Arthouse & ClassicsMartydition>QotDFavourite incel joint?>BonusFavourite volcel joint?>BonuserFavourite Borgnine joint?Previous: >>221115233
Queen of /film/
>>221149317Marthouse & Classics*
My bad I didn't announce or hear an announcement so I made a counterbake against "him"*dies*
>>221149317>Favourite incel joint?My culture is not your entertainment you know.
>>221149481Have you tried the Stardust Ballroom?
>>221149481Your culture is inferior to mine so I feel it is only right for me to make fun of it.
>>221149631Bigot.
>>221149396Bigot.
>>221149317>Favourite duracel joint?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43VhRKJX_sk
>>221149654Tolerating intolerance is bad. Sit down.
>>221149766What are you talking about?
>>221149805Incel culture is rooted in extreme misogyny. It's evil and vile. If I were to tolerate incel culture I would be taking the side of evil.
>>221149805I wouldn't pay any attention to it. Sometimes he pretends to be retarded because it's funny.
Could you guys check if these films are finally up on the private trackers? Thank you,>Remake (Ross McElwee)>Orfeo (Virginio Villoresi)>Un anno di scuola (Laura Samani)>Dossier 137 (Dominik Moll)
>>221149880No to all but Dossier 137. There is a TV movie version of Un anno di scuola.
Un anno di Ettore Scola.
>>221149805His own hypocrisy by being friends with racist pedobullies, then pretending he's St. Leftist the White Knight. Also, this: >>221149875
>>221149929>No to all but Dossier 137I'll take that one, sir.>TV movie version of Un anno di scuolaI think that's a 1970s miniseries. Try the English title A Year of School, though I don't think it's available yet
>>221150214A 'please' goes a long way, you know.
>>221150214I'll send it but the English subs are gated behind the currently-down forums. I can update you later if necessary. No luck with the English title.
>>221150273Sorry, I forgot it in the first post and as a non-native English speaker I just thought saying thanks would be enough
>>221150214https://gofile.io/d/q60JnH*smooch*
Life isn't like in the movies, life is much harder.
Is there something in the movies that's better than my love?
>>221150921De Palma did shots like that in the early 80s without all that retarded rig.
>>221150980She really looks like that Harry Potter goblin from up close like that.
>>221150887The movies are certainly Bigger Than Life, thoughbeit.
Ontologically evil does not win today.
>>221151008It's just the one.
>>221150911Our love will destroy the fucking world.
I haven't posted in literal years, I feel like I'll just get banned because of VPN but that's the only way I can even open this site because the internet in this piece of shit country is North Korea-tier at this point. I'm not even sure if this is going to work. You still here friends? Where is Kinskifag? I legit have no one to talk to, about film or not, fuck that shit seriously. I used to hate on post-2015 4chan but now I miss posting here so much it's unreal
>>221152699动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门
>>221152699Kinskifag spreadass butthole pics were leaked then he dropped off the face of the earth. Now we just have incredibly butthurt waifujeets
>>221152699>Where is Kinskifag?There was some Kinskiposting in the last thread.
>>221152857Was it his asshole again?
>>221152966You are mentally ill.
>>221152823>incredibly butthurt waifujeetsI've noticed an increase in the hurting... but why?
>>221153108>defending a bbc cuckspammer
>>221153530You're also mentally ill, figures.
>>221153108You gotta be loco en el coco to truly enjoy cinema, ese.
>>221153734Kinskifag pls post butthole
I watched Solaris yesterday and now Stalker and I don't really get the hype behind this "master" director. He seems to just use long, wide takes and then zoom in slowly. Where's the master directing come in?
>>221153813He’s actually shit. Bodes well for you that you’re attuned to that.
>>221153813You seem to be confusing direction for cinematography. They're certainly related, but not the same thing.Besides, just because something isn't particularly original, that doesn't make it bad.
Henry Jaglom > Andrei Tarkovsky
Sir Ridley Scott > Andrei Tarkovsky
>>221153898People say its atmospheric but I don't feel anything lol
Based posts happening right now.
Kinskifag butthole > tarkovsky
Tchaikovsky > Tarkovsky
>>221153913Alien > Solaris but unironically
>>221151008Even bigger than that.
>>221153416Idk but it’s mad funny
>>221153813Those two films suck on dick, but Andrei Rublev is actually great.
>>221154087Aliens mogs both.
>>221153416Catfag
>>221155064He really fucks their asses like it's nothing, man.
