I can't believe how much a low-budget movie made by a Zoomer is single-handedly streamrolling the entire Hollywood establishment.
>>221002167idk I think it was pretty obvious nobody gives a shit about he man and that the movie would flop hard, I did cop the fortnite skin though.
>>221002167>BPD whore meme movie destroys He-Manyou cant make this shit up
>>221002167Ah, another Jared Leto joint that fails to make money?IT'S SKELETORIN TIME
>>221002251go back
>>221002321No.
>>221002167That zoomer is a Hollywood plant to try and get people to watch movies again. There is nothing authentic about him except that he is probably down with raping kids
>>221002167it's better than marvel flicks!
>>221002167>made by a Zoomerwhere's the recognition for 4chan though
>>221002251I actually think it's a shame. Bet (not unlike Frank Langella in the Dolph Lundgren version) he'd actually had himself a good time with the role.
>>221002167>fourth weekend hahahahahahaha
HOW COULD THIS BE? WHY DON'T PEOPLE WANT TO WATCH A LIVE ACTION ADAPTATION OF A 50 YEAR OLD TOY COMMERCIAL??
Why would any zoomer give a shit about an 80s cartoon?
>>221002349>plant a guy in the industry with the single instruction of making a good film so as to convince audiences to see movies againWorks for me
>>221002349Man you guys are really psychotic
>>221002408He-Man is from fucking 1982. 1982. You have any tangible memories of it, you would have to be born in the 70s. There's been no major reboot that's had a huge pop culture impact. It's not like Transformers, which had Beast Wars, and all this other stuff. It's literally always been known as that gay Conan ripoff for babies. It's crazy Hollywood even tried with this shit.
>>221002251he's the best part of the movie
>>221002212If you play fortnite you don't belong here.
>>221002429Some kike producer blew the dust off his IP rights after the Barbie movie succeeded because “toy movies are big right now.” I bet you 1000$
>>221002429It was a thing until the early 90s. I was born in 90 and I remember watching it, even had some toys.I'm not sure how successful was the netflix's he-man sequel, but I guess it was good enough for them to make a movie.
>>221002429we need more adaptions of 90s saturday morning cartoonshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VI__EW_fPJs
>>221002167What's the problem? It's got le white man front and center. Isn't this what you asked for?
>>221002494I was born in '96, I remember they had show on toonami in the early 2000's so even uo until that point the franchise was squeezing money from boomer parents
>>221002494It was animated like a 70s cartoon and was heavily overshadowed by anime-style cartoons from the mid-80s like Transformers and GI Joe and Ninja Turtles. One reason why the 1987 movie with Monica flopped
>>221002429I for one watched He-Man cartoons on VHS in the 90s!They weren't very good compared to shit that was on TV at the time, though
>>221002167He-man was woke simple as
>>221002212People still like he man. They don't like numales being pumped up slightly to play the strongest man in the universe, race swaps, pants on every female when there was none in the cartoon, killing the king and oh of course, Leto, even if he did do halfway decent. They made every wrong choice here and stuck their fingers in their ears. Can't blame us.
>>221002834who the fuck cares about He-Man?the only cultural relevance it had in the last thirty years was Gen Xers making gay jokes
>>221002167they put teela in a body suit lolso no man wanted to see it
>>221002349>made a good movie as a psyop to trick people to watch moviesIt's so crazy it just might work.Reminds me of some old sitcom where a guy wanted to cheat on an upcoming test so he memorized the class material to write down the answers 'in his mind' and he thought he was very clever and sneaky.
>>221002857>"Nobody likes He-Man, yet they made a movie about him and we're talking about it"Do you even process your bullshit thoughts before you type them?
>>221002951yeah, a retarded movie that floppedthat people only talk about because it was such a retarded idea to make it in the first place
>>221002834Dude the he man cartoon was already lame IN THE 80S, the toys were cool but they were different from the cartoon made for babies
>>221002167I feel really bad for pic relShe’s been saying for months how it’s always been her dream to star in a blockbuster movieIf this doesn’t make money her A-list career might be over and she might have to start appearing in low-budget erotic films
>>221002951They keep trying and failing to reboot he man because it made Mattel a fortune in the 80s, Mattel doesn't realize yet how fucking lame he man was that would never work today
>>221003097>All the riverdale cast is stuck in dogshit doing dogshit>The most successful cast from the series is that asian dude who does romcomsLame...
>>221002653>>221002494Yeah. I forget it was that old. I was eight in 1990 and had a ton of the toys. Maybe it was older stock. And I guess it was reruns on syndication and old tapes I watched.
>>221002408Or a millennial, for that matter.
