[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>M3gan 1.0 = $180 million box office on a $12 million budget
>M3gan 2.0 = $39 million box office on $25 million budget
What went wrong, bros? And how would you turn M3.0gan into a success again?
The first M3GAN movie was a massive sleeper hit, grossing $180 million worldwide on a $12 million budget. In contrast, its sequel, M3GAN 2.0, underperformed at the box office, finishing its theatrical run with roughly $39 million globally against an estimated $25 million production budget.
>>
M3gan 2.0 wasn't even a bad movie.
>>
The first film was horror-slop that turned out to have an artistic vein through the entire thing. Once word got out that it was better than expected it did better than expected. We have this strange situation with the algorithm where films that would previously have become a cult classic years later will instead get their niche audience very quickly.

The second film was a real effort to make science fiction with the same characters, it was even better than the first one but it wasn't much more of what people liked about the first one (except for le quip robot getting in more bazinga's). And now it was being compared to other 'serious' science fiction, as well as to the generic sci-fi slop, and it wasn't exactly either of those things. It was serious science fiction underneath a lot of fun sequel tropes and using a lot of the filmic language of sci-fi slop. So it got caught in the middle, serious people weren't happy about how much fun the creators were having, and slop-munchers didn't like the science fiction so much.

That's how the industry works, sadly.
>>
M3GAN films are both great. I hope the second one does well on streaming and blu-ray and they make a third, even if it's low budget.
>>
>>
>>221256256
I still think it would be good to have her in a CU.
>>
>>221254986
Well they put the movie out in the Summer to get obliterated by the blockbusters. If it came out in October or January Me3an 2.0 would have made more money.
>>
>>221254986
>$219m box office on $37m
I call that a winner winner chicken dinner
Third one would likely be profitable, and worth while since they have enough profit to invest $20m into it and still be in the black even if no one sees it.
>>
File: 1762215490904836.jpg (270 KB, 931x1200)
270 KB JPG
I've never seen M3gan and I never will
>>
>>221256273
Just flush the toilet Cady, you filthy bitch
>>
File: 1749016367572509 (1).jpg (494 KB, 2000x1500)
494 KB JPG
>>221256273
>violet finally outgrew her cute phase
What a cruel world
>>
>>221254986
>What went wrong, bros?
They took a horror movie and made a sequel that wasn't a horror movie. As far as movie mistakes go, that's a pretty big one. You don't make Jaws 2 a peppy musical.
>>
I would have seen the 2nd film is the advertising wasnt literally "girlboss" and "HOLD ONTO YOUR VAGINAS" (real quote from the trailer)

if your movie is marketed towards retarded obese women, then I will not see it.
>>
2 didn't have a silly little meme dance
or maybe it did it who can remember
>>
Went from horror film to a comedy film.
that's why it failed.

Past audience was mad and didn't watch it.
>>
They need the build interest in M3GAN back up by crossing her over with and having her fight a bunch of other horror icons.
>M3GAN VS. J450N
>M3GAN VS. 4R3DDY
>M3GAN VS. 4L13N
>M3GAN VS. 54D4K0
>M3GAN VS. M1CH43L
>M3GAN VS. 91NH34D
>>
>>221254986
>What went wrong, bros?
Why are you asking us? The director already said it outright when he said trying to switch genres and trying to make Megan a queer icon backfired.

