stupid and I'm sick of people trying to use the "opening crawl" as a defense for it. How does blockading a planet remove taxes from trade routes? Naboo has no sway on the Galactic Senate seeing as they are unable to get the Republic to stop the blockade or even believe the subsequent invasion. (Also weird how it's legal for members of the same government to blockade eachother). Naboo isn't negatively harmed by the blockade so it isn't a good candidate for showing off the Federation's power. The only explanation I ever get from fans is that "Sheev made them do it," which is stupid since Sheev is dependent on the Federation's resources not the other way around. The film pretends Sheev has massive leverage on the Trade Federation but we are never given any reason why they would trust Sheev enough to follow this dumb plan. You would think that a massive monopolistic corporation with it's own droid army would have at least a dozen other options to convince the republic to rescind taxation of their trade routes. They could raise prices to make up for deficit and tell anyone upset with the prices to take it up with the republic. They could lobby the senate to remove the taxes, We are shown the Trade Federation has enough sway to hold off an investigation into the invasion, yet for some reason can't get taxes overturned. Or, and I know this sounds crazy, maybe they could refuse to pay the republic any taxes. The Republic has no army to enforce its will, so why even bother paying the taxes at all? Save us an entire movie and get to the clone wars already. There's no problem that the events of the film are incited by tax disputes but to try and dispute these taxes with a blockade is asinine.
I think some of these prequel guys must have been too young to have experienced the internet mockery
>>220822165>half dozen good changesThe best changes are so trivial they pale in comparison to the rest, and even then I doubt we'd even agree on whatever six "good changes" you consider unassailable. The most prominent changes are the most deleterious, and the rest are trivial. The Special Editions are almost entirely shit.
>>220822176Yes, "The Special Editions are GOOD, actually" is quite a hot take even among other retarded opinions, Lucas-cultist. So if you're unironically going to defend them and call people "stupid" or shit like that for shitting on them, you better have a pretty impressive argument prepared.
>>220816878I was 17 when i watched plinkett. I agree with him on I and II, dissagree with him on III. He is a little nitpicky on III.
>>220822165I can still purchase both versions of Blade Runner. I can't with the OT.Fuck off with this comparison.
>>220820640>The Gamewhat>The Lodge is low-browhere's the only miss (I'd say it's more middlebrow, but I guess the illustrator was just a basic bitch franc-maçôn hater, truly shameful smdh
>>220822227The victory celebration music is so much better in the SE it's not even funny.
>>220822267You actually can't purchase the theatrical cut of Blade Runner anymore, unless you're buying out of print editions.
>>220822285Not that anon, but that is literally the only change I like and it has way more to do with how it shows the galactic scale of the victory. Other than that none of the changes are beneficial.
>>220822299Cloud City also looks a lot nicer. It looks grand and sci-fi, instead of looking like some cheap hallway sets.
>>220822296I can literally stream it right now on Netflix you lying faggot.
>>220822196I always assumed Naboo was a party in the dispute. But even if it's entirely between the federation and the republic, the republic still doesn't want its planets to be blockaded>Naboo isn't negatively harmed by the blockadeBased on what?
>>220822315That's a minor glow up at best and I say that having grown up with the special editions and now heavily preferring the original cuts.
And the establishing shot of Moss Eisley is better for giving you the actual scale of the place. You get the impression in the original cut that it's just a few shacks in the desert.>Noooo! Stormtroopers riding big lizards!Yes, that was a good inclusion.
>>220822187I know it's shocking to you but nobody stopped you from exposing yourself as a retard. Just like how you used your cultural touchstones of Razorfist and Moviebob without any prompting, nobody prevented it. Likewise when I point out you are a retard and you watch even stupider people than the ones you're trying to criticize you're still free to embrace who you are. You're getting mad at something you invented in your mind.
>>220820640LIGHT OPERABROS, NOOO!!
>>220822330>the republic still doesn't want its planets to be blockadedSo why is it legal? Why does the Republic's constitution allow for its members to legally blockade eachother? That would be like Georgia having the right to blockade Florida.>Naboo isn't negatively harmed by the blockade, Based on what?The fact we never see a single negative impact from it. No one is poor on the street unable to eat because of supply chain issues. The capitol is pristine without any sort of protest. Naboo isn't a industrial planet and doesn't seem to have any supply issues. So no the planet isn't effected by the blockade just because the characters say so.
