[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Amazon-MGM.jpg (106 KB, 1000x563)
106 KB JPG
>Amazon purchase MGM
>Instead of adding their catalogue to their existing service they create a different streaming service that requires a separate subscription
What a (((scummy))) move. Decisions like this are why people feel justified to pirate.
>>
Agreed. What's worse is that MGM barely has anything to watch. Same with Paramount cus a long ass time ago Warner Bros ended up acquiring both catalogs at different times and basically strip them of a lot of good movies.
>>
>>221025347
They have some great films I occasionally feel in the mood to go back and rewatch like Network, Terminator, Robocop, Rocky, or Silence of the Lambs but not at the kind of volume that someone can justify having an entirely separate subscription.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.