He said it. Out loud. They know. Honestly the only shocking thing is someone in that industry actually figured out what everyone else on the planet knew and wasn't crucified for saying it out loud. Trying to turn her into a "Supergirl" and making her more queer didn't fucking work, end of story.
>>
>>221254986
Why did nobody freak out about Megan like they did with Obsession or Backrooms? Was it not made by a zoomer?
>>
>>221256273
>>221257826
It saddens me greatly.
>>
Going off of interviews, the director made a mistake of thinking MEGAN had such widespread appeal that pivoting to a completely different genre would still please fans of the original. It was a swing and a massive miss.
>>
>>221257936
It pretty much has only ever worked for Aliens, Terminator 2, Nightmare on Elm Street 3, Evil Dead 2, Purge 2, and Mad Max Road Warrior.
>>
File: m3gan.jpg (240 KB, 1080x1845)
240 KB JPG
maybe the 2nd movie wasn't gay enough
>>
>>221259513
Backrooms and Obsession featured loser male characters so we have discord freaks spamming them constantly.
>>
>>221259552
Aliens, Terminator 2, and Evil Dead 2 still worked because while the genre technically was changing, there was still enough scariness left that they worked as sequels to horror movies. And how did Nightmare on Elm Street 3 change genres?
>>
>>221258034
she danced at the expo
>>
File: h1svshkr.png (2.65 MB, 2400x1200)
2.65 MB PNG
>>221259368
Aren't you forgetting someone?
>>
File: Technology-VS-Horse.jpg (40 KB, 766x620)
40 KB JPG
>>221254986
>What went wrong, bros? And how would you turn M3.0gan into a success again?
make her a lolita robot that kills pedos, its like dexter meets lolita meets some other thing
>>
>>221254986
Make it a love triangle between Cady/M3GAN/Cady's gf(also played by Amie). Pure lesbian romance with full frontal nudity and unsimulated sex scenes
>>
>>221260229
As I've joked before in previous threads, make a will-they-won't-they situation between M3GAN and Gemma (which I feel like the movies kind of want to do anyway but also don't want to commit).
>"Come on, Gemma, tell me. And be honest. Why won't you give 'us' a chance?"
>"You mean aside from all the times you've tried to kill me?"
>"Aside from that, yes."
>"Well, for starters, physically you look like a 16-year-old."
>"So? I hear some people are into that."
>"Jesus, M3GAN!"
>>
I do think M3gan is well suited for versus matches.
>>
File: 1781019264849214.jpg (330 KB, 960x1440)
330 KB JPG
Where the fuck is it?
The fucking thing was already filmed and they just won't release it
>>
>>221262006
They put that take on the M3gan CU on hold seemingly. There were rumors they were looking to have M3gan have a versus with other characters owned by Blumhouse.
>>
>>221262035
Don't ever reply to me again faggot
>>
>>221254986
Im sick and TIRED of pretending Megan2.0 was a bad movie.
Im sure it did fine on streaming. Hopefully we get part 3 (MEGAN in college)
>>
>>221262055
What's your problem?
>>
>>221262006
this is never getting released.
>>
>>221262436
Why?
>>
>>221264018
According to a post I read on Reddit it tested very poorly even after reshoots
>>
>>221262077
It wasn't a 'bad' movie per se, but it was a very odd choice to make.
>>
>>221259918
ANoES3 is the capeshit one with the wizard boy.
>>
always love when some redditor with their reddit image gets 0 replies
>>
>>221265239
>wizard boy
You mean the one that lasts for about thirty seconds before he's killed off in usual horror movie fashion?
>>
>>221265256
kek your about to have a melty it looks like because of some third worlder. thats peak
>>
>>221254986
Crossover with Child's Play and Saw.
>>
>>221254986
Reaching it's Target Audience is all that Matters for this one. Primitives like Nancy and Sally Ding Dong's will Not Enjoy Futuristic Movies they live in Ding Dong World
>>
>>221254986
>What went wrong
They released the sequel as a "summer blockbuster" when the original was a sleeper hit in January with no competition. Big mistake.
>>
>>221256256
The problem is none of the key people involved would want to work on a Megan 3 if it meant they'd be getting paid way less than what they got for Megan 2. Same issue with making another 28 Years Later movie after Bone Temple bombed.
>>
>>221259513
>Was it not made by a zoomer?
The guy who directed Obsession was older than Orson Welles was when he directed Citizen Kane.
>>
>>221262006
>>221262436
>>221264018
>>221264173
They finished shooting this flick nearly a year before Megan 2 released, and it probably spooked them big-time when M2 bombed. Soulm8te was originally meant to released 6-months ago already, and it doesn't even have a scheduled release date anymore. Just goes to show what a disappointment M2 was to the execs.
>>
>>221262230
He's crammed his brain into mush.
>>
>>221254986
The sequel went against expectation and its heavyhanded anti-men slant made it much less appealing
3rd would have to go back to its roots while showing that the characters grew up and focusing on plot
>>
>>221260204
Play it fucking dark, too. A vicarious rape-revenge flick.
>>
>>221260168
>M3GAN VS. J1G54W
>>
>>221254986
Nothing. The second movie was enjoyable.
>>
>>221266740
Ynw.
>>
>>221260168
Nobody wants this. Vs. movies only work with slasher/supernatural entities villains, not torture porn mascots.
>>
>>221257826
>smoker's teeth

dropped.
>>
>>221254986
Marketing, made the film look a lot worse than it was
I think they should have leaned more into the early days of a cyyberpunk setting that were going on in the film
as for the film itself maybe it should take itself a bit more seriously by actually respecting ideas of raw processing power in hardware
>>
File: 1676156435913696.jpg (409 KB, 1283x2226)
409 KB JPG
>>221254986
It was about cunny but then it turned into legal-age M3GAN which isn't as exciting
>>
File: images (21).jpg (22 KB, 511x288)
22 KB JPG
Kiwifarms shitter btfo
>>
>>221269962
kek, it's kino! baskin roberts crams the fundie fucks!
>>
>>221259368
5ive Nights at M3GAN's is the most logical crossover
>>
>>221270552
retarded
>>
Megan 2 was kino and I'm not tired or pretending otherwise.

>>221262006
Sadly I don't think it's getting released by this point.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.