[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: image-w856 (1).png (2.19 MB, 1280x1519)
2.19 MB PNG
Was Kubrick a coomer or did he just want to depict that all women in his movies are whores?
>>
>>221402968
Neither. He understood the visual allure of beautiful naked women because movies are a visual medium and he depicted women in several ways, with a nuanced and realistic outlook. The girl at the end of Pathsvof Glory, Lolita, Wendy and the teens at the Clockwork Orange's record store scene are all realistically depicted.
"Coomer" is a pointless concept bc the reality of life is sexual attraction and tittilation
>>
File: kubrick.jpg (113 KB, 500x639)
113 KB JPG



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.