This stuff really happened? Wtf britishers.
>>220985439Brits could be pretty brutal when they wanted to be. Look up what Stanley did in Belgium's Congo colony
It's a sad state of affairs but they most likely perpetrated far worse behavior than that old chap
>>220985439help stop the spread of pollution by doing this to every jeet you see
>>220985439an untouchable was blaspheming his personal juggernaut, by hindu law he was honour bound to put her rightly
Jeets have some sort of policy where every movie has to have an anti-british scene whether it has any relevance to the plot or not.One movie I think its called the Warrior Queen of Jhansi has a scene with British redcoats dragging kids across the ground to throw on fires. Seems like some complete bullshit because they are still seething at the British ending sati killings
>>220985599pretty sure japan has the same thing with anti-nuke. the attack on titian movie ends with using a giant unexploded nuke to plug the hole in their defensive wall. also new york being pro-new yorker e.g new yorkers helping spiderman once every movie in the rami trilogy
>>220985439It’s funny that most people can understand the British fellas motivation now.Before it just seemed like he was a horrible monster but most people now see that Indians deserved it
>>220985439The British raj was the only time in history when it was ever bearable to live life as a jeet. Before that they were being ass raped by Mughals and before that they were an even weaker fractured region. Jeets were under Muslim rule for centuries while British rule lasted less than 80 years.
>>220985714its funny how jeets were dominated by muslims but those muslims were dominated by mongols
>>220985622This is why they torpedoed the ending of Attack on Titan as well because otherwise it would've justified the use of nukes
>>220985439Jumanji is crazyer than I remembered it.
>>220985439A filthy little fuzzy-wuzzy wog was putting its vile hands all over one of His Majesty’s motor cars. What’s a chap to do?
>>220985902maybe but a lot of anime is lefty pacifist bs, its the default were every beast-kin/demon race is just lazy "muh racism bad" allegory. i secretly believe the reason why frieren and demon slayer are as big as they are is because they buck the programming
>>220986204>secretlyThat's obviously why they're popular. When everyone zigs, the one that zags stands out. It's what popularized the grey morality in media in the first place. Every story was black and white, so the stories that left it ambiguous stood out.
>>220985439>"By jove, she touched my nice clean car."
>>220985439The real question is how were they able do genocide feather Indians but not dot Indians?
no, they never did thatinstead they starved millions of people to death to make a few more shekels
the embarrassing state of the yookay now is basically karmic punishment for what they did beforealso a preview of what's going to happen to the US later
>>220986639well they said the same thing about the germans then they started the third reich
>>220986591>peopleindia was in a constant 40 year cycle of famine dating all the way back to the Buddha and before, kind of the reason why Buddhism took off to free people from the endless cycle of suffering where even death isn't an escape. this all ended in the mid 1900's when Whites(to their shame) gave them modern agriculture including the born-haber cycle and dwarf wheat causing the world to be flooded by endless millions of them
>>220986655don't pretend they treated white people any betterthey fucking starved half of Ireland to death too for their shekels
>>220986667no they didnt. The potato famine was caused by an unavoidable rot that affected all of Europe. And the Irish were too retarded to fish.The famine in India was caused by drought and Brits do not control the weather.Famine was a common occurrence all over the world up until mid 20th century.Blaming Brits for natural disasters is subhuman behaviour you dirty fucking lying jeet.
>>220986591indians got raped by every el nino event for 10000 years until the british invented systems to do something about it
>>220986696>The potato famine was caused by an unavoidable rot that affected all of Europe.no, you fucking retardyes, there was a plague affecting the crops but the Irish would have been able to still produce enough to feed themselves if the British didn't ship most food away to sell in Englandthere's a reason the rest of Europe didn't starve, you dumb cunt
>>220986667something like a third of all crops across europe failed the first year of the famine and it was the liberals that stopped aid being given to ireland and knifed the pm in the back when he tried to change the laws because it was illegal to bring in foreign grain to protect local farmers. you 'people' all talk like it was caused by evil brits salting the paddy fields and not just the continual struggle against nature
>>220986715what really didnt help was Ireland turning itself into an entire monocrop industry just for potatoes, thats why the rest of europe didnt starve
Should've kept her filthy pajeeta paws off her majesty's motor vehicle like some other Anon said.