>>220822285Maybe if it weren't obvious that the original music were diagetic. Of course Yubnub would not suit the footage spliced in to establish the galaxy-wide celebrations, but that footage is all conspicuously awkward anyway, so I'd happily take Yubnub over that. It feels like a fan edit in the worst way.
>>220817018So the prequel defense force is 40 year old fags.
>>220822360I don't even like Razorfist or Moviebob. I'm just aware of discussions that take place on the internet.
>>220822341The problem isn't the creatures added it's the fact that we stop tracking our main characters to look at shit that doesn't matter. Some biker almost hitting a Rontu doesn't add it distracts. Worse the Rontu walking right in front of the god damn storm trooper checkpoint is ugly and jarring. It actually harms the film because you stop focusing on what's important, our main characters.
>>220822330>>Naboo isn't negatively harmed by the blockade>Based on what?What tells us it IS negatively harmed by the blockade? Nothing. That's why you might suggest to the junior filmmaker you make some sort of scene that gives us some insight into the plight of the people. Then again Lucas thought it made sense to have his boy rapist monks kidnap a child and leave his mother in slavery, where she somehow remains for a fucking decade without anyone intervening until she can be raped by sand people. Maybe that little inconsistency was too subtle for you, or maybe the autism squad has a whole 400 page headcanon ready to justify why that piece of dogshit writing was actually a stroke of genius.
It’s insane how much Gen X and Y wants to fuck those men and glaze them like niggers do with LeBron James.
>>220822397>shit that doesn't matterThose shots are there to establish a setting. >this is the city>look at all of these buildings>look at the wide array of people who live here>look at these big lizards they use to get around, which tells us something about the local cultureIt's just basic storytelling, man.
>>220822395>I don't like them I just watch them and use them as reference points for what "debates on the internet" were like even though these two fags collectively have 1000 viewersJesus Christ man just walk away from the keyboard
>>220822449You're tying yourself in knots here, trying to defend the honour of "your team". I'm just saying stuff.
>>220822377the new victory celebration scenes at the end never made sense, the new death star is blown up and palpatine has not somehow returned yet, but how did that make the empire and it's entire infrastucture collapse instantly, on every world across the galaxy?
>>220822165>film makers should be forbidden from revisiting their moviesI didn't say that, though. I think the debate about preservation is more complex than you're letting on, but it's largely irrelevant here. No doubt if Lucas had released the theatrical cuts it would have ameliorated the handwringing over the Special Editions, but that has no bearing on whether the Special Editions are themselves good or bad, and they are quite bad.
>>220822444All of that was already done in the original cut.
>>220822272you just lost it
>>220822477it was done worse. You do not get the intended sense of scale, or the bustling nature of Mos Eisley.
>>220822464>You're tying yourself in knots here, trying to defend the honour of "your team". Ino u
>>220822486you shouldn't mess with the classics
>>220822341>Moss EisleyFake fan, explains the dogshit opinions.
>>220822503So Blade Runner should only ever exist as the theatrical cut?
>>220822507I'm not going to look up the spelling of every glup shitto word to make a point.
>>220815968I mean, it's more a criticism of a style of discourse those two guys popularized
>>220822376>the republic still doesn't want its planets to be blockaded, So why is it legal?Parties like the trade federation obviously would obviously want to resist banning it. They apparently won out. It's unclear to me how the republic would even enforce that since they don't seem to have much of a military.> So no the planet isn't effected by the blockade just because the characters say so.So it's your headcanon? Naboo must be immune to trade blockades because we don't instantly see people starving inside the royal palace the second one happens.>>220822425>What tells us that blocking trade to a place harms it?Do you really need a 400 page explanation to understand this? Have you even read that much in your entire life?
>>220822486Yes you do. There's the entire establishing shot showing ships taking off and landing.
>>220815942Based. Prequel hating gen xyrs on big doo doo watch.
>>220815942Rick are you still doing this lame shit?No one cares about your videos, deal with it.