>>221153763If other waifufags itt post their buttholes, I'll do a ranking.
/film/ cannon
>>221152699Welcome home.
>>221153898TRVTH NVKE
>>221149317He's literally me
>>221156284Generally nice cinematography, but some of these shots you can only really get away with by slapping the "indie", "arthouse" and "experimental" labels on them. Specifically, I'm talking about the intentionally blurry-out-of-focus-lens ones. Do they work in the context? Yeah. Are they a fucking eyesore to look at? Also yes.
It's greenlit!You available to test?
>>221156778>It's greenlit!They're making another adaptation of that overrated Stephen King novel?
>>221156778uh
>>221156263Same.
>>221157593Per the transitive property, that means you are that other anon. Interesting.
We're all listening to R.E.M. here.
>>221157640We’re all samefagging here.
>>221157785Yeah. I'm literally everyone in here but the Fixspammer.
No one gives a fuck about this faggot here: >>221157683
>>221149317Blessed day /film/!A BRAND NEW NEVER BEFORE SEEN Amanda Fix image was just uploaded to her IMDB and she's GORGEOUS!!!
Just got done watching Special Effects. As is typical of the all the Larry Cohen films I've seen it's bizarre, awkward, somewhat haphazardly made, utterly charming and memorable. Zoë is the clear highlight as expected, she's utterly delightful in her dual role (I found her over the top JAP character particularly adorable) and acts circles around the rest of the cast. Also she gets to show off her body more than in Ms .45, which is a plus. It was super cool to see all the old school film and editing equipment being used and it made me want to go on ebay and buy a 16mm camera. There were some great visual moments even though the cinematography was a bit pedestrian overall. The only thing that really dampened my enjoyment was the soundtrack, it sounded like a first month piano student noodling around with the stock patches on a cheap sampler. Overall about a 6.5, flawed but very fun.
>>221158270Thoughts on?>>221158038
>>221158287Fish monsters belong in >>>/hor/. Now go get your shinebox.
>>221158270>go on ebay and buy a 16mm camera.Based. Will download, thanks anon.
>>221158038Worship time Fixbros
>>221153813Slavs overate him because he was the best they had during Communism (outside of the one Kurosawa flick).
To me Tarkovsky's faux poetic shallow slavic nonsense is intellectual counterfeit money when compared to a good Leonid Gaidai comedy.
>>221156284did the camera lens fall?
Remember when Fixjeet posted his revolting cock twice during a meltdown?>>221158270>she gets to show off her body more than in Ms .45I will now watch your film.
>>221159505Is Bong a Korean guy or the familiar device for smoking marijuana?
famous last words>>221159542koreans don't do that
honor de cavalleria
We're all honoring the cafeteria here.
what would D.W.Griffith do if he had a steadicam?
>>221160831He''d show those niggers for what they really are
I watched Secrets and Lies the other day, thought it was fantastic. What other Mike Leigh joints should I watch?
>>221160812/film/ mukbang
Times you acted like Cluny Brown?
>>221160859Life Is Sweet
>>221156263Low self esteem but manages to catch an absolute qt that everyone else seems to think is "a dog"?
>>221160943So cute.
>>221161535She's neither an absolute qt nor a dog. She's on the cuter side of plain.
I was going pretty fast on my bicycle and I heard a *cling* from the bicycle bell because a bug kamikazed itself into it. Films for that bug?
Canes won. Best hockey /film/?
>>221160831Eggersian, Spielbergazoidal oners.
>>221160943that time I fixed your mom's plumbing
>>221162421Slapshot and... uh.....that's it
>>221160943I fed some squirrels to some nuts once. LiveLeak-worthy.
/film/sisters.... we've been had>>221163542
What does /film/ think of HDR releases of classic films?
>>221163766how much autism do you have? because it feels like a field where neither the bluray companies nor the paying consumers have any idea of how the technology works
>>221163766HDR is a meme.
>>221163912How do you mean?
>>221163991You tooHow do you mean?
>>221164022many hdr releases are not good encodingseven if they are good encodings, this is what you're paying forthis is the extrais it worth it?
>>221164082these are the pixels with the gamut outside the sdrI dont think it's worthy unless you buy tech demo films like Avatar 7 or Top Gun 5
>>221164082>>221164100I mean HDR is included with the 4K releases, and 4K is a very noticeable improvement over the regular Blu-ray, so it just adds to it overall. With old movies the HDR isn't too flashy but it does make the image look better.
