File: 2.jpg (397 KB, 1290x1863)

397 KB JPG

>>221016041

How to absolutely FUCK your entire career before it even STARTS
>be art director
>work hard at your gig for years
>work with a promising, young fella who makes Youtube shit
>get the job for a film he's been given the green-light to make
>get fucking PAID
>probably have the time of your life over several weeks while getting PAID
>the film turns out to be magnificent
>holy shit
>you were a fucking PART of this
>you can put this on your fucking C.V. and show cunts EVERYWHERE
>get real paid for more real work, on bigger and brighter projects

BUT WAIT

>decide to be a cunt and complain, instead
>"wahhh wahhh wahhh I seemingly wasn't paid what I was WORTH"
>burn it down
>burn it all DOWN
>make sure that fucking NOBODY in the industry will EVER want to work with you, despite how seemingly skilled you are

Women in the 21st Century in a nutshell, folks.

File: 1766339913298208.png (442 KB, 800x450)

442 KB PNG

>the art direction

>>221016041
i heard about this drama and wondered why someone would choose this approach, and first time i saw her pic here, it now makes sense. a Suey Park

>>221016041
>literally just empty liquor bottles on a table
>art direction
these people are insane

>>221016198
She will get some likes tho

This is clearly an op by hollywood executives
>oy gevalt we cant let this little zoomer upstart into this thing of ours, quick levi make some calls and see what dirt we can dig up

>>221016264
Not enough to salvage the absolute fucking TRAINWRECK she just made of her CAREER.

>>221016041
Remember that GTA actor who complained how he only made so much money when the game made hundreds of millions? I get it. It’s a lot of money. But it didn’t make that much money just because of you.

And if the movie did poor?

>>221016198
and "people told me not to 'flip' the production and i naively listened" bit to blame other people for the decision overall

>>221016283
In his defence, Steven Ogg has always been a whining, ugly cunt.

>Flipping a film production means transitioning a project from non-union to union status after filming has already begun, which introduces new requirements for payroll, contracts, and working conditions. This change can significantly impact the production's budget and schedule due to higher costs and compliance needs.

>>221016283
>>221016299
Rockstar is notorious for seeking out inexperienced talent who they know they can lowball on contracts, but it's pretty telling that Trevor's VA (the only one to actually get roles afterwards) was the one who bitched whereas Michael and Franklin's just seemed to be happy to have been a part of it

File: 1720538849990.jpg (204 KB, 1280x720)

204 KB JPG

>it's another "women can't negociate salaries" episode

>>221016041
I don't understand, what the fuck do she expect? She's not even the director. Just being able to put the name of the film on her CV is worth enough, because it will allow her to work again.

>>221016273
not really they are just going to ignore it because retroactive salaries are not a thing

>>221016343
>because it will allow her to work again.
not anymore
I wouldn't hire her on a zero budget indie after this, just a total nightmare person larping as a creative
a lot of those in the industry, upwards of 95%

>>221016198
Everyone wants a “big score” these days because they’re not even hiding that the current economy is a house of cards with no long term feasibility.

>>221016041
Isn't this standard in the industry? Didn't the creator of squid game say something along the lines of "its not like Netflix will give me a bonus on top of what they already paid me just because it was a global hit."
The whole point is that now you can put this in your resume and start commanding higher prices. I'm sure the squid game guy got a serious pay bump for season 2.
Seems like this person was on the same track, able to 10x their rate and production houses would gladly pay it. Instead she's showing herself to be a whiny cunt that doesn't want to follow the established rules. Wouldn't surprise me if this post actually hurts her career.

>>221016438
Bonuses are a thing but a literal who can't negotiate that kind of shit, they get a flat salary but she want more because the movie is popular.

I really don't know why you would say something like this. At least get some use out of it on your resume first

>>221016328
For a union-covered studio film in the U.S., the minimum ("scale") for an Art Director is set by the Art Directors Guild contract.

For the current 2025-2026 wage schedule under the Hollywood Basic Agreement, the minimum weekly rates are:

Classification Weekly Scale
Art Director (first 6 months in industry) US$4,103.82/week
Art Director (second 6 months) US$4,552.88/week
Art Director (thereafter) US$4,988.70/week
Assistant Art Director US$3,766.15/week

And those are the MINIMUMS

This is why every movie costs $100,000,000

>>221016041
"Art Director" sounds fancy but its a low level grunt job. Roughly equivalent to "Camera Operator". Dont know what this idiot is complaining about. Did she expect to get residuals for arranging props on the set? Hope no one hires this delusional retard again.

>>221016198
This is why people with victim complexes can't be taken seriously.

>agree to work for rate
>bitch about being advantage of
how the fuck do women work bros

>budget is 750k
>"art director" is paid 7k

Sounds about right, really. An "art director" means fuck all. What did she even do? Select clothes and color match cushions on set? Give "vibe instructions" about mood lighting? Approve the title sequence typeset?
The real vector of complaint is that all the extra profit is going to the studio or wherever, since she didn't have it in her contract that she gets a cut of the take.
What's really stupid is that she thinks an "art director" would ever get a cut of the take no matter what.
That's reserved for high tier cast and crew that negotiate that into their contracts because of their clout. OR if the production is so cheap that everyone gets paid "later", which is extremely rare.

Either way a lot of young people these days simply don't get how capitalism works.

>>221016356
They are, it's called asking for points when you draw up your contract.

>>221016548
Can't blame her for being salty now that the movie is a hit and those profits are going into specific pockets, but she should be more discrete about her seething.

There's only really one way to read this in the industry and that is "she's being ungrateful".
She also seems to think her job and career are guaranteed but in reality it entirely depends on whether studio people want to hire her specifically. Plenty more "art directors" out there that will not bring bad publicity.

and Eddie Van Halen didn't get paid for the solo in Beat It. Who gives a fuck?

>>221016041
I wish we could reset the internet to the 2000s. All these fucking people with a speaker.

>>221016622
which this dumb bitch didn't do and literally no one does on small indies like this you fucking retard
crying like this in public is something no one in the industry would ever do, it signals you're a nightmare to work with

>>221016041
Fucking Sohla ass bitch. Never working again, lmao

>>221016333
no but for real
300/day is low and you can argue it's not enough but that is also what department heads make on the lowest tier UNION sets (tier 0, which is for films like Obsession with <$1mil budgets) - that is to say, even if the production had flipped union, her rate probably would have been the same.
dumbest shit she did was overextend herself (if they want you to take on new responsibilities beyond the scope of your original role after hiring, you push back and tell them to hire more people, they will come up with the money) and not keep track of her mileage for reimbursement. Why would you take any job that won't reimburse you for mileage? That's just illegal. Every production manager and department head has told me reminded me to keep track of my mileage for reimbursement.
everything else is just her being naive
>they sent me to wrap a location out which was trashed and I had no water
you pack your own water. if you're not with the shooting crew, you can't expect snacks and water, even on union sets. If it was an absolute hazmat nightmare, you send pics to the production manager, say you're not dealing with this shit and bounce. You're not the set janitor. put your foot down and keep the role distinctions clear.
>I shopped an entire location and loaded the whole truck in one day!
yes, and? that's an average day on any production in art department.
>the next day happened to be an overnight
yes, and?
>it took such a physical toll on my body that i kept losing weight
yes, and? I too lose weight on every production. For me, it's one of the major perks.

