>The dystopian future movie in which the bad guys won>everything appears to be a utopia on the surface like an idyllic 1950's american dream>but it's totally evil and oppressive under the surface>but only the underground rebel forces who seek to destroy the government through violent terrorism are ever targetted by this oppressive regimeCome on now
>Based >>221024111
>>221024111Doctors Who subverted that with the episode where humans from the future are murdering people because it’s fun. Fringe too
>>221024111If the Nazis won, they probably would've still had a liberal movement (albeit probably later than our timeline) and events would've probably played out more or less same as it did in real life.
>>221024417The nazis almost did win, sort of. There was a plan for them to ally with the allies against the soviets and they would have survived the war. We could have had a future where the nazis are still around and it became completely normalised.
>>221024156I would smash that girl
>>221024111Wrong board
>>221024156It's stupid to pretend that most people were miserable back then but romanticizing it as something it wasn't is dangerous and stupid. Like much of history there is nuance.
>scrapy underground rebel forces win which leads to an even worse dystopian future
>>221024111People making those kinds of stories think white people existing is a dystopia
>>221024417Nazism existed specifically to counter that. There was literally no other function for it than preventing a Marxist revolution. "It would have liberalised" is a fool's game argument.