How will they ruin this one?
>>221164131great, good for youI feel like it's a terrain where the disappointments are more obvious than the successes, so I try to avoid having a hard opinion because it can trigger my autism tendenciesplenty of autismo if you look for it on the net alreadyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG2L7UtTNbg
I find the more a person obsesses over image quality and things like HDR and 4k the less likely they are to have good taste or even understand half the things they watch, it's a common midwit trap. Most films are fine even as a dvd rip.
>>221164341If you can't see that 4K Blu-ray is a massive improvement over DVD then I don't know what to tell you.
>>221164373It's an improvement but not necessary. If I limited myself to 4k blu-rays the amount of movies I could watch would diminish significantly. Sure, if a 4k version of a film I care about exists, I'll pick that over a 1080p encode/remux. I just rarely come across such choices.
>>221164253I'm scared. The cover is ugly already.
>>221164253ill buy it when its 50% off and let you know>>221164341there is definitely truth to faggots being like this but there is a massive visual improvement from dvd to 4k disc. seeing a 70 year old film in crystal clear quality is an enjoyable experience.ill always buy the best quality available if there is a disc release, but agree with the sentiment. pixel peeping faggots suck. 95% of them just watch denis villeneuve and tron slop on repeat
>>221164551I'm not saying you should limit yourself to only 4K releases, but I don't understand why so many people act like resolution doesn't even matter. Maybe they all just have shitty TVs.
How's the Marseille Trilogy?
>he doesn't watch his films in 16mm prints projected on a sheet that was once white but now has several yellow piss stainsNGMI
The issue now is that you have to wait to judge the new 4k releases to see if they’ve ruined the film- DNR, color grade, aspect ratio, etc.I’d rather watch a DVD that doesn’t have DNR or ridiculous color grade than a 4k that does.
>>221164785The thing I look for is if a release has the original audio track, or if they force you to listen to a Dolby Atmos remix. Disney is awful about this.
>>221159504You thinking about cock, color me surprised...
>>221164625I mean there is an obvious difference but to me it doesn't matter enough to be really important. Bitrate however plays an important role to me.
>>221164878I look to see what color the sky is.Sky is beautiful pink- the release is mink!Sky is lifeless white- say goodnight!!
>download Adventure 1946>no adventure in it; it's a romance movie>false advertising.jpgI enjoyed it, but again they make the mistake of casting two (2) women hotter than the main leadLina Romay > Joan Blondell > Greer Garson
>>221166631this Lina Romay is unrelated to Jess Franco btw
Rear Window was pretty funny but hardly suspenseful or mysterious
dont care for hitchockdont care for wellesdont care for kubrik simple as
>>221166631>>221166647Victor Fleming was a car mechanic who was a photography hobbyist and only got into films when Allan Dwan took a car that was being used in a production for Fleming to fix, saw his photography equipment laying around his shop, and then asked him if he would be interested in being a cameraman in films, kek. The early days ruled so much.
>>221166747the world was a lot smaller back then
>>221167618I met the /tv/ jannies late at night in Peter Thiel's hot tub
Films that explore BDSM scenarios like this?>protagonist has a situationship with a woman in another country>she knows a cuck who pays for her travel and dates she has with other men>she plans to meet the protagonist for sex and having the cuck pay for all of it
>>221169049Nothing of what you described has anything to do with BDSM though?
>>221158038HOLY HECK SHES GORGEOUS
>>221169124It does already but to add detail: the protagonist is going to get femdommed by her
>>221169357I don't think cuckoldry qualifies as a form of BDSM.
>>221169357>femdommedBishoujo Denshi Sailor Moon would never!
>>221169419It can't be being dominated in some sense? It can't heavily involve sadism and/or masochism?
>>221169124Trve.Btw, this nigga really feels the need to constantly flex fake sexual scenarios on /film/ to try and create, (or maybe maintain in his mind?) the image of some incredibly profficient seducer to /our anons/. Right.Anyway, Maîtresse.
>>221169555No, it can, but i think it still doesn't qualify as BDSM.
>>221169902Why not?
>>221170070I don't know, you'll have to ask the BDSM council or something.
>>221170470I blame Steven Universe for shit like this.
>>221170628I accept your concession.
>>221170698You know more about cuckoldry than the rest of us. Congrats!