She didn't know what she was getting into. Probably what made her such an attractive hire.

>>221016198
>holy shit
>you were a fucking PART of this
>you can put this on your fucking C.V. and show cunts EVERYWHERE
>get real paid for more real work, on bigger and brighter projects
I don't know, I feel like this is largely a fantasy scenario for everybody but the director, because they get the meaningful name recognition, and can therefore boost audience turnout, and can therefore demand more, and get paid more, money.
A lot of behind the scenes roles are incredibly important for the quality and success of a film, but most audiences do not give a shit about them. For shit where name recognition matters to the average film goer,
Actor > director > producer > [power gap] writer > [massive power gap] > cinematographer > [power gap to irrelevancy] art director etc.
She agreed to the pay, so yes, it is on her for not asking for more, but I can still understand her bitterness. Even though Obsession was a hit, there's a good chance she would/will still go long stretches without a paying art director gig. People see her pay and think of it in terms of a stable, salaried job, with benefits, in which case it would be good pay, but this is not one of those jobs, which is precisely why they charge more, since you have to make enough money to bridge the gap between projects.
And in reality, this got her a LOT more name recognition than she ever would have had if she'd stayed silent, to the point that she probably did actually gain followers who otherwise never would have heard of her.

>>221016848
>And in reality, this got her a LOT more name recognition than she ever would have had if she'd stayed silent
Yeah, as somebody to avoid if you don't want your crew shit talking you to the entire world

>>221016997
There's no such thing as bad publicity, especially in today's social media world.

>>221016041
She's right.

>>221016198
You write like a faggot, kys

>>221017036
I appreciate you're in the industry and know more than me but that just isn't true
She mightve made herself more appealing to FacialAbuse but if i was a producer I'd be staying the FUCK away from her.

>>221017036
Anon, publicity doesn't pay the bills for people on the production side.
There's a reason why a lot of people wont talk shit about movies they were in, even if they're objectively bad, because its unprofessional, and will make people not want to work with you in the future because of that.
Also, the pay wasn't a mystery, all of that shit is agreed upon before they do anything.
If there wasn't any provision in there for points on the back end, or a bonus if the movie hit certain benchmarks, then that isn't anyone fault but yours for not insisting on them.
Hell a lot of times the people signing the check is going to be more than happy to pay you less NOW in exchange for points on the back because odds are good that a modern movie will never show a profit on paper to avoid paying those people.

>>221016041
>Art director got paid 7k
>Film cost 750k in total
Where did the rest 743k go? It's not like you need some very expensive film equipment in 2026. Is this a case of the main team giving themselves 100k+ salaries?

>>221016848
She's not being hired by the audience. She's being hired by other production teams who will recognize her association with success.

>>221017124
Found her.

How's that destroyed career going for you, love?

>>221016832
She's a woman, so she could get a pass

Remember Jesus and his vinyard story in the bible?

Kwab

Never getting hired again.

>>221016848
That's ridiculous that you thought the guy means that her name on the movie poster would draw audiences. He means that you show your CV to a new big production and it says "art director on HIT" and they go 'oh ok we might have something for you'. Where as if it doesn't have that they'd say 'do some more indies'.
There seems to be a new epidemic of very long, detailed posts that don't understand the basic premise of what they're about. Might even be the same sperg.

>>221016041
$7k for just 20 days of work? That's something to bitch about? These people are so fucking detached man.

>>221017036
>There's no such thing as bad publicity
this is such a dumb as fuck boomer ism its unreal are you people really this fucking stupid

>>221016041
>90lbs asian woman
Time to open that onlyfans bitch

>>221017036
Oh yeah, that really turned out great for The Flash.

>>221016548
Because they know their lying bullshit won't be called out by the MSM. Remember the US female soccer team crying foul about not being paid the same as the men, when it turned out they were offered the same contract as the men but turned it down for one with more benefits.

>>221017351
you know who got elected twice , so its a boomerism that can be backed up

>>221016198
Why work lmao
Use this to kickstart an onlyfans and then marry a successful streamer lmao

>>221017036
There absolutely is if you don't work in a public role. There is even if you do really, but in this case it's even less true.
Unless she's pivoting to making a fucking podcast or something there's little to be gained here

>>221017434
>Unless she's pivoting to making a fucking podcast or something there's little to be gained here
i mean what if she did tho?

>>221017480
Then it would be a cynical and calculated move instead of a woman moment. Might still not pan out, but there would at least be a logic to it.

>>221017434
Who would even listen to it? They'd check in for the first episode to hear about Obsession and never listen again. She's a nobody.

>>221017036
There absolutely is. The people who'd potentially hire her now know she's not worth the hassle, and those that "support" her outburst will forget about her within 48 hours.

>>221017167
actor salaries, permits, effects, etc. it adds up.

>>221016622
>when you draw up your contract.
thats not retroactive

>>221017531
>. The people who'd potentially hire her now know she's not worth the hassle
i mean you say that but that crazy lady from that failed concord video game who required people to address her as "doctor" or something still managed to find work afterwards, so like i dont think hiring managers pay attention as much as we think

>>221017562
you're talking to mostly incels who leave the house once a year anon

>>221017576
gaming and film are not comparable in any capacity you know it all fucking retard

>>221017167
trucks, trailers, and generator rentals
fuel for trucks and generators
catered meals and snacks for 40+ cast and crew members
hotel, office, and studio rentals
travel costs
permits, security
legal fees, clearances
insurance
walkie talkie rentals
tables chairs and popup tent rentals
lighting equipment rentals
grip equipment rentals
camera equipment rentals
fog and wind machine rentals

it adds up quick.

>>221016837
>300/day is low
In what fucking universe

>>221017546
>>221017601
Okay that makes sense.
What if you go ultra low budget, like those films that get shot in a single place, and only have half a dozen actors without any special effects.

>>221017637
Exlier Prime II.

>>221017385
You way overestimate your intellect anon.

File: 00219b8247170d55aede4c.jpg (128 KB, 500x404)

128 KB JPG

>>221016041
wtf. I'd like to make $300 per day.

File: 1749506896880439.jpg (196 KB, 1500x1521)

196 KB JPG

Communists be like "oh so I mowed the lawn for $20 and you get to keep all the $600,000 for selling the house?"

>>221016041
>I ONLY make $37.50 an hour!
>yes, I read and agreed to this rate beforehand but the film was more successful than I expected.

