[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: disclosure-day.jpg (1.84 MB, 2000x3000)
1.84 MB JPG
I just got back from the theater from what could be the final movie from Spielberg.
PROS
Elite CGI
Elite cast and acting especially Emily Blunt (aside from one I'll mention below)
Elite camerawork
Steven uses all of his tricks
Very interesting premise
There is one segment that gave me chills, it was so good.
I would watch a movie just of "disclosure footage" it was done so well.

CONS
Josh O' Connor. This guy is not the guy. He's like the male Zendaya; totally miscast charisma vacuum. He's carried by Emily Blunt like Sam carries Frodo.
The tone is off. Sort of like it doesn't know what type of movie it wants to be.
LENS FLARE I remember one or two scenes in Saving Private Ryan with flare and ever since then, he's become increasingly obsessed with it. It totally destroys the movie immersion.
There is one scene that I was shocked to see in a Spielberg movie, it was so dumb, but not like a dumb fun, just dumb.
Very heavy handed messaging.
Some very flimsy character motivations.
There is no reason to ever rewatch this movie.

7 UFOs out of 10.
>>
>>221101048
Yeah I saw it too. Hopefully the aliens will finally stamp out antisemitism.

Slava Ukraini.
>>
Close Encounters > Disclosure > E.T. > War of the Worlds
>>
>>221101048
Yes
>>
What compels goyim to consoom television and film in the current year?
>>
>>221101048
Can't think of any Spielberg movie I've ever researched besides Duel. Disclosure Day looks alright though. I'll get to it eventually
>>
Vero boring movie, felt like some shit from the early 90s with the same old tropes.
Everything felt off. Just bad, but then speilberg is 80 years old. So yeah. grandpa made a movie, has that energy too.
>>
>>221101048
Decent cam
https://ok.ru/video/15255164226302

Easily Spielberg's worst
>>
>>221102028
>Vero boring movie
A Florida phone poster. Jesus Christ.
>>
>>221101048
>Is this AI?
t. TV producer in movie

You can't use CGI for ayys in 2026 for a movie about "disclosure." It's weird how Spielberg's canon doesn't exist in this "super realistic" movie in the way that characters don't call zombies "zombies" in undead slop.
The shittiest scene in Act 1 is when a hackerman evades an entire paramilitary unit searching for him outside by hiding behind tumbleweeds 20 feet away, then steals one of their vehicles bc keys in ignition.
>>
>>221101874
Being able to have informed conversations with anons like you
>>
>>221101048
>Elite cast
>Male lead miscast
Make up your mind, schizo.
>>
>>221101048
>Very heavy handed messaging.
what's woke about this movie?
>>
>>221103098
Nothing but the emotional crutch is getting you to care about alien puppets getting abused, and I just couldn't give a shit. They're not like ET or Gizmo, they're not human enough in their facial expressions to make you sympathetic. They're also not characters in the movie either, just plot devices in the background.
>>
Honestly pretty similar OP

>Blunt is fantastic
>Firth is good as well, even if his character feels a bit shallow
>Characterization is generally a bit shallow desu, only feels like they really hit the mark on Blunt
>Rest of the cast is OK, O'Connor is disappointing considering he's meant to be the other main character
>Christianity message is hamfisted
>Even if it's not Spielberg's best, he knows how to direct a movie and it's generally solid throughout
>Feels like an adventure
>Action scenes are good
>Ending feels a bit like it loses momentum, the reveal and the found footage is really well done though
>Nixon/Gleason footage is honestly pretty funny
>Tone is all over the place to the point it's honestly jarring, you get thrilling action scenes like the car/train one but downright slapstick like the invisible house one
>Good score from Williams, not standout but solid
>Plot is cool, if underbaked

Spielberg has done aliens better but it's still worth a watch IMO
>>
>>221101805
>worse than Close Encounters
Yeah I think I can skip this one.
>>
>>221103925

Also something about the CGI animals felt off but I get the feeling they were meant to be uncanny
>>
File: IMG_4755.jpg (724 KB, 1284x1281)
724 KB JPG
>>221101048
>more Ayyy LMAO propaganda from Kikeberg himself

Nah, I’m good. Hard fucking pass.
>>
>>221101048
Cool, I think i'll check it out now. Thanks for the review, anon.
>>
>>221103952
actual young'n
>>
>>221101048
I can't stand Emily Blunt's performances for some reason so if she's the best thing about it that's a hard pass
>>
I think the movie is specifically made for either ufo lore enthusiasts and actual abductees.
>>
>>221104004
How is fiction propaganda in this case? Unless you think Spielberg is saying that this is a documentary
>>
File: Spoiler Image (72 KB, 598x678)
72 KB
72 KB PNG
>>
>>221105792
>accepting aliens is apostasy
I'm not religious, but the Catholic Church would 100% accept aliens.
>>
>>221101805
War of the world's mogs except the ending
>>
Lmao they had to practically blur the whole face on this ugly bogged ass bitch
>>
File: Spoiler Image (395 KB, 666x666)
395 KB
395 KB GIF
>>221105792
>Delete zis!
>>
Actual dogshit. These old fucks need to retire.
>>
>>221105792
If he put it on the internet, WARDEX would have known and used their alien tech to delete it. You can't delete what has been aired on TV.
>>
>>221106066
I feel like the Russians in this movie would take the alien shit as a deliberate move and nuke Seoul in response or whatever that plot point was.
>>
>>221105909
If anything the Church would try and frame the discovery in some way that made it so the church was totally acknowledging aliens the whole time. If the Church can IRL state that Natural Selection from microbes and a literal non-metaphorical reading of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden are both 100% true, then they would have no problem fitting aliens in there somewhere,
>>
>>221104507
dont be a retard, anon
>>
Not consooming this project bluebeam primer. Greys are demons, much like the director and Hollywood as a whole. He had it right in the fourth Indiana Jones movie but went back to lame corporal ayys
>>
Nothing Happens the movie
>>
>>221107656
>alien disclosure
>nothing happens
this phrase is meaningless now
>>
>>221107706
I was looking forward to it but it was just dramatization of ufo scene concepts. I guess it would have been same if Spielberg had done a mockumentary of my fav vidya game or comic or some of my past relationships. No surprises, just your spielberg slop.
t. Ufo-fag since 90s
>>
>hope and holding hands
the premise doesn't make any sense in this movie because the aliens are seemingly only in the US, the two chosen ones are Americans, and an American company is the only organization that has reverse-engineered the alien tech.
The film suggests Russia, the Koreas, and the US are on the verge of WW3, and we're supposed to believe that if everyone found out the US had alien tech, we'd all just drop the fighting and hug each other? If anything, Disclosure Day would trigger the war, not end it.
>>
>>221107656
>>221107762
>>
could have been an email: the movie
>>
Pros: got to see it for free

Cons: my legs were cramping

Felt it ended abruptly but it was entertaining enough to watch so it felt shorter than it was.
>>
>>221107825
Anyone who watched the live video of Maggie after she said listen were mind graped by her and forced to believe. The allan gave her that power



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.