[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
 No.221415806
File: haywire2011.png (1.45 MB, 2557x1051)
1.45 MB PNG
 No.221415806 Archived
Why did so many early 2010s movies use that flat, boring digital look? I thought it looked terrible even back then, and it was an instant turn-off for me. It wasn't just budget because low-budget films from the 70s and 80s even looked better.
>>
Anonymous
 No.221415833
 No.221415833
>>221415806
It still happens and it's because filmmakers have a good enough mentality these days. The perfectionists shoot on film, the lazy bums shoot on digital.
>>
Anonymous
 No.221415945
 No.221415945
Probably looked pretty novel back then because we had just entered the widescreen flat television era, so even though it looks flat in comparison to films from an earlier time this still looked incredibly clean and detailed compared to watching the old stuff on CRT.
>>
Anonymous
 No.221415962
 No.221415962
>>221415945
It didn't look novel at all lol it looked like you were watching some crappy movie that went straight to streaming on netflix
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.