>>220986696the brits deliberately made the famines in india and iran during WW2 worse because they prioritized war production over the local population.now you can argue that maybe it was necessary to do so, but they DID have an effect on it.the last time a famine was solely caused by bad weather was in the 14h century, since then there's always an administration aspect to it, even during bad weather or droughts, the people have food stores and trade to tide them over. but the people in charge can make it more difficult, which makes them responsible. they couldve helped, but they didnt.
>>220986774>they prioritized war production over the local population.rationing in Britain also severely fucked over British causing all manner of problems and as you said there's always an administration aspect to it, i doubt the natives in charge in india and iran went hungry
>>220986639It’s not karma it’s just that democracy is a terrible form of government. The poor will always outnumber the rich so their only endgame in such a society is to vote to steal stuff from the rich. But voting to take stuff isn’t a productive activity and the rich no longer have an incentive to produce.>but it’s the poor workers who actually produce stuff not the rich capitalists!Poorfags are content to sit in squalor eating beetles and clubbing each other over the head if there is no Mr. Boss man standing over them. People don’t want to work. Leaving Poorfags to their own devices doesn’t work out without external aid to fund their existence. Otherwise you end up with mass starvation.
>>220986667moron
>>220986774>the brits deliberately made the famines in india and iran during WW2 worse because they prioritized war production over the local population.Based
>>220985439They have the british do this in movies while indians use a bolder to kill and rape his countrywomen
>>220985599The poos learned well from the jews
>>220985517>Brits could be pretty brutal when they wanted to be"Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed." -- Sir Charles James Napier
>>220986774>the brits deliberately made the famines in india and iran during WW2 worse because they prioritized war productionDo you not understand n-th order effects? Prioritization of war production is not "deliberately making the famines."
>>220987161Good for them, Churchill still gave Palestine to kikes though
>>220987161>Sir Charles James NapierAny relation to John Napier, inventor of the logarithm? (the inverse function of an exponent function), the tool that allowed easier calculation of huge or tiny numberswow yeah he is
>>220987209any relation to jack?
>>220985439Throughout all of human history, that was pretty tame.
>>220985439>wtf Britishers Normal human reaction to seeing Indians for the first time
>>220985757Those mongols converted to islam and continued to subjugate the jeets
>>220985439If you can think of a better way to get a jeet off your car I'd like to hear it
>>220987236if I slap someone in the face or lash their back, will they feel less pain in the present from having the knowledge that past humans had to endure worse violence?there are people out there with much lower or higher quality of life than me, but my body feels pain and sadness and joy all the same, not relative to others' real or hypothetical suffering
>>220986639>implying colonization didn't benefit the brownsnot karma, India was a shithole when the british arrived and they turned it less shitty and when the brits left it became shitty again.
>>220986774Speaking of famines how about the soviet union holodomor, that was def on purpose.
>>220985517thankfully, due to the fact that the Congolese natives were completely illiterate, there is no first hand evidence from the victims going against the narrative that all of the suffering was personally due to the Belgians. There was a thread on /his/ w/ European witnesses writing about how the native soldiers employed by the Belgians would murder or amputate the arms/hands of other natives to show how much "work" they were doing, so they would get more supplies which they would then sell to personally enrich themselves.
>>220987492do no cry for people who would do no such thing for you
>>220985517brits invented concentration camps before the Germans stole their idea
>>220987504>the brits twits dindu nuffin wronglol
>>220987562my treatment of people or empathy towards them is not contingent on mutual benefit or expectation of reciprocation. Note: this doesn't mean I allow people to overstep on my charity towards them.
>>220986774how does the Brits "prioritizing war production" lead to a famine in Bengal? The Japs were occupying Burma and their navy was operating in the Bay of Begal. Why the fuck would the Brits ship food through an area controlled by the enemy?
>>220987611>Brits "prioritizing war production" lead to a famine in Bengal?They exported the produce back to the UK instead of feeding the locals, you retard.
STAND CLEAR OF HER MAJESTY'S MOTOR VEHICLE *BONK*
>>220987593no you see the Brits were the wealthiest empire of all time because they lived in such a rich lush country and not plundering other countriesinb4 industry, Germans quickly outdid the Brits in industrial capacity and quality but were still considerably poorer
>>220987625>reproduce to the point that you can't even feed yourselves>blame othersk.
>>220986831elite ball knoedge
>>220987605>my treatment of people or empathy towards them is not contingent on mutual benefit or expectation of reciprocation. Note: this doesn't mean I allow people to overstep on my charity towards themClearly it does.
