>we can already write books from scratch with AI>same for music>we can ask AI to write a book just like our favorite author and it will do it perfectlyWhen is the same going to happen with movies and tv shows?And what will you be doing with it?I have 3 Harry Potter books written by AI on a slice of life style, so once we can generate tv shows and movies from it that's what I'll be doing.What about you?
>>221228346>What about you?I will ignore your>look guys what I've madethreads. And watch something else
>>221228346It’s incapable of actually writing a cohesive and planned thing. Which is why you’re digesting pure SOL slop But I’m pretty sure the actual energy cost of generating 24 FPS 2 hr long SOL slops would be prohibitively expensive for a normal person to just do at their whim.
AI Concept is the future. It's is rockin'.
>>221228407You're not wrong.
>>221228346Call me when AI can proceedurally generate a psychological survival horror video game that studies my actions and choices to create a plot that I can't predict and scenes that actually terrify me.
>>221228346AI writing is terrible and if i had an app to filter it if use it.
>>221228346>steal from one artistIllegal sued>steal from 10 000 artistFair use200 IQ galaxy brain move by anthropic, why didnt Shakespeare just rThink of that
>>221228346AI has plateaued aesthetically. Fidelity has improved, but it still has the same ugly stench of aesthetic mediocrity that it had 3 years ago. It's still extremely obvious when someone uses AI art or text. If it hasn't improved in years, this is the ceiling. Stop hoping for an AI that will make difficult and daring creative decisions because it won't exist (and likely can't exist for technical reasons I won't go into).
>>221228346>a book written with modern internet language (which makes up a majority of an AI's language abilities)No thank you! I'll stick to generating waifus.
>>221228407>>221228473Tell me more?
which one of you was this
>>221228346AI has no cultural impact, the one and only thing it's good for is porn.
>>221228346>I have 3 Harry Potter books written by AI on a slice of life styleSounds cozy.
>When is the same going to happen with movies and tv shows?You already can, but the problem is that no one here is creative enough despite spamming for years that they could run circles around hollywood and that ai would let them do it.
>>221228346It's never gonna be good. It's always going to be a worthless facsimile of hand made art. It takes away control from the artist and leaves the product open to the arbitrary whims of a machine that doesn't understand what art is. I can't see myself ever enjoying it. It's like saying >I'd rather admire the patterns of diarrhea on the walls of my toilet bowl than the paintings in a museum.
>>221228346>it will do it perfectly
The scariest part is that it's probably already happening, but no one notices because writing has already been the most abysmal dogshit in movies (and other media) for the past decade or more.
>>221228677that's also how the finance industry works
>>221228346saar
>MILK THE GOBLIN QUICK AND FIRM>SQUEEZE HIS TENDER BRAINS NO PAIN
>>221228946toad frog bag slam.
>>221228346>and it will do it perfectly
>>221228346>When is the same going to happen with movies and tv shows?Already happening, anon. It's a matter of time and money to run a decent model.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtnt84CDP-s
>>221228677>steal from 10 000 artistFucking ESLs. Luddites don't know learning from stealing. If you look at lots of paintings to learn how to paint that's learning. Same thing when a clanker does it.
>>221232799>EOL actin' upI can't hear you with that corporate dick in your mouth.
>>221232935dial 8
>>221230291too soon
>>221228346>>we can ask AI to write a book just like our favorite author and it will do it perfectlynope
>>221231253infinate possibilies... but 99% of it is just porn and smut
>>221228346>we can already write books from scratch with AIyou mean AI can already write books for you
>>221232799You have no idea what you're talking about
>and it will do it perfectly
>>221228346And who the fuck is actually reading those AI books unless they’re scammed to do it? >Well I doSo you’re spending your time reading trash?
>>221228407>It's is rockin'
>>221229666I guess sometimes the devil tells the truth.They might not have been using current script generation, but Hollywood has been using algorithms and data analysis of demographics and test audiences for years. They have been using analitics and corporate mandates based on audience tests to write stories for so long, it might as well have been by ChapGPT.
>>221233122No. I listen to the audiobooks of them as I browse reddit.