>>221170698Because there is no bondage, domination, submission or masochism involved? The OG scenario was just a woman cucking her man, what's BDSM about that? Cuckoldry isn't even BDSM by itself.
>>221170717Trvke.
>>221170752Would you say there is not some element of submission involved when you get off on being humiliated like that?
>>221170807There's elements of submission in almost every single sex act, that doesn't make something a part of BDSM.
>>221170647>I blame Steven UniverseI blame Steven Spielberg. For everything.Well, almost everything. For some thing I blame Steven Seagull.
Watching the Baskervilles.So far it feels the the beginning could have been a little longer about the hunt and killing the servant
>>221170914>Watching the Baskervilles.No idea who they are. But I've heard a lot of things about their dog.
>>221170807Yeah, but I don't remember the OG scenario mentioning the cuck getting off on the cucking; if that was the case, then yeah, it'd be BDSM, but just light BDSM anyway.
>>221169049>watching films to live out your grotesque coomer fantasiesjust go jerk off you weird faggot
>>221171060I wonder who made this post...
So what type of films you recommend? No smut, I'm telling you now
>>221171103Korean
>>221171073I wonder who made this one >>221169049
>>221171103Pictures of the Old World (1972) is my recommendation.
>>221171060>>221171213Waifufags checked once again
>>221171213The Birkinfag of course.
>>221171103The cremator >>221171224This is an approved recommendation.
>>221171271Grotesque DespicableUncultured Disgusting
>>221170752>Cuckoldry isn't even BDSM by itselfI agree that there's nothing inherently BDSM or even fetishistic about cuckoldry in the strict sense of a wife cheating on a husband (which is also ruled out by the absence of any marriage in the situation described), but my point is that there are connotations to cuckoldry in the wider sense (including the explicitly fetishistic sense invoked in the scenario) that align it with BDSM. I agree that he hasn't shown his working in the brief sketch he provided, but my point is that he's just not just spouting nonsense.
>>221171367*ruled out here by the absence of any marriage in the situation described
>>221167618What are some good nose /film/s
just marathoned pic rel. if the anon who recommended it happens to be in this thread, thank you from the bottom of my extremely moved heart. top 20 film fr
>>221171389Anything with Silvana Mangano.
>>221171389Besides the kinographs of Barbra Streisand, of course
La tarde del domingo (1957) and King of New York (1990) tonight.
watched The Lawless from that nigga Losey
>>221171636What did you think
>>221171389who nose
>>221171633I read somewhere recently that Buscemi was a last minute casting decision for King of New York and his outfit in it was meant for a black guy. Which explains why he's dressed like a member of Run-DMC.
>>221171389The Dark Nose of London (1939)Nose Without A Face (1960)The Million Noses of Sumuru (1969)Sinbad and the Nose of the Tiger (1977)Nose Wide Shut (1999)
>>221171743All of that does seem like something Abel Ferrara would do
>>221171644there were two different scenes in which the newspaper editor watches from a distance as parents embrace their son and the almost total lack of emphasis or dramatic effect gives it a dignity that I find very moving. I can forgive some of the more histrionic moments
>>221171700Nice nipslip.
>>221171807Man I can't find any of these
>>221172017Yeah, they're rare. You can only get them on private trackers.
I really like the film taxi driver what films would you recommend to me based off of that information?
>>221172176
>>221172176Light Sleeper (1992)
>>221152736does this shit really get chinamen v& just for appearing on their screen? china can't be that bad, right?>>221149317Does Her count as incel or volcel
>>221172176>kys (2026)
>>221149317what about favorite femcel joint?
>>221172281>does this shit really get chinamen v& just for appearing on their screen? china can't be that bad, right?Idk but i think it's funny.
>>221172189>>221172437Say, koreanon, what's your opinion on all these cheaply-produced choose-your-own-adventure-style Korean dating-sims?Mediocre acting (cute girls though), nonsensical stories, terrible direction and camerawork: They seem right up your alley!
>>221172705too much smut kdramas and kmovies are not for that
>>221172739>too much smutNever knew you were a puritan.
>>221149317I really enjoyed the early parts of Marty but I dislike when it becomes more of a romance and gets mired in all the shit with his mother and friend that don't like Clara. The film was far more interesting when it was focused on Marty himself and his hopelessness. It's fine it ends on a positive note, but I wish it actually just ended on it instead of being the focus of so much of the film.
>>221172739you and i are of one mind unnie.