>>221002408>>22100312870s rock was before my time and I like it. Hell, I remember realling liking swing and big band stuff from my grandparents time when they had that resurgance in the 90s.
the masses dont care about theaters anymore. the only people still propping up the industry dont care about slop. you guys are thinking about this all wrong
>>221003111Lili Reinhard is doing okay I think
>>221002951have a (You) friendwell done
>>221003138But you listen to actual good music from the 70s, not cheap trash made for little children to sell toys that you'd only like for nostalgia sake.
>>221003138it's a toy commercial that was done and dusted in the mid-80s anon
>>221003111She deserves better, don’t you think?
Brothers...
>>221002429I was born in 1983 and remember playing with the toys when I was very young, but I don't remember much of the show though I had seen it. I think stuff like Thundercats probably held up a lot better in people minds because they showed reruns of it well into the 90s.
>>221003221>tattoosNope
>>221003221No, not at all
Apparently Camila Mendes regualslry gets informed by casting producers that she’s “too white” to play Latina roles
Who the fuck actually wanted to watch he man
>>221002167Isn't "Leto the Box Office Poison" in this movie?
>>221002167>I can't believeyou're a stupid faggot
>>221003456It's practically a dead ip, the audience simply doesn't care, they tried to revive it with two Netflix shows and both failed.
>>221003439>>221003221>>221003097Fuck her; Tella is not a spic.
>>221002167>Hello 16 year old. Which would you rather watch?>Movies made by people close to your generation that capture and portray the struggles and interests of your generation, or would you like to see nostalgic cash grabs for man-children in their 50s?I haven't seen Obession or Backrooms but I'm very happy to see the younglings get movies that they seem to like and connect with and I really hope this modern trend of endless nostalgia fucking dies the horrible death it deserves. I'm not even against the idea of bringing back old ideas from time to time but it's so clear that Hollywood has become drunk on it's own memories and refuses to let go
>>221003539Or named "Tella".
>>221002951>they made a movie about him, so he must be popularYou are allowing Hollywood executives to control your thoughts
>>221003623It's not even popularity.It's a recognizable IP - that's all that matters.That's what makes it stand out in a sea of random shit to consume.It's why anyone is even talking about it.
>>221002429the movie isn't flopping because it's woke it's flopping because the IP isn't interesting and it looks like a 2012 movie
>>221002429There was a cartoon in the 2000s. As a millenial I grew up in the 90s with He-Man toys but wasn’t a huge fan later. I think the cartoon was quite good though but I only saw a couple of episodes at most
>>221003097They bleached this girl with makeup for this role, she doesn’t look this white in some photos
>>221003686It might be flopping in part because pretty much everything is woke. How many people just don't care anymore and don't want to chance it? The demographic group who would have been nostalgic for this have seen films change a lot and mostly for the worse.
>>221002429they hated anon
Not watching it because of nigger man at armsHe was always my favourite character and don't want to see him destroyed.
>>221004573Explain how he was destroyed.
>>221004672He is a nigger duhLike I said, I didnt watch the movie
>>221002167>cast some faggot twink gypsy to play He-Man>make the women wear burkasGee, I wonder why it failed.
I haven't seen this shit yet, but they've completely fucked up Cringer's voiceIt's just a normal person's voice
>>221004573Correct opinion and actions detected.
>>221002469You anons are so retarded. Hasbro/Mattel announced this years ago after the success of the mark wahlberg transformers movie. I swear you mouth breathers don’t even pay attention. Zoomzooms must be destroyed.
>>221002951The movie is fucking flopping. It was a retarded idea. The franchise started in 1980. To be conscious of He-Man during its original run you’d have to be minimum 45 years old. What 45+ year old is going to sit through a 2.5 hr commercial for toys of a franchise old enough to have died of cervical cancer? This was a passion project for someone in Hollywood that was a bad idea and they should feel bad for putting it into action.
>>221002167They missed the boat hard on the gen x nostalgia bait
>>221003221>Build a home????
>>221004749Don't you mean Michael Bay's Transformers movies
>>221004802No, because Hollywood back then still relied heavily on the three movie trilogy formula. Michael Bay was only ever going to make 3 movies. After studios realized they could pump out old IP a la Marvel and audiences would eat it up as long as it was recognizable franchises. After the Wahlberg transformers movie succeeded despite being absolute shit (same with the Bumblebee movie and the hot jewess who I want to impregnate with my penis), Hasbro, Parker Bros and Mattel opened the flood gates (along with everyone else to be fair).
>>221003591retard zoomer child…this is in itself nostalgia. copying an old 4chan post known for years. and the context it comes out of is also old and lame (creepy pastas). and how much do you want to bet hollywood is balls fucking deep in both obsession and back rooms?
>>221002167It's just more fucking 80s nostalgia bait, this time for a toy commercial. I want all the millennial nostalgia shit to burn in a fire and I'm happy lil zoomies are watching something that's not a sequel or reboot instead. Even if it is just the wishmaster premise. Go forth and make more low budget movies.