>>220822581>the trade federation made blockades legal in the republic!You think the Trade Federation existed back during the start of the Republic and instituted that the Republic's constitution allow for its members to blockade one another? Why the fuck would anyone join an alliance where military actions are allowed between its members? That's just fucking retarded. Nice headband, speaking of which>Hur dur your making things up about the blockadeThe blockade has no visible effect on Naboo that is literall how the movie presents it. Sorry but no if the movie can't bother to show it's effects than the blockade has none.
>>220822906it wouldn't even have been difficult to make the blockade seem like it mattered, there's this one maguffin space resource specific to naboo that they export, or don't have but rely on and need constantly imported, it would take literally a couple of sentences in the opening crawl to establish the planet was in imminent trouble.but yeah there's this trade embargo so lets send some jedi instead of actual trade negotiators because???
there's never been a group of "people" more butthurt about someone's opinion of their favourite fictional thing than prequelfags
>>220815942Daisy Ridley was charismatic as hell.
>>220815942The reason Mike's reviews still stand the test of time compared to his countless imitators in my opinion is because they actually attempted to review the movies as movies. Most prequel discussion that exists today is some 20 year old autistically nitpicking aspects of the "lore" nobody gives a fuck about. Bonus points for thinking obnoxious sarcasm is funny.
>>220821614kek gottem
>>220822581>Do you really need a 400 page explanation to understand this?No, I needed a single scene. It says so in the post you're replying to. Somehow you managed to confuse that with another sentence talking about the problem of Lucas leaving Anakin's mother in slavery for a decade to be raped. Presumably your inability to parse a handful of sentence is indicative of the level of stupidity you need to hold your opinions and to be a prequel defender. Thanks for clearing that up.
>>220822542>look up the spelling of every glup shitto wordIt's only the most foundational setting in the Star Wars movies, clearly it's unreasonable to expect an autistic fan defending Lucas remaking of the scene set in the very same location, to know what the fuck the place is called.It's time for you to shut the fuck up.
>>220822531not the same. I think it's important for historicity sake to keep things in their proper time.
>>220816007For real.I've NEVER clicked on a youtube link here.Dumb shills living in the past.
>>220816747Sorry Broheim, but George "Faster/More intense" Lucas has long been known to be really really bad at directing actor performances. This is like well documented and known through the industry.
>>220822906>You think the Trade Federation existed back during the start of the Republic and instituted that the Republic's constitution allow for its members to blockade one another?Parties like it surely did. It's shown throughout the prequels that the republic is weak and that power is decentralized. That limits how much it can regulate its members. The republic apparently found allowing factions to protest taxation using blockades preferable to the effort it'd take to reign them in, which could lead to them leaving the republic or possibly even civil war.Now obviously, having your allies blockade each other is not ideal, so if the republic isn't able to resolve these disputes quickly, or if they escalate, it'd lead to a loss of confidence in its leadership, or centralization of power. Which is what we see play out in the films.>if the movie can't bother to show it's effects than the blockade has none.George didn't invent trade blockades. It's not my headcanon that blocking trade harms the economy, that's basic real world knowledge. We don't need the film to explain this to us.
>>220823397>blocking trade harms the economyNot if your nation is completely self sufficient and that's what Naboo's is or at the very least appears to be. The fact the gungans are doing just fine shows trade doesn't matter when it comes to just managing a population on the planet.
>>220823397A Republic literally requires its members to curtail to a central authority. There is no way one would ever give that much military autonomy to one of its members. Look up literally any historical republic and it's member states were never given authority to actively fuck one another's economies in such a direct manner. It literally defeats the point of a Republic in the first place.
>>220823521>Not if your nation is completely self sufficient and that's what Naboo's isIs this stated anywhere?>or at the very least appears to beBecause the palace is doing fine? Maybe Naboo is largely self sufficient. I don't know. That's not the same as them not being impacted at all. You're writing about this like we'd expect to see an apocalypse, but it's perfectly possible for parts, especially the parts we see, to appear more or less normal.But how about this. Why would you block the trade of a planet that somehow has neither exports nor imports? Does the fact that blockade trade not imply that there was trade before? Is this not textual evidence that a blockade would have an impact?>>220823565Different political systems have had various degrees of centralization and correspondingly different degrees of members fucking with each other. I don't think it's unreasonable that a republic that tries to cover an entire galaxy would have to make larger concessions to it's members.>There is no way one would ever give that much military autonomy to one of its members.They'd certainly start building a centralized army of their own if a member using it for invasions!
