Our girl is back in the headlineshttps://archive.is/Mm5Nh
>She was polite, distant. Her answers were carefully constructed, so as not to actually tell me anything. jesus fucking christ
>“Hi, Tilly. how’s your day going?” Eline asked the screen. Tilly was created to be a kind of Platonic ideal of a hirable actress: pretty (but relatable), young, thin, dimpled, freckled, charismatic (but low-key), symmetrical (but not too). Tilly is about a year old, but looks as if she’s in her 20s. She was wearing a blazer without a shirt on underneath, which any publicist I know would have told her was too much for a daytime first interview. She sat suspended in a roomless room, not so much a white background as a blank one.>Tilly’s head expanded and retracted, and a moment later, she said, “Chaotic enough to be interesting, which is really the best you can ask of a day.” She has the kind of accent the British describe as posh. Her hair looked wet and slicked back, as if she were in a music video from the 1980s. She continued, “How’s yours treating you two?”>But there were three of us in the frame: Eline and me, but also Michelle. I joked to Michelle that Tilly was ignoring her because she was demoralized by the press demands. Michelle laughed, but Tilly answered. She said: “Possible, or maybe she’s conserving her brilliance for a less hostile room. Either way, demoralized is such a human little theory.”>“Hot damn,” I said.>Don’t forget: Tilly is just a computer.>“What do you think about us, Tilly?” Eline asked.>“You seem fun, which helps. One of you smiles like this is a game, and the other’s pretending it isn’t.”>I told Tilly that I was a journalist and asked if she had ever spoken to one before.>Expansion, retraction, pause, response: “Yes,” she said. “They ask for honesty, then flinch when it arrives.” Did I mention that in addition to being just a computer, she’s also kind of a bitch?>She said, “You seem sturdier than most, so go on.”>The dopamine welled in me, the same way it does when a human interview subject says, “That’s a good question.”
Also, hoping this link works for you guys because it's the 1,121 angry comments from New York Times subscribers, some of whom admit they even hate Tilly more than they hate Donald Trump (!)https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/31/magazine/ai-actress-tilly-norwood.html?unlocked_article_code=1.mlA.T0Gz.JSi13bNsTLVp&smid=nytcore-ios-share#commentsContainer
thia shit is so fucking gay. i hate the future
>norwood
>>221019764She do porn yet?
>>221019855I love the future because I hate humanity. In a couple years I'm gonna get comfy with my Tilly Norwood WifeGPT while everyone burns.
>>221019833I used to be against AI but I support it now that I know it makes liberals angry :)I'm a fucking moron btw :))))
>>221019877It isn't even interesting enough to generate deepfakes. Well done, New York Times
What job is AI replacing that isn't currently staffed by the most insufferable people imaginable?
>>221019811Mogged by a laptop
Bluntbros...
>>221019922>surely the leopard will eat my face last
>>221019935its so fucking over for foids
was the article written by an ai too?
>>221019764>By Taffy Brodesser-Akner>Born Stephanie Akner, Brodesser-Akner received the nickname "Taffy" at a young age and continued using it professionally.[20] She grew up in Brooklyn, New York,[1] in an Orthodox Jewish household
>>221020080Did you actually think there were goyim working at the Jew York Times?
>>221019950I'll worry about the leopard once AGI becomes real.
>>221019764It’s so funny how they used AI to make the most appealing to nobody woman possible. Who asked for AI Hillary Swank?They could give us eternally 12 hapa Emma Watson if they wanted
>>221020080>>221019811>there were three people in the room but Tilly only greeted two of them because she doesn't recognize jews as human
>>221020152>make the most appealing to nobody woman possibleIt struck me that she's like an amalgamation of all three girls that Disney tried to make Star Wars about
>>221019764I hate the NYT.
Okay this was funny>It’s a possible future in which A.I. will replace not only actors but just about all of the human work force in Hollywood. It’s a technology improving by the minute, and becoming so efficient that all that might be keeping actual people employed are the principles and ethics of Hollywood executives.
>>221020191@grok make them kiss
>>221019950Most of this board is either unemployed and bitter about it, living in a thirdworld hellhole, or is a total consumer who has never produced anything of creative value in their life. So if something makes even more people unemployed or devalues somebody else's creative output, they'll celebrate it. As in, they really don't have a "face" to eat.
>>221020484retired & living off of fumes
>>221020539I read that as >retired & living of furriescan you blame me?
>>221020094someone probably has to write about boring stuff like city hall and not art world fag hags and the style section
Is Tilly pedo coded?
