What was it, /tv/?
>>221221655The Blob of RapeCONFIRMED
Myth of the female orgasm
He probably says what it was in the video, so you could watch it instead of asking us.
The cookies myth
The Sopranos fan with a father figure
>>221221655The afterlife, but then Grant actually died instead of just having a near-death experience. Lost data.
>>221221655They never tested racial stereotypes. Cowards
Same poltard raid threads over and over.
>>221221655Hookers & Blackjack Auschwitz
>>221221655How did he get away with it?
>six million?
>>221221655That one about that USA ship in the middle east.
>reenact moon landing things on earth>this proves that the moon landing was real
they didn't want people to know that easter bunny is real
>>221222578they kinda did once:on the episode where they are testing if women drive worse than men, the asian woman on the test group is the worst driver, she is comically bad.
common household ingredient make boom, just a guess I saw posted once in a thread.but then again even if it was, surely that would've been discovered independently elsewhere too?
>>221221655Jesus's resurrection.
holocaust
>>221221655girls farting
>>221223315Why didn't they try with the B team?
I try to re watch some of their episodes but can't get through the lame fake skit banter before every myth.
>>221222578post yfw you found out that this character was played by a woman. don't be a boring lying (totally smart oldfag) shithead by pretending you knew all along
>>221221655
>>221223475That one never made any sense. If girls don't poop why would they fart?
>>221221655If a blindfolded man would prefer horse pussy over human pussy.
>>221223595They fart out of their vagina of course.
>>221222923They were disproving claims that the footage was done using special effects by actually trying to re-enact it using special effects
>>221221655Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams.
>>221221655https://youtu.be/AK5jyVCdXwc?si=q4VPRVnCRr8hHAHd
>>221221798based
>>221223557I watched the skit when it aired on tv you stupid zoomer
>is jacking off to femboys actually gay?
I think it had something to do with the chips in credit cards.
>>221224149I could see Tory testing this one out
In case any of you are wondering what the real answer is, it's literally just dowsing rods
>>221224744i mean no shit those dont work lol >guys I just realized when the rods cross randomly it means theres water here ok>what how??>it just does!
The myth of consensual sex
>>221223475>>221223633*busts your myth*
>>221224930>that maskYJK
>>221224930>>221224970i dont get these comments
>>221224791I think it still could have worked as an episode if they did the whole detecting gold/silver prospecting bit (because of the magnetism or whatever). Also still not as dumb as pyramid power
>>221225006It's better this way, trust me.
>>221223093The only time I've almost been in a wreck on the freeway, an asian woman next to me steered sharply into my lane while I was surrounded by trucks. Thankfully my white man driving reflexes had me slamming on the brakes and maneuvering into an empty space in the next lane behind one of the trucks. Shit was close, though.
>>221223685they didnt really disprove anything, theres no way to explain the spotlight effect
>>221225127What's the spotlight effect?
"Diversity is our strength"
>>221225149The official take is that the sun is so far away from the moon that the sun rays coming down onto the moon's surface are basically coming in parallel, all across it. Meaning that the entire moon's surface that gets hit by the sun should basically be lit up to the same intensity all across, but in the official images you have many spotlight effects, where the ground is lit up with a circular spotlight, while outside of it, and especially in the back, you see the light intensity drop a lot.
the myth of The Wall
>>221221655The most oft-repeated claim is that they had started shooting an episode on myths about common household items and chemicals that could be used to create explosives and ended up stumbling upon a ridiculously simple way of making an extremely volatile explosive (the exact compound is unknown, but the generally accepted most-likely candidate is TATP, which is notorious for not only being manufacturable from common household chemicals, but also for being prone to blowing up during production, and which was also one of only a handful of explosive compounds which was undetectable by instruments of the time the episode would have been made).Basically, they stumbled on a really easy way to make something super dangerous and which probably would have opened them up to serious liability and litigation and decided that they, their viewers, and the public, would be better off without that floating around on cable.
>>221225036>Also still not as dumb as pyramid powerI still can't believe they dedicated a whole episode to that shit.