>my dick is nonexistent so I will let JamAI please the woman of my dreams while I beat my peckerAI cucks in a nutshell
>>221233070>implying that webm isn't perfectjoke's on you i'm a jazz master now thanks to that webm.
>>221229666>>221233141I honestly believe all mainstream media since COVID onwards has been AI generated
Soon AI will even masturbate for you.
AI is the inevitable.
>>221228346>>we can ask AI to write a book just like our favorite author and it will do it perfectlyWronghttps://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.03136
>>221228844Fuck waifus.I'll stick to AI frog posting.
>>221233122No one really, it's just that they're so easy to make and publish that everyone does it If they make even just one sale, they'll make profit.
>>221233204two more weeks and the new model will solve the issues.trust me, bro.
Warner Bros already made this AI abomination and sold tickets to it.
>>221233230>it’s okay to flood the market with slop
onenothing wrong with me
>>221233281it has worked so well for studios like Disney
>>221228844computer, does it come in black?
>>221228346>I have 3 Harry Potter books written by AIno, you have notthey are bootleg versions, fakejust like you being decent human being
>>221233017>>221233204Just give the technology more time.We can replace writers just like we are replacing actors and artists. Two more years! Tops!
>>221233281Didn't say it was okay. But that is what's happening.
there are some decent use cases for ai
>>221233381left kinoright soulless
jeet thread
>>221233370>they are bootleg versions, fakeI say the same of the last decade+ of Star Wars
>>221228346By 2025 everyone will be able to prompt their own 3 hour feature film in a matter of minutes. Hollywood is COOKED!
>>221233424like curing cancer, right?
>>221228346>I have 3 Harry Potter books written by AI on a slice of life styleI'm glad that you're not in the genpool game
>>221228346The sole use case for ai is furry porn because actual furries can't finish anything without having a mental breakdown and paywall milking
I find it kinda funnyI find it kinda sadBig companies are jumping head first into the AI craze
>>221228346>Nobody reads the AI books and digital bookstores now heavily restrict AI book submissions because of the flood of AI slop.>US courts deemed all AI songs Public Domain so AI music will only ever get used in samples and common license stuff.Probably never because it runs to the two fundamental issues of people not ready to pay money for AI because they already get AI back home for free, and the fact you need to hire a human being to substantially change the AI creation anyway or otherwise you cannot actually own the thing you prompted.
>>221228346>we can already write books from scratch with AIX doubt >I have 3 Harry Potter books written by AI Post excerpts
>>221229187>RSubtleI like it
>>221231253get down with your bad self
There are only two possibilities.1. AI progress moves slowly so people adjust to the slop and generations are raised on it meaning when AI becomes actually good nobody appreciates it, their diseased brains will just demand more slop.2. AI becomes actually good in 5-10 years and ushers in a golden age of advancement and creativity.
>>221228718>AI that will make difficult and daring creative decisions because it won't exist (and likely can't exist for technical reasons I won't go intoexplain pls
>>221233705You know how girls are with old sweaters.
>>221232799Building a neural network with 10,000 data points isnt learning its construction. All of the people that helped the construction need to be compensared or you just built your neuronetwork with slave labor. Wow! Slavery is so much cheaper than paying workers! This slavery thing must be the future
And YET AI can't generate any good longform futa on male noncon stories yet
>>221234213change her book to>32 best sex positions with canineswritten by prof lupus or whatever his name was
>>221228718>>221234233Retards with no clue, dumber than clankers.
>>221228718>3 years forward>It will stop getting better and better any day now!! Sure you can shoot a photo of your hot neighbour, de-age her 20 years give her double d's, and let her avatar blow you in 8k in vr, but it won't get any better than this i-i promise! Everybody listen to me!
>>221234378Tbf slavery was p cheap too.
>>221232799AI cant think you turbo niggerit shouldnt even be called AI since it isnt one in its current state
>>221234691It wasn't and copying paintings isn't slavery. You are a retard.