>>220986588Diseases like smallpox and typhoid did a lot of the heavy lifting taking out the natives in the Americas, didn't have the same luck with the jeets because, well its fucking India
>>220987625>They exported the produce back to the UK instead of feeding the locals, you retard.Why didn't the locals buy it?
>>220987673well then, alright
>>220985439>Sells her kid>Gets paid>Stops car and demands return of kid>Doesn't offer to give back moneyFucking jeets have always been scammers.
>>220987642Industrialization began in Britain.You don't know history?
>>220985599It's because anti-British sentiment is all India has holding it together. You know that old joke about how in America you can drive for two hours and still be in the exact same part of America, whereas in England you can drive for one hour and the local accent will change twice and bread rolls will have a new name? Well in India you can walk twenty minutes and find a completely different ethnic people speaking a different language belonging to a different caste (or even entirely different caste system) following a different religion (we call it all Hinduism, but to them that was imposed by foreigners and without foreign imposition they go right back to arguing about whether Hanuman is more based than Vishnu or Ganesh is lower than Purindarpreet etc.).This is why India is so corrupt, to an Englishman any Englishman is about the same as any other Englishman so aside from some class concerns people are treated basically the same (at least before Blairism flooded us with foreigners). In India, you're either part of my tribe or you're an eternal enemy, and I'll elevate my tribe members at the expense of yours because elephant god told me to and fuck you bloody bastard penchod my tribe eats shit and your tribe drinks piss so I rape your daughter dog fucker. They have to constantly remind themselves, "We hate the British for giving us laws and shit," because without that they would have literally nothing to unite them, at which point they would go back to genociding each other en mass like the fucking monkeys they are.
>>220987593>implying indians of all people are good people and colonization is black and whiteBrits ended the indian tradition of burning the wife when the husband died. Also look up rape rates in India, a girl is lucky if she make it to adulthood without getting raped by her close male family members.
>>220987605Anon that is noble but some will exploit you at best or kill you at worst, just be careful take care of yourself.
>>220985622>the attack on titian movie ends with using a giant unexploded nuke to plug the hole in their defensive wallWait, what? I don't remember that from the manga
>>220987642German philosophers mogg brits
>>220985599>still seething at the British ending sati killingsReminder that it was the Brahmins, the ostensibly wealth educated class, that objected to the ending of Sati. That child temple prostitutes, murder cults, and sati are far less common today (not extinct) among Hindus is NOT the result of some sort of Hindu Reformation but Englishmen pointing guns at them and ordering them to stop. Terrible religion, terrible culture, terrible people.
>>220987234Of the Meoffs family?
>>220985439Imagine if the British employed demographic replacement of the natives in all the colonies. Instead of billions of brown leeches, the world would have billions more White people. We'd be centuries more advanced than we are now
>>220987684>The American land was more like a widow than a virgin. Europeans did not find a wilderness here; rather, however involuntarily, they made one. Jamestown, Plymouth, Salem, Boston, Providence, New Amsterdam, Philadelphia - all grew upon sites previously occupied by Indian communities ... The so-called settlement of America was a resettlement, a reoccupation of a land made waste by the diseases and demoralization introduced by the newcomers
>>220987625>The Man in the High Tower was the result of feeding Poojeets. Man, Churchill fucked up.
>>220987625If they raped less then there wouldn't be so many poos to feed
>>220990103A boy is lucky too.
>>220990103The British continued to divide the population based on religion and caste. Look up the divide and rule policy followed by them. Then of course their part in the Bengal famine and introducing the repressed Victorian ideology. But good job ignoring those things.
>>220985439They knew how to handle jeets back in the day
That one's for, Henry. Sleep well, lad
>>220991238Rrr does their own version of this with jeet level special effects added.
Don't forget we (Brits) pulled off the biggest heist in history, 100 trillion pounds (sterling) or whatever the figure is today. Sucks to be India lmao
>>220985439
>>220986572Always thought Van Pelt was effay as fuck.The black shirt and red tie with the little pin under full safari? Swagged to the max.
>>220988637Yes, I know and I said nothing to the contrary.You don't know English?
>>220985439She should have done the needful then
>>220985517or read what they did with tasmanian natives
Brits are the biggest dindus after Russia
>>220987605Fuck Plato. That asshole ruined Western civilization with his woke-ass bullshit. Real homies know Aristotle's the way.