The myth of dubs
>>221225313>The official take is that the sun is so far away from the moon that the sun rays coming down onto the moon's surface are basically coming in parallelThat's hardly an "official take." That's just really basic physics and optics that a schoolkid could prove with the sun and a flashlight.>the ground is lit up with a circular spotlight, while outside of it, and especially in the back, you see the light intensity drop a lot.The intensity only drops off "a lot" in edited photos where the contrast has been increased. In the original unedited photos, there's barely a difference at all, and the barely brighter area corresponds perfectly with where surface dust would be blasted away from rocket exhaust during landing.
>>221225640Show me some of those unedited photos.>corresponds perfectly with where surface dust would be blasted away from rocket exhaust during landingThere are images of the lunar lander after landing which had gold foil cups on its legs and they have 0 dust on it every time, so that didn't happen. Unless you can post a single image of those legs having dust on them too.
>>221221655I never thought they would have done the civil war soldier got one of his balls shot off and the flying stray testicle hit a spectating female and impregnated her myth
>>221225755 (me)Here are the lander's feet, 0 specs of dust in a clear cup shaped gold foil leg for example.Everything is explained in more detail in this documentary https://archive.org/details/american-moon-massimo-mazzucco-2017
>>221221655famously, one of the myths they didn't air was how easy it is to tamper with credit cards
James Gunn?
>>221225640Why would the landing feet have dust on them if the dust was already blown away by the rocket exhaust? If exhaust is blowing dust away, it's getting pushed out and away from the landing site. There's no air for it to get caught up and swirl around in before settling down more or less in the same spot, like on a landing foot. Each dust particle would get pushed away and continue travelling in a trajectory outward until it hits the surface again somewhere away from the landing site.
>>221225892meant for >>221225755 and >>221225870
>>221223093An asian women almost ran me over when I was crossing the street. Didn't stop at the stop sign. Didn't even glance. No signal.
>>221225313All that light shit can easily be explained by retards like you not knowing how exposure and lenses work
>>221225006She put her feces into cookies and baked them
>>221225347>Single mom>Walled>t*tsI would rather die because of a brain implosion like grant than be like this
>>221225006You are a pure soul, leave while you can
>>221225892>Why would the landing feet have dust on them if the dust was already blown away by the rocket exhaust?Because when you blow dust it doesnt just roll off the ground, even if there is no air for dust to go far up and then down very very slowly, a lot of it would still get kicked up, and catch onto the cup shaped legs while being pushed away from the center of the lander.The moon was very dusty as can be seen on all footage when they interact with the ground at any point with any object, the lunar lander, their feet etc was caked in dust very quickly, but the lander's feet shaped like cups which should catch dust easily were 100% completely spotless.You can also see more footage of how the dust gets thrown around during the landing footage by the very powerful rocket in the documentary while afterwards it doesn't seem like anything was really disturbed even right beneath the rocket.>>221226136Feel free to explain
>>221223475I'm positive they had Kari fart for some reason in an episode.
>>221226372
>>221226372there was literally an episode about farts and it was literally called "The Reddit Special"
>>221225870>0 specs of dust in a clear cup shaped gold foil legwhy would there be?
>>221226491>>221226345
>>221223475>>221226372Apparently it was unaired, but they did it:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giAgd3DTzO8
>>221226501>Because when you blow dust it doesnt just roll off the ground, even if there is no air for dust to go far up and then down very very slowly, a lot of it would still get kicked up, and catch onto the cup shaped legs while being pushed away from the center of the lander.This should be simple enough for you to prove. They sell cheap vacuum chamber kits for silicon degassing (chamber and pump) for like a hundred bucks. Set up a little fake lander with some compressed gas (maybe one of those mini CO2 cannisters) and some dust on the bottom and spritz some gas onto the dust. See how much of it falls back in on the lander's legs. Boom, you just disproved 60 years of space exploration for the price of a couple fast food takeouts.