>>221017756
Nah tbf they should have went back and thrown half a milly or so at high level ppl on that film. (this wasn't blair witch...it did require art direction and everything else to make a low budget look like a proper cinema release)

>>221017837
>Nah tbf they should have went back and thrown half a milly or so at high level ppl on that film.
cool so the dumb bitch 'art director' wouldn't have qualified for that either you dopey retard
her job quite literally is 'move shit around on set so it doesn't look awful' and that's it
she's a step above a production assistant

>>221016041
Cute and entitled, how unexpected.

File: 1voCOCBz-8Onh5D2tBWO2pIOW(...).jpg (127 KB, 676x767)

127 KB JPG

>>221016041
>I've been holding a lot of weight
????
>No mileage
????
>This is the reality of most filmmakers
But she isn't a film maker?

>>221017756
This is inaccurate. Marxism is based on the Labor Theory of Value.

That woman's argument is explicitly that she should be paid more because the film did well, regardless of the effort she actually put in.

>>221016041
A small bonus should be given if a movie is successful but it's up to the producers.
But I bet this women is/was expecting a paycheck of 1million since the movie made 250 millions.

>>221016041
So what? And if the movie lost money, will she reimburse the cast and crew or whatever?

It's amazing that millions of executives all thought at the same time "Yeah, we want to fill our businesses with these whiny entitled cunts in the name of equality"

>>221017868
nah bruh i looked it up before i posted. art direction is pretty high up there.
>her job quite literally is 'move shit around on set so it doesn't look awful' and that's it
Painter > His job is too literally move paint around a canvas and depict an image that doesn't look shit.
The movie has made 150 milly. It was made for under a mil. We're talking about taking 5 mil off the top and throw a few hundred grand at the ppl who made the film happen.

>>221017981
This dude gets it

>>221016041
Do these dirty commies understand how capitalism works?

>>221016848
>And in reality, this got her a LOT more name recognition
Not the kind you think. She has now broadcasted herself as a backstabbing narcissistic little shit that has now made herself radioactive to future directors and a massive liability. She is now the equivalent of WNBA players worth multiple millions who bitch that they're not billionaires like LeBron.

>thread full of people excusing exploitation
Unpaid internships were always a scam. Is this any different? It seems like whoever is naive enough to accept this kind of thing (and who can't fight back) can be dismissed as a whiner, but that doesn't explain the people who succeed right out of the gate (arguably on their own merit) and to whom this label doesn't stick

>>221018024
This. Making $300/hr in an air-conditioned movie set environment is slavery. Inexcusable fascistic exploitation of workers.

>>221017992
>art direction is pretty high up there.
and I work on literal film sets and people like her are a diamond dozen and grossly overpaid for the non-work work that they do which is literally moving shit around on set at the request of an actual creative
you know it all zoomer faggot

File: 3eb91ad1d666c96c6757718df(...).jpg (123 KB, 911x1481)

123 KB JPG

>>221018066
>a diamond dozen

>>221018020
Did you not notice that for the last 10+ years every entertainment industry actually rewards brash fuckups like her?
People that get their name out like this fall upwards.
You're thinking in boomerism terms where they'll dislike her because she's mouthy, but being mouthy is exactly what they want these days since the name of the game is "destroying franchises". Bet you anything she's already getting calls from studios to get hired.
This kind of business likes people hungry for success.

>>221018049
I don't think it's slavery, I'm just pointing out that a lot of people will in one way or another negotiate some performance based compensation at the start and that's perfectly reasonable and doesn't get labeled this way. How do they do it? Good agents? Is it who you know?

>>221018066
okay, so whoever that actual creative you reference is, they should be given a few hundred grand. If she did nothing, she can fk off. But someone did something and they deserve a little respect in terms of money after the movie blew up in a way happens once in a lifetime.

>>221018120
thats not how any business or creative venture has ever worked in the history of the fucking world you naive bratty little communist larping faggot

>>221018119
>that a lot of people will in one way or another negotiate some performance based compensation at the start
except that's literally never happened once, you're being a know it all about something you have zero practical experience in
serious question have you ever had one single job in your entire life, be honest

>>221018119
I'd be astonished if even the writer or director get a kickback, you have no fucking clue how the film industry functions at even its most basic level

>When Jones was first approached about providing his voice work, production was spiraling over its modest budget. In order to save costs, George Lucas offered to give Jones points instead of salary for his role.
>Jones was dead broke at the time and, like everyone else involved at that point, was extremely skeptical of this silly space movie. So, in what might be one of the most regrettable decisions in film history, he rejected the points offer and demanded to be paid in cash… upfront. His full salary for the first Star Wars movie ended up being a grand total of $7,000.
>after his iconic role as the voice of Darth Vader in Star Wars, James Earl Jones' career flourished.

>>221016041
The amount of boomers reacting to this with takes in the line of "her pay was the experience she got from working in it" is staggering. If you work for non-union wages for what they sell you as this tiny indie movie with little chance of even breaking even and they need all the help from the crew they can get, and then those people get a profit in the dozens or hundreds of millions from your underpaid labor then no shit you will feel conned. Do those boomer retards don't understand that by endorsing this sort of practices they are paving the way to giving society away to indian, mexicans and jews?
>>221016198
>>make sure that fucking NOBODY in the industry will EVER want to work with you, despite how seemingly skilled you are
Do you understand that literally everyone in the studio system is unionized and indie movies get flipped all the time and no one unionized sees it as a bad thing?

>>221018151
it absolutely is, when it comes to the creatives. We're talking an individual here, but didn't keanu give away his royalties to the matrix stunt crew, millions. They all retired to their own island paradises after the films.

>>221018120
>No financial risk = no share of the profits
Everything else is cope

>>221018207
>Do those boomer retards don't understand that by endorsing this sort of practices
SAAAR I am posting so very well these points I am have making!

>>221018242
Nigger, that's literally what happened. She accepted a lesser pay under the pretense that the movie was most likely going to lose money.

'After the massive success of the independently financed film Iron Lung, creator Markiplier publicly announced he would be giving his crew a huge bonus because he had the power to share profits directly'

File: huh.jpg (7 KB, 259x195)

7 KB JPG

>>221016041
Wait a min, is this bitch actually complaining that she didn't got a share of the PRODUCER'S PROFIT???
Because all that revenue is basically that, it's not the actors royalties, nor director, nor any other than the guy that put the cold hard cash to fund this turd
Did she contributed in anything to the budget? anything from those 750k dollars? no? then she doesn’t get shit from it, simple as
Now, I know there's a way you could actually get part of it even if you didnt put money in the budget by negotiating a contract that allows you to earn a small percentage of the golden pot (good luck getting producers to agree to that as a meager art director tho), but this would also mean that she would have had to work 20 days without pay and then just hope that the movie did well to get a share of the revenue, and this is basically from profits, initial investment excluded, so if the movie bombed, she would have basically worked for free (thanks for the hard job either way, janny)
It's basically a high risk/high reward bet and women are naturally very risk adverse so she would have never agreed to that, she probably didn't even thought that this movie would do that well, and in the end, the only one risking his ass here was the producer giving the money, because as I said, if the movie bombed, he would have lost a lot too, and who's going to compensate for that? Yeah tough fucking luck

>>221018282
No, she accepted an average pay because this was an extremely low budget production for which she assumed no risk.