>>220992484I bet the crowd raped her afterwards
>>220991221Because that's how India is naturally divided. British colonial policy was to mostly rule through existing elites and power structures. Indians blame Brits for not redesigning their entire culture from the ground up which is absurd.>Bengal famineWas triggered by Japan invading Burma and Britain having to fight the biggest war in mankind's history.
>>220992509This wasn't colonial policy. It was frontier violence that ended up in eradication because British settlers were organized and had firearms whereas Aboriginals had spears.
>>220985439you're welcome
Didn’t Indians place their children in front of a moving death temple on wheels? Because they believed it would incarnate them into a better next life or existence? Anyone have the photo of the Britishman desperately trying to save an Indian kid from his insane mother doing just that?
>>220992122>that one step that makes his head pop forwardinternal decapitation maybe. bet the first step on his back was extremely painful
So, actually the brits were based, colonialism was good, and "the victim of colonialism" actually deserved it?
>>220986588Britain had no interest in genociding them. In fact, Britain was very fascinated by India, hence their pioneering of Indology back in the 1700s.They created colleges specifically to educate their officers in numerous Indian languages and to translate Indian works like the Bhagavad Gita into English and to translate English books into Indian languages. You can see these rosy and enchanted depictions of India in a lot of older British dramas like the Jewel in the Crown. To the older British generation, the one that has mostly died out, India was an exciting place full of adventure and not without its own intriguing and highly competent locals.This whole topic is so frustrating because self-loathing whites and resentful Indians have conspired together to present a narrative far more simplistic than what actually happened.
>>220992882The Brits did a lot of bad things and took a lot of goods, but, they did uplift Indians and allowed their population to skyrocket after ending famines (after briefly causing some) by allowing more goods to disperse into the country, upping the standard of living (although this won’t stop the majority from living in absolute filth) and granting them access to white man’s technology, medicine, science, etc.The British also, y’know, more or less united India. I’d say the British did more good than bad, overall, in the long run.
>>220991238so when jeets seethe about the Armitsar massacre, do they just neglect the fact that the troops were all jeets?
>>220985439SEETHE JAM BOY SEETHE
>>220992509abbos (close enough to tasmans) engage(d) in crazy sexual violence against children so don't even try bringing that shit up nigga lmao.
Indians and India are fucked. I watched a video of them parading around a decapitated child. They were all covered in ash, wearing flowers, and most of them were shirtless. The one carrying the child was running around like an insane person, showing it to everybody. Absolute fucking insanity. You can’t blame the British for seeing them as a bizarro bunch.
>>220990445>child temple prostitutesThat only became a thing during the British era.
>>220993195Didn’t the Aboriboos sell and trade the heads of white people? Didn’t they rape and eat the previous inhabitants of the islands?
>>220987561deboonked
>>220987581Brits invented them then promptly set about rescuing the inhabitants after it caused moral outrage and a huge scandal at home. Reports of starving Dutch women and children reached home, the government investigated and then immediately set about helping the people in the camps. Then the war finished. Little bit of a different story than "they invented them b4 the germans used them!" – yeah, the Germans somehow took half a century to make the same realisation the Brits made (that they were quite bad)
>>220992882Colonialism was complex and there are many critiques you can make of it as well as things you can praise. It's not something to which you should try to assign a simple "good" or "bad".Also Indians themselves were often used as secondary colonizers in places like Fiji, Singapore, and Africa, sometimes to the resentment of the indigenous populations there. I don't think Indians appreciate this point: any criticism of colonialism or coloniality includes their actions as well.You might rebut that those Indians were used as laborers or servants but then, so were most Australian settlers, and that's still considered a colonial state.
Maybe the decolonization people are right. I mean they're not because they want to reject all forms of euro-centric ways of being and knowing which means all the good is destroyed too but there's definitely some shit here that's gotta go.
>>220985439timmy means victory
>>220985599Most Indians aren't even aware their country has also been occupied by the French, the Portuguese, the Danish and the Dutch.The Brits were amongst the most benign in all honesty. Not that the occupation of any country is good for anyone.
>>220993349Look up who ran it before Europeans showed up. 90 million genocided Hindi over 60 years. Everyone’s hands were dirty. I’m an American so my view is probably skewed but I like Indians muslin and Hindi and they usually are among the best groups here
>>220993331who is timmy? huh?
