So now that the dust has settled, can we all agree that the outrage at the pacifier scene in Euphoria was completely fake and a symptom of viral marketing?
It was just you replying to yourself so yeah I guess
>>221212083I want to see Zendaya like this.
>>221212158Yeah me and my several hundred twitter accounts and media outlets I own, you got me
I want to see maude apatow like this
>>221212240well yeah, most of the internet is just bots
>>221212269I wanna see her sisters friend livvy like this
>>221212278Not what you meant but okay
>>221212240I’ll take your word for it. I don’t use Twitter or read the news. Because I’m cool.
>>221213094Cool people always assert how cool they are
I'm glad it turned out this way because I got tired of Sneedney worship and her being posted everywhere all the time.
>>221212083Based disingenuous retard. There's a reason why Batman has Catwoman and not Babywoman.
>>221213539Because you're a closeted furfag?
>>221212083There was dust? From what I remember nobody who cared about this shit actually watched it, and nobody who watched it actually cared.
>>221213732Where's the fur in that webm, mongoloid?
>>221213758>durrrr furry means you're into furI know you're not actually this retarded.
>>221213539I've heard of cat burglars, but never baby burglars. That said, there probably are weird baby themed supervillains, but I'm not going to google that
>>221212083The total impact of Euphoria was the result of viral marketing. There was never any real audience engagement.
>>221212083do people really, unironically, watch this shit?
Onlyfans doesnt allow age play BTW, even manyvids bans it
>>221212083Being ok with nudity and porn doesn't mean you like all of it and that wasn't even an accurate depiction, OF is the last platform that would allow that kind of stuff
>>221214498I don't think the people who got duped by this media outrage care much about the nuances
>>221214732There are OF accounts where women trample small animals to death for fuck’s sake. Get down off your high horse, you sick porno addict.
>>221214773That must've been years ago when they allowed too much. Heard they ban almost everything now
>>221214498It's targeted by payment processors along with a bunch of other fetishes.
>>221214826Why hasn't trump stopped them? They're monopolies who tries to cancel and deplatform people over things that are legal. Completely unacceptable
>>221214835Most politicians probably don't want to be the champions of mind control porn or whatever, even if the concept of payment processors doing shady monopoly shit is fundamentally horrible. I wouldn't exactly expect Trump to be the guy who does it either
>>221212083There’s something incredibly lame about over the top horny shows that only show tits. Any romcom or kids show has tits now. Push the envelope a bit
>>221214773And there are OF accounts where uninteresting women who are sick of dating app roulette try to turn their sexuality into a livable income and fail. And that's 99.9% of onlyfans accounts. There's a reason Margot Needs Money got an audience and hypersaturated Sweeneytits didn't. Euphoria 3 didn't understand it's subject.
>>221214859I saw that some sex worker groups celebrated that part of the trump admin signed some law that forced banks to never deplatform customers unless they do something illegal, but not sure what happened with that and maybe it wasn't powerful enough to make sure visa and mastercard does the right thing.
>>221214773>>221214877Btw isn't it interesting how they'll ban certain harmless fetishes but they'll let women financially drain and humiliate men? Or how about when they hire foreign chatters to pretend to be the woman and trick the men into giving away their money to what they think is a woman? Not to mention all the fetishes that involve heavy dangerous peneration that no one seems to care about.
>>221214897Not sure that ever went through. I remember it when they came for porn games
>>221214918>isn't it interestingNot really. The story of onlyfans is a series of "whoops, we didn't know that was going to happen."And that only becomes interesting when you add the human element to it. You're still seeing OF creators as basically pornstars in a race to the bottom, in reality almost all OF creators were not very bright women following breadcrumbs to an empty breadtin with all of the epidemic exploitation of women by organized crime following in their wake. I do understand your perspective, but that's not the story. The story is single mums trying to feed their kids creating cover for impoverished women from eastern Europe and south America being forced into sex work by violent men. Actual genuine stories abound, but privileged white suburbanites on a tik-tok to OF pipeline wasn't it.
>>221214897The wording was kind of vague and could be interpreted as banks only have to serve individuals regardless of their politics rather than the politics of the product, it remains to be seen how it will actually be enforced
>>221214949>>221215056So who's pushing the payment processors to crack down on legal, consensual activity? That australian radfem group? Or maybe it's a culmination of all the anti porn sentiment that gets pushed in the media.
>>221215160It's always some combination of monopoly bullshit (in this case, in bed with someone who doesn't like the competition) or religion at the end of the day. Nobody else has any reason to truly give a shit
>>221212083sexo tho
>>221214498People still use manyvids?