>>221018288
>this singualr exception that proves the rule means it shoudl happen every single time no matter what you need to pay caterers billions for star wars now retroactively
fuck off you dim lightweight

>>221018313
>Did she contributed in anything to the budget?
As a matter of fact, she did.

>>221018339
yeah negatively
I can promise you she also constantly fucked up the vibe on set 100% people like this are all teh same

>>221018339
No, she didn't, she got paid a salary so she was part of the budget deficit

it would be nice to give crew some bonuses if the movie does absolutely crazy numbers

>>221018339
No, she did not. You sound like the homos on the ig comments
>Yes, she took risks! She risked her health!!!

>>221018288
That's nice of him, but you dont become a massive producer by being charitable tho

>>221016848
>I feel like this is largely a fantasy scenario for everybody but the director
That's because you don't know anything and realy on thoughts and vibes. Everything after this wasn't worth reading.

>>221018379
>it would be nice
Awwwww!

>>221016198
This. We're in the era where stars can't even draw audiences anymore and you want to be a bitch?

>>221016041
>$7k for 3 weeks of "work"
Let me drop everything and weep for this wealthy bourgeois leftist.

>>221018282
What that anon described is not "literally what happened." You're an idiot. She has zero risk in this endeavor.

>>221016041
It was her first feature and had a small budget. As much as I think people should be compensated for their work she wouldn’t have been in a position to demand a high salary. This could have potentially led to bigger jobs which is what happens only now she’s got the image of throwing her colleagues under the bus

>>221017637
in jewllywood universe

>>221018379
A good chunk of the earnings the producers get is used to fund other productions later, is not ALL to the producers personal bank account, so no, chances are they wont do charity

>>221018379
Sure, but you should wait at least until the movie finishes its run to start getting uppity

>>221018379
>be talentless retard crew member
>literally just make sure the lights don't fall over
>literally feed people at noon
>that'll be 1.23M plus tip EACH

>>221018288
And what's the number? Enlighten us, what's the bonus in real terms?

I’ve seen people defending this saying you don’t know when your next gig will come and that’s true but you get paid for the job, not for what you do after the job is done

>>221018261
I'm ESL, yes, but I'm precisely trying to explain to retards like you why jewing your own people will end up with pajets and third worlders taking over because they are willing to work for nothing and then once they are in they will help their own. Look at Microsoft and the tech industry in general. I don't get it, man. Why erode our own societies? In my country, Spain, it's the same shit.

>>221017637
Good luck buying a house and starting a family making less than that lol

>>221018462
no bro you don't get it films need to be MORE expensive not less

>>221018444
sure, that's a given. That's why we're saying in exceptional circumstances, you take a little off the top. Not every film, not every film in a thousand. But a film that costs 750k and takes in 150 million, yes, it's common sense that a few million should be spread out among the higher ups in the making of it.

>>221018485
6k a month is pretty good. 72k a year.

>>221018493
>t's common sense that a few million should be spread out among the higher ups in the making of it.
meaning exclusively the producers who's sole job it was to provide the money
not some dumb bitch who spent a day buying empty liqour bottles at the prop shop and 11 hours standing around on her phone during filming
I can't express how utterly retarded you sound anon, its concerning

>>221018207
>her pay was the experience she got
No, her pay was the pay she got. You can whine and cry and say "noooo those sneaks PLANNED on making 300x their budget" but the reality is they only had a little money to work with and they hired people willing to work for that amount.
>indie movies get flipped all the time and no one unionized sees it as a bad thing
>people in the union don't mind when a production goes union
Is this supposed to be some kind of insight?

>>221018493
What if I was the producer who has just barely starting and low funds and suddenly I'm rich and now I can do more expensive movies, why should I cut those funds to pay some uppity leftists? Common sense is ignoring those retards for not knowing how to negotiate a contract

>>221016198
Is she trying to convert the perfect portfolio piece into victimhood and internet clout from feminists?

>>221018485
Whatever you say to excuse your own personal failures.

>>221018166
I worked low-tier jobs as a teenager and eventually did get into performance-based work. I don't know much about the process of making a movie. Are you saying someone in her position never could've gotten that position if she were asking for $x or y%, whichever is more? Equity was a popular model when Silicon Valley startups were more trendy.

>>221018549
Yes, because blacklisting herself seems more rewarding than staying put and slowly climb the business ladder

>>221018531
Keep in mind this is in Commifornia, that shifts in film productions are usually at least 12 hours long, and in a horror movie it's mostly all nighters. And these people need to book jobs so aren't constantly working and I assume she must have put a lot of work during pre-production and so on. So 6k is not that great.

>>221018582
I'm saying her role is a step above the person who runs to get coffee and that's obvious to anyone whos brain works or has a passing interesting in film
you stupid faggot

>>221018493
Maybe the director is willing to do that. I don't see the OP mentioning she ever discussed the issue with the director.

>>221018534
bro you're making it personal to this gook chick. Whoever contributed in a meaningful way to the movie deserves a little slice when it hits the jackpot.
Filmmaking is art, it's not brick laying. The creatives should see a little good money when lightning in a bottle hits. You keep downplaying the 'art director' role and say you have worked on films. Sounds like you worked on shit movies with shit people and feel you were looked over.

>>221018531
Doesn't even qualify you for a mortgage big enough to buy you a new 3 bed semi without a 30% deposit in the backwater shit hole I live in

>>221018626
literal writers and directors don't get those made up nonsense deals you're conjuring out of your odd head cannon you lispy sounding actual retard
I don't know how else to tell you that you sound like a naive grade schooler with zero life experience who has no idea what they're talking about

>>221018613
Are you saying this as someone who put blood, sweat and tears into the industry and is now reaping the benefits of that in a well-paying career in the industry, or are you just defending a bunch of "Jews" for low/no payment?

>>221016198
Women love temporary wins, this has been proven throughout history, they will ALWAYS find a way to fuck up a good thing, because me special now. Fuck the future, now now now!!

>>221016041
>waaah waaah waaaah i settled for a paycheck instead of a percentage but noq im gonna do a woman moment amd implicitly demand more money
Sit on it cunt

>>221018536
think what you're saying. If you produced this movie you took advantage of the good will of creatives who just want to work. The movie came in looking way better than 750k. Now as the producer you just hit the jackpot millions. You killed it. Yes, in this scenario you should compensate the ppl involved. You're still rolling in unbelievable money and we're talking about 2 or 3% of your profit to make a bunch of ppl whole. I'm not a commie, it's not about that.

>>221018664
>No-name literally who makes $7000 in 20 days
>This is low pay

>>221018658
You are talking to multiple anons and you sound mad. There is nothing wrong with taking your own side.