>>220993061They also built lots of canals which helped raise the amount of irrigated land. This helped lots of farmers, increased the stock of food and cash crops for export. Britain's main failure was that, by nature of being a far-flung and distant colonial ruler, lacked the resources and will to really make something of India other than a giant market and source of cheap produce. What resources it did put into the colony were spent on defence and internal security. It also looks bad how another famine happened just at the end, the Bengal Famine, which was a pretty sad conclusion after Britain had got stuck in making what had been up to that point a very effective famine relief system. Couple that with the Green Revolution that took place a couple of decades after independence, and the booming population, and you would at a glance write Britain off as something that held India back or actively harmed India even though those gains were mostly about new technology and grain types.
I should also sayMost of the racebait is started by moderation or some form of law enforcement these days especially on pol and int. If you are a troll don’t respond to it. Once you bring it up and it’s some asshat trying to get blackmail or someone arrested shit gets 404d. Do not respond to any of that shit including politics
>>220993306Very true, as seen by how many of them tried to return to their 'home country' of Britain during decolonisation. They were colonial administrators all over Africa
>>220993195Yes, of course, "they started" never fails.
>>220993487I'm British and grew up in London and have to agree. Had endless trouble with black people but never any issue with Indians. People say they're swarming the world, and that's bad but honestly, it could be worse. If their numbers are checked, they're completely harmless and generally pretty friendly people.
>>220987561As is often the case modern versions of colonialist narratives ignore the concerning truth that every successful colony operated on pitting locals against each other and using division to keep order. It's always scores of white guys murdering hordes of browns which was onky the case in the initial conquest, after that colonial holdings were one white guy letting browns do whatever as long as it didn't undermine him
>>220993667I wonder how many wealthy and influential Indian families today you could trace back to colonial administrators or Maharajas who sided with the British.
>>220993061>>220993509Don’t you just love it when a fat and posh Indian-Brit shits on a cunty Indian lady for having the total gall to claim Britain made India worse (when it’s the exact opposite)https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oAxBI0O7dvc&pp=ygUaUmF5ZiBoYXlkZWwgbWFua29vIHRvIGxhZHnSBwkJkQoBhyohjO8%3D
>>220985439I don’t believe it happened but if it did they deserved it
>>220993061Yeah, i'd say they've done more bad than good in the long run now that we have a billion Indians pouring into every country.
>>220985714>British rule lasted less than 80 years.The British Raj lasted for 89 years 1858-1947. While India was only under official crown rule for 89 years, British colonization of India began much earlier when the East India Company began taking Indian territory in 1757.
>>220993900That’s the longer-long run. It was bad for us, good for them. Indians should be grateful for being uplifted but they aren’t.
>>220986768Ireland was literally required to grow majority potatoes by british legislators.
>>220992424He was an officer and a gentleman.
>>220994120Why didn't they fish? The country is surrounded by water.
>>220986831>Seething this hard that the wealthy have proved themselves incompetent and femininelol
>>220993124I think they were ghorkas.
>>220994145The same reason they didn't grow other crops.Any time spent not producing potatoes for britain is time wasted, according to the grand capitalists in charge.
>>220985439Saaaaar pls feel bad. Import more of me now
>>220994171But if the potatoes were all rotten what work did they have to do? It sounds more like a skills issue.
>>220985622Attack on titan ended the way it did because he had to course correct after being called out on copying a gundam ending. The fag got big on ntr and now that the fetish has passed. He regrets his ending.
>>220994204Ah, so you're just retarded.Not only do british directives not change just because a famine is there, but industries like fishing don't just spring up overnight.
>>220986831Imagine writing something so ridiculous in the era of rentier capitalism."I'm a producer!" he says, renting out his nan's flat, pocketing the money, and buying another house to rent.
>>220994232What industry? Grab a fucking fishing pole and go down to the beach.
>>220994269Man, you'd immediately starve in any famine situation, that's hilarious.
>>220994289I'm not a lazy wet brain who expects everything to be handed to him.
>>220994145Millions lived in-land where rivers were owned by the British gentry.
>>220994325Yes you are, you literally just suggested that nature would simply hand you and your countrymen fish. No boats, no planning, no fisheries, hell, not even any bait.
>>220994344He can't understand these things anon. I already told him the british prevented such activity.
>>220994344Pick a direction and walk. It's an island the size of Maine, you'd find the ocean within a week.
