[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1754478859094234.jpg (566 KB, 1080x1410)
566 KB JPG
Why doesn't anybody just do good movie for money? Why keep making bad ones?
>>
>>220866135
Post your billion dollar idea.
>>
Because there are 2 kinds of movies. The first are meant to be international viewable, so it must cater to the western audience, the Chinese audience and the bomb vest audience. These movies must therefore ultra safe in theme which more or less will limit them to "CGI fight movies".
The second ones aren't meant to make money, because bean counters aren't interested in your x10 return on a 10 million budget kind of deal, since it is still a tiny smudge on their accounting sheet. They are meant to compete with political ads. Are political ads supposed to make money directly? No, and neither are the second type.
Whenever you see a movie premise or cast that clearly are meant to fail, it's because it's the 2nd category. Propaganda.
>>
>>220866135
Because fags keep watching them.
>>
>>220866204
A jaded white cop guy has to escort a quirky criminal that's on witness protection and they get stranded in a small town that's filled with vampires. They must work together to survive until dawn.
>>
>>220866466
Yet another small town slop, this goes into the catalogues



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.