>>221221798>Myth of the female orgasmExplain this then
>>221226345>Feel free to explainA camera is a machineIt has to choose what's in focus, and for that it has to disregard things that are not in focusIt will block out dim lights (like from the stars) and burn all brighter lights (like the outline of the suit) in order to just get the range of light in the suitThe blocking out dim lights also works for the land, the further you are, the more it'll "block" out or dim, because it's not in focusOr something like that, I don't need to be a camera expert just get the gist of itIn this pic, there's not a "spotlight" behind the astronautThat's the brightest part of the land ON THIS PIC, because that just so happen to be what's captured most for the aperture/exposition or whatever that makes the suit in that exact position in focus.If the astronaut is in another pose that's lit in a different way so the camera has to refocus, another part of the ground could be the "most bright" that makes it look like a spotlight.This is how I understand it and seems reasonable and not stupid
>>221221655>CRUST BUSTED
>>221226674that machine was built in Grant's free time, it wasn't part of the show.
>Ants are attracted to used underwear because vaginal discharge contains natural proteins and organic compoundsWould have been a cool subject to explore
>>221221655who controls the media
My sister says it's not a myth.
>>221226228She baked with her low and mid level poop. The high quality turds got sent out as is.
>>221226680>The blocking out dim lights also works for the land, the further you are, the more it'll "block" out or dim, because it's not in focusIn the image you yourself posted you have everything closer, in front of the astronaut, in focus and yet its darker than the rest of the surface.
>>221226674That's sustained constant sensory overload.That's not "an orgasm", like a climax thing that burst and decreases rapidly.The myth is that the girl mounts a climax and burst along with you, when her system is actually never doing that and that she can keep doing the thing forever untill her brain is cooked.
Why is it that when I sat down my diaper was dry but when I got up my diaper was wet?
>>221224930>this bolsters the immune system
>>221226674nerve gas
>>221226799That doesn't disprove anything I saidThe front is SHARP, but not IN FOCUS, that's just you being retardedThe astronaut is in focus and the camera is set to capture the suit as much as possible,, and all light coming into the camera dims or burns to keep the astronaut in focus.Whatever weird shit it does with the background doesn't matter.The front is darker, the back of the astronaut is brighter, the background hill is darker. Non of that matter because it's not fucking taking a fucking picture of the landscape, it's taking a picture of the astronaut.Whatever light fits or not with the background doesn't matter (to the camera).
>Fact: Losing sight does not magically grant superpowers. Blind women rely on their sense of touch, hearing, and smell exactly as sighted people do. However, because they learn to pay closer attention to these inputs, they can often process and utilize sensory information—like recognizing a voice or navigating the layout of a room—with exceptional skill.I doubt this by the way
>>221221655>What was it, /tv/?
>>221226674epilepsy
>>221226865>I doubt this by the wayYou can literally just test it, I close my eyes to focus on sounds, I close my eyes when trying to reach for something out of sight like something that fell behind a couch.
>>221226854>The front is SHARP, but not IN FOCUSIts sharp because its in camera focus. The other meaning of the word "focus" of what the person taking the shot wanted to capture is irrelevant to the optics of the camera having a set distance from it in optical focus.
passports surviving plane crashes
>>221222578They tested if redheads can endure less pain with the ice water pain test. Don't think they've done much else specifically.
RAPING BLOB
>>221226674
>>221221655These steel beams aren't melting Jamie.
>>221226895That's the hill you die on?"If it's sharp that means it's in focus, exposure doesn't matter"Please let me know that's your argument so I can stop wasting my time, having proving you the retard that knows nothing about cameras that already claimed you werePlease tell me if I'm correct and this is something you believe in:>If it's sharp that means it's in focus, exposure doesn't matter
>>221226766>taking a photo of obviously soiled panties to seethe about your mcjob on reddit instead of quickly pocketing them before your colleagues notice them so you can enjoy them laterngmi
Did we ever get to the bottom of this?>Published: May 29, 2008 12:00 AM>Perceptions about bare feet began changing in the 1990s when cross migration between the alt.rec.nude and alt.rec.backcountry newsgroups sparked discussion about whether it really was illegal to drive barefoot. (No, according to a widely circulated Internet survey by the alt.folklore.urban newsgroup, though Alabama does frown on anyone riding a motorcycle without shoes.) That led to more discussion about what was and wasn't legal, as well as myths associated with the practice. Proponents say the discussion helped lower inhibitions about setting our piggies free.
