[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>Bond. James Bond.
> The same James Bond who works for MI6 and brought down numerous of my associates organisations? The very James Bond my men discovered would be infiltrating here tonight undercover? The James Bond with a known reputation for violently murdering his targets? Here, unarmed at a poker table, surrounded by my guards?
>...err, no, I'm... I'm a different James Bond
>>
for his purposes it would be better to just go by mohammed muhamad
>>
The codename theory is fucking stupid btw
>>
>>220981561
The villain doesn't want to simply capture and kill the extremely dangerous spy who is basically a one man army. They want to trick him into an impossible trap for 3 hours and kill him that way.
>>
"Mr. Bond, you defy all my attempts to plan an amusing death for you."
Moonraker is one of the best Bond movies. If you think it's a bad Bond movie, you have the wrong idea about what a Bond movie is. They should all strive to be more like Moonraker, and less like what you think they're supposed to be.
>>
Fleming originally considered about making him use fake names but then came to the conclusion that it's contrived and only faggot losers would care anyway.
>>
File: file.png (370 KB, 485x681)
370 KB PNG
>>220984612
Ah yes, the chad hominem



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.