>>221172812Korean movies are for romance, but not in the shallow or pornographic sense. They're about yearning. About prolonged tension, unspoken feelings, missed chances, and "will-they-won’t-they" arcs not smut and violence as many would have you believe.
>>221172928Sounds like wearing a penis-cage.
>>221172977
Don't engage the kdgfag please.
>>221173201Why is he even here when there is already a specific thread dedicated to that exact type of faggotry?
>>221173428Same reason the acress spammers are here, I guess.
>kfag slop is about the yearn>ho oihhh I’m g-gonna I’m gonna y-yeeeeaaaarrrrnnnn
>>221173464Autism and homosexuality?
I'm going to engage with the kdgfag, I'm gonna do it, don't provoke me
>>221173451*slaps your ass*
>>221173575*slaps your ass*
>>221173582noooo you cannot do that
>>221171431Wasn’t me but glad there is another anon with based taste around here. Glad you enjoyed. That’s a great film.
>>221173576You know when they found his corpse he still had a cigarette hanging out of his mouth? So he didn't aspirate on his own puke he actually just partied so hard he stopped living.
last Miguel Gomes just dropped to public torrents, grand tour (2024)
what are some good korean movies?
>>221173727The films of Park Kwang-su.
>>221173727Oxymoron.
>>221173727The Wailing rules
>>221171190>>221173727of the ones John has seen I think Poetry and Mandala are the best. Hong Sang-soo. I'm not so sure about Kim Ki-duk because I haven't absorbed his films yet, but I hear decent things.
>>221173832>Kim Ki-duk Doesn’t he hate women or something?
>>221173862not anymore because he's dead.
>>221173886Cats (2019) did it better.
>>221173886I didn't even know he was sick.
>>221174038All Korean filmmakers are sick.
>>221174283Touché.
>>221174314*slaps your ass*
>>221174283wow calm down
Turns out Fagper, Kfag, Fagpetic and Baufag were all inventions of his mind, huh? No wonder this nigga was in a psych hospital a few years ago.
all me btw
We're all all me here.
I think seeing fear in others gives me pleasure.
Criterion have just announced a boxset of Carax's Alex trilogy (annoyingly using the English title for Les Amants but the French title for Mauvais Sang??). I assume it's the new 4K. And the Pierre SD master upscale and (allegedly DNR'd) Pola X out on 4K via Carlotta. Both at the end of summer, I wonder if they're avoiding stepping on each other's toes & there'll be Carlottas for the other 4Ks, or not.
>>221174692>French title for Mauvais SangBecause 'Mauvais Sang' is a reference to a famous work. It's not just 'Bad Blood'.
>>221174386Mentally ill post.
I run the underworld, guy!
>>221162421I'd say Two Boys in a Pool, Hollywood (1965)
I don't wanna take my time going to work, I got a motorcycle and a sleeping bag and ten or fifteen girls. What the hell I wanna go off and go to work for? Work for what? Money? I got all the money in the world. I'm the king, man. I run the underworld, guy. I decide who does what and where they do it at. What am I gonna run around like some teeny bopper somewhere for someone elses money? I make the money man, I roll the nickels. The game is mine. I deal the cards
>>221175034I am, yes, but I know something they don't...
>>221173625Based. Sleazecore icon.
>>221175322Come by the Plaza Hotel, I got work for you.
>>221175302/zesty/
Yovr sovl is damned, Nosferatv.
I'm making a list of /mothy/ actresses. Any suggestions? What I have so far>Jane B>Lydia Lunch>Lung Leg>Berto
>>221175849>Any suggestions?don't do it, watch a film instead
>>221175849Just shut the fuck up, faggot midget.
>>221171980Interesting you say that, years later he would also show a father embracing his son in Time Without Pity, but this time it's front and center, just pure raw emotion and affection, with no distance.
>>221173201Generally speaking, I'm torn on the strategy. Ignoring posters like him seems sensible, but we've all tried that and it doesn't make them stop. So maybe engaging them in somewhat investigative debate is the way to go? Ideally, it'll get them to actually start talking about film as a medium in the long run. At the very least, if they do respond, it'll help understand what makes them tick, even if it has nothing to do with film. His comments in here did that in a way.And if not even that works, maybe repeatedly trying to engage them in serious discussions will turn their own tricks on them and annoy them so much after a while that they'll stop posting altogether?To be fair, I only have hope that this works for someone like koreanon, or maybe the western guy. Someone like the Fixspammer is a lost cause.