Reminder that if you, as a Star Wars fan, have maintained any kind of interest in it sivce 1998 or whenever that Phantom Menace dropped, youre a fucking moron. Your taste is dogshit. Youre a buffoon. I was fucking 12 playing rogue squadron til 2am with all the toys and comics and autistic encyclopedias of ships/characters/planets etc.I walked out of the cinema baffled and havent seen anything since. Not one clip or meme has made me want to see anything since. Not one person has ever seen these movies and had anything positive to relay to me in recommendation.This goes for Terminator, Alien and every single other thing that was actually cool. If you dont know where the cutoff pointias youre a loser consoomer.
every critique of reddit letter media in this thread is met with 'prequel' tranny. there was a fine before they were overtly popular any thread related to them was rightly laughed off this board. These are "men" who provide no content that isn't someone else's work remasked or critiqued, who developed a cult following of people who struggle with constructive thought I would rate them only slightly higher than one of those watch a long series women do to cash on lonely men
don't call rick worley a fagyou'll get accused of being rick worley
>old /tv/ never liked rlm anywaynew prequelfaggot cope just dropped
>>220823852Nigger I was 9 when TPM got released and it blew my mind away I can't not love that movie
>>220816155I once knew a guy who would say things exactly like this and then he became trans
>>220816155>Super gay way to start any post. proceeds with>Protip, girlbrainI love this place man
>>220819471It’s funny to think about how the entire point of Plinkett is that it would take a psychopath to be so emotionally invested in Star Trek/Star Wars as to make such an autistic dissection of the films, and now that’s literally just what culture has become.
>>220822285>WEEEEEESA FREEEEEEE
>>220824427yes, based.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yTntOoDlAAPeople who prefer Yub Nub are insane.
>>220820640>the gameFUCK
>>220823044https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGCQUwtOjNE
>>220815942>Assblasted prequelfag can't even get 300k views in 6 yearsRLM is the king of Star Wars.
>>220824720More like the king of being raped.
>>220824720>king of Star WarsThat is a sad title to hold
>>220815942While the guy who made this video has some good points he also brags about how he went to a bug swap party and got gaped by some random guys fist. He's an unhinged faggot. It's disgusting.
>>220824799Damn. That's crazyAnyway
This thread is a great example of how at the source of every KiwiFarms-style hate thread on 4chan, there's just some faggot with a grudge trying to promote his shitty lidl Youtube channel
>>220816119Yeah, imagine being so buttblasted you make a documentary about some guy filming something raping your childhood. That would be fucking retarded. Imagine being a faggot who would bitch about that. But enough about the People vs George Lucas
>>220824857>But enough about the People vs George Lucasyou haven't seen this, have you?
>>220823852Sorry nigga but the Star Wars film franchise was never good and no one of any sort of intelligence gets into the fandom through the films, they did so through the handful of EU shit that's infinitely better written. I literally never gave a fuck about Stop Wars until I started reading the EU books. Star Wars ruined western scifi films permanently by marketing them toward adhd riddled retards who can't handle high concepts. This is why superior chinkoids don't watch Starslop. They are too busy reading 3 Body Problem and the Wandering Earth, ya know, ACTUAL scifi in between plotting liberating Taiwan from the legal gay marriage America pushed on them, which America also has by the way because it's a gay country and Star Wars is full of fags directing other fags do it fits. Fuck Star Wars. Only the top 10% of the EU is good, and Andor. Andor seasons 1 & 2 and the last 1/3 of Rogue One fucking embarass the OT.
>>220821929>a new narrativeit's not even new; people going back and realizing the people who thought the prequels were good were teenagers who were little kids when they came out has been documented for over a decade
>>220824720Yes. Disney even wrote an entire trilogy around Mike's ideas.
>>220822214BUT IN THE EEEEENDSHE DIDN'T EVEN SUCK IT
>>220816119>>220816251>>220816286>>220816334>>220817761Ooooh, here comes another ass blasted Disney employee defending RLM.How's Manhole and Gringo doing?
You know, I think I really respect the way George Lucas mindbroke the entire western world. It's impressive.
>>220816155>Super gay way to start any postbut not as gay as Rick Worley lmao
>>220824813t. homosexual
>>220815942>RLM are subhumans faggots nigger lovers cock suckersWow! and the water is wet
>>220824926>Sorry nigga but the Star Wars film franchise was never good>IP worth $50 000 000 000Didn't read the rest. Sorry Disney tranny.