>>221004782>The movie is fucking flopping.It's flopping because they made every stupid choice, as evidenced by the 5+ threads up on this very board right now saying as much.>o be conscious of He-Man during its original run you’d have to be minimum 45 years old. What 45+ year old is going to sit through a 2.5 hr commercial for toys of a franchise Ones that have kids maybe? Idiot?> This was a passion project for someone in HollywoodYes, someone who thought and they still think with just the right amount of tweaking, they can pussify something that was pretty masculine and great. Won't work though, can see it failing in every franchise they try.
>>221002834none of the adaptations can even get how he says "I have the power" right. https://youtu.be/7yeA7a0uS3A?si=ur_FpGBu7MJGqO-X&t=32
>>221004918>Ones that have kids maybe? Idiot?i didn't see anyone with kids going to the theater to watch this yesterday, it was mostly 40+ years olds.
>>221002349Jared Leto is not a zoomer, no matter how much he wants to look like one
>>221004929>he paid to see something obviously badis torrenting the camrip really so hard.
>>221005195im not poor so the price of a movie ticket is inconsequential to me.
>>22100491845 year olds aren’t taking their teenager to see a schlocky blockbuster for a franchise that has been dead for 3 decades. No teenager wants to see He-Man either. A teenager wants to see Obsession or Backrooms, and so does the 45 year old. If they don’t want to see either of those two, they want to see I Love Boosters or Scary Movie. There is no audience for this, Marvel movies oversaturated the market for the past 20 years and teens don’t give a fuck about a walking skeleton man and his overmuscled nemesis.
>>221002892The movie is 69-31 men according to deadline. The real problem is that its only playing to men over 40Who could have predicted some toy from the 80s wouldnt have much appeal to people younger than 40?
>>221002533I recall that the X-Men, also Batman and Iron Man and many other comic book superheroes had their own 90s cartoon shows. Theybshouldnthink about adapting them for live action film.
>IS THAT... AN EMPTY ROOM?!>OH NO I'M GOOOOIIING INSAAAAAANEEEE!
>>221005523They already did too much shit with all those franchises, and would just have confused wider audiences with yet another different version.But they did an actual sequel cartoon to the 90s X-Men show.
>>221004918>Ones that have kids maybe? Idiot?Kids don't give a shit about He-Man, retard.
>>221005568an empty cinema, now that's terrifying
>>221002349I thought he was just some guy who started out on YouTube but it turns out his dad is actually a world renowned playwright.
>>221005880another nepobaby makes it big, surprise surprise
>>221002167>comedy/parody instead of a fantasy movie>trailer was shit and set in real world>called masters of universe, when people mostly know it was "he-man"its like they wanted it to fail
>>221002349>zoomer meme+black guy as the main actorand people told me woke era is dead, get ready for trump to remain president and accelerate world war 3. This is your fault libtards.
40+ boomer here.If i want to satisfy my 80s nostalgia i watch movies from the 80s.If i want to see He-Man i'm going to watch the Lundgren one because i liked it when i was a kid.I don't care about nostalgia bait movies. In fact i hate modern movies, modern actors and the "quirky" fags writing and directing all this bullshit. You can stop making this trash, i'm not interested.
>>221003539Everyone is so fat.
>>221002951They made a movie because Mattel saw Barbie do so well and thought time was ripe for more toy movies, you stupid fucking idiot.Actually that’s a good point: women shower up for Barbie and made it one or the biggest movies of the year. Middle-aged manchildren once again failed to show up. And it’s nothing to do with “woke” and everything to do with the fact that He-Man hasn’t been relevant in decades and there is no demand for it now and the “fans” don’t care enough to support it because they’re too busy whining online about stupid shit
>>221006199He-man was never supported as a brand by Mattel. They kept trying to relaunch, but it always failed. It has has following among boomer, gen x and some millennial toy collectors, but it's an old man thing. It's not like Batman or Spider-man that constantly has cartoons, comics, video games and never really goes away. He-man has been gone from the public eye for decades. Barbie constantly had new toys for forever. Doesn't matter what kind of movie you make, he-man doesn't put butts in seats.
Why aren’t people buying tickets to see her (and her ass)?
>>221007069Middle age men are still mad at Teela because of the Kevin Smith cartoon apparently.
I'm not watching a Leto movie.
>>221002429bon in 1973 really enjoyed he-man as a kid. infact Masters of the universe was the first ever video i rented when i was 16 and old enough to join a video store.I'm not watching because it doesn't hold as much nostalgia or as big of a universe as something like transformers, which was out around the same time. funnily enough i went to school with Idris elba. which is another reason i ain't watching.
Also they rebooted the he-man cartoon as woke shit a couple of years ago, So nope not gonna to reward that bullshit.