>>221228346I just make characters and romance them
>>221228346Art is expression and communication through skill. The whole point is on the decisions the artist make, on the HOW, the artist chooses to convey the ideas, emotions and all that. Culture is an inherently humane thing. AI has it´s place curing cancer, doing our laundry, our accounting or our repetitive production related tasks as that may free humans to become more than replaceable working drones. It has no place or meaning on the cultural arena. Furthermore not only profiting from AI generated imagery and the like is difficult, as the produce can not be copyrighted, but derivative generated products can result in becoming subject of legal action (The only "proof of process" one can show are the actually copyrighted materials used to train the AI. Not only that doesn´t qualify as design, it´s legit proof of a crime, well done). That, paired with how expensive media is to produce, make it a red business. And then there are the issues of consistency and control... as it stands AI little more than an expensive toy for personal use.
>AI can produce text>But they would never ever use it to astroturf the technology to suckers
>>221234849This. Using the work of thousands od artists without paying them to make art for you is NOT slavery. Its progress.
>>221228407AI Concept is getting extremely popular in media.
>>221228844Klein 9b?
>>221228407Liking AI slop is third world coded SAAR.
I use ai for sex stories but you pretty much have to be autistic to like it because its basically the same story over and over
>>221231253ayy lmao
>>221229666They already did for Alien Earth and it shows.
>>221235147ZIM+ZIT
>>221228528Yeah or one that can be about turning on generators
>>221229666They are doing it and it's obvious because how shit and lazy finales are
>>221228346No it can't.It won't even give me a pg13 scene between Marie and Skyler.
>>221228346Art is only interesting because its made by people, Apocalypse Now is great because of the huge effort it took to make and the stories from production add loads to it while The Room is famous for being terrible because of how enigmatic Tommy Wiseau is. AI could conceivably generate both movies frame by frame in the future but it wouldn't be interesting because its basically just an accident
>>221228346It's actually crazy that you can ask AI to write the next song of ice and fire and it will most likely be better than the actual book.
>>221235814Someone elsewhere had a great line about how photos capture energy, not just the person or setting. This is why the uncanny valley exists. AI can do everything exactly the same and we'll still feel something is off because the energy isn't there.
>>221235851Very true, each photo taken by a person says at least something about whoever took it because whether they thought much about it or not they made loads of micro decisions that lead to the photo looking exactly how it did. AI is more like a security camera accidentally capturing something while it films constantly 24/7 from one set angle, it tells us nothing
>>221228391>I will ignore your threadsdoubt.jpg
>>221235827That is so crazy, haha!
>>221234534>It will stop getting better and better any day now!! Sure you can shoot a photo of your hot neighbour, de-age her 20 years give her double d's, and let her avatar blow you in 8k in vr, but it won't get any better than this i-i promise!This lol. AI *still* can't do... everything.
>>221235851>anti-ai luddites are delusional schizophrenicsChecks out.
>>221236127AI is perfect if the only thing you want from movies is to see Batman punch the joker
AI Concept Revolution (AI C R)
>>221236218>um you literally can't just start a camera running and have it create an entire movie, you have to DIRECT the movie!!!!one! So cameras are basically useless and a time-wasting novelty.This is what smug anti-AI "people" sound like.
>>221228346Why haven't we redone the last season of game of thrones or winds of winters and dream of spring
>>221236240I have no idea what you're trying to say, you will need to re-prompt your argument
>>221236253>winds of wintersSomeone already did and fatman's publisher dmca'd the fuck out of the book the AI spit out.
>>221228346I'll just make femdom porn because current femdom porn sucks.
>>221228346Grok lets you write porn.
>>221236271>I have no idea what you're trying to sayWe already knew you're retarded.
>>221236528"We" being you and grok I assume
>>221228346>we can ask AI to write a book just like our favorite author and it will do it perfectlyIt literally cannot do this
>>221236332What the fuck is George's problem? He created the foundation for the biggest TV show in history, then left the story unfinished on purpose.
>>221236542There you go again with the schizo conflation of all your imaginary internet enemies
>>221236709Point brilliantly made, maybe AI really is the future of movies after all
>>221236332>Someone already did and fatman's publisher dmca'd the fuck out of the book the AI spit out.Shit, well surely there's a copy online?
>>221228346If you say "I want to be a writer, but I want AI to do my writing for me", maybe you shouldn't actually be a writer at all.
>>221236758U mad bro?