>>220824988>Is that an adult having consensual sex?>Oh my god I feel so RAPED right now
>>220825004haha, you got the "bug"
>>220824720>RLM is the employee of Disney Wars.FTFY.
>>220825011you are brown
>>220825011Jokes on you, I've never had sex :^)
>>220816119>defending RLM when RLM told people to worry about niggers starving in Africa instead.Heed your master's advice anon.
>>220823044>there's never been a group of "people" more butthurt about someone's opinionRemember when Mickey 'Mouse' Stoklasa cried about other reviewer, having panic attacks about hecking hate speech and platforminf when people mocked Acolyte?
>>220825001Is that the total networth of the United States today or the amount of money Genshin Impact makes in a day? I can't tell.Looking and Mumbo and Grok it looks like that could do with removing half the zeros.
>>220815942I mean rlm made a few bad jokes that aren't really Good points but um actually the prequels aren't actually bad meme has gone too far to the point of dick sucking literally anything that doesn't completely shit the bed.I now actually see episode 1 and 3 both ranked above empire consistently Episode 3 is fine, like on par with the original desu but phantom menace is still a boring piece of shit.The sequels are just better than episode 1/2 easily
>>220825081>words words words wordsDisney shills can't meme.
>>220815942>these other youtubers are not as intelligent as me, I am the smartest youtuberlmao
>prequelschizo coming completely unhinged againbased rlm.
>>220825091Lol prequal fag can't read, a classic.You have to be sub 60 IQ to like episode 1 or 2Sequel movies are just soulless and u needed which I mean any movie past he first Star wars was unneeded anyways
>>220825081Lmao Disney is at bargaining stage.
>>220825129I'm sorry, but anyone who thinks sequels are anything other than shit is either subhuman or a nigger lover who deserves to die.
>If you're someone who's under the age of like 20>who says his least favorite film in the series is The Empire Strikes Back because it was "the most boringest one" >then I suggest you shut this review off right now>before I carefully explain how much of a fucking idiot you are
It is hilarious all the zoomers who saw the prequels as little kids are making videos now trying to pretend the prequels actually weren't garbage.
>>220822043>s a comparatively comforting lie when pitted against the actual truth that the Prequels sucked bafflingly hard and were widely rejected by people over the age of 10 when they came out.You do realize that we have actual studies and data from before the RLM reviews came out that people did like the prequels, right? This gaslighting that they were universally hated by everyone and not just the Gen-X freaks creeps and losers that would later go on to have a meltie about them is so funny.George won.
>>220825049No, I don’t remember that.
>>220825121>>220825129>Iger retires>Mickey Stoklasa goes 'ummm I have to apologise'Oof, checks dried our that quick, eh?
>>220825156Lol nigga you like the boring fucking full politics for babies movie where the cartoon man le funny steps into shit with cgi art on par with the first Scooby Doo movieYou are subhuman, your opinion is literally not valid and all you're proving is anything DOGSHIT will eventually be seen as good with enough time.Give it 20 years faggot and you will suck off episode 7 like a good nigger with no values
>>220825182Well, starving African children who comprise most of RLM fanbase lack calories for basic brain functions, so that is not surprising.
>>220825175Nice made up image. You got more?
>>220824975How do you reconcile that RLM panned Mando and Sneed?
>>220816155hello mr reddit
>>220825175Retards like something before their brain registers what it wasWow big news
>>220825193>niggaLMAO!! Your skin is the color of shit!
>>220825206See>>220825185
report eceleb threads as off topic
>>220825217Lol give it 10 more years, hell people are already more nice to last Jedi now than they were a couple of years ago.If you braindead fags can come around on the dogshit that was episode 1/2 I see no reason you won't do the same for the rest.
>>220825241>give it 10 more yearsAccording to RLMoids and their starving African children fanbase, it was supposed to be 10 years since the release. What happened?
>>220825166Actually, it's my least favorite movie in the series because of the diaper fetish scene
>>220820381Guess which one I'll be doing.
>>220825273Oof. So that's why Gen Xers like it so much.