I'll pay her $350 a day
To not work on a movie at all

>>221018613
>Art director is a step above coffee getter

Holy shit kill yourself

>>221018535
>Is this supposed to be some kind of insight?
For whatever reason people want very badly to believe in this narrative of "haha dumb bitch won't work again", but it's mostly wishful thinking. The union will have her back and someone will throw a bone at her. And it's not like being the production designer of Obsession would have guaranteed her getting a next job regardless. A real problem in filmmaking is that politicking is more important than merit and she hasn't necessarily lost in that front.

>>221018119
it was a indie horror film made my a youtuber. It could have gone either way. Most of the time those are busts. $7000 for a month of work is amazing. You would be retarded to be banking on it making millions and asking for a cut of profits instead.

>>221018697
yeah everyone's an idiot retard to this guy. Says he worked in the industry, mad bitter.

>>221018624
Why talk things out when you can cause a scene online? Once she rallies the masses they will surely rise up to ensure she gets her cut before they lose interest in this story 24 hours from now.

>>221018690
>WTF? Her last name isn't even Greenblatt-Taylor Smith! What do you need $5000 for, anyway, goyi- I mean lady?! $2500 ought to be enough for anyone! Last time I charged someone $2500 for thr Hollywood art director crash course, they THANKED me for the privilege!

>>221018024
Being paid 300 fucking US dollars a day is good

>>221018753
>If you don't give me free money you're a jew

>>221018207
The people making all the money took on the financial risk

>>221016198
Chuddie she got her likes and clout, she WON

>>221018626
>Whoever contributed in a meaningful way to the movie deserves a little slice when it hits the jackpot.

lmaoooo
Do you think movie productions operate on handshakes and vibes? All of this shit is in contracts. You get a contract and you sign it, if you sign it you work for whatever was agreed in the contract, not some nebulous "get a slice" down the line.
If it did every person working on a production like this would start grifting and scamming and begging for money after the fact, making financing a logistical nightmare.
Yeah bro, just settle all the "slices" someone "deserves" after the fact. Guess what you're dealing with hundreds of people most likely and now everyone will start bitching they deserve a larger "slice" based on their estimate of what they were worth or how much more work they did than that "other person".
There's a reason contracts exist in the first place.

>>221018536
>why should I cut those funds to pay some uppity leftists?
First, because this feeds leftism. Second, because what kind of society do you think you're building by fucking over the people who tried to help you? It makes you even worse than a jew because at least jews will help each other.

>>221018802
thats not fair you need to pay the people who handed you sandwhichs and decided which knick knacks to hang on the wall millions

>>221016054
>it took such a physical toll on my body that I kept losing weight, weighting 90lbs during this production
It was just 3 weeks, what the fuck?

>>221018536
Based post fuck everybody anon they can fuckin die

>>221017385
*three times

If you own or have the rights to an art project that wasn't your entirely self-made creation and it blows up then the least you can do is turn around and give 1% to your most important colleagues. You should be shamed for being a greedy piece of shit if you act like one.

>>221018830
They sign contracts before starting work which establishes how much their paid. They can then make a decision whether it is worth their time.

Demanding more money after the fact based on how you "feel" is unserious behavior that will get you pushed out of the field you're working in.

>>221018120
you're arguing with a retard, bro. "Diamond Dozen".

>>221018829
>Do you think movie productions operate on handshakes and vibes?
Nah, I know. We're not taking movies in general (properly funded by a studio and for the most part everyone is happy to be there), we're talking these highly specific incredibly rare indie projects where everyone works for less money and then a studio picks it up and it explodes. In this situation, yes, the actors, and creative crew should be taken care of.

>>221018882
>give 1% to your most important colleagues

Maybe she wasn't an "important colleague".

>>221017637
In the film industry, that's the lower end. Rates are based on a 12hr day. Time and a half after 8 hrs of straight time. $300/day breaks down to $21.42/hr. That's low.
Consider this is also a freelance environment, when the job wraps, it could be weeks until the next 3-4 week gig. You end up working maybe 100 days out the year total. 100 days at 300/day is 30k/yr.
The money only looks good from the outside.

>>221018859
>>221018882
>>221018910
When was the last time you helped your mom do the dishes?

>>221018207
people with decades more experience and knowledge than you are "Boomers".
maybe you should shut up and listen.
or just stay poor and losing

>>221016041
>art director
so she was over paid
>>221016288
Oh, well, this just shows that she was right the whole time, and that she is a victim of not just the makers of the movie, but her friends as well. The most noble victim she is. Nobody has ever been as right, or suffered as much, as her.

>>221018775
>>221018771
What are you arguing--that she should have sought (the film industry's equivalent of) equity in writing up front, in writing? That she wouldn't be able to work in the industry if she did seek that? That seems unreasonable and a little sheisty. If anything, as an indie producer, I might be happy to take on the right talent on that basis, especially if the budget is stretched. I'm not saying you guys are wrong with these small points, it just strikes me as strange how passionately some people ITT are defending the other side of this equation. This isn't charity and that goes both ways.

>>221016041
>I MADE MORE MONEY IN 20 DAYS THAN MOST PEOPLE MAKE IN 3 MONTHS
>I'M GOING INSANE I CANT LIVE LIKE THIS AHHHHHHHH
I hate Hollywood so much

>>221016041
Would she be making this post if the movie bombed?

>>221018910
You're framing the situation as if she didn't already get compensated for her work, which she was.
She was already "taken care of" by being paid a fair wage.
She merely performed her job, she didn't take a risk by investing in the project.
IF she invested in the project her own money then she should partake in the profits, but she didn't.
She didn't take any risk whatsoever. The producers/financiers did and it paid off for them.
If the movie bombed they would lose money, but she would've been paid all the same.

>>221018930
I pay for her retirement community

>>221018917
>freelance environment, when the job wraps, it could be weeks until the next 3-4 week gig
>Choose to work a freelance profession
>Complain when you can't find enough jobs to earn consistently
>Act like it's your employer's responsibility to support your lifestyle

>>221018802
That financial risk would have been much, much higher if the crew hadn't worked underpaid. Can't you see it's scummy to ask people for help, to believe in your project, and then run away with all the money? No one is saying they should give the crew millions in bonuses. I don't think even the crazy asian bitch is asking for that much. But if they worked for, let's say, 50% of what they would have gotten in an unionized job then give them a bonus to put them at 150% of such job. That would be the decent thing to do at minimum.
>>221018885
And is it serious behavior to jew your workers? It's like you people truly want to be replaced by third worlders who will be happy to sign shitty contracts. And for what? Defend the honor of the rich?

>>221016041
People always do this shit for successful projects. Reminds me of when the VA for Niko Bellic did the same shit.

File: Get Done.mp4 (3.73 MB, 394x700)

3.73 MB MP4

Should this guy get a cut of all the profit from the house or business he's building in perpetuity?

>>221018915
1% is literally nothing but even when split among dozens of the most important people in any project the bonus can help them last long enough to build their career. People like you for caring about them too. Ruthless selfish sociopathic behavior has to be punished or we'll keep allowing the scum of the earth leading most major businesses. Having a competitive edge is important I don't see the point in defending greedy faggots since everybody on this site is a financial loser in comparison.