>>221221655>can men be women
>>221226940Here's professional photographers showcasing the problem of the spotlights in photos:At time 2:37:15https://archive.org/details/american-moon-massimo-mazzucco-2017
>>221226973Tiresias did it
>>221221655It was this
>>221227010???
>>221226979Are you going to answer my question on your beliefs?
>>221225870Why would there be specks of dust on the leg?
>>221227016It's about how excessive masturbation is becoming a common hobby in current year due to these machines everyone is hooked up into.
>The most persistent massage myth is that deep tissue massage "releases toxins" into your bloodstream.
>>221227032Example image where you see the same surface lit up very differently on two sides despite both captured on the sides of the astronaut's visor which should be the same distance from the camera.
>>221222923>>221225127>>221225870what is the motivation of moon landing conspiracy theorists? butthurt slavaboos? space isn't real? or is it just "i know something you don't know" hobnobbery?Genuinely I do not know.
>>221227035>>221226345
>>221221655Holocaust numbersWhite privilegeWhy do blacks commit so much crime
>>2212270713 letter psyop to discredit actual conspiracies.
>>221227069Are you going to answer my question on your beliefs?
>>221227071>whats the motivation of showing how the supposed biggest humanity's achievement was a lie??? why dont they just trust authority despite the contrary evidence?
>>221227111why would nasa lie about the moon landing
>>221227104I am literally proving how what I was talking about was right, you are now dodging again and again because what you said got disproven. >>221227069
>>221227071I do believe the moonlanding was real, but the conspiracy I buy is that cosmonauts hear weird shit in space that shouldn't supposed to be there, and they are told to disregard it
>>221227122>why do people in power give false information to those below them?No reason at all, the government only wants the best for you.
>>221227147what does the government gain by lying about a scientific achievement that proves the triumph of the human spirit?
>>221227132That doesn't disprove my framing in the slightest and has a very reasonable explanationBUT REQUIRES YOU TO KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT FUCKING CAMERAS AND YOU DON'T BELIEVE EXPOSURE IS REAL
>>221227163The americans lost every step of the way during the space race, and then the president promised that somehow they will win at the end. The spend a huge amount of money on marketing and propaganda about their superiority in space and how they will do it.But as the years went on and they kept finding problem after problem that was unsolvable, not getting any close to actually doing what they promised, then they out of the blue just went and all those problems disappeared.https://archive.org/details/american-moon-massimo-mazzucco-2017And asking why would someone lie is irrelevant when there is evidence that he did anyway.
>>221227167Did those two points on the visor which are the same distance from the camera somehow have wastly different magical focus that made one multiple times darker?
>>221227201>The americans lost every step of the way during the space race, and then the president promised that somehow they will win at the end.butthurt slavaboo confirmed
>>221227201Oh, so their competitors in this race - the USSR, who were tracking the US and intercepting communications - must also believe the moonlanding was fake... right?
>>221227255>no argument ad hominemConcession accepted.
>>221227263>concessionThere's no point in engaging with bad faith arguments like "the moon landing was faked because america is dumb and incompetent and had to save face".
>>221227201why did they stop though? they proved that they could do it, then they proved that it wasn't a fluke by doing it more than once.and then they just...quit? both sides just agreed to stop even trying? nobody wanted a permanent base on the literal moon?
>>221221655Is it true that its only gay if the balls touch? We have twenty guys with their balls hanging out, and we are 100 yards back behind this blast shield, and on one, we're gonna launch these guys at eachother balls first and see if they turn gay.
>>221227260The argument of "why didnt ussr complain that it was fake then?" has a simple answer.If you supposedly had real-time conversation of the president and the astronauts which was televised to everyone, how would the ussr look like if after they just said "No, it's fake!". They would look like sore loser clowns.The same question can be asked about the recent covid which everyone went through. "Why would the entire world, all countries, organizations, and most doctors lie?".Because:1. Most of this is heavily compartmentalized, most doctors are just regular people who take orders and do what they are told, they don't have the opportunity to see the whole picture and they don't need to. They just need to be told that X medicine is good.2. Most people in governments and corporations also don't need to be in the know, and the very few people at the very top that are in the know all just want to stay there, because they view themselves as a group beyond some national borders.