>>220825175>kid anakin and jar jar binks are in the top 3 most liked characters of the movieIf you think that's real then i have a base on the moon to sell you.
I'm going to be honest prequel memes were never funny, and were always reddit. The joke is, it's stupid but half of them forgot that was the joke.The triolgy is saved from outside material like the TV show, and video games like battlefront/Lego all just happening to come out at that time keeping prequal imagery alive
>>220815942>The Industry Shills Back!
>>220816119The first summary of TFA on the entire internet was the Plinkett reviews and those came out years before Disney even bought Lucasfilm. You are gaslighting yourself to not see the direct influence. It's almost a direct 1-to-1. The Prequels still suck, but Mike's ideas sucked harder. It's fucking hilarious you conflate hating RLM with Prequel defense because it completely gives the game away. You wouldn't do it unless you noticed the Sequels line up with everything Mike suggested the Prequels should have done. You never consider for a second maybe Mike was a shit critic and his filmmaking skills are subpar, hence Spacecop. There are good criticisms of the Prequels just not from Mike. You want to know how to spot an actual Prequelfag? If they attack Chris Stuckmann (like the OP), not RLM. Christ Basedmann made an actual movie, not some lame self-aware garbage that has the shield of being bad on purpose. Stuckmann is a filmmaker, not some lowbrow fag who can only bring down others. Stickmann ACTUALLY shits on what's wrong with the Prequels and committed to his ideas hard enough to see them put on film. RLM got all his ideas adapted in the Sequels and runs away from those ideas so obviously mirroring his own thoughts in those reviews that he's reverted to telling people not to take Star Wars so seriously and to worry about starving blacks in Africa or some shit instead. Stuckmann won. Fuck Mike. Star Wars has been Stuckmanized.
>>220815942Rick is right and based, fuck reddit letter media. lol
>>220825182they said starving children in africa and then both him and rich burst out laughing because it's obviously a retarded statement not to be taken seriously. the schizo takes everything at face value and thinks they're being genuine, you can't talk about nuwars because there are starving children in africa, that is rlm's official stance.it was in the acolyte video where they said it's really not worth wasting your time watching, this is proof in the schizos mind that they're paid disney shills.
>>220825302Kids loved Anakin and people back then could laugh at Jar Jar without worrying about whether it's racist or not.
>>220825301Hey man, don't hit Mike below the belt like that
>>220825333>kids loved anakinProving the point only kids liked the movie.>could laugh at Jar Jar without worrying about whether it's racist or not.The fuck? Nobody gives a shit about that, it being racist isn't even a thought that ever crossed my mind. People hate jar jar cause he's cringe and annoying. Simple as.
>>220816155I don't mind if people like the prequels but you sound like a judgmental faggot
>>220825313>those came out years before Disney even bought LucasfilmThose came out a decade after PT release, the same year Disney started pressuring George to sell his IP.Pure coincidence, but unfortunately for you the Great Noticing will continue.
>>220825394>Proving the point only kids liked the movie.Yea. Those damn 90's kids ruined Star Wars for us adult Star Wars fans
Born in 97 I should have been the perfect audience for episode 1, but I remember thinking it was really really boring as a kid. And the only kid I knew who was into Star wars was weird.
>>220825325'Burst out laughing' apparently means making two long ass videos crying about other reviewers.
>THEY'RE NOT LAUGHING THEY'RE CRYINGliteral mental illness
>>220825422Literally all you're doing is agreeing with me and pretending like it's actually wrong.You're terrible at shilling lmao. Not even trying to make the prequels seem less stupid and making RLM sound less right.
>>220825521Aw sweetie, I'm so sorry George Lucas raped your childhood. That was weely weely mean of him :(How old are you again? Pushing 40?
>>220815942These dumb midwesterners got rich from your tears
>>220825551reddit
>>220825560Nah, they got rich from fat dysgenic mentally raped retards who already agreed with them. I used an ad blocker.
mike is the most powerful man in hollywood, I can see the patterns.
>>220825595We don't sign our posts here.
>>220825633The most powerful man in Hollywood is Japanese.
>>220825633They literally got JJ abrams for the sequel because mike suggested it in his star trek reviews. This is literally unironically what happened.I've heard mike joke about it a few times but i wonder how he really feels inside knowing that he had such an influence.
>>220815942WHAT'S RICK'S STORY?
