[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ninth-gate.jpg (9 KB, 280x180)
9 KB JPG
I think I like the 1080p version more than the 4k. The 4k has some weird CGI looking softening and otherwise doesn't look much clearer.
>>
...I guess I should have asked: Has anyone else compared the versions? Thoughts?
>>
File: 1767372824724725.webm (3.92 MB, 1280x542)
3.92 MB
3.92 MB WEBM
Last time i saw a comparison i remember the 4k version being quite gud.
Also.
Kino.
>>
>>221381286
Always loved unscrupulous guy, the movie had so much tongue-in-cheek humor.
>>
>film about literal satanism
>directed by a jewish pedophile
>stars a drug addicted and alcoholic wife beater

yeah, no thanks.
>>
>>221381306
So the story with this is the actor wanted to cancel because he had an eye appointment that made his eyes all wonky for a few days and polanski convinced him to do it anyways. That's why his eyes are like that.
>>
Could be poor quality denoising
>>
>>221381535
There are parts that look great, and others that look a little wonky like some digital things were done. They also just made it needlessly darker, which I guess is just an HDR trait?
>>
>>221381286
>>221381485
yeah that's in the directors commentary. worked out great.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.