>>221227323Because the moon is a barren shithole with nothing on it that has no tactical value to justify the insane cost for something impossible and pointless to maintain.
>>221227228With one very very simple explanation? Sure!I'm going to amuse you, little retard, but this will be my final message because I gotta get back to workI'm going to leave you like a bitch with a very simple explanation.Those cameras are bulky, and the suit makes it difficult to make a selfie. It doesn't have a digital preview that lets you see what's taken. It's literally a shoebox with a button that you point and pray it gets something.The nigga inside doesn't have the time to wait for the full aperture or whatever bullshit lense captures light to settle down and even out. It's a quick photo with a bulky shit.If in the process of taking that pic, he very realistically covers the "fall off" part of the helmet for a split second moving his hand up trying to grasp the shoebox, or turn his head to the "fall off" side for a split second, or any other number of a million equally realistic posibilities on the process of taking the pic, that could cover that "fall off" side for a second, the "hotspot" side will have more bright light for longer on the camera, that will make it seems like the other side is not as dark.
**[SCENE START]****[UPBEAT, REVVING INDUSTRIAL ROCK MUSIC PLAYS]****NARRATOR (V.O.)**On this episode of *MythBusters*... Adam and Jamie tackle a legendary piece of locker-room logic. A rule of thumb passed down through generations of high school gym classes and fraternity houses. The ultimate clause in bro-code theology: *“It’s only gay if the balls touch.”***[CUT TO: THE M5 SHOP. ADAM IS WEARING A LAB COAT OVER A T-SHIRT. JAMIE IS IN HIS SIGNATURE BERET AND WHITE BUTTON-DOWN, LOOKING VISIBLY WEARY.]****ADAM***(Grinning widely, gesturing with his hands)*Now, usually, we deal with physics, chemistry, or firearms. But today, we are diving deep into the murky waters of *social constructs* and *bro-science*. Jamie, what is the official definition we're testing today?**JAMIE***(Sighs deeply, rubbing his temples)*The myth states that an act of physical intimacy between two men is completely devoid of any homosexual context *unless* there is direct, scrotal-on-scrotal contact. According to internet folklore, this is the definitive, immutable threshold.**ADAM**Exactly! But here at the shop, we don't just take internet folklore at face value. We test it. And how do you test a high-velocity, high-stakes collision theory? You build a giant pneumatic launcher, obviously.### **THE SETUP****[CUT TO: THE ALAMEDA NAVAL AIR BASE. THE RUNWAY IS CLEAR. THE SUN IS BEATING DOWN.]****NARRATOR (V.O.)**To test this scientifically—and safely—the guys have recruited twenty brave, highly compensated, and incredibly confused stuntmen.**[SHOT OF TWENTY MEN IN GYM SHORTS, STANDING IN A LINE, LOOKING NERVOUSLY AT A MASSIVE STEEL APPARATUS.]****ADAM***(Holding a megaphone)*Welcome, gentlemen! Today, you are pioneers of science. We have modified our classic high-pressure nitrogen cannon into a dual-track, synchronized human slingshot.
>>221227341>we've invested billions over decades and they come in and fake the ending?>welp, better not say anything, don't wanna look like sore losersno one is as stupid as you're pretending to be, so knock it off.