>>221175849>/mothy//mouthy/?
>>221160943Incredible eyebrows (especially for her time).
>>221176839Incredible everything. Lovely all over and super underrated.
>>221177080>super underratedCurious because she was a very popular star back then, and the studios considered her a prestige dramatic actress.
>>221177106>she was a very popular star back thenThing is, and actors really need to understand this, it's not your talent that forms your legacy as an actor, it's the films that you appear in.If you look at her filmography, you can tell that she was good, she was popular and sought after.But the directors she worked with? Mostly quite mediocre Hollywood studio establishment. The films she starred in? Mostly mass-produced mediocre Hollywood sluff that blended into the sea Hollywood slop of its time.I mean, sure, if you are a Humphrey Bogart or Audrey Hepburn, in other words a complete icon with a lot of charisma and a cult of personality surrounding you, you can get away with just that, no matter your filmography (not saying that Hepburn and Bogard didn't have some outstanding films though).But for your average actor, no, being popular among your peers and getting hired in Hollywood doesn't produce a long-lasting legacy no matter how good a performance you deliver. That was true back then, and it is true nowadays for all that capeshit slop studios shit out. It's why good actors should try to get out of that trap and try to work with "rogue" directors, or at least directors who try to add some creative drive to their commercial projects. And why terrible actors like "Zendaya", while being Hollywood's darling, will have leave behind no legacy whatsoever.
>>221177359Unironic truth nuke. It's so disheartening loving an actor's performance and later finding out that they never had an opportunity to give another like it again because their filmography is full of unremarkable flicks.
>>221177359>>221177426And then you have a guy like Eric Roberts who's a better actor than literally everybody else in Hollywood but chooses to star in 300 sloppiest of slops every year because he's more interested in working and getting paid than leaving a legacy; and is he wrong for doing so? Should he instead pick and choose his jobs more carefully, working less and making less money, just so after he's long dead or even just retired people look back at his career and go "wow what a great filmography"?
>Zo tired, bros...
>>221177687>is he wrong for doing so?Yes.>Should he instead pick and choose his jobs more carefully, working less and making less money, just so after he's long dead or even just retired people look back at his career and go "wow what a great filmography"?Yes.
>>221177740Go to sleep then.
>>221177687>Should he instead pick and choose his jobs more carefully, working less and making less money, just so after he's long dead or even just retired people look back at his career and go "wow what a great filmography"?Well, if he's a great actor, you can make the argument that his talent would serve all of us better if not wasted on slop. It's not just about legacy.That the altruistic choice would be to gift his talent to great projects and help make art. Of course, his decision is his to make.
>>221177781Yes, that is a better argument than the legacy one in my view.
>>221177800It's connected, and frankly, most actors do care about their legacy more. Viewers like us are obviously more concerned with getting good films.Inside and outside perspective on the same thing.
>>221175849https://youtu.be/uO8_e4aUf-A
>>221176659Martha Raye
>>221175849>>221176659Sandra Bernhard.
>>221177359she was the lover, and then wife, of the biggest Hollywood producer of the 40s
>>221175849Beatrice Dalle
>>221178666Well, congrats to him. Doesn't really affect what we discussed here though, does it?
>>221178703RETVRN
>>221178794>Dalle has been arrested on several occasions for shoplifting, drug possession and assault.[10] She has had run-ins with the law in France and was arrested for alleged drug possession in America. An investigation into a suspected drug trafficking network led to Dalle being questioned in Paris as a witness in 2005.[11]>Interviewed on the French TV programme Divan in 2016, Dalle stated that when she used to work in a morgue with her friends, they sold body parts of corpses, and while on acid, they ate a dead man's ear.[12][5] What's her problem?
>>221178809Busybodies trying to cramp her style.
>>221178740because the projects were built around herthat's not mass-produced mediocre Hollywood sluff
>>221176659Mothy. Mothian.
>>221178982What does this mean?
>>221178882>that's not mass-produced mediocre Hollywood sluffIt pretty much boils down to that, yes. Look at her filmography and point to a film that REALLY stands out among the usual Hollywood slop of its time in terms of how it is remembered. You maybe can make an argument that a few of her films are technically more worthwhile than that, and I'm willing to entertain that idea. But they really did not leave a mark on the larger public record. And that's what we were talking about.
>>221179037Adjectivemothy>Resembling or characteristic of a moth.
>>221179172Like they're attracted to bright lights?
