who was in the wrong?
>>220846308everyone
>>220846308I refuse to believe that 86%. It has to be botted to hell.
>>220846308Rise of Skywalker got an 86% audience score. Huh. Literally never met one person who likes that movie.
>>220846308Disney for making each movie one at a time.
>Let the past die. Kill it if you have to.>Disney: NO YOU FOOL, MILKING NOSTALGIA HAS BEEN OUR ENTIRE BUSINESS MODEL SINCE THE DAYS OF WALT!!!
>>220846308rise of skywalker is meh, but the last jedi is actually one of the worst movies ive ever seen
Please refer to the Rotten Tomatoes cope chart.
>>220846336Damn that was my post. Good job, friend.
>>220846308That audience score is ridiculously fake. I have never met even 1 person in my life who didn't hate that movie. 86%? It's probably not even 5%
>>220846308Fuck off ivan
>>220846558The people I saw this with don't remember anything about it besides a couple of retarded things like the Goonies knife and horses on a star destroyer
>>220846308Disney for letting the spin offs mog the mainline sequels. Rogue One was the subversive story that Last Jedi wanted to be and even Mando was the mindless popcorn flick that Rise of Skywalker wanted to be.
>>220846362>>220846372Rotten Tomatoes basically shut off the score after it dropped to 86%. They were already starting to manipulate things with Captain Marvel
>>220846362It was. Botted by both sides, actually.
>>220846308bot are irredeemable garbage
I'm over 40 and even I'm too young to give a shit about Star Wars. Who the fuck are these people who still manage to give a shit about this moldy old franchise?Obsess over literally anything else, please.
>>220847136>Rotten Tomatoes basically shut off the score after it dropped to 86%. They were already starting to manipulate things with Captain MarvelDo you have hard evidence to prove it?
>>220846308(((verified))) ratings vs. real ratings
>>220847193>Who the fuck are these people who still manage to give a shit about this moldy old franchise?You, since you posted in the thread
>>220847193You gave enough of a shit to post a seething comment about it, though.
>>220847229People on /tv/ and outside of here were watching the score back then noting how the number of reviews went up but the score stayed in place.
>>220846308Last Jedi is the worst film I ever paid to watch
>>220847291>>220847615And you seethed enough at his post to respond to it twice. Almost 20 minutes apart, too. That's an impressively long time to stay mad, anon.
>>220846308Red Letter Media for ruining Star Wars
>>220847252Ah yes, real people like the guy in front of you in the supermarket who uses self-checkout despite apparently having never used an electronic device in his life. The standard deviation on subjective taste in the general populace is so fucking wide it might has well be meaningless. Meanwhile, professional critics are obviously always considering corporate overlords in their rating, but at least they understand what proper storytelling looks like on a fundamental level.
>>220846308It’s no longer reliable since movies are now “claimed” by the left or right. >ghostbuster: claimed by the left>joker: claimed by the right>last Jedi: claimed by the left >top gun maverick: claimed by the rightPeople don’t care if these films were even good or not, if they see their tribe defending it they defend it. If they see other tribe liking it they attack it.
More people would like Rise of Skywalker if they showed Palpatine making clones and being a force ghost instead of somehow returning. Also Rey should have changed her last name to Solo.
>>220848169The problem is, years later, there is no audience core manipulation in The Rise of Skywalker, since the only hard evidence I can find is Bunker 15 rotten tomatoes report. The manipulation is only the critic's score, not the audience score.
>>220848259Star Wars was already ruined when the Red Letter Media guys were still children.