>>221227387PAN TO: THE "BALLISTIC BRO-LAUNCHER." TWO PARALLEL TRACKS FACING EACH OTHER, EQUIPPED WITH REINFORCED SLINGSHOT CRADLES DESIGNED TO LAUNCH HUMANS HORIZONTALLY, FEET TRAILING, FRONTAL REGIONS FORWARD.]JAMIETo ensure absolute safety and isolation from any psychological bias, Adam and I will be monitoring the results from 100 yards back, safely behind this polycarbonate blast shield.[CUT TO: JAMIE AND ADAM STANDING BEHIND A THICK LEXAN SHIELD. JAMIE IS HOLDING A DETONATOR BOX. ADAM IS WEARING A FULL FACE SHIELD AND COUNTING DOWN ON HIS FINGERS.]THE EXPERIMENTNARRATOR (V.O.)The parameters are simple. Two men. One hundred yards of separation. Accelerated to a relative velocity of forty-five miles per hour. Target acquisition: direct structural convergence.ADAM(Over radio)Load Bro-1 and Bro-2 into the cradles![TWO STUNTMEN ARE SECURED INTO THE SLINGSHOTS. THEY GIVE A WEARY THUMBS-UP.]ADAMAlright, Jamie. Pressure looks good. Nitrogen tanks are at 2,500 PSI. On my count... Three! Two! One! LAUNCH![JAMIE FLIPS THE SWITCH.][LOUD PNEUMATIC WHOOSH! CLANCK!][SLOW-MOTION CAMERA: THE TWO MEN ARE HURTLED TOWARD EACH OTHER AT BREAKNECK SPEED. THE SOUND OF RUSHING WIND. THEY COLLIDE IN THE EXACT CENTER OF THE TRACK WITH A DULL THUD AND A LOUD "OUCH!"][THEY TUMBLE SAFELY ONTO A MASSIVE PILE OF FOAM MATTRESSES.]THE EVALUATION[ADAM AND JAMIE RUN OUT FROM BEHIND THE BLAST SHIELD WITH A CLIPBOARD.]ADAM(Inspecting the crash site)Alright, contact was confirmed! We had definitive, sub-centimeter proximity engagement. Let's check the vitals. Guys, how do you feel?STUNTMAN #1(Groaning, holding his ribs)My shoulder hurts.ADAMBut structurally... emotionally... do you suddenly feel a desire to update your interior design preferences or download a specific dating app?STUNTMAN #2(Staring blankly)No. I just want my check, man.
>>221227307Claiming you will win the most important political race of all time you spent an insane amount of money on and pushed propaganda for, for years and years on end only to fail at the end would be great PR for the government and they would never just... lie. The government is known for not lying, especially about something like that. The fact that they themselves admit no doing things like experimenting on regular people of society secretly in the most vile experiments nobody got punished for during all of those times also is irrelevant and doesn't mean anything.
>>221227323If you think the feasability and value of a moon base is something worth actually considering I have a bridge to sell you, on the moon.
>>221227408THE CONCLUSION[CUT TO: THE M5 SHOP. ADAM AND JAMIE ARE STANDING BY THE WHITEBOARD.]JAMIEWell, after nineteen more iterations of high-velocity impact, the data speaks for itself. We observed zero shifts in sexual orientation, zero romantic tension, and a significant amount of bruising.ADAMIt turns out that launching twenty dudes at each other balls-first doesn't change who they are—it just makes them incredibly sore. The idea that a specific physical contact point acts as a magical, binary switch for human sexuality is completely unfounded.JAMIESo, the physics are clear, the biology is clear, and the sociology is clear.ADAMThis myth is... BUSTED.[A MASSIVE EXPLOSION ROCKS THE BACKGROUND FOR NO APPARENT REASON AS THE MYTHBUSTERS LOGO SLAMS ONTO THE SCREEN.][SCENE END]
>>221227341They could've, and still could if it were true, photograph the supposed landing site to show what is or isn't there. After all, a few countries and even private companies have done this.
>>221227409No, you won. You defeated with me with the greatest argument "it was fake because the US had to save face because they're dumb". It's like if I were to debate Socrates; I'm utterly outmatched without any possibility of success.
>>221227409>Claiming you will win the most important political race of all time you spent an insane amount of money on and pushed propaganda for, for years and years on end only to fail at the end would be great PR for the government and they would never just... lie.And yet the Russians would lie about it, even though they lost?
>>221227392Why didn't any country expose covid as a meme and instead they let all of their own people get injected with something that they had no idea what it really was with no actual long term studies for?
another inorganic thread where one guy jokingly greentexts about the moonlanding and the entire air force base goes on high alert to shut down any conspiracy talk
>>221227437Even if this was to be granted in it's entirety for the sake of the argument, it doesn't prove that humans themselves step foot on the moon, which was the entire point.