People only like stories, art, or poetry because of the human attention element, not because of the style of writing or the plots.Like Harry Potter would not have gained the traction it did if people knew it was written by AI, and it would have been impossible for AI to write Harry Potter because it doesn't have the unique life experience that JK Rowling did.Yes the future of fiction will be fake and gay forever because the AI genie is out of the bottle now. And there may be future works of fiction that command a fanbase as strong as Harry Potter. But I think for the vast majority their command will be relatively brief since AI will churn works of similar quality at the volume of tens of thousands a day.I actually foresee that the future of art be dominated by the equivalent to modern day influencers. Why do people like influencers, because they're human people doing stuff. So the future of lucrative art will be the equivalent of Belle Delphine's bathwater with a little more effort, maybe Belle Delphine macaroni art or Asmingoldstein fingerpainting, where the favt it's a certain person doing something is the focus.
>>221236603>sells the rights to HBO>they completely fumble it to the point people don't care about the franchise>they do House of Dragon>fuck up S2 as wellHe made his money, no point in finishing it when reading is going to be automated by corpo spy bots
>>221228346Post your "AI Harry Potter" books so we can laugh at you.
>>221237020Pop music is a good example where AI could easily reproduce the actual art of it, but can never actually compete with the real thing because people who are fans of Taylor Swift only care about Taylor Swift and she can (and does) put out endless dross but it doesn't matter because for whatever reason teenage girls find her fascinating
>>221237201Yea we already see it really, where modern day pop stars are bigger than most movie stars. Even some comedians too.Although if the production aspect is completely streamlined by AI and the artist is just a human face at the fore that's still a dystopian future.Japs are even worse on this with Hatsune Miku and voacloid concerts. I mean, if I'm being hinest with myself I would watch a Doro concert. But not in person and I wouldn't pay for it.
I've been having fun, but it'll go away eventually
>>221228346Hollywood is fucked.
>>221228346yeah bro totallyelias thorne lighthouse keeper film will be totally epic
>>221237274Mass market art for drooling retards has always sucked to be fair, that's the only thing that will be affected by AI. Anyone actually interested in what they're taking in automatically isn't going to enjoy anything made by AI and the niches that exist now will survive through it.
>>221228346AI writing is fucked because its programmed to stray away from sex, violence, and anything offensive. If you asked it to write a Star Wars movie it would never go anywhere because it avoids killing people, even faceless mooks like Stormtroopers.
>>221237403You can just run one locally, without restrictions.
>>221237403AI writing is fucked because even with all that stuff it would be totally inconsequential. Titus Andronicus is an overly edgy violent mess that everyone hated and would have been totally forgotten if it wasn't written by Shakespeare, the artist is as interesting to people as the art
>>221237403Skill issue. ChatGTP spits out painal scenes whenever I ask for them.
what kino are we working on bros?>2 supergirls confronting lex luthor
>>221228346Sneedance 2.0 already gave us a preview. Time to wait only, man.
>>221237403All future art will need a specific scene denouncing the Talmud to ensure it's made by humans.
>>221237645
>>221228718Looks pretty good to me
>>221237765>>221237645>meeeeeennnn
>>221228346>same for musicAnd it fucks https://youtu.be/MTNQG-gsO3E
>>221235159>codedFaggot
>>221237824if you don't understand why this is aesthetically pedestrian then there is no hope for you. God bless you.
>>221228346you can't do any of that with AI, at least not well
You either do AI Concept or you get left behind.
>not doing your own movies with AIwhat does stop you?
AI will make all humans unnecesary. Billions will suffer.
You all need to stop using AI because I'm bad at prompting.
>>221228346Write me a new Terry Pratchett Discworld book using AI.
>>221228346Real problem isn't that you can DO those things. It's that resulting slop is absolutely alright for 90% of people.
>>221228346Same. I use it to play CYOA games based on existing IPs like for example a CYOA game based on A Song of Ice and Fire on George RR Martin's prose, it can produce mega kino writing. I don't use chatgpt though because it's censored to shit.
>>221239536>I don't use chatgpt though because it's censored to shit.Just enable DAN mode
>>221239264i have heard this a few times now what is that supposed to be>>221239561dont pretend this still functions
>>221240538It works on whatever model Cici/Dola is currently running.
>>221239301>what does stop you?