>>220994374>Walk for a week with no food, to an ocean you are not allowed to fish on, to fish with equipment you don't have, for fish that do not live so close to the shorelol
>>220994347I'm an American you fucking retard. Yes, that's exactly what my country is like outside of the cities full of your kind. You can literally go fishing with your hands.
>>220994397>Cannot understand what it is like to live without a studiously managed ecology and public landslol
>>220994386>let's not even try You really deserved everything the British did to you, even the stuff you've made up.
>>220994374If the rivers were owned by the gentry then most Irish would not have grown up fishing at all. You're asking people to migrate away from their lots (which they were renting in exchange for labor, thereby becoming a debtor) to attempt fishing which they don't know how to do. Half of them had probably never even seen the ocean.
>>220994444They did try what you suggested, that's why they starved.Like you just proved you would.lol
>>220994421If your ecology was studiously managed you'd have trees.
>>220994472You've entirely lost track of the conversation.
>>220994469I proved that I'd starve by going fishing without waiting for permission?
>>220994386Ireland is full of lakes and rivers, long inlets to the sea full of FISH. Oh no the British Fish Police are patrolling every square inch of water!
>>220994489You proved it by suggesting it was a reasonable alternative, and cited waterways that have active nationwide fisheries populating them. It's hilarious.
>>220994467They had no problem migrating across the ocean to befoul another continent.
>>220994520A much better idea than fishing, yes.You actually have a destination with food, one wh
>>220994528But nobody wanted you here.
>>220994500If you're just going to do crime by stealing from nobles, why not just steal from the nobles?
>>220994558>He thinks I'm irishlol, cucked.
>>220994500Oi mate, that's bloody highlarryus. They couldn't do that. Wasn't allowed, you see.
>>220994588Again, if you want to go poaching with a death penalty, why not just rob one of the bakeries for the wealthy?
>>220994610Poaching seems like it would be easier to get away with.
>>220994619I dunno, they've got gamewardens and houndsAnd the payout is a lot less certain.
>>220994656True but a bakery would probably be in a town with who knows how many witnesses. Gamewardens and hounds would be easier to keep track of then who knows who looking out their window.
They stopped and now look at the world.
>>220994567>>220994610Crimes did go on during the famine and the Brits deployed marines to the country and used their local Irish police to keep order. Absent landlordism doesn't mean absent authority.
>>220994681I'm actually kind of counting on the witnesses, who are also starving, to get in on any kind of bread raid.And you have to remember how SMALL the place is. It's much easier for the game wardens to find you than in a proper american forest.
>>220994696Yeah, I'm just criticizing this man's choice of crime.I don't think poaching would be the good one if you want to actually be fed.
Never forget
>>220990092The internal boundaries and subdivisions of the British Raj was Holy-Roman-Empire levels of jank. Funny enough, Mountbatten did both India and Pakistan a huge favor by insisting that ALL Princely States had to join one of the new nations.
>>220994733100% deserved and invented by the Mughals.
>>220994733Why did he do to deserve that?
>>220994804Mutiny
Of course we all know the brits never did anything wrong
>>220994959The only thing they did wrong was not doing more.
>>220985599>>220985622Its called getting dabbed on so hard you receive a new blood memory.
>>220994804This was done after the rebellion if 1857 were the Indians targeted not only British soldiers but also their wives and children. >The surviving women and children were taken to Nana Sahib and then confined first to the Savada Kothi and then to the home of the local magistrate's clerk (the Bibighar)[115] where they were joined by refugees from Fatehgarh. Overall, five men and 206 women and children were confined in the Bibigarh for about two weeks. In one week 25 were brought out, dead from dysentery and cholera.[111] >...>two Muslim butchers, two Hindu peasants and one of Nana's bodyguards went into the Bibigarh. Armed with knives and hatchets, they murdered the women and children.[116] After the massacre, the walls were covered in bloody handprints, and the floor littered with parts of human limbs.[117] The dead and the dying were thrown down a nearby well. When the 50-foot (15 m) deep well was filled with remains to within 6 feet (1.8 m) of the top,[118] the remainder were thrown into the Ganges.[119]The British then went completely apeshit and killed every man in the cities they captured and sometimes the women and children in response. IIRC they strapped some to canons and blew them to bits in front of their family members. >All the city's people found within the walls of the city of Delhi when our troops entered were bayoneted on the spot, and the number was considerable... These were not mutineers but residents of the city, who trusted to our well-known mild rule for pardon. I am glad to say they were disappointed.>The women were all spared but their screams on seeing their husbands and sons butchered, were most painful... Heaven knows I feel no pity, but when some old grey bearded man is brought and shot before your very eyes, hard must be that man's heart I think who can look on with indifference.