>>220825680>Mike destroyed a multi-billion dollar franchise with his bad adviceSuch power!
>They literally got JJ abrams for the sequel because mike suggested it in his star trek reviews. This is literally unironically what happened.sure thing little fella, it wasn't because abram's stock was through the roof after over a decade of massively succesful tv shows and movies as a writer/director/producer, it's because the youtuber schlub from wisconsin gave disney his seal of approval.
>>220825773Oh no, I think Mike should own the fact that having JJ Abrams direct the sequels was his idea. I think Mike should own the fact that his ideas destroyed the Star Wars brand shortly after Disney bought it. It's impressive really, how much power Mike has!
>>220825773Yeah that's how it works. Disney bought star wars, they had a ton of internal meetings about what to do with it and move forward, among those meetings they discussed fans wants, interests, and of course the plinkett reviews were used as a form of reference.It's not some grandiose mythological notion, it's pretty basic.
>>220825832So why do RLM never really have anything bad to say about the Disney films?
>>220825858They do? Force awakens was touted as boring which it was, but that's fine for a set up movie. Last Jedi literally ruined the entire trilogy and was universally shit on by everyone. Rise of Skywalker was unsalvageable mess because rian johnson fucked the entire series up beyond repair.RLM has said the same about all 3 of these movies.
>>220825858You mean like when Mike said you literally have to be retarded to enjoy RoS? Like when Jay said TLJ made him done with the franchise?
>>220822043>Prequels sucked bafflingly hardNta, and I agree with your post. This was the broad sentiment at the time, even among the younger audience. I'm the same age as the actor who played kid Anikin, the movies were made for me. Baffling is a good word for them. I saw the original trilogy's theatrical releases on VHS at home, pretty much everyone had, and the originals held up. They were exciting and emotional. I saw The Phantom Menace in theaters and even at that age, I can remember walking out of the theater kind of disappointed and perplexed. Pod racing was cool, the droids were cool, but Anikin was pouty, whiny and annoying while Jar Jar and the rest of the Gungans gave me the ick. It was probably the first time I was ever disappointed by a film. By the time the clone wars came out everyone was going to see it only ironically, to see how bad it could possibly be. Clone Wars had it's apologists but the general consensus was that it was going to be laughably awful and it was. By the time Revenge of the Sith came out, most people weren't going to see it other than diehard apologists who thought that it could save the trilogy and people watching it ironically or people who could enjoy it despite it's glaring flaws. I think how bad the prequels are is overblown by obsessed original trilogy fanboys. They're nothing to be enraged about but they aren't good. The Plinkett review is emotionally hyperbolic for comedic effect but the criticisms are fair and it's just restating conversations everyone was having after walking out of the theater but in an exaggerated tone. The Prequel Trilogy was more fun to criticize than it was to watch, though most people criticizing it outside of the internet did so in a more baffled tone. Walking out of the theatre you'd probably be smiling saying what the heck was all that nonsense. Plinkett was a parody of the hardcore star wars fans but now everyone who criticizes the prequels is equated to the character to deflect criticism.
>>220825012Proof?
>>220825680>They literally got JJ abrams for the sequel because mike suggested it in his star trek reviewsYou are ALMOST getting it.
>>220825927>>220825955I don't believe you.They always manage to say something like "But you should still see it anyway" Give me more examples.
>>220826013They damage controlled for every single bad Disney release, including Tron Arws.
No amount of bitching can erase the joy and laughter George Lucas hath provided 27 years ago.
>>220825927Force Awakens, at the very least, established the start of a new trilogy we knew nothing about yet, with plenty of unanswered questions to build upon in the coming years. But now that the other two movies have come and gone, the whole thing is a mass casualty event quagmire.
>some no name grifter wants to piggyback on others' fameWe'll still be talking about RLM long after this nobody necks himself.
>>220826034Completely untrue. The Tron Ares review didn't recommend it, even.
>>220826027>But you should still see it anywayNo they don’t. Their stance on Star Wars is that you already know if you’re going to watch it or not. They even made a huge point of this saying it’s slop who’s fans are akin to cultists at a political rally over a montage of goycattle consumers at conventions.
>>220826034yeah, except for all the new star wars shit they say is mostly bad and that they've been done with disney capeshit for years, they're really going hard shilling for disney!