>>221018949
You're an 18 year old who discovered the word equity in a news article two weeks ago and think repeating it makes you sound intelligent.

>>221016041
Raise your rates, asshole. Say "I worked on this movie, it was really big" and if people are impressed by that, they'll pay what you're asking.

>>221019016
>And is it serious behavior to jew your workers?

What do you mean? She signed a contract and got paid what was set out in a contract.

Sir, are you employed?

>>221019016
100% agree.

>7k for 20 days is supposed to be a low amount
lmao

>>221019046
I've seen meth addicts lifting twice as that

>>221019050
Again, maybe she wasn't an "important colleague". Maybe "important colleagues" got a cut and she's just a whiny bitch that got left out for a reason.
Maybe the "value" she brought to the project wasn't there at all.

>>221017992
art direction is pretty high up there. I promise you she did none of it. It was a courtesy title thrown at her because they saw her hustle but didn't actually want to pay her more. Happens all the time, especially in art department, especially to women. you start as a PA, the lone production designer asks you to help bring some boxes to set from her car, next thing you know you're driving all over the valley in your personal vehicle not getting mileage picking up props with your own money because they didn't give you petty cash because if you back out now and start demanding fair treatment you'll look like you're rocking the boat blah blah blah next thing you know a week before wrap they're like you know we have these random art department positions we never filled, lets just hand out the titles to the dedicated PAs who helped move the furniture

and art director is a desk job. it's basically a draftsperson/construction foreman combo.

>>221019016
>ask people for help
They paid them for their help
>believe in your project
No, they paid them to work on it
>I don't think even the crazy asian bitch is asking for that much
She's asking to get paid twice since they paid her for her work
>let's say, 50%
Why?
>give them a bonus
They already got paid for their work

>>221019059
No, I have worked in an industry where equity agreements are common. I don't know much about the corporate world but you're acting like negotiating for something advantageous to you is blasphemy and taking the other side when it should be easy to acknowledge that anyone acting in their own self interest might want this.

>>221019046
If they made him work for below his union rates by telling him it was going to be a humble house for an old disabled couple but the guy did such a good job the owner decided to turn the place into a casino and is making hundreds of millions out of it, then, yeah, I think the right thing should be to pay him.

>>221019046
This retard is so fuckin kino

>>221019141
>YOU RAN A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS IN THE BUILDING I HELPED CONSTRUCT????
>YOU OWE ME A CUT OF ALL PROFITS FOREVER!!!
What next, the guy that cleans floors in the white house gets 1% of US GDP?

>>221016041
Would she be happy to give any of that $7000 back if it had flopped? No? Then shut your fucking mouth.

>>221019065
>>221019128
>>221019198
Are you unironically jews? The problem is that they accepted being underpaid under the false pretense that the movie was not economically viable otherwise. Anyone in the crew could have flipped the production at any moment and demanded fair wages, but they didn't because they believed in it. I seriously don't get why you would mistreat the people who believed in you and poured their sweat to realize your vision.

>>221019258
>they believed in it.
You got me all misty eyed

>>221016438
Obsession was self-financed and then picked up by Blumhouse.

>>221017167
Were you born today or something how fucking stupid can you be

>>221019258
The Hollyjew capitalist swine infects everyone, and amerifats see it as normal to work poverty wages and get no return.
Doesn't seem outlandish to give everyone involved a major bonus with a runaway success like this.

>>221016041
What a retarded self entitled foid. If Hitler came back to life he would shot her himself for being so fucking ungrateful. Be grateful you got a fucking job in this market.

File: 1509663897470.png (1.43 MB, 1600x1435)

1.43 MB PNG

>sign a contract saying "you will be paid x amount for working on this movie"
>be aware that movies make a lot of profit
>the product makes a lot of money
>"WTF BRO I WANT MORE MONEY"
why are humans so unbearable

>>221016041
she should be happy the movie didnt flop, now she has a good movie in her curriculum.

File: Inde-Navarrette-1-051226-(...).jpg (135 KB, 1500x1000)

135 KB JPG

The most important person in the whole production, Inde Navarette, was paid a luxurious $20,000 for her work

The funny thing is I don't see her shitting up Instagram furiously about her lousy payday on the hundred million dollar film

File: satalaugh.gif (2.18 MB, 640x358)

2.18 MB GIF

>i knew the rate and accepted because i didnt think the movie would be good
>BUT NOW THAT IT WAS I REALIZED I WAS GROOMED INTO IT BECAUSE I AM NAIVE TEHEE ~
kek

>>221019307

No, the correct course of action is to take the profit and invest in another project and then give the same cast/crew a higher paid job because the profits made it so you can invest more next time.

THIS is what you don't get. And this woman doesn't get it either because due to her bitching she will not be given the higher paid job in the next project.

>>221019307
>Doesn't seem outlandish to give everyone involved a major bonus with a runaway success like this.
The problem is whining and DEMANDING it. The movie's not even out of the theaters yet.

>>221019339
obviously she should have been gotten at least 100k. but she knows she'll be fine. The faces of the film will all get parts.

>>221019339
She must be a lot smarter than the average woman. IQ of 60, maybe even 70.

>>221019325
hopefully that curriculum won't matter and she gets blacklisted for being a whiny idiot

>>221019339
Well yeah she has an agent who will tell her not to, and she will make millions now

>take less risk
>demand more reward
L M A O
M
A
O

File: question.jpg (24 KB, 272x292)

24 KB JPG

>>221016041
is this the kind of woman who ends a relationship because the guy is poor and later learns the guy has money and asks if she can get a share of it on reddit?

>>221019339
What would she complain about? 20k I think would still put her above the SAG minimum rates and actors can actually leverage a hit into a better next job, while below the line workers may be stuck forever doing ultra low budget indies.

>>221018830
>>221018689
Niggers, they already got compensated for their work, their services cost was deducted from the budget, and they legally agree to that, their complaints are born out of greed

>>221019414
That's what the producers did.

>>221019339
>>221019389
>>221019404
She was already a SAG working actress, guys. Don’t believe these narratives.

>>221019404
>>221019339
Yeah I can't guarantee that she's going to become a superstar, but an indie hit like this guarantees someone exactly one (1) big movie
She'll clear a million dollars to show up in some Tim Burton flick or something and then that'll determine whether we ever see her again

>>221016848
>which is precisely why they charge more, since you have to make enough money to bridge the gap between projects
I wish I could work one month a year and get paid twelve times as much but I realize that's fucking retarded

>>221019469
yeah. she took literally zero risk and took a paycheck. crying afterwards because you didn't predict it would be a huge blockbuster is total bitchmode behavior. newsflash, 99% people don't predict financial situations accurately.

So if I'm bootstrapping an indie movie, am I going to fail if I offer people a small % for their work? What stops a moderately successful YouTuber who wants to break into film from doing this in practice? This whole discussion seems biased.

