[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


People pretended to like this movie for one week.
>>
>>220988889
don't forget the 100s of Beavers movie. that still has 97% on rottentomatoes.
>>
I still like it and the show.
>>
>>220988889
haven't seen the movie, but the show was really funny and if you disagree you're objectively wrong
>>
>>220989298
no you don't. you're not even real.
>>
>>220988950
I didn't get the appeal of this one. So its an old cartoon but overly long and cheap live action so no animators or any people with talent get to work on it?
>>
90% of the references appeal to a very specific niche
>>
the show is hilarious but the movie sucked
>>
>>220989695
yeah this movie was made 100% for white guys
>>
>>220989962
I wouldn't say it sucked but it could have been better.
>>
>>220988889
Loved the movie. Both shows are better though. You could tell they were trying to reach a wider, blinder audience with the film



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.