>>221002429>He-Man is from fucking 1982. 1982.Batman is from 1938. 1938.You dumb children have the most retarded takes.
>>221008156Batman has been getting contemporary reboots, cartoons and comics every decade. It's competely different. He-man has been irrelevant since the 80s.
>>221002167Chuds are like the woke faggots. They scream and cry for stuff to catter them but they don't show up as well.
>>221008236Most chuds don't actually want stuff to cater to them, they just want excuses to be angry and throw tantrums.
>>221008236chuds crying about free speech and regulating big tech went really quiet the moment they got into power
>>221002951A movie that flopped, retard.No one cares about He-Man except for a handful of obese Gen X weirdos
>>221002167Zoomers are tired of the factory line mentality of 80s nostalgia in hollywood. Tired of Star Wars. Tired of Star Trek. Tired of superheroes that have been around from the 1960s.Zoomers want the CREATION of new ideas and new stories, not the recycling of shit that has been forced on audiences for decades.
>>221002420No no, he's onto something.It's actually a genius ploy...Hollywood execs trawl the internet for young talent, give them millions of dollars to make a unique and interesting movie that will appeal to audiences, and then before they know it they've been TRICKED into enjoying movies!So crazy it just might work...
>>221002167I can. Hollywood brand milking strategy is shit. Everything they do looks the same. Same themes, same messages, same visuals. They need to go back to the singularity and risk of trusting authors rather than marketing teams, statistical data and whatnot. They need to get back to honest, more human film making. Can´t do that and social engineering though so it may not happen any time soon.
>>221002167But Hollywood produced that other movie as well
>>221007650>Does that cartoon feature a girl? You've lost a customer for life!Cringe.
>>221008413true idk why basedboy millennials are so fucking obsessed with super heros and star wars..like nigger there have been 10 spidermans, 8 avengers and 8 other random super hero movies and the 6th star wars how are u not tired of ts?
>>221008854Blumhouse picked it up as a distributor. They didn’t finance it
>>221008413>Zoomers want the CREATIONWe all know about Skibidi Toilet and The Emoji Movie.
>>221008394It flopped because they did it wrong, not because no one likes it dipshit
>>221008971That´s not the issue and you know it. A woman taking the lead is not the same as the whole subversion of the gender roles they keep pushing. Teela is supposed to be like wonder woman you know, not quite as strong as Superman but still capable of beating him through strategy, experience and technique. Teela is that for He-man but they didn´t want a strong female that remained female, they gave her male traits. Double so for Evil Lynn when she gets the sword (as if they didn´t understand the sword enhances the innate latent traits. By right Evil Lynn should have turned in some sort of super feminine sorceress but again, they drew a muscular dude with tits). If anything it´s them who shy away from femininity and consider it weakness. In fact when they emasculate He-man that´s what they do, they turn him into a damsel in distress. There is clear recurrent ideology on these constructions. Ideologies that are being rejected by men. Men don´t want to be passive or to subordinate their own desires to what others expect of them or want them to be. Because that seems to be the message on these products.
>>221009784Men really are insecure and fragile
>>221009851Mostly white American men.
>That´s not the issue and you know it. A woman taking the lead is not the same as the whole subversion of the gender roles they keep pushing. Teela is supposed to be like wonder woman you know, not quite as strong as Superman but still capable of beating him through strategy, experience and technique. Teela is that for He-man but they didn´t want a strong female that remained female, they gave her male traits. Double so for Evil Lynn when she gets the sword (as if they didn´t understand the sword enhances the innate latent traits. By right Evil Lynn should have turned in some sort of super feminine sorceress but again, they drew a muscular dude with tits). If anything it´s them who shy away from femininity and consider it weakness. In fact when they emasculate He-man that´s what they do, they turn him into a damsel in distress.>There is clear recurrent ideology on these constructions. Ideologies that are being rejected by men. Men don´t want to be passive or to subordinate their own desires to what others expect of them or want them to be. Because that seems to be the message on these products.
>>221005290>they want to see I Love BoostersI don't know about that one anon.
>>221002167It's John Carter all over again.MotU deserves to be a hit.
this movie is 15 years too late
>>221009763There is no alternate reality where a god damn He-Man movie makes a ton of money at the box office in the year 2026. Even if this movie came out in 2008 on the heels of the success of Transformers it would have underperformed.
>>221002834No, that's you. The general population doesn't even remember who He-Man is.
>>221002429Hey man I liked the early 00s versionStill not seeing this movie because it is cowardly: set on earth, ironic poisoned shit. If you're going to do He-man, roll with it, don't act ashamed
>>221009851Women are insidious ruiners.
>>221005571>But they did an actual sequel cartoon to the 90s X-Men show.No one counts that shit
>>221010211Yeah your mom really was a shameless town whore
>>221008432>Hollywood execs trawl the internet for young talentExcept when it's almost always nepotism.