>>220826063>some no name grifter wants to piggyback on others' fameWe'll still be talking about George Lucas long after Mike necks himself.
>>220826089Somehow, despite it all, they managed to say you should watch Mandalorian and Grogo on Disney Plus
>>220826105>moving goalposts
>>220826130No, they didn't.
>>220826130sure , if you want to be a disingenous faggot. what they actually said was it would have been "fine" if it was released as a season of the mandalorian on disney plus, because that's what it quite ofbviously is, a bunch of episodes stitched together to make a movie and it doesn't work. mike literally said it's the worst star was movie.
>>220826187Prove they didn't by posting more examples of them trash talking Star Wars, and thus devaluing Disney's brand.>>220826176>m-m-moving g-goalposts *sniffle*
>prove to me my schizo headcanon I made up about these youtubers is wrongjej
>>220826216Rich said, at least three times, "It'll be fine to watch on Disney Plus" So which is it?Are they tasteless retards?Or do you have more examples of them trash talking the Disney movies and shows?We all know Mike loves the Acolyte, so besides that
>>220826060Yeah everyone was seemingly in agreement that force awakens was boring and kind of shitty but it was fine for an establishing step up movie that was just a retelling of a new hope. Plenty to build off of.But then they changed directors for no reason and gave it to the rian johnson guy who just decided to ruin everything, not sure if out of malice or incompetence. Seems like malice since he went out of his way to do the whole subvervice meme. He fucked it up so bad that there was no hope to fix it even with going back to JJ.
>>220826252It's so easyPost examples of them trash talking Disney's productsOtherwise they're Disney shills.Or is it that you don't want to post examples of RLM trash talking Disney products, because that would harm Disney's brand?
>>220826256>what they actually said was it would have been "fine" if it was released as a season of the mandalorian on disney plus, because that's what it quite ofbviously is>Rich said, at least three times, "It'll be fine to watch on Disney Plus"That's literally what he said you retard. He just explained this to you and you still don't comprehend it. You're retarded.
>>220826261>Yeah everyone was seemingly in agreement that force awakens was boring and kind of shitty >but it was fine for an establishing step up movie that was just a retelling of a new hope. Plenty to build off of.No one with a brain thought this, after what happened with LOST.
>>220826285>Anon can't parse rhetorical questions >or the fackt that he's being fuckt with>He'll ignore this information and carry on as if nothing has been saidRegardless, Rich is either a fat retard with no taste for recommending people watch a movie they were all in agreement was dogshitOr he's a fat retard with no taste on Disney's payroll. If it's the latter, Disney should consider letting them go.
>>220826083>The Tron Ares review didn't recommend it>it was really fun - Mike 'Disney Employee' Stoklasa
nobody is this retarded, he's genuinely not well isn't he?
>>220815942Rick WQN, it's trve.
>>220826362You sound raped
>>220825927Mike literally said that he loved TFA and that it was "everything I hoped it would be".
>>220826362This is what i'm trying to figure out now. I genuinely can't tell if this guy is trolling or actually this schizo and retarded. Why does he have such an autistic hate for RLM lmao.
I can't believe Disney nuked itself
>>220826428Be less raped, Mike
>>220826428Because they are cinematically illiterate retards that have done permanent damage to film criticism online. You can thank RLM for retards like Mauler and Critical Drinker.
>>220826415>>220826465>samefagging yourselfCringe.>>220826480>schizo takeMeds.
>>220826509Oh don't be such a rape victim
>>220826428Twitter blasted my TL full of Star Wars shit for a few days a couple of weeks ago, so I can speak on this a bit.Basically prequelfags started pushing this narrative that prequel hate was "caused" by RLM as if everyone just copied their takes and decided the prequels were bad based on that.Then there was pushback to that because obviously people disliked the prequels immediately after release and RLM got popular simply because they put into words why(i never watched their shit btw)That being said I did find the whole trade route meme pretty fucking funny (pic related) because it came up during that Strait of Hormuz Trump-Iran drama, apparently RLM tore into the movies for that plotline?
>>220826944I'm "not a retard" so I can speak on this a bit. There are kids who grew up having no idea people disliked the prequels until the RLM reviews.
>>220815968People want to review reviewers but don't study the classics (asalieri, the irate gamer sucks blog)