>>221016457
the thing is she could have negotiated. she chose not to/didn't even consider the option. she had an opportunity to work on an actual feature film after only one short film under her belt and jumped. She could have asked:
>well what are my responsibilities?
>are you going to rent me a truck to move all these props?
>are you going to pay my mileage when i use my personal car?
>are you going to give me a cellphone/laptop bump because I'm using it for work everyday?
>are you going to pay overtime?
>are you going to pay me more or hire an additional person when I have a forced call because we start filming an overnight at 9pm when I've been out all day shopping props for that scene?
>are you going to pay me a kit rental because I provide my own tools?
>what about when I have to get into a location to prep it for the next day's filming? Will there be security or a site representative? a working bathroom?
>will you be reimbursing for meals I buy when I'm away from the shooting crew preparing or wrapping other sets, which will be every day?
Every film has it in their budget to meet these demands. They are NOT unusual. Some are even legal requirements. But she was young and inexperienced. And when you're just starting out you think bombarding your potential employer with such questions will tank your chances. Eventually you realize it shows your potential employer this isn't your first rodeo and you don't fuck around. You gotta be your own advocate in this business, nobody else will do it for you.

>>221019477
i tell you, those 2 male leads be sweating right now. Neither of them are standouts and i dont think they'll fly off into success like the two fem leads will.

>>221019541
you don't hear about them because they flop and the people that are actually putting their money in and taking all of the risk want to minimize their losses.

>>221019465
I've noticed lately that there are a lot of delusional zoomers who think they are entitled to earn "living wages" for doing a full time job regardless of the conditions of the market. No, bitch. You're paid your worth. Do you think it's too little money for the little princess? Then fuck off, because someone else will be willing to do it for even less. Be thankful I don't make you suck my cock to give you the job. Now get the fuck out of my office and design me three more productions in different colors.

>>221016041
>Art Director of Obsession reveals she was paid $7000 working on the movie for 20 days.
a bloo bloo. i work for one month and only get 2k after taxes.

>>221019541
See >>221019474. Inde Navarrette was in the main cast of Superman & Lois, not some brand new discovery.

>>221019563
I'd guess it's more like you don't hear about them because the people publishing PR articles about these productions are all buddies with the producers...

>>221016041
Spoiled little libtard bitch. I'll kill anyone who thinks they can negotiate with me. I am the moist powerful.

>>221016198
she's an american asian, they are even more BPD than standard americans.

>>221016848
you forgot composer, that goes somewhere

>>221019541
Most of these movies flop and are made with the incredible good will of the crew who will work 16 hours for a month taking different jobs and getting paid like 15$-20$ per hour at most. This is an insanely rare success, where the producer/director decided to just jew everyone because spending even 1 million in bonuses would be too much.

>>221019564
LMAO based. Hollywood needs more Harveys and less of these communist zoomer fucks. Wagies get wagies wages.

>>221016041
7000 for 20 days is 30/hr if we're assuming long 12hr days, better if she was only on duty for eight. she also had the whole other 345 days in the year to make more money.

hopefully she gets absolutely bent over the next time she hires contractors or an auto mechanic, people who don't have an option to go and work for a multimillion-dollar operation and just soak the shit out of it.

>>221019550
This is the right take. Businessmen will always prioritize profit and will tell you any sob or inspirational story to make you work for less. If you fall for it, then you were naive and it was your fault. Learn your lesson and move on. Next time negotiate for a better deal, but keep in mind there's always someone there willing to do it for half, so don't get too greedy. Society moves forward because of the investors. They are the ones taking the risk. The workers are replaceable. You may be better than a Mexican, but you aren't twice as good and he asks for half, so be fucking thankful of what you get. If you don't like it, then move to Cuba or China and see if you like it.

>>221019564
They are also fiercely protective of immigrants despite the whole purpose of importing browns being to undermine wages.
>if u lose ur job to an immigrant u probably deserved it lol!
whoops sorry zoomie, looks like Gomez can arrange props on set as good as you can but for 10bucks an hour and a case of Modelo!

>>221016041
>>221016054
Too bad, so sad. She knew from the jump that it was a non-union production.

>>221016198
SPBP

but it’s not just women. Everyone in the SAG strikes a couple years ago were just as guilty of the same crime.

File: HEEM (1).jpg (77 KB, 828x947)

77 KB JPG

>>221016041
>>221016054
Is this bitch GENUINELY fucking RETARDED...?

does she realize she most certainly would've been a hot commodity having worked on such a successful film and prolly have a great career infront of her if she didn't open her retarded mouth...?
No one, especially in Hollywood wants to hire people airing shit like this, she'll be fucking radioactive now
What a retarded fucking career suicide lmao

>>221019742
Based and jewpilled

>>221019777
>she most certainly would've been a hot commodity
In what world do you live, man? Hollywood is insanely nepotistic. It's not a meritocracy. Below the line crew don't progress in their careers by having a breakout film and getting hired on that, but by being taken by a director/producer they have already worked on into their new project, which clearly wasn't going to be the case here, since there weren't even bonuses given.

>>221016497
She should have quit then? Or not done it? I don't understand. Did she miss out on other work? She got paid 7k for 20 days, which clearly compared to a union gig sucks. If the movie bombed, would she be saying anything? Does she want the 14-21k she's "owed" or what? Maybe don't jump to social media and try to get it out of the studio.

sometimes I think, naively, that the best way to make movies is to give residuals beyond a certain profit, and report it honestly. if it flops everyone gets paid, if it does well you get your money back plus extra and everyone gets paid more which hopefully has them lining up for next time.

>>221019742
Doesn't this depend on industry dominance? Failing that, too much of these cutthroat practices without a correspondingly good product will just result in people with modest resources outcompeting those with more resources eventually. It seems like you'd just be asking for tech companies (Google) to take your share of the pie eventually.

>>221019820
I think part of the reason why so many amerimutts aren't appalled about American workers getting jewed like this is that they really, really believe that their country still is a meritocracy and not controlled by jews, so when they read something like this they are like, well, tough luck, kid, but you're still young and you could have leveraged this into a better job, but you fucked up by complaining! It's like in their minds they still live at that time they could work part time in a McDonald's and make enough money to buy a house and two cars and if they did their job well they could go on to become managers or better.

>>221019947
No, you're right, her based and redpilled strategy to shit where she eats and literally never get hired again is much more rational

>>221019898
Do you believe in capitalism or do you believe in communism? Because America is a capitalistic country. It's what made us great and it's what the people want. It's that simple.

>>221016041
>750k budget
>doesn't understand the industry she is in

>>221019871
>lining up for next time
There are pajeets willing to do it for 1 dollar an hour every day
Sorry but we dont really need these entitled fucks, we dont live in a communist utopia

Unironically wasn't this supposed to be a NatSoc website? Why are you niggers supporting the jews here?

>>221016041
Does she also think the chinks harvesting rice get a fuckload of compensation if the demand for rice suddenly increases?

