I dont really understand that chart.

So whats your criteria? For me its basically a top 1,000. Specifically top 100 for each year. Because for example every year has a strong top 10. So that gets us absolutely nowhere.

So what about 2nd best? I assume the 90s. Because for example 1970-1972 is surprisingly weak. The top 100 of just 1984 is probably stronger than the top 100 of those 3 years combined.

Late 80s to the late 90s. Agent Smith said so.

>>221234118
There are maybe five good movies within that image.

>>221234118
Dude, MCU had the biggest bangers bangs with 10s

1890s

Where it all started. Accept no substitutes.

>>221235671
ayo look at this unc ahh unc

>>221234118
2010s and 2020s for both.

>>221234268
Fewer.

>>221236005
Also I forgot to add, I'm a trans girl born in 2008. I just love those 2010 classics.

>>221236040
>muh classics
Unlike you, I don't have to conform my taste to what's already established as "the classics." Benefit of not being a brainlet.

>>221236112
Shut up boomer. 2010s were banger oldie movies

>>221236598
It's not about whether they're old.

It's the best era of all time right now. This year alone we had Obsession as a new horror masterpiece in the traditional sense and Kane Pixel's revolutionary landscape changing tour de force movie.

>>221237257
This but unironically.

1900-60s all sucked and only poseurs pretend otherwise. Star Wars was the first good movie

>>221237257
>It's the best era of all time right now.
True.
>This year alone we had Obsession as a new horror masterpiece in the traditional sense and Kane Pixel's revolutionary landscape changing tour de force movie.
Haven't seen them, but I doubt anyone seriously treats them as better than upper mid horror flicks.