1) Take another guys video2) put it into a live stream for the youtube donations $$$$3) Every 2 minutes the YT adds play4)Guy talks super slow5)Pauses the original video every minute>Ahaha yes AHAHA you can say it like that 6) nonstop interrupts this because someone donates $5>Ay hes thank you "mega fart fagot" for $5!7)Reads someone elses comment>Yes that is a good point "dick sucker 69"This garbage is unwatchable. Zoomers are degenerates.
I don't understand this trend of "reviewing the reviewer". Wouldn't it be easier to review that they reviewed and make a counterpoint? Why review a review? Yeah yeah money and autism, but why?
report eceleb threads as off topic
>>221007269It's a debate in video formThe want to address that person specifically
okay so why'd you watch it for 3 hours then commit the mental energy of making this thread i don't think anyone on this board thinks this youtube slop nobody else has watched is high art. you're fighting shadows
>>221007269I prefer reviews of reviews of reviews because at that point I can be certain that the information density is so low I can comfortably treat it as background noise without any anxiety about possibly missing anything of value by not paying attention (I'm not a Zoomer, just retarded)
>>221007269YouTube used to have video replies, you know.
Thanks for consooming like a good goy, gramps. Stay cucked
>>221007269>but why?FOR THE MONEY!>Have no ideas for a review>Simply play someone elses reviews while you not to it every 5 minutes>Give shutouts out to zoomers who give you $5>>A yes thank you "mega fart fagot" for $5!>>221007321>okay so why'd you watch it for 3 hours then commit tWAtched is a big word here1) See it is a retarded live stream2) Speed to 200%3) Into is waiting for the fagot to start>jump 30 minutes forward4) Listen to some of that slop5) Decide it is trash jump forward 50 minutesSame trash6)Quit video
>>221007299>It's a debate in video form>The want to address that person specificallyOnly they never do it.Like there are people who actually criticize a review and there are fagots who literally nod to the video who plays providing nothing of value And only interrupt it with>THANK YOU MANCHILD 89 FOR DONATING $2!>>221007376>YouTube used to have video replies, you know.YES and this is not it!Video responces:>Cut out parts of the video that are irelevant>If the boring segment is to long summarize it with>>He did go like this foe 30 minutes saying nothing!>Add counter points.
>>221007269well he knows he'll get hate views from RLM fans.