A moth walks into a podiatrist's office...
there was a hole here. it's gone now.
>>221176049yep that exact moment left an impression on me when I watched it last year. but iirc it's done in a very similar manner, no music and absent of any cuts that would risk tipping over into mawkishnessI need to stop fucking around and watch his stuff more frequently than once every few months
There was a thread the other day about if people prefer film grain or not in a movie... So what about SOUND grain in a film? This is just fucking grain sound non-stop alongside the proper audio, shit release from Eclipse wtf filter that shit you niggers
BOOBA
>Prophesying how he would die, 29 years before it happenedhow did Angelopoulos do it?
>>221180354>Nouilles Froment Hommes>Un film de Chantal AkermanWhat a truly deconstuctivist title.
>>221180948Watching these two documentaries I posted one after another made me realize how relevant the differences between male and female filmmakers are. These two are based solely on images and background reading of texts. (I can use "Affettuosa presenza" by Piavoli to do the same as an example.)Male Filmmaker letters-text reading based documentary>The Past, The War, Comparisons, Art, Personal Fears, History Retelling, Other texts references, poetry, deathFemale Filmmaker letters-text reading based documentary>I send you 20 dollars, did you recieve the twenty dollars?>Your sister divorced>Weather>We'll sell the shop>Nevermind I still working on the shop>Why didn't you write more often!?>I recieved your last later after sending you the letter about you not writing us anymore>When do you come back?>I sent you 20 dollars, have you recieved them?tl;dr I hate women
>>221181075Philogynous general, pal.
>>221181383*slaps your ass*
>>221181416*stabs your ass*
>>221181433*dodges**slaps your ass again*
>>221178809Sounds more like a (You) problem.
>>221177687What are his best and worst joints?
>>221182024>his bestStar 80 (Fosse is /film/)Runaway Train>worstEverything else
>>221173862Yes, but you left out that he also hates the way that society treats women.
>>221160882/fukbang/
>>221179149>. Look at her filmography and point to a film that REALLY stands out among the usual Hollywood slop of its time in terms of how it is remembered.she goes from a Dick Tracy serial (the very definition of Hollywood slop) to winning the oscar for The Song of Bernardette. After that it's all O'Selznick's prestige titles and megaprojects like Duel In The Sun, which was more expensive than Gone With The Windwhat is your definition of slop?
>>221182208>what is your definition of slop?Things I dislike
>>221182230Based.
>>221182208>winning the oscarDoesn't mean much.>O'Selznick's prestige titles and megaprojects like Duel In The SunOkay. And who still watches those? Right, no one. Mainstream Hollywood of its time. Being expensive doesn't make it any less of slop.But, let me guess, you're a massive Christopher Nolan fan?
>>221181075t. filtered by foid
>>221182085Have you delved into the slop output at all? Are there any hidden gem performances that contrast with the shit surrounding it?
>>221182481making a documentary out of your mother's letters to you is despicable, glad the dyke is dead.
>>221182365>And who still watches those?I do,and I enjoy themlet me guess, you're a festivalslop fan?
>>221172189Kek.
>>221182598To the tunnel you go*push*
>>221182598>making a documentary out of your mother's letters to you is despicableWhy?
baking
>>221182727>>221182727>>221182727>>221182727nyew
>>221182603>let me guess, you're a festivalslop fan?Not really. There are of course many good festival entries, but also a lot of trash. But more importantly, there's a wide range of films between your "festialslop" and the trite unimaginative hardcore-mainstream shit Hollywood studios pump out. And most films I really like are somewhere in that wide range.Now, to your actual point: If you enjoy mainstream stuff, even if just some of it from a specific era, that's great for you. Nothing wrong with that. But please don't pretend that those films have any staying power in the public eye. They get their fifteen minutes in the spotlight, then the audience moves on to the next thing. That's how the "industry" works. Has to work, because it's all about money. And ten years later, people barely remember it. Two generations later, and it's basically forgotten. And, yeah, in 2070, some guy on some imageboard will post "but I watch and enjoy those superhero flicks from the 2010s", and he'll be the same kind of outlier you are now. And it'll be fine. But no one will remember who Zendaya was.
>>221182938guess the only things worth discussing are the pyramids and homer
>>221183360Pyramids are kinda timeless, yeah. Platonic shape and all that.Not sure about Homer though. The Simpsons will end one day.
>>221182615*crawls out of the tunnel**slaps your ass*
