Nolan's trilogy have... good films, but they're the worst Batman movies in my opinion: terrible interpretation of atmosphere, little understanding of the Batman myth, zero character development, much more focus on the villains, making Batman a supporting character in his films, action scenes more suited to a James Bond film than a comic book epic, strange casting choices, an obsession with being grounded, and uninspired, "flat," and too surgically clean cinematography.I liked the soundtrack, I guess. And the infinite memetic potential.
I agree on some of your points, mostly on the blatant glazing of the villains and sidelining of Batman, but I don't think they're the worst Batman movies ever at least not the first 2 of the trilogy.I'd also add Nolan inserting his shitty OCs when Batman comics already have a bazillion side characters to pick from. Rachel was a shit character and the John "Robin" Blake twist was insulting. Not to mention that audiences were only impressed by that twist because they think Robin is a name instead of a title and they don't know there's been 6 different Robins.
I think Ledger passing hurt what he was trying to do with the movies desu
>>221279365Fair enough, maybe not the worst movies, for example the Snyder movies have a good atmosphere, but dogshit written characters. But still, even the Schumacher movies have "something more" when it comes to translating that comic book feel on the silver screen, I always liked them better even if they're campy and a little naive.Over the years it seems to me Nolan never really likes to work with established source material, he wants to write his own stories and that's why I never really liked his Batman movies.>>221279401That too, yeah. The idea of the Joker becoming this quintessential tragic character , never really focusing on the "joke" aspect of the character.
>>221279209They win the competition simply by being good movies. All the other batman movies are 6/10 at best, most worse.Pattinson Batman was okayish too I guess, if you skip the last overlong act. It's closer to the source material than Nolanman at least. Pattinson was also an odd choice. He is a good actor, but he wasn't really all that believable as batman. Too twinky.
>>221279209>little understanding of the Batman mythBurton did it first>zero character developmentBurton did it first>much more focus on the villains, making Batman a supporting character in his filmsBurton did it first>action scenes more suited to a James Bond film than a comic book epic Burton did it first>strange casting choicesBurton did it firstThe actual true to life definitive Batman experience outside of the comic books were the Arkham games.
