Hollywood is gonna learn an entirely wrong lesson from this aren’t they? Tons of low budget horror movies come out all the time (check Shudder), so I don’t know why these hit so big.
>>220870897So? Shitty low budget movies don't get wide released as part of the Hollywood establishment. These ones did which is why people are seeing them.
>>220870925Really good point and this is something film critics like Jonathan Rosenbaum have been saying for decades. He once famously said more people would be watching Wong Kar-Wai movies if they played in multiplexes.
>>220870897>Tons of low budget horror movies come out all the time (check Shudder), so I don’t know why these hit so big.because they are actually good unlike most of the stuff shudders releases you stupid fucking chud of a moron
Why is this board so fucking negative?
>>220871030Please no more squid game movies
>>220870897The directors already had followings from social media. The media campaign for both of these were amazing. These are both great films and everyone recognizes it. Plus it's the slow season right now.
>>220870897>so I don’t know why these hit so bigThere's no competition. The only other thing out there is a fucking Star Wars movie from a show everyone got tired of years ago
>>220870897The only lesson Hollywood has ever learned from anything low budget is if a low budget film is successful spending 10 times that amount on another film has to mean even more profit
>>220871066*SiteFtfy
>>220871063Audiences made Paranormal Activity and Saw huge franchises so I doubt people care about quality that much dumbass
>>220871157Yes but no one besides horror and Internet retards know what shudder even is
>>220871117>There's no competition.last resort cope every fucking time lmao
the fuck else is there to watch? some cape shit?
>>220871157i don't know why you're fighting so hard. It feels personal
>>220871175There is literally no competition. Its the slow spot before summer. And their only opponent is named Grogu. They could not fail if they tried
The lesson the studios are gonna learn is that this shit is just IP in a different form, and they don’t even need to waste any money developing it.Just let these young guys grind away developing a following on YouTube until they have enough of a following then swoop in with a low budget movie offer and watch it 10X its budget even if the movie is mediocre because zoomies have no taste in movies but they need to maintain there parasocial relationship with the creator and their dopey fan base.
>>220871157Paranormal was done well imo. Never watched saw but yeah it got big
>>220871157>Audiences made Paranormal Activity and Saw huge franchises so I doubt people care about quality that much dumbassSaw was great. Had a cool hook, and a strong ending people talked aboutParanormal Activity had a unique premise
>>220871232>>220870897Backrooms was basically cashing in years of people making videos through video game mods tik toks YouTube’s everyone was making some dumb liminal space type bullshit and uploading online. Since the name backrooms did not belong to Disney or anyone else, a24 could make some bullshit movie and claim copyrights. Obsession was just pornography movie everyone went to go see in theaters. It’s porn like those old school pornography theaters that existed with boomers.
>>220871230why is it so hard for you to accept those are good movies that people liked? Are you one of those retards who think liking things is cucked and it's all jewish psyop?
>>220871232How did stuckman and markeplier movies do? Exactly.
>>220871066>why doesn't this board say the things I want to hear?Grow up.
>>220871230The marketing really helped these movies but so did word of mouth. A lot of people are already calling Obsession one of the best movies of the year.
>>220871285What are you going on about with the porn comparison?
>>220871230obsession is a microbudget movie that will finish at 300m+. It earned more in 2nd week than it did in 1st and more in 3rd than in 2nd. All because "there's nothing else to watch" and "it's a presummer slow season". Why are you coping so goddamn hard? What are you gonna lose if you admit people liked it?
>>220871438He's just salty.
>>220871360>>220871438People can go watch pornography in theaters right now that’s why it’s making money.
>>220871458There's one sex scene and it's mainly the main dude's ass. What are you talking about?
>>220871289>>220871344>>220871438because they're not good movies. People are so starved for anything good or at least new they're saying mediocre shit is gold
>>220871499It’s a pornography movie. It’s babies first porn movie to be exact.
>>220871499he doesn't mean "pornography" in the same way normal people do. He uses it in a chud way (copied from nazi propaganda)
>>220871513They're good. Backrooms is alright but obsession was amazing. What movies do you like?>>220871526Explain>>220871554Explain
>>220871513>more copelmao. Buy a camera and start a yt channel. Because this bitterness is unhealthy
>>220871595No with backrooms EVERYBODY was making backrooms videos. Not just what’s his name. It was that popular. So in reality he and millions of others have to grab a camera and start a yt channel it’s not the same as if only one person started making backrooms videos
>>220871586Movies will keep getting edgier and edgier until someone will show edgier pornography in theaters.
>>220871586>Explainwhen normal people say "pornography" they mean explicit depiction of sex or something along those lines. Nazis used that word to describe basically everything (books, paintings, movies, songs etc) that they thought had corrupting influence on society and le traditional values. They used the word "degenerate" in the same way. It's very easy to spot /pol/cels based on the context in which they use those two words
>>220871700>>220871554Blackrooms will make less money than obsession because it doesn’t show pornography.
>>220871778handsome black man next to beautiful white woman is not pornography???? You went woke, lmao
>>220871812Uh no? And it’s not that type of movie.
>>220871658Yea I don't think porn has a major wide screen appeal. This is a stupid idea media is already porn today. Obsession isn't even that edgy or degenerate.
>>220871876>media is already porn today.>Obsession isn't even that edgy or degenerate.>It's very easy to spot /pol/cels based on the context in which they use those two wordsi couldn't ask for a better example lmao
>>220871876> Yea I don't think porn has a major wide screen appealHow old are you?
>>220871985Huh?>>220872055Zoomers hate sex these days. Why do you think porn is going to take off?
>>220872279If zoomers hate sex why didn’t obsession bomb?
>>220871292Iron long was definitely a success
>>220871157I hated Paranormal Activity and Blair Witch, but Backrooms was actually really good.
why did women make a movie about how bear is an evil psychopath that will mind rape them infinitely? didnt they choose the bear over men becasue men are evil psychopaths that will mind rape them infinitely?
>>220872429There is one sex scene. You don't even see cleavage. Shut. Up.
>>220872770But wait I thought zoomers hated sex scenes?
>>220872848It is barley a sex scene. It's also 5 seconds long and creepy. You're a retard.