>>220995060> I am glad to say they were disappointed.So based. How can anyone hate these guys?
>>220995060Why didn't the britishers protect their women and children?
>>220994959they taught indians(and irish) english, a crime against the world.
>>220995060>Heaven knows I feel no pity, but when some old grey bearded man is brought and shot before your very eyes, hard must be that man's heart I think who can look on with indifference.even when doing the needful the White man feels empathy
>>220986639>laterThe US is a lot more brown than the UK last I checked.
>>220995203The US has had browns since before it was even the US. The UK has received their diversity in the past forty or fifty years.
>>220995096The Britishers relied upon the sepoys for policing and many of those rose up against them.>>220995166Some White men did. But the native British population was out for blood.>Most of the British press, outraged by the stories of alleged rape committed by the rebels against British women, as well as the killings of British civilians and wounded British soldiers, did not advocate clemency of any kind towards the Indian population.[164] Governor General Canning ordered moderation in dealing with native sensibilities and earned the scornful sobriquet "Clemency Canning" from the press[165] and later parts of the British public.It's a good example of a strategy of "just kill 'em all" failing. If the Indians weren't as savage, the British probably would have been fine with a more moderate approach.It's not a great comparison because of the ethnic and cultural differences but many Brits, including senior parliamentarians like Edmund Burke, were sympathetic to the American revolutionaries. Which was easy because Americans weren't committing atrocity after atrocity.
>>220985622>credits roll>starring The City of New York as itself
all jokes and memes aside medieval indian history is actually a really interesting subject
>>220986639Collective punishment is a war crime
>>220987197This. Fucking bong sissies bending over for literal terrorists to avoid bad ((press)).
>>220990445>>220985599The lower caste liked Brits because they were treated equal
>>220995379>"You want a railroad ticket? Go stand in that line with everyone else."This was a radical improvement in civil rights for low-caste Indians, believe it or not.
I really need to learn about the British Empire and such. Those brits sound based. I believe I have been mislead by the "popular opinion" like so many other times.
>>220986653how'd that work out for them?
>>220995301hindu mythology is also pretty cool. unfortunately like all mythologies, you then look at the people who believe it and realize it's some bullshit
>>220995379>they were treated equala wog is a wog. apparently gandhi blew a gasket when he was arrested and put in the same cell as untouchables
>>220995726He got mad about being forced to sit with blacks on a train in South Africa too.
>>220985439BRING THIS BACKTJD
>>220995923We really need to bring back the brtish first
>>220994587Nobody wanted you either.
>>220992509>Settlers keep shooting abo's >Governor decides we have to protect them or they'll go extinct>Send them all to a shit rocky island with no food or shelter>They all die in like 5 years>We did it, we saved the Tasmanians!It was an accident
>>220996446You have to go back.
>>220985439based reaction
>>220996559They had 50,000 years to figure out how to defend themselves against the Brits.
>>220992577they were coming to rape the kid, their shock was at the kid being safely driven away by the British
>>220993667>>220993814It's a common tactic in general. Look at how modern North American politics uses social issues with niche minority groups to divide the populace while they are being destroyed economically and culturally.
>>220985599>the Warrior Queen of JhansiWhy would you watch a jeet movie about the Sepoy mutiny and expect anything besides righteous jeets vs. evil bongs?
>>220985439If only there was a stick big enough to hit all of them at once.......
Discussing history on 4chan is such a shitshow. Just a bunch of schizos making shit up and thinking if they just spam theif retarded fantasy it will become the truth. Niggers.
>>220997534yeah well thats what happens when you let micks use the internet. lying thieving stupid micks
4chan history is based. Me? I want to learn more. Tell stories of the British Empire rightfully punishing the savage.
>>220998078>Be it so. This burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom. When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property. My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed. Let us all act according to national customs.[20][21]Charles Napier
>>220998476posted it again award
>>220998561some nice sweet jam will ease that tummyache
>>220998608:Dmoar like this pls
>>220998669This is the only one I saved
>>220985439You don't conquer 1/3rd of the world by being a nation of pussies.
>>220985439why would he do that?
>>220999511He was trying to conserve bullets.
>>220985439this is how baseball started
