Why do critics dislike Michael but everyone else absolutely loves it?
>>221364274Because it didn’t show him fucking those kids! We need to see him fuck those kids!!!
>>221364306Dear god. So violent. You can separate the artist from the rapist, can't you?
>>221364326The human brain is a vastly complex mechanism. A single brain can house a virtuoso akin to Mozart, and a murderer akin to Dahmer.
>>221364306>>221364326Proof? Evidence? Oh right, because it didn't happen.
>>221364274(((they))) paid them off
>>221364306I am imagining these scenes in my mind right now. I don't think I would enjoy witnessing those scenes for real. I don't doubt that it happened. Because virtually everything that you could imagine has happened somewhere. I just... I have to stop imagining this part of reality, as soon as I realize it might have actually been real.
test
they didn't touch the molestation just like he touched those boys
>>221364274The movie was just meh regardless of your thoughts on him. They did try really hard to make him innocent and child-like in the movie though.
>>221364274The opinions of critics are no longer relevant. Much like boomers, critics have proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted. So people simply stopped listening to them.