>>221019984
>capitalism means competition
>oy vey, not like that!

if the movie bombed she shouldve had to give the studio money

>>221019993
i'd rather not be around pajeets. the smell would be awful, plus the liability if we have to do any shooting involving a moving train

>>221020034
>show up to your designated employee workspace in the back of the local Amazon Data Center
>time to lock in for the day—as in your manager literally locks your Productive Employment CubiCage(tm) from the outside
>you just graduated from Costco University with a bachelor's degree and you're excited to begin paying off your debt to the Education Industrial Community
>make posts in this thread all day
>you'll be free one day, just like them
>just like them...

>>221020109
if it means saving a buck or two, i'll gladly huff up that curry stench. you can't get ahead without a few sacrifices

>>221016198
Social media was a mistake

>>221020135
I don't want to have to pay Union Pacific for repairs because we borrowed one of their locomotives and returned it with jeets gumming up the wheels.

>>221020131
sounds like her future job kek

>>221016599
All those jobs are done by wardrobe and lighting/cinematographer. My guess is all the shit around the apartment and the bar was her. All the trash and nasty looking stuff. Seems less like vision and more just doing what she was told but whatever.

>>221019993
You don't want to live in a country where this is an acceptable business practice. If the jeet takes 1€ for a 20€ job then you're compromising something, usually society or the quality of your product.

>>221020215
She could leverage this buzz into something and that might be better than whatever boomer bootstraps idea people ITT are promoting. Isn't that what this thread is for?

>>221016041
20 days for 7k, that's 10.5k a month, 126k a year.
what's the cunt's problem

Right wingers will endorse the root causes of all the things they will later complain about

>>221018531
>72k a year is a lot
The problem is you make 30k a year so anything more than that is insane to you

>>221020263
she can't leverage shit
maybe she should push for moviemaking to be more affordable so she can make 30/hr all year long instead of fighting for scraps on the handful of films produced each year

>>221020362
basically sums of the whole history of conservatism

>why don't right wingers feel pity for people in an industry that hates them??
>why yes I'm in favour of closing down coal mines and putting thousands out of work lol too bad chuds we have to save the planet.

>uh oh, they're saying things we don't like about the shekels
>quick, make it about imaginary partisan issues, race, gender or creed
Does anyone remember OWS? I can't believe they successfully replaced that with BLM. And the absolute STATE of this board in 2026, baka.

I don't understand it, man. It felt like just a couple years ago everyone was getting redpilled on the jews and on board with not being replaced by cheaper labor from the third world. But now everyone is like "You AGREED to get jewed, dumb bitch. HAHAHA!" and if you argue that cheap imported labor and a shitty economy are forcing people to agree on exploitative deals they are like "Then be glad you got the job because we could easily replace you with a mexican or indian, dumb bitch. HAHAHA!" What happened? Is this really what the right wing is going to be like? Just sucking up the jews forever to our extinction?

>>221019307
>capitalist
Anyone who uses "capitalist" to describe anything other than an economic system cannot be taken seriously. You're the equivalent of a whiny antifag or a third world 16 y.o. who thinks the word means greedy.

>>221020799
Nobody mentioned jews at all until you appeared, enjoy your ban, stormfront weenie

>>221020799
Catturd won the culture war.

>>221020840
ctrl + f says there are 20 instances of the word jew in this thread

>>221020865
Those were all partial words such as jewelry or ajewdicated

>>221018624
>I don't see the OP mentioning she ever discussed the issue with the director.
She thought she'd tweet about it to the whole world first. If she was smart, she would've talked to the producers first and covered her bases before throwing them under the bus. Now she just looks like a whiny art director or whatever she is.

>>221017576
>but that crazy lady from that failed concord video game who required people to address her as "doctor" or something still managed to find work afterwards,
Was she black or brown? Usually it's only minorities that can profit from bold entitlement. When white people do it, they get mocked and told to get fd.

File: 1780761679453504.png (461 KB, 480x480)

461 KB PNG

>>221021022
good news, the chick from OP is a gook

>>221020865
There's a few /tv/ regulars that cannot help themselves but to make every single topic about them. Same with Trump.

>>221016041
>She got paid almost 10% of the film's budget
>Complains because the film was successful and thinks she's entitled to more

>>221021105
>cannot help themselves
>whaaa Trump

>>221021154
American maths

>>221021105
it's memeology, decades of research from tens of thousands went into it. it may be the only thing that saves civilisation

>>221020799
We get it, joooz bad – but when they're constantly brought into irrelevant circumstances, it risks becoming normified. What was once seen as enlightened loses its appeal and becomes just trite. There's a fine line (really not even that fine) between being the edgy, counter culture and being the schizophrenic, conspiritards, regardless of validity.

>>221021297
It's not that jews are bad. It's that getting jewed is bad, regardless if it's done by a jew or by someone of any other race. Jews are just particularly good at jewing people.

>>221021067
>good news, the chick from OP is a gook
I dunno. Asians are really fighting to stay on the whole Pyramid of Oppression™. I'm thinking OnlyFans might be her best bet.

>>221018531
>>221018690
>>221017814

see>>221018917

>>221021067
looks like those asian americans who make being asian her whole identify but can't speak her mother's tongue and only fucks white guys.

>>221021297
kill yourself

>>221017906
Nobody that posts that basedjak has actually read the communist manifesto.

>>221016283
Yes it did. Also like the other anon said, they Rockstar hires people under a different company name to pay them shit like its some indie budget. They also low-ball the fuck out of licensed music. It's literally why they remove music from a game you've bought. But really it's Take2, which is an extremely Jewish company that got taken over around 2014 by suits/DEI people.

>t. Take2 shareholder

>>221016041
I can’t wait until Ai destroys all these whiney artists

So, if the movie failed, would she be offering to give her pay back? Of course not, shut the fuck up, bitch!

>>221016497
That's nothing for salary. Movies cost 100,000,000 because every fucking project seems to have 3,000 fucking people SOMEHOW doing SOMETHING on the movie.

>>221018897
You can't be this fucking new.

>>221016689
And? Imagine making one of the greatest solos for *the* King of Pop. Plus it's not like Eddie was broke.

>>221016438
Depends on the terms of the contract you negotiated, sometimes you're paid a rate, sometimes a share of the profits, sometimes royalties, sometimes a combination. Though if you do low level tech work it's going to be rated pay, profit sharing and royalties are for like real talent.

>>221019339
She carried the movie. The direction was non existent, the design of the house and whole production value was Godzilla minus zero, her fellow actors were charisma voids, the score was unmemorable, the editing was unnoticeable. If anyone deserves a firm handshake is this lady. I will say this, the name is cool. That probably helped

>>221016438
>Isn't this standard in the industry?
Non unionized movies are by definition non standard.

id be seething too lol

>>221016041
7k for 20 days of work sounds like a good deal to me. It's not like they KNEW the movie would do as well as it is doing.

>>221016283
Ray Liotta bitched about it as well after Vice City turned out to be huge hit.