a picture is worth a thousand words
both look kino
>>221480568bottom has more of a dream-like quality imo. it can work depending on the movie vibe
image encoding/compression nerds, is this true?
>>221480568god I fucking hate blue filters
>>221480672it looks like a fucking youtube video
>>221480568First one was shot analogue, second digital when it was still very much shit. But, it has been shown with remasters that the digital movies from those time actually had a lot of details hidden by filters and formating it to theathers made for analogue movies.
>>221480568
>>221480568I sat in awe watching Disney's newest Peter Pan movie and comparing it with the critically ravaged Hook. A supposedly bad Spielberg movie from the 90s looks like a fucking masterpiece compared to anything today
>>221480672My dreams look like top>>221481144It's not as much digital (which is a still a downgrade from film), but the lazy lighting practices that digital enables. Basically what De Palma says here >>221481241
>>221480568I think the picture is trying to tell us the French aren't descended from the La Tene culture nor do they have any trace of Indo-European steppe ancestry. The average French person today looks like an Arab with traces of Germanic, Nordic, and Italian heritage.
>>221481407i was surprised to learn Hook isn't a beloved childhood classic. or that contemporary critics at least didn't like it.it's strange how a Rotten Tomatoes survey of hundreds of critics in the 2010s gives a 97% score to a Marvel flick, but critics in the 90s were divided on e.g. Hook or The Mummy.
>>221481144Pay attention to the costumes, specially Obélixs pants
>>221482555It's very bizarre, you're right. Critical standards have fallen off a cliff
