is this true? were 90s-2010s the best time for scifi?
Literally everything was better before 2010. That goes without saying.
The 90s, yes. Sci-fi stopped being good around 2002.
>>221030809If I never watched Star Trek I probably wouldn't have gone to uni for physics and therefore would probably not have a PhD in math rn. I am a meme.
long hyphen. humans don’t use them. AI written.
>>221030857you're out of a job bitch
>>221030832For me, I just defer to the Mayans and say that 2012 was the last good year.
>>221030906Computation is not mathematics. Also getting a PhD is not about getting a job, unless that job is academia.
If I ever become a tech billionaire I'll dedicate my life towards lobbying for an industry standard function in every keyboard, electronic and otherwise, that sends a non lethal but extremely painful electric shock when someone is typing the word "woke".
>>221030919so what is getting a phd about
>If I ever become a tech billionaire I'll dedicate my life towards lobbying for an industry standard function in every keyboard, electronic and otherwise, that sends a non lethal but extremely painful electric shock when someone is typing the word "woke".
>>221030964It is just about spending years studying and doing research on a subject you enjoy.If you want to continue in academia and do research, this is the path. But if you just want to get a normal job, a PhD does not help with this and can actually hurt in some cases.
>>221030809no, it was the 60s/70s and it's not even close
>>221030906
>>221030809Not the 00s and definitely not the 2010s. In the 00s most sci-fi started taking on a more notable dark and grittier tone instead of the optimistic and fun adventures of the 90s. Star Trek Nemesis came and killed the movie series. Enterprise was meant to be more "adult", but eventually they stopped doing that when the series wasn't as successful as they hoped. You had the Battlestar Galactica reboot come and people liked that, but it was a far cry from the goofy sci-fi adventures of the 90s. Like sure even classic Star Trek at its worst is way better than what it had become, but at the time people really did not like it. People act like somehow "woke" came in the mid 2010s and ruined things, but its foundations came form the early 00s where sci-fi was trying to be a lot more cynical and "realistic".
A lot of it was adaptations (and blatant plagiarism) from stories from the 1930s, 40s and 50s.
That guy makes ai scat porn of people very weird behaviour
>>221031267Yeah, butA. We are on /tv/B. That's the nature of media, by large
>>221031399Honestly I wouldn't even care if it weren't for many of those same cunts (male) now pretending they hate white men.Like bitch you made your entire career plagiarizing people like Campbell who wrote White (Hu)Man Fuck Yeah stories and assorted authors from that era and now you're pretending to be above that? Hell he even gave like 90% of the women in SF publishing their first jobs and that set of cunts rewarded him by making sure no one white and male can get published anymore without resorting to amazon print-on-demand.
>>221030809So the problem is wokesters. Just build George Droid to identify, pursue and terminate those wokers, get on it sci-fy nerds inspired by 90s scifi.
>>221030809too much realismbefore you could come up with an explanation using made up science jargon, now you have to explain how can a world sustain life when it isn't exactly like earth or why do they speak english
>>221030809it bookends at BSG when grimdark scifi became the norm (more of a post-9/11 thing than really anything to do with BSG).
>>221030809
>>221030885Look the sentiment is 98% mine and what I wanted to say I just had grok polish it for me a bitMe and others are pissed at Amazon for approving then killing stargate keep up the preasure guys #SaveStargate we were able to save TheExpanse for a time in a similar way