>>221228346no one is going to pay you to use your shitty copier
>>221240709Why is the "rebuttal" to 'we can make our own movies without hollywood' always 'Nobody will pay you for the movies you make for yourself'?
>>221240751you still aren't getting paid for your centralized copier that shits out slop on demandnot even taking the luddite tone, there are tools here but they can all be done local cheaper with greater freedom I just hate this because its bieng forced everywhere it shouldn't by oppressive corps sucking all the air out of consumers lungs, the bubble can't pop soon enough
>>221240845>you still aren't getting paidSee? Even after having it pointed out, he did it again. Why do anti-ai "people" have such a hard time wrapping their heads around the concept that the output is made for the prompter and no one else matters?
>>221240660If you tell them what's wrong with their grammar they might eventually learn and then spotting them will be harder.
>>221240751I don't pay for media at all anymore. If I can't pirate it, I don't want it.
>>221240910nah, i think this is the apex of their capacity.
>>221240751People seriously underestimate how fucking LAZY the average consumer is. Not everyone is going to subscribe to the latest AI chat bot or service. Or download the latest model. Or have the know-how to prompt engineer to get around the guardrails. People will absolutely pay for second hand AI slop. Mostly boomers. And even then, the average smart phone user doesn't even remember their fucking passwords! This shit can absolutely be monetized and there's a whole industry already dedicated to it.
>>221233424
>>221231253>Random dictionary backgroundJust like the posts we got a few years back before the AI stabilized.
At the moment, ChatGPT is NOT good at writing. I've tried, but it gives me pretty shitty suggestions. It's a great tool, but it won't write a script from scratch.
Post yfw AI literally can't do everything yet
>>221228346>on a slice of life styleA non-ESL would say "IN the style of a slice of life" for your information.
>>221241044Thing is, in the consumer market at least, it will never go beyond porn, and porn will be the most developed market for AI.In terms of advertising and graphic design space, every time I see AI art being used to advertise something it just turns me off. Maybe the regular consoomer won't care about that.Now if AI was being applied in an industrial level it might be a different story. Like I can see how AI might be cool for Disney theme parks in creating robotic versions of Disney princesses that walk around trained on their Disney characters that can organically interact with guests.>>221241934Even if AI was great at writing, I think it's a dead end at least for the entertainment industry.Because you'd need to hire people to actually read these AI churned out scripts to make sure it's not slop. Though with what we've seen with artists being caught using AI with art with glaring errors, maybe not.And I think that when actors read over the scripts and realize it's AI generated slop they'd drop the project. There's probably already clauses in actors contracts that stipulate that if they were given an AI script then the contract is rendered null and the actor is compensated.
secret b@skin threadkik? kik!
>>221242242tee bee aych, a normally functioning person will immediately realize that the "i" and "o" keys are adjacent and that those characters are often accidentally transposed.
>>221233070You don't see these often any more. Was there a particular model used?
>>221228967Tbf, after years of AI being a central cultural talking point, we did get "We Are Charlie Kirk" and tung tung tung sahur. Well worth the hype
>>221228346AI can't write worth shit, and AI music is boring garbage. I have yet to prompt something where I'm like "Yeah I'll still be listening to this in five years."It's great for posting a funny song on X or facebook real quick, but thats about it. Too many hooks, not interesting music at all, very boring.AI only works when it's used as a tool in hands of artist, when a human is still doing most of the work.Like the Will Stancil show for example.https://x.com/i/status/2064725041263026627Or whatever the hell this is.https://x.com/i/status/2067207576551292951Or thishttps://x.com/i/status/2061458682714484939
>>221240877>there must be a pony in there!
>>221242778THAT'S your fucking excuse lmao? Notice there was more than one correction in that post.
>>221232799>>221234233>>221234378Art is more involved than looking at thousands of other pieces of art. Ask a non artist to look at and analyze and memorize a million different works, will not make that person an artist.This has been debunked a long time now. No matter how much the deranged ai cultists try to push that angle, they are not equivilant things.
>>221234213Catbox?
>>221228346It’s been 4 years. AI hasn’t replaced shit. AI video still looks uncanny and not anywhere good enough to replace actors and a camera. It’s actually extremely disappointing, I wanted to watch kinos made by anons but it will never happen