>>221227440>ad absurdum fallacyAlso, if the good government would never do something as lie, >>221227467>Why didn't any country expose covid as a meme and instead they let all of their own people get injected with something that they had no idea what it really was with no actual long term studies for?
>>221227467>immediately compare it to other conspiraciesyep, it's this >>221227102 clear as day. no one actually believes this bullshit, it's just glownigs trying to muddy the water
>>221227424ok.but they're apparently going to do it now, with the artemis mission. is that just a great, big boondoggle? they're doing it for no reason?
>>221227458>>221227341
>>221226877They also used ordinary funeral pyres which don't have the limitations of ovens. You can scale corpse disposal as much as you want as long as you have wood and a labor force.
>>221227518>>ad absurdum fallacyLiteral Socrates. I told you I can't win. Just take your success and go!!!!
>>221227519>"the government would never lie to save face!">so why did they all lie to inject their own populations with a mystery chemical?>"Y-YOU ARE A GLOWNIGGER!!!"indeed.
>>221227545>the most important political race of all time you spent an insane amount of money on and pushed propaganda for, for years and years on end>look like sore loser clownsSee the difference in magnitude here?
>>221227541>but they're apparently going to do it nowThey were apparently going to do it many times over and it went nowhere but sure, we'll see.
>>221227579The difference in magnitude doesn't matter because there is no way to easily disprove something people got shown on television supposedly happened. Especially in the time where people didn't have internet, phones, social media, video sharing sites etc. The average person would just hear the news on the american tv or american newspaper that ussr complained it was fake like sore losers and that would be it.Even today despite having all these things and the evidence against many things in this world majority of the people dont care and just believe what the government tells them on any topic.
>>221227560There would be massive deposits of burned/partially broken down bone fragments containing the remains of hundreds of thousands of people if this were the case (not to mention the vast deposits of ash and forensic evidence of this left behind if done on this scale). Bones have to be ground separately in special machines after cremation in order to produce a fine powder that is mixed back in with the ash. Basically it's fake and easily debunked fairytales like this have to be created from thin air to make it even remotely plausible.
>>221227071"I know something you don't know" is the core behind all conspiracy theorists. They aren't interested in real proven conspiracies because knowing about it doesn't make them a special boy.
>>221227639>The difference in magnitude doesn't matter because there is no way to easily disprove something people got shown on television supposedly happened.Okay, then shut the fuck up and stop ruining threads with your off topic retardation.
>>221221655The holocaust
>>221227667>ignores the rest of the comment so he can cope>even has to ignore the "supposedly" in what he quoted so he can copeGrim. Another concession accepted.
>>221227560So that's EASIER to cover that just buring a body?You can snap someone, dig a hole, and dump the whole body in one go.If you are talking about funeral pyres, you are talking about collecting 206 bones individually times the persons you want in your pyre ON THE GROUNDNot on a furnace with an ashtray or shit you accommodate, you are now talking about open ground thousands of bones
>>221227689
>>221227717Ok I admit it, it was 20 million
>>221224930>I almost bought one of Pooalexa’s shit stuffed Twinkies Grim times.
>>221224099suck my wrinkly millennial balls, you predictable moron lol
>>221227717who is this
>>221227576You're conflating "the government is evil" and "the government is retarded".
>>221228875Are you arguing the government isn't both of those things or that it's impossible for many to be stupid while the few at the top being evil?
>>221221798This. Also it would have been such an easy myth to test
>>221229083You're shifting the goalposts. Earlier it was that the government lies because it's retarded but doesn't want to admit it, but post-coof the government is lying because it's evil and duplicitous. How can the government be inept and a mastermind at the same time?
>>221222584You lost, tranny.
>>221229137>How can the government be inept and a mastermind at the same time?Not sure if you're aware but, "the government" is not one person.Like I said in the very thing you quoted>or that it's impossible for many to be stupid while the few at the top